1 Fischlin, A, Ayres, M, Karnosky, DF, Kellomaki, S, Louman, B, Ong, C, Plattner, G, Santoso, H, Thompson, I. %22Future environmental impacts and vulnerabilities.%22 In: Seppälä, R, Buck, A, Katila, P, eds., Adaptation of Forests and People to Climate Change: A Global Assessment Report. Helsinki, IUFRO World Series
, 2009, 22:53–100.
2 IPCC. IPCC WGI Fourth Assessment Report. Climatic change 2007. The physical science basis. Geneva, 2007.
3 Hyvönen, R, Ågren, GI, Linder, S, Persson, T, Cotrufo, MF, Ekblad, A, Freeman, M, Grelle, A, Janssens, IA, Jarvis, PG, et al. The likely impact of elevated [CO2
], nitrogen deposition, increased temperature and management on carbon sequestration in temperate and boreal forest ecosystems: a literature review. New Phytol 2007, 173:463–480.
4 Ryan, MG, Hunt, ER, McMurtrie, RE, Agren, GI, Aber, JD, Friend, AD, Rastetter, EB, Pulliam, WM, Raison, RJ, Linder, S. %22Comparing models of ecosystem function for temperate conifer forests. I. Model description and validation.%22 In: Breymeyer, AI, Hall, DO, Melillo, JM, Agren, GI, eds. Global Change: Effects on Coniferous Forests and Grasslands
. Chichester, U.K: John Wiley %26 Sons Ltd.
5 Battaglia, M, Sands, PJ: Process‐based forest productivity models and their application in forest management. For Ecol Manage 1998, 102:13–32.
6 Mäkelä, A, Landsberg, J, Ek, AR, Burk, TE, Ter‐Mikaelian, M, Agren, GI, Oliver, CD, Puttonen, P. Process‐based models for forest ecosystem management: current state of the art and challenges for practical implementation. Tree Physiol 2000, 20:289–298.
7 Grant, RF, Black, TA, Gaumont‐Guay, D, Kljun, N, Barrc, AG, Morgenstern, K, Nesic, Z. Net ecosystem productivity of boreal aspen forests under drought and climate change: mathematical modelling with ecosys. Agric For Meteorol 2006, 140:152–170.
8 Seidl, R, Lexer, MJ, Jager, D, Honninger, K. Evaluating the accuracy and generality of a hybrid patch model. Tree Physiol 2005, 25:939–951.
9 Battaglia, M, Sands, P, White, D, Mummery, D. Cabala: a linked carbon, water and nitrogen model of forest growth for silvicultural decision support. For Ecol Manage 2004, 193:251–282.
10 Comins, HN, McMurtrie, RE. Long‐term response of nutrient‐limited forests to CO2
enrichment ‐ equilibrium behavior of plant‐soil models. Ecol Appl 1993, 3:666–681.
11 Kirschbaum, MUF. Modelling forest growth and carbon storage in response to increasing CO2
and temperature. Tellus B Chem Phys Meteorol 1999, 51:871–888.
12 Parton, WJ, Schimel, DS, Cole, CV, Ojima, DS. Analysis of factors controlling soil organic‐matter levels in Great‐Plains grasslands. Soil Sci Soc Am J 1987, 51:1173–1179.
13 Ollinger, SV, Aber, JD, Reich, PB, Freuder, RJ. Interactive effects of nitrogen deposition, tropospheric ozone, elevated CO2
and land use history on the carbon dynamics of northern hardwood forests. Glob Change Biol 2002, 8:545–562.
14 Gracia, CA, Tello, E, Sabate, S, Bellot, J. Gotilwa: an integrated model of water dynamics and forest growth. Ecol Stud 1999, 137:163–179.
15 Grant, RF, Jarvis, PG, Massheder, JM, Hale, SE, Moncrieff, JB, Rayment, M, Scott, SL, Berry, JA. Controls on carbon and energy exchange by a black spruce ‐ moss ecosystem: testing the mathematical model ecosys with data from the BOREAS experiment. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 2001, 15:129–147.
16 Medlyn, BE, McMurtrie, RE, Dewar, RC, Jeffreys, MP. Soil processes dominate the long‐term response of forest net primary productivity to increased temperature and atmospheric CO2
concentration. Can J For Res 2000, 30:873–888.
17 Simioni, G, Ritson, P, McGrath, J, Kirschbaum, MUF, Copeland, B, Dumbrell, I. Predicting wood production and net ecosystem carbon exchange of Pinus radiata
plantations in south‐western Australia: application of a process‐based model. For Ecol Manage 2008, 255:901–912.
18 Smithwick, EAH, Ryan, MG, Kashian, DM, Romme, WH, Tinker, DB, Turner, MG. Modeling the effects of fire and climate change on carbon and nitrogen storage in lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta
) stands. Glob Change Biol 2009, 15:535–548.
19 Ollinger, SV, Goodale, CL, Hayhoe, K, Jenkins, JP. Potential effects of climate change and rising CO2
on ecosystem processes in northeastern U.S. Forests. Mitig Adapt Strat Glob Change 2008, 13:467–485.
20 Battaglia, M, Bruce, J, Brack, C, Baker, T. Climate change and Australia`s plantation estate: analysis of vulnerability and preliminary investigation of adaptation options. CSIRO, 2009, p. 125.
21 Sabate, S, Gracia, CA, Sanchez, A. Likely effects of climate change on growth of Quercus ilex
, Pinus halepensis
, Pinus pinaster
, Pinus sylvestris
and Fagus sylvatica
forests in the Mediterranean region. For Ecol Manage 2002, 162:23–37.
22 Grant, RF, Barr, AG, Black, TA, Gaumont‐Guay, D, Iwashita, H, Kidson, J, McCaughey, H, Morgenstern, K, Murayama, S, Nesic, Z, et al. Net ecosystem productivity of boreal jack pine stands regenerating from clearcutting under current and future climates. Glob Change Biol 2007, 13:1423–1440.
23 Running, SW, Hunt, ERJ. %22Generalization of a forest ecosystem process model for other biomes, Biome‐BGC, and an application for global‐scale models.%22 In: Ehleringer, JR, Field, CB, eds. Scaling Physiological Processes: Leaf to Globe
. San Diego, CA: Academic Press
; 1993, 141–158.
24 Raich, JW, Rastetter, EB, Mellilo, JM, Kicklighter, DW, Steudler, PA, Peterson, BJ, Grace, AL, Moore, B, Vorosmarty, CJ. Potential net primary productivity in South America: application of a global model. Ecol Appl 1991, 1:399–429.
25 Esser, R, Hofstadt, J, Mack, F, Wittenberg, U. High Resolution Biosphere Model version 3.00.00 ‐ dokumentation: Mitteilungen aus dem Institut fuer Pflanzenoekologie der Justus Liebig Universitaet Giessen, 1994, 2: 68.
26 Peng, CH, Liu, JX, Dang, QL, Apps, MJ, Jiang, H. Triplex: a generic hybrid model for predicting forest growth and carbon and nitrogen dynamics. Ecol Model 2002, 153:109–130.
27 Ueyama, M, Harazono, Y, Kim, Y, Tanaka, N. Response of the carbon cycle in sub‐arctic black spruce forests to climate change: reduction of a carbon sink related to the sensitivity of heterotrophic respiration. Agric For Meteorol 2009, 149:582–602.
28 Perez‐Garcia, J, Joyce, LA, McGuire, AD, Xiao, XM. Impacts of climate change on the global forest sector. Clim Change 2002, 54:439–461.
29 McGuire, AD, Sitch, S, Clein, JS, Dargaville, R, Esser, G, Foley, J, Heimann, M, Joos, F, Kaplan, J, Kicklighter, DW, et al. Carbon balance of the terrestrial biosphere in the twentieth century: analyses of CO2
, climate and land use effects with four process‐based ecosystem models. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 2001, 15:183–206.
30 Peng, CH, Zhou, XL, Zhao, SQ, Wang, XP, Zhu, B, Piao, SL, Fang, JY. Quantifying the response of forest carbon balance to future climate change in northeastern China: model validation and prediction. Glob Planet Change 2009, 66:179–194.
31 Matala, J, Ojansuu, R, Peltola, H, Sievanen, R, Kellomaki, S. Introducing effects of temperature and CO2
elevation on tree growth into a statistical growth and yield model. Ecol Model 2005, 181:173–190.
32 Milner, KS, Coble, DW, McMahan, AJ, Smith, EL. FVSBGC: a hybrid of the physiological model Stand‐BGC and the forest vegetation simulator. Can J For Res 2003, 33:466–479.
33 Waterworth, RM, Richards, GP, Brack, CL, Evans, DMW. A generalised hybrid process‐empirical model for predicting plantation forest growth. For Ecol Manage 2007, 238:231–243.
34 Nuutinen, T, Matala, J, Hirvela, H, Harkonen, K, Peltola, H, Vaisanen, H, Kellomaki, S. Regionally optimized forest management under changing climate. Clim Change 2006, 79:315–333.
35 Kurz, WA, Dymond, CC, White, TM, Stinson, G, Shaw, CH, Rampley, GJ, Smyth, C, Simpson, BN, Neilson, ET, Tyofymow, JA, et al. CBM‐CFS3: a model of carbon‐dynamics in forestry and land‐use change implementing IPCC standards. Ecol Model 2009, 220:480–504.
36 Garcia‐Quijano, JF, Deckmyn, G, Ceulemans, R, van Orshoven, J, Muys, B. Scaling from stand to landscape scale of climate change mitigation by afforestation and forest management: a modeling approach. Clim Change 2008, 86:397–424.
37 Nabuurs, GJ, Schelhaas, MJ, Pussinen, A. Validation of the European Forest Information scenario model (EFISCEN) and a projection of Finnish forests. Silva Fenn 2000, 34:167–179.
38 Kurz, WA, Dymond, CC, Stinson, G, Rampley, GJ, Neilson, ET, Carroll, AL, Ebata, T, Safranyik, L. Mountain pine beetle and forest carbon feedback to climate change. Nature 2008, 452:987–990.
39 Kurz, WA, Stinson, G, Rampley, GJ, Dymond, CC, Neilson, ET. Risk of natural disturbances makes future contribution of Canada`s forests to the global carbon cycle highly uncertain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:1551–1555.
40 Nabuurs, G‐J, Pussinen, A, Karjalainen, T, Erhard, M, Kramer, K. Stemwood volume increment changes in European forests due to climate change ‐ a simulation study with the EFISCEN model. Glob Change Biol 2002, 8:304–316.
41 Eggers, J, Lindner, M, Zudin, S, Zaehle, S, Lisk, J. Impact of changing wood demand, climate and land use on European forest resources and carbon stocks during the 21st century. Glob Change Biol 2008, 14:2288–2303.
42 Kellomäki, S, Väisänen, H, Hänninen, H, Kolström, T, Lauhanen, R, Mattila, U, Pajari, B. Sima: a model for forest succession based on the carbon and nitrogen cycles with application to silvicultural management of the forest ecosystem. Silva Carelica 1992, 22:1–85.
43 Prentice, IC, Sykes, MT, Cramer, W. A simulation model for the transient effects of climate change on forest landscapes. Ecol Model 1993, 65:51–70.
44 Bugmann, H, Fischlin, A. Simulating forest dynamics in a complex topography using gridded climatic data. Clim Change 1996, 34:201–211.
45 Lexer, MJ, Honninger, K. A modified 3D‐patch model for spatially explicit simulation of vegetation composition in heterogeneous landscapes. For Ecol Manage 2001, 144:43–65.
46 Kellomäki, S, Peltola, H, Nuutinen, T, Korhonen, KT, Strandman, H. Sensitivity of managed boreal forests in Finland to climate change, with implications for adaptive management. Phil Trans R Soc B Biol Sci 2008, 363:2341–2351.
47 Lindner, M, Badeck, FW, Bartelheimer, P, Bonk, S, Cramer, W, Dieter, M, Dobbeler, H, Dursky, J, Duschl, C, Fabrika, M, et al. Integrating forest growth dynamics, forest economics and decision making to assess the sensitivity of the German forest sector to climate change. Forstwiss Centralbl 2002, 121:191–208.
48 Fuhrer, J, Beniston, M, Fischlin, A, Frei, C, Goyette, S, Jasper, K, Pfister, C. Climate risks and their impact on agriculture and forests in Switzerland. Clim Change 2006, 79:79–102.
49 Lexer, MJ, Honninger, K, Scheifinger, H, Matulla, C, Groll, N, Kromp‐Kolb, H, Schadauer, K, Starlinger, F, Englisch, M. The sensitivity of Austrian forests to scenarios of climatic change: a large‐scale risk assessment based on a modified gap model and forest inventory data. For Ecol Manage 2002, 162:53–72.
50 Sitch, S, Smith, B, Prentice, IC, Arneth, A, Bondeau, A, Cramer, W, Kaplan, JO, Levis, S, Lucht, W, Sykes, MT, et al. Evaluation of ecosystem dynamics, plant geography and terrestrial carbon cycling in the LPJ dynamic global vegetation model. Glob Change Biol 2003, 9:161–185.
51 Levis, S, Bonan, GB, Vertenstein, M, Oleson, KW. Land Model`s Dynamic Global Vegetation Model (CLM‐DGVM): Technical Description and User`s Guide. Technical Report NCAR/TN‐459+IA. Boulder, CO: National Center for Atmospheric Research
; 2004, 50.
52 Krinner, G, Viovy, N, de Noblet‐Ducoudre, N, Ogee, J, Polcher, J, Friedlingstein, P, Ciais, P, Sitch, S, Prentice, IC. A dynamic global vegetation model for studies of the coupled atmosphere‐biosphere system. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 2005, 19. doi:10.1029/ 2003gb002199.
53 Bachelet, D, Neilson, RP, Lenihan, JM, Drapek, RJ. Climate change effects on vegetation distribution and carbon budget in the United States. Ecosystems 2001, 4:164–185.
54 Woodward, FI, Lomas, MR. Simulating vegetation processes along the Kalahari transect. Glob Change Biol 2004, 10:383–392.
55 Schaphoff, S, Lucht, W, Gerten, D, Sitch, S, Cramer, W, Prentice, IC. Terrestrial biosphere carbon storage under alternative climate projections. Clim Change 2006, 74:97–122.
56 Alo, CA, Wang, GL. Potential future changes of the terrestrial ecosystem based on climate projections by eight general circulation models. J Geophys Res‐Biogeosci 2008, 113. doi:10.1029/2007JG000528.
57 Lenihan, JM, Bachelet, D, Neilson, RP, Drapek, R. Simulated response of conterminous United States ecosystems to climate change at different levels of fire suppression, CO2
emission rate, and growth response to CO2
. Glob Planet Change 2008, 64:16–25.
58 Euskirchen, ES, McGuire, AD, Chapin, FS, Yi, S, Thompson, CC. Changes in vegetation in northern Alaska under scenarios of climate change, 2003‐2100: implications for climate feedbacks. Ecol Appl 2009, 19:1022–1043.
59 Smith, B, Prentice, IC, Sykes, MT. Representation of vegetation dynamics in the modelling of terrestrial ecosystems: comparing two contrasting approaches within European climate space. Glob Ecol Biogeogr 2001, 10:621–637.
60 Morales, P, Sykes, MT, Prentice, IC, Smith, P, Smith, B, Bugmann, H, Zierl, B, Friedlingstein, P, Viovy, N, Sabate, S, et al. Comparing and evaluating process‐based ecosystem model predictions of carbon and water fluxes in major European forest biomes. Glob Change Biol 2005, 11:2211–2233.
61 Clutter, J. Compatible growth and yield models. For Sci 1963, 9:354–371.
62 Wykoff, WR. A basal area increment model for individual conifers in the northern rocky mountains. For Sci 1990, 36:1077–1104.
63 Pretzsch, H, Biber, P, Dursky, J. The single tree‐based stand simulator Silva: construction, application and evaluation. For Ecol Manage 2002, 162:3–21.
64 Vanclay, JK. Modelling Forest Growth and Yield: Applications to Mixed Tropical Forests
. Wallingford, CA: B International
65 Rathgeber, C, Nicault, A, Guiot, J, Keller, T, Guibal, F, Roche, P. Simulated responses of Pinus halepensis
forest productivity to climatic change and CO2
increase using a statistical model. Glob Planet Change 2000, 26:405–421.
66 Girardin, MP, Raulier, F, Bernier, PY, Tardif, JC. Response of tree growth to a changing climate in boreal central Canada: a comparison of empirical, process‐based, and hybrid modelling approaches. Ecol Model 2008, 213:209–228.
67 Karjalainen, T, Pussinen, A, Liski, J, Nabuurs, G‐J, Erhard, M, Eggers, T, Sonntag, M, Mohren, GMJ. An approach towards an estimate of the impact of forest management and climate change on the European forest sector carbon budget: Germany as a case study. For Ecol Manage 2002, 162:87–103.
68 Shugart, HH Jr, West, DC. Forest succession models. Bioscience 1980, 30:308–313.
69 Chiang, J‐M, Iverson, LR, Prasad, AM, Brown, KJ. Effects of climate change and shifts in forest composition on forest net primary production. J Integr Plant Biol 2008, 50:1426–1439.
70 Iverson, LR, Prasad, AM, Matthews, SN, Peters, M. Estimating potential habitat for 134 eastern US tree species under six climate scenarios. For Ecol Manage 2008, 254:390–406.
71 Taylor, AR, Chen, HYH, VanDamme, L. A review of forest succession models and their suitability for forest management planning. For Sci 2009, 55:23–36.
72 Sitch, S, Huntingford, C, Gedney, N, Levy, PE, Lomas, M, Piao, SL, Betts, R, Ciais, P, Cox, P, Friedlingstein, P, et al. Evaluation of the terrestrial carbon cycle, future plant geography and climate‐carbon cycle feedbacks using five dynamic global vegetation models (DGVMs). Glob Change Biol 2008, 14:2015–2039.
73 Kaplan, J, Prentice, I, Buchmann, N. The stable carbon isotope composition of the terrestrial biosphere: modeling at scales from the leaf to the globe. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 2002, 16:1060.
74 Neilson, R. Vegetation redistribution: a possible biosphere source of CO2
during climatic change. Water Air Soil Pollut 1993, 70:659–673.
75 Kirschbaum, MUF, King, DA, Comins, HN, Mcmurtrie, RE, Medlyn, BE, Pongracic, S, Murty, D, Keith, H, Raison, RJ, Khanna, PK, et al. Modeling forest response to increasing CO2
concentration under nutrient‐limited conditions. Plant Cell Environ 1994, 17:1081–1099.
76 McMurtrie, RE, Comins, HN. The temporal response of forest ecosystems to doubled atmospheric CO2
concentration. Glob Change Biol 1996, 2:49–57.
77 Matthews, H, Eby, M, Ewen, T, Friedlingstein, P, Hawkins, B. What determines the magnitude of carbon cycle‐climate feedbacks? Glob Biogeochem Cycles 2007, 21. doi:10.1029/2006GB002733.
78 Amthor, JS, Chen, JM, Clein, JS, Frolking, SE, Goulden, ML, Grant, RF, Kimball, JS, King, AW, McGuire, AD, Nikolov, NT, et al. Boreal forest CO2
exchange and evapotranspiration predicted by nine ecosystem process models: intermodel comparisons and relationships to field measurements. J Geophys Res 2001, 106:33, 623–633, 648.
79 Pepper, DA, Del Grosso, SJ, McMurtrie, RE, Parton, WJ. Simulated carbon sink response of shortgrass steppe, tallgrass prairie and forest ecosystems to rising [CO2
], temperature and nitrogen input. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 2005, 19. doi:10.1029/2004gb002226.
80 Simioni, G, Ritson, P, Kirschbaum, M, McGrath, J, Dumbrell, I, Copeland, B. The carbon budget of Pinus radiata
plantations in south‐western Australia under four climate change scenarios. Tree Physiol 2009, 29:1081.
81 Coops, NC, Hember, RA, Waring, RH. Assessing the impact of current and projected climates on douglas‐fir productivity in British Columbia, Canada, using a process‐based model (3‐PG). Can J For Res 2010, 40:511–524.
82 Loustau, D, Bosc, A, Colin, A, Ogee, J, Davi, H, Francois, C, Dufrene, E, Deque, M, Cloppet, E, Arrouays, D, et al. Modeling climate change effects on the potential production of French plains forests at the sub‐regional level. Tree Physiol 2005, 25:813–823.
83 Tian, H, Melillo, J, Kicklighter, D, McGuire, A, Helfrich, J. The sensitivity of terrestrial carbon storage to historical climate variability and atmospheric CO2
. Tellus 1999, 51:2.
84 Thornton, PE, Law, BE, Gholz, HL, Clark, KL, Falge, E, Ellsworth, DS, Goldstein, AH, Monson, RK, Hollinger, D, Falk, M, et al. Modeling and measuring the effects of disturbance history and climate on carbon and water budgets in evergreen needleleaf forests. Agric For Meteorol 2002, 113:185–222.
85 Landsberg, JJ, Waring, RH. A generalised model of forest productivity using simplified concepts of radiation‐use efficiency, carbon balance and partitioning. For Ecol Manage 1997, 95:209–228.
86 Bugmann, H. A simplified forest model to study species composition along climate gradients. Ecology 1996, 77:2055–2074.
87 Canadell, JG, Le Quere, C, Raupach, MR, Field, CB, Buitenhuis, ET, Ciais, P, Conway, TJ, Gillett, NP, Houghton, RA, Marland, G. Contributions to accelerating atmospheric CO2
growth from economic activity, carbon intensity, and efficiency of natural sinks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:18866–18870.
88 Ainsworth, EA, Long, SP. What have we learned from 15 years of free‐air CO2
enrichment (FACE)? A meta‐analytic review of the responses of photosynthesis, canopy properties and plant production to rising CO2
. New Phytol 2005, 165:351–371.
89 Nowak, RS, Ellsworth, DS, Smith, SD. Functional responses of plants to elevated atmospheric CO2
‐ do photosynthetic and productivity data from FACE experiments support early predictions? New Phytol 2004, 162:253–280.
90 Farquhar, GD, Caemmerer, S, Berry, JA. A biochemical model of photosynthetic CO2
assimilation in leaves of C3
species. Planta 1980, 149:78–90.
91 Ainsworth, EA, Rogers, A. The response of photosynthesis and stomatal conductance to rising [CO2
]: mechanisms and environmental interactions. Plant Cell Environ 2007, 30:258–270.
92 Eamus, D, Jarvis, PG. The direct effects of increase in the global atmospheric CO2
concentration on natural and commercial temperate trees and forests. Adv Ecol Res 1989, 19:1–55.
93 Norby, RJ, Wullschleger, SD, Gunderson, CA, Johnson, DW, Ceulemans, R. Tree responses to rising CO2
in field experiments: implications for the future forest. Plant Cell Environ 1999, 22:683–714.
94 Medlyn, BE, Badeck, FW, De Pury, DGG, Barton, CVM, Broadmeadow, M, Ceulemans, R, De Angelis, P, Forstreuter, M, Jach, ME, Kellomaki, S, et al. Effects of elevated [CO2
] on photosynthesis in European forest species: a meta‐analysis of model parameters. Plant Cell Environ 1999, 22:1475–1495.
95 Curtis, PS, Wang, XZ. A meta‐analysis of elevated CO2
effects on woody plant mass, form, and physiology. Oecologia 1998, 113:299–313.
96 Luo, Y, Su, B, Currie, WS, Dukes, JS, Finzi, A, Hartwig, U, Hungate, B, McMurtrie, RE, Oren, R, Parton, WJ, et al. Progressive nitrogen limitation of ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric carbon dioxide. Bioscience 2004, 54:731–739.
97 Kubiske, ME, Quinn, VS, Heilman, WE, McDonald, EP, Marquardt, PE, Teclaw, RM, Friend, AL, Karnosky, DF. Interannual climatic variation mediates elevated CO2
effects on forest growth. Glob Change Biol 2006, 12:1054–1068.
98 Liberloo, M, Lukac, M, Calfapietra, C, Hoosbeek, MR, Gielen, B, Miglietta, F, Scarascia‐Mugnozza, GE, Ceulemans, R. Coppicing shifts CO2
stimulation of poplar productivity to above‐ground pools: a synthesis of leaf to stand level results from the POP/EUROFACE experiment. New Phytol 2009, 182:331–346.
99 Norby, RJ, Luo, YQ. Evaluating ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric CO2
and global warming in a multi‐factor world. New Phytol 2004, 162:281–293.
100 Oren, R, Ellsworth, D, Johnsen, K, Phillips, N, Ewers, B, Maier, C, Schafer, K, McCarthy, H, Hendrey, G, McNulty, S, et al. Soil fertility limits carbon sequestration by forest ecosystems in a CO2
‐enriched atmosphere. Nature 2001, 411:469–472.
101 Körner, C, Asshoff, R, Bignucolo, O, Hattenschwiler, S, Keel, S, Pelaez‐Riedl, S, Pepin, S, Siegwolf, R, Zotz, G. Carbon flux and growth in mature deciduous forest trees exposed to elevated CO2
. Science 2005, 309:1360–1362.
102 Norby, RJ, Warren, JM, Iversen, CM, Garten, CTJ, Medlyn, BE, McMurtrie, RE. CO2
enhancement of forest productivity contrained by limited nitrogen availability. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2010, 45:19368–19373.
103 Peng, CH, Apps, MJ. Modelling the response of net primary productivity (NPP) of boreal ecosystems to changes in climate and fire disturbance regimes. Ecol Model 1999, 122:175–193.
104 Norby, RJ, DeLucia, EH, Gielen, B, Calfapietra, C, Giardina, CP, King, JS, Ledford, J, McCarthy, HR, Moore, DJP, Ceulemans, R, et al. Forest response to elevated CO2
is conserved across a broad range of productivity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2005, 102:18052–18056.
105 Medlyn, BE. Interactive effects of atmospheric carbon dioxide and leaf nitrogen concentration on canopy light use efficiency: a modeling analysis. Tree Physiol 1996, 16:201–209.
106 Morgan, J, Pataki, DE, Korner, C, Clark, H, del Grosso, SJ, Grunzweig, JM, Knapp, A, Mosier, AR, Newton, PCD, Niklaus, PA, et al. Water relations in grassland and desert ecosystems exposed to elevated atmospheric CO2
. Oecologia 2004, 140:11–25.
107 Wullschleger, SD, Gunderson, CA, Hanson, PJ, Wilson, KB, Norby, RJ. Sensitivity of stomatal and canopy conductance to elevated CO2
concentration—interacting variables and perspectives of scale. New Phytol 2002, 153:485–496.
108 Tatarinov, FA, Cienciala, E. Long‐term simulation of the effect of climate changes on the growth of main central‐European forest tree species. Ecol Model 2009, 220:3081–3088.
109 Zaehle, S, Bondeau, A, Carter, T, Cramer, W, Erhard, M, Prentice, I, Reginster, I, Rounsevell, M, Sitch, S, Smith, B. Projected changes in terrestrial carbon storage in Europe under climate and land‐use change, 1990–2100. Ecosystems 2007, 10:380–401.
110 Rustad, LE, Campbell, JL, Marion, GM, Norby, RJ, Mitchell, MJ, Hartley, AE, Cornelissen, JHC, Gurevitch, J. Gcte‐News: A meta‐analysis of the response of soil respiration, net nitrogen mineralization, and aboveground plant growth to experimental ecosystem warming. Oecologia 2001, 126:543–562.
111 Medlyn, BE, McMurtrie, RE, Dewar, RC, Jeffreys, MP. Soil processes dominate the long‐term response of forest net primary productivity to increased temperature and atmospheric CO2
concentration. Can J For Res‐Rev Can Rech For 2000, 30:873–888.
112 Atkin, OK, Tjoelker, MG. Thermal acclimation and the dynamic response of plant respiration to temperature. Trends Plant Sci 2003, 8:343–351.
113 Del Grosso, S, Parton, WJ, Stohlgren, T, Zheng, D, Bachelet, D, Prince, SD, Hibbard, K, Olson, R. Global potential net primary production predicted from vegetation class, precipitation, and temperature. Ecology 2008, 89:2117–2126.
114 Boisvenue, C, Running, SW. Impacts of climate change on natural forest productivity ‐ evidence since the middle of the 20th century. Glob Change Biol 2006, 12:862–882.
115 Penuelas, J, Prieto, P, Beier, C, Cesaraccio, C, de Angelis, P, de Dato, G, Emmett, BA, Estiarte, M, Garadnai, J, Gorissen, A, et al. Response of plant species richness and primary productivity in shrublands along a north‐south gradient in Europe to seven years of experimental warming and drought: reductions in primary productivity in the heat and drought year of 2003. Glob Change Biol 2007, 13:2563–2581.
116 Norby, RJ, Luo, Y. Evaluating ecosystem responses to rising atmospheric CO2
and global warming in a multi‐factor world. New Phytol 2004, 162:281–293.
117 Ciais, P, Reichstein, M, Viovy, N, Granier, A, Ogee, J, Allard, V, Aubinet, M, Buchmann, N, Bernhofer, C, Carrara, A, et al. Europe‐wide reduction in primary productivity caused by the heat and drought in 2003. Nature 2005, 437:529–533.
118 Aronson, EL, McNulty, SG. Reply to comment on “Appropriate experimental ecosystem warming methods by ecosystem, objective, and practicality” By Aronson and McNulty. Agric For Meteorol 2010, 150:499–500.
119 Donohue, RJ, McVicar, TR, Roderick, ML. Assessing the ability of potential evaporation formulations to capture the dynamics in evaporative demand within a changing climate. J Hydrol 2010, 386:186–197.
120 Kolari, P, Lappalainen, HK, Hänninen, H, Hari, P. Relationship between temperature and the seasonal course of photosynthesis in Scots pine at northern timberline and in southern boreal zone. Tellus 2007, 59B:542–552.
121 Kirschbaum, M. CENW, a forest growth model with linked carbon, energy, nutrient and water cycles. Ecol Model 1999, 118:17–59.
122 McMurtrie, R, Wang, Y. Mathematical models of the photosynthetic response of tree stands to rising CO2
concentrations and temperatures. Plant Cell Environ 1993, 16:1–13.
123 Long, S. Modification of the response of photosynthetic productivity to rising temperature by atmospheric CO2
concentrations: has its importance been underestimated? Plant Cell Environ 1991, 14:729–739.
124 Sage, RF, Kubien, DS. The temperature response of C3
photosynthesis. Plant Cell Environ 2007, 30:1086–1106.
125 Atkin, OK, Bruhn, D, Hurry, VM, Tjoelker, MG. The hot and the cold: unravelling the variable response of plant respiration to temperature. Funct Plant Biol 2005, 32:87–105.
126 Grant, RF, Arain, A, Arora, V, Barr, A, Black, TA, Chen, J, Wang, S, Yuan, F, Zhang, Y. Intercomparison of techniques to model high temperature effects on CO2
and energy exchange in temperate and boreal coniferous forests. Ecol Model 2005, 188:217–252.
127 Larigauderie, A, Körner, C. Acclimation of leaf dark respiration to temperature in alpine and lowland plant species. Ann Bot 1995, 76:245.
128 Atkin, OK, Atkinson, LJ, Fisher, RA, Campbell, CD, Zaragoza‐Castells, J, Pitchford, JW, Woodward, FI, Hurry, V. Using temperature‐dependent changes in leaf scaling relationships to quantitatively account for thermal acclimation of respiration in a coupled global climate‐vegetation model. Glob Change Biol 2008, 14:2709–2726.
129 Huntington, TG, Richardson, AD, McGuire, KJ, Hayhoe, K. Climate and hydrological changes in the northeastern United States: recent trends and implications for forested and aquatic ecosystems. Can J For Res 2009, 39:199–212.
130 Knapp, AK, Smith, MD. Variation among biomes in temporal dynamics of aboveground primary production. Science 2001, 291:481–484.
131 Hanson, PJ, Todd, DE Jr, Amthor, JS. A six‐year study of sapling and large‐tree growth and mortality responses to natural and induced variability in precipitation and throughfall. Tree Physiol 2001, 21:345–358.
132 Bates, JD, Svejcar, T, Miller, RF, Angell, RA. The effects of precipitation timing on sagebrush steppe vegetation. J Arid Environ 2006, 64:670–697.
133 Hanson, PJ, Weltzin, JF. Drought disturbance from climate change: response of United States forests. Sci Total Environ 2000, 262:205–220.
134 Wullschleger, SD, Tschaplinski, TJ, Norby, RJ. Plant water relations at elevated CO2
‐ implications for water‐limited environments. Plant Cell Environ 2002, 25:319–331.
135 Porporato, A, Laio, F, Ridolfi, L, Rodriguez‐Iturbe, I. Plants in water‐controlled ecosystems: active role in hydrologic processes and response to water stress: III. Vegetation water stress. Adv Water Resour 2001, 24:725–744.
136 Martínez‐Vilalta, J, Pinol, J, Beven, K. A hydraulic model to predict drought‐induced mortality in woody plants: an application to climate change in the Mediterranean. Ecol Model 2002, 155:127–147.
137 Austin, AT, Sala, OE. Carbon and nitrogen dynamics across a natural precipitation gradient in Patagonia, Argentina. J Veg Sci 2002, 13:351–360.
138 Eamus, D. How does ecosystem water balance affect net primary productivity of woody ecosystems? Funct Plant Biol 2003, 30:187–205.
139 Brando, P, Ray, D, Nepstad, D, Cardinot, G, Curran, L, Oliveira, R. Effects of partial throughfall exclusion on the phenology of Coussarea racemosa
(Rubiaceae) in an east‐central amazon rainforest. Oecologia 2006, 150:181–189.
140 Weltzin, JF, Loik, ME, Schwinning, S, Williams, DG, Fay, PA, Haddad, BM, Harte, J, Huxman, TE, Knapp, AK, Lin, GH, et al. Assessing the response of terrestrial ecosystems to potential changes in precipitation. Bioscience 2003, 53:941–952.
141 Ellis, TW, Hatton, TJ. Relating leaf area index of natural eucalypt vegetation to climate variables in southern Australia. Agric Water Manage 2008, 95:743–747.
142 Nepstad, DC, Moutinho, P, Dias, MB, Davidson, E, Cardinot, G, Markewitz, D, Figueiredo, R, Vianna, N, Chambers, J, Ray, D, et al. The effects of partial throughfall exclusion on canopy processes, aboveground production, and biogeochemistry of an Amazon forest. J Geophys Res‐Atmos 2002, 107:18.
143 Nepstad, DC, Tohver, IM, Ray, D, Moutinho, P, Cardinot, G. Mortality of large trees and lianas following experimental drought in an amazon forest. Ecology 2007, 88:2259–2269.
144 Grant, RF, Zhang, Y, Yuan, F, Wang, S, Hanson, PJ, Gaumont‐Guay, D, Chen, J, Black, TA, Barr, A, Baldocchi, DD, et al. Intercomparison of techniques to model water stress effects on CO2
and energy exchange in temperate and boreal deciduous forests. Ecol Model 2006, 196:289–312.
145 Jackson, RB, Canadell, J, Ehleringer, JR, Mooney, HA, Sala, OE, Schulze, ED. A global analysis of root distributions for terrestrial biomes. Oecologia 1996, 108:389–411.
146 Canadell, J, Jackson, RB, Ehleringer, JB, Mooney, HA, Sala, OE, Schulze, ED. Maximum rooting depth of vegetation types at the global scale. Oecologia 1996, 108:583–595.
147 Nepstad, DC, Decarvalho, CR, Davidson, EA, Jipp, PH, Lefebvre, PA, Negreiros, GH, Dasilva, ED, Stone, TA, Trumbore, SE, Vieira, S. The role of deep roots in the hydrological and carbon cycles of amazonian forests and pastures. Nature 1994, 372:666–669.
148 Zeppel, M, Macinnis‐Ng, C, Palmer, A, Taylor, D, Whitley, R, Fuentes, S, Yunusa, I, Williams, M, Eamus, D. An analysis of the sensitivity of sap flux to soil and plant variables assessed for an Australian woodland using a soil‐plant‐atmosphere model. Funct Plant Biol 2008, 35:509–520.
149 Benyon, RG, Theiveyanathan, S, Doody, TM. Impacts of tree plantations on groundwater in south‐eastern Australia. Aust J Bot 2006, 54:181–192.
150 O`Grady, AP, Cook, PG, Howe, P, Werren, G. Groundwater use by dominant tree species in tropical remnant vegetation communities. Aust J Bot 2006, 54:155–171.
151 Ritchie, JT. Water dynamics in the soil‐plant‐atmosphere system. Plant Soil 1981, 58:81–96.
152 Leuning, R, Cleugh, HA, Zegelin, SJ, Hughes, D. Carbon and water fluxes over a temperate Eucalyptus forest and a tropical wet/dry savanna in Australia: measurements and comparison with MODIS remote sensing estimates. Agric For Meteorol 2005, 129:151–173.
153 Pepper, DA, McMurtrie, RE, Medlyn, BE, Keith, H, Eamus, D. Mechanisms linking plant productivity and water status for a temperate Eucalyptus forest flux site: analysis over wet and dry years with a simple model. Funct Plant Biol 2008, 35:493–508.
154 Kirschbaum, M, Keith, H, Leuning, R, Cleugh, H, Jacobsen, K, van Gorsel, E, Raison, R. Modelling net ecosystem carbon and water exchange of a temperate Eucalyptus delegatensis
forest using multiple constraints. Agric For Meteorol 2007, 145:48–68.
155 Sadras, VO, Milroy, SP. Soil‐water thresholds for the responses of leaf expansion and gas exchange: a review. Field Crops Res 1996, 47:253–266.
156 Granier, A, Breda, N, Biron, P, Villette, S. A lumped water balance model to evaluate duration and intensity of drought constraints in forest stands. Ecol Model 1999, 116:269–283.
157 Hoff, C, Rambal, S. An examination of the interaction between climate, soil and leaf area index in a Quercus ilex
ecosystem. Ann For Sci 2003, 60:153–161.
158 Martinez‐Vilalta, J, Pinol, J. Drought‐induced mortality and hydraulic architecture in pine populations of the NE Iberian peninsula. For Ecol Manage 2002, 161:247–256.
159 Hacke, UG, Stiller, V, Sperry, JS, Pittermann, J, McCulloh, KA. Cavitation fatigue. Embolism and refilling cycles can weaken the cavitation resistance of xylem. Plant Physiol 2001, 125:779–786.
160 Kaiser, WM. Effects of water deficit on photosynthetic capacity. Physiol Plant 1987, 71:142–149.
161 Joslin, J, Wolfe, M, Hanson, P. Effects of altered water regimes on forest root systems. New Phytol 2000, 147:117–129.
162 Aerts, R. Climate, leaf litter chemistry and leaf litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems: a triangular relationship. Oikos 1997, 79:439–449.
163 Adams, HD, Guardiola‐Claramonte, M, Barron‐Gafford, GA, Villegas, JC, Breshears, DD, Zou, CB, Troch, PA, Huxman, TE. Temperature sensitivity of drought‐induced tree mortality portends increased regional die‐off under global‐change‐type drought. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:7063–7066.
164 Sala, A. Lack of direct evidence for the carbon‐starvation hypothesis to explain drought‐induced mortality in trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2009, 106:E68.
165 Finzi, AC, Norby, RJ, Calfapietra, C, Gallet‐Budynek, A, Gielen, B, Holmes, WE, Hoosbeek, MR, Iversen, CM, Jackson, RB, Kubiske, ME, et al. Increases in nitrogen uptake rather than nitrogen‐use efficiency support higher rates of temperate forest productivity under elevated CO2
. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:14014–14019.
166 Comins, HN, McMurtrie, RE. Long‐term response of nutrient‐limited forests to CO2
enrichment; equilibrium behavior of plant‐soil models. Ecol Appl 1993, 3:666–681.
167 Tian, H, Melillo, JM, Kicklighter, DW, McGuire, AD, Helfrich, J. The sensitivity of terrestrial carbon storage to historical climate variability and atmospheric CO2
in the United States. Tellus Ser B‐Chem Phys Meteorol 1999, 51:414–452.
168 Ostle, NJ, Smith, P, Fisher, R, Woodward, FI, Fisher, JB, Smith, JU, Galbraith, D, Levy, P, Meir, P, McNamara, NP, et al. Integrating plant‐soil interactions into global carbon cycle models. J Ecol 2009, 97:851–863.
169 Thornton, PE, Lamarque, JF, Rosenbloom, NA, Mahowald, NM. Influence of carbon‐nitrogen cycle coupling on land model response to CO2
fertilization and climate variability. Glob Biogeochem Cycles 2007, 21. doi:10.1029/2006gb002868.
170 Sokolov, AP, Kicklighter, DW, Melillo, JM, Felzer, BS, Schlosser, CA, Cronin, TW. Consequences of considering carbon‐nitrogen interactions on the feedbacks between climate and the terrestrial carbon cycle. J Clim 2008, 21:3776–3796.
171 Rastetter, EB, Ryan, MG, Shaver, G, Melillo, JM, Nadelhoffer, KJ, Hobbie, JE, Aber, JD. A general biogeochemical model describing the responses of the C and N cycles in terrestrial ecosystems to changes in CO2
, climate, and N deposition. Tree Physiol 1991, 9:101–126.
172 McMurtrie, RE, Medlyn, BE, Dewar, RC. Increased understanding of nutrient immobilization in soil organic matter is critical for predicting the carbon sink strength of forest ecosystems over the next 100 years. Tree Physiol 2001, 21:831–839.
173 McMurtrie, R, Comins, HN. The temporal response of forest ecosystems to doubled atmospheric CO2
concentration. Glob Change Biol 1996, 2:49–57.
174 Magnani, F, Mencuccini, M, Borghetti, M, Berbigier, P, Berninger, F, Delzon, S, Grelle, A, Hari, P, Jarvis, PG, Kolari, P, et al. The human footprint in the carbon cycle of temperate and boreal forests. Nature 2007, 447:848–850.
175 Reay, D, Dentener, F, Smith, P, Grace, J, Feely, R. Global nitrogen deposition and carbon sinks. Nat Geosci 2008, 1:430–437.
176 Dezi, S, Medlyn, B, Tonon, G, Magnani, F. The effect of nitrogen deposition on forest carbon sequestration: a model‐based analysis. Glob Change Biol 2010, 16:1470–1486.
177 Flannigan, MD, Krawchuk, MA, de Groot, WJ, Wotton, BM, Gowman, LM. Implications of changing climate for global wildland fire. Int J Wildland Fire 2009, 18:483–507.
178 Balshi, MS, McGuire, AD, Duffy, P, Flannigan, M, Kicklighter, DW, Melillo, J. Vulnerability of carbon storage in North American boreal forests to wildfires during the 21st century. Glob Change Biol 2009, 15:1491–1510.
179 Cary, GJ, Flannigan, MD, Keane, RE, Bradstock, RA, Davies, ID, Lenihan, JM, Li, C, Logan, KA, Parsons, RA. Relative importance of fuel management, ignition management and weather for area burned: evidence from five landscape‐fire‐succession models. Int J Wildland Fire 2009, 18:147–156.
180 Seidl, R, Schelhaas, M, Lindner, M, Lexer, MJ. Modelling bark beetle disturbances in a large scale forest scenario model to assess climate change impacts and evaluate adaptive management strategies. Regional Environ Change 2009, 9:101–119.
181 Pinkard, L, Herr, A, Mohammed, C, Glen, M, Wardlaw, T, Grove, S. Predicting NPP of temperate forest systems: uncertainty associated with climate change and pest attack: client report, CSIRO, 2009, 167, p. 94.
182 Jothityangkoon, C, Sivapalan, M. Framework for exploration of climatic and landscape controls on catchment water balance, with emphasis on inter‐annual variability. J Hydrol 2009, 371:154–168.
183 Leuzinger, S, Körner, C. Rainfall distribution is the main driver of runoff under future CO2
‐concentration in a temperate deciduous forest. Glob Change Biol 2010, 16:246–254.
184 Robertson, T, Bell, C, Zak, J, Tissue, D. Precipitation timing and magnitude differentially affect aboveground annual net primary productivity in three perennial species in a Chihuahuan desert grassland. New Phytol 2009, 181:230–242.
185 Amthor, JS, Hanson, PJ, Norby, RJ, Wullschleger, SD. A comment on “Appropriate experimental ecosystem warming methods by ecosystem, objective, and practicality” By Aronson and McNulty. Agric For Meteorol 2010, 150:497–498.
186 Jones, G. Plants and Microclimate: A Quantitative Approach to Environmental Plant Physiology
ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
187 Kramer, K, Leinonen, I, Loustau, D. The importance of phenology for the evaluation of impact of climate change on growth of boreal, temperate and mediterranean forests ecosystems: an overview. Int J Biometeorol 2000, 44:67–75.
188 Milne, R, van Oijen, M. A comparison of two modelling studies of environmental effects on forest carbon stocks across Europe. Ann For Sci 2005, 62:911–923.
189 Chertov, O, Bhatti, JS, Komarov, A, Mikhailov, A, Bykhovets, S. Influence of climate change, fire and harvest on the carbon dynamics of black spruce in central canada. For Ecol Manage 2009, 257:941–950.
190 Logan, JA, Regniere, J, Powell, JA. Assessing the impacts of global warming on forest pest dynamics. Front Ecol Environ 2003, 1:130–137.
191 Kang, S, Kimball, JS, Running, SW. Simulating effects of fire disturbance and climate change on boreal forest productivity and evapotranspiration. Sci Total Environ 2006, 362:85–102.