Home
This Title All WIREs
WIREs RSS Feed
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Clim Change
Impact Factor: 4.402

The challenges of building cosmopolitan climate expertise: the case of Germany

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

By generating intense public scrutiny of international climate science, the ‘climategate’ controversy has paradoxically underlined the authoritative status accorded to scientific knowledge in policy decision making on climate change.

In contrast to the universalizing discourse of international climate science (as presented by the intergovernmental panel on climate change (IPCC)), notable differences exist between countries with regard to the degree of public trust in its expertise. Focusing on the German case, this article explores how and why countries vary when it comes to interpreting and validating ‘universally valid’ expertise. It argues that differences in the way climate change are addressed in national research and decision making cannot be explained solely by the quality of scientific knowledge available, because it is the same body of knowledge (produced by the IPCC) that provides the common point of reference. The reception of scientific evidence for climate change by publics and policy makers depends additionally on the ways in which scientific claims are validated and rendered authoritative for public use and on prior criteria of what counts as scientifically valid and policy‐relevant knowledge. This article then discusses the implications entailed by these national differences in terms of interpreting expertise on matters of global relevance. It shows why the task of producing policy‐relevant knowledge ‘under the public microscope’ requires new forms of interdisciplinary scientific judgment and justification toward wider publics. It reviews recent initiatives set up to respond to ‘climategate’ and discusses the alternatives offered by a wide range of efforts to promote a differentiated, reflexive, and culturally sensitive ‘cosmopolitan’ approach. WIREs Clim Change 2012, 3:1–17. doi: 10.1002/wcc.151

Related Articles

Does climate change knowledge really matter?
The History of Climate Change: Ideas, Knowledge and Expertise

Browse by Topic

The Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Climate Science and Decision Making
blog comments powered by Disqus

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts

Twitter: earth_wise Follow us on Twitter

    RT @DrFionaLM: New book - available to review! Wiley: Remote Sensing of the Terrestrial Water Cycle - Venkataraman Lakshmi http://t.co/Xfrf…
    RT @theAGU: Want to hear student visions of future water science? Like TED-talks? See Water Sciences Pop-Ups on 16 Dec at #AGU14! http://t.…