Maibach, E, Leiserowitz, A, Cobb, S, Shank, M, Cobb, KM, Gulledge, J. The legacy of climategate: undermining or revitalizing climate science and policy? WIREs Clim Chang 2012, 3:289–295.
Moser, SC. Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. WIREs Clim Chang 2010, 1:31–53.
Trust MC. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; 2011. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/trust/.
Resnik, DB. Scientific research and the public trust. Sci Eng Ethics 2011, 17:399–409.
Rousseau, DM, Sitkin, SB, Burt, RS, Camerer, C. Not so different after all: a cross‐discipline view of trust. Acad Manag Rev 1998, 23:393–404.
“Trust, n.”. Oxford English Dictionary Online; 2013. Available at: http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/207004?rskey=oUneu5%26result=1.
Pettit, P. The cunning of trust. Phil Public Aff 1995, 24:202–225.
Baier, A. Trust and antitrust. Ethics 1986, 96:231–260.
Hardwig, J. Epistemic dependence. J Phil 1985, 82:335–349.
Ericsson, KA, Charness, N. Expert performance: its structure and acquisition. Am Psychol 1994:1–23.
Collins, H, Evans, R. Rethinking Expertise. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2007.
Select Committee on Science and Technology. Science and Society; 2000. Available at: http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld199900/ldselect/ldsctech/38/3801.htm.
National Science Board. Science and Engineering Indicators 2012; 2012. Available at: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/seind12/start.htm.
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser‐Renouf C, Hmielowski J. Global Warming`s Six Americas, March 2012 & November 2011; 2012. Available at: http://environment.yale.edu/climate/publications/Six‐Americas‐March‐2012/.
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser‐Renouf C, Feinberg G, Howe P. Global Warming`s Six Americas, September 2012; 2013. Available at: http://climatechangecommunication.org/sites/default/files/reports/Six‐Americas‐September‐2012.pdf.
Gauchat, G. Politicization of science in the public sphere: a study of public trust in the United States, 1974 to 2010. Am Sociol Rev 2012, 77:167–187.
Maibach E, Roser‐Renouf C, Leiserowitz A. Global warming`s Six Americas 2009: An Audience Segmentation Analysis; 2009. Available at: http://trid.trb.org/view.aspx?id=889822.
Shuckburgh E, Robison R, Pidgeon N. Climate science, the public and the news media: summary findings of a survey and focus groups conducted in the UK in March 2011; 2012. Available at: http://nora.nerc.ac.uk/id/eprint/500544.
Cicerone, RJ. Ensuring integrity in science. Science 2010, 327:624.
Weingart, P. The moment of truth for science: the consequences of the “knowledge society” for society and science. Eur Mol Biol Organ Rep 2002, 3:703–706.
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser‐Renouf C, Smith N, Dawson EJ. Climategate, Public Opinion, and the Loss of Trust; 2010. Available at: http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/images/files/Climategate_Public%20Opinion_and%20Loss%20of%20Trust%281%29.pdf.
McComas, KA, Trumbo, CW. Source credibility in environmental health‐risk controversies: application of Meyer`s credibility index. Risk Anal 2001, 21:467–480.
Priest, SH. Misplaced faith: communication variables as predictors of encouragement for biotechnology development. Sci Commun 2001, 23:97–110.
Priest, SH, Bonfadelli, H, Rusanen, M. The “trust gap” hypothesis: predicting support for biotechnology across national cultures as a function of trust in actors. Risk Anal 2003, 23:751–766.
Larson, H, Paterson, PB, Erondu, N. The globalization of risk and risk perception: why we need a new model of risk communication for vaccines. Drug Saf 2012, 35:1053–1059.
Wilson, A, Coveney, J, Henderson, J, Meyer, S, Calnan, M, Caraher, M, Webb, T, Elliott, A, Ward, P. Trust makers, breakers and brokers: building trust in the Australian food system. BMC Public Health 2013, 13:229–235.
Bates, SR, Faulkner, W, Parry, S, Cunningham‐Burley, S. “How do we know it`s not been done yet?!” Trust, trust building and regulation in stem cell research. Sci Public Policy 2010, 37:703–718.
Malka, A, Krosnick, JA, Langer, G. The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Anal 2009, 29:633–647.
Rabinovich, A, Morton, TA, Birney, ME. Communicating climate science: the role of perceived communicator`s motives. J Environ Psychol 2012, 32:11–18.
Wynne, B. Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science: hitting the notes, but missing the music? Commun Genet 2006, 9:211–220.
Hovland, C, Janis, I, Kelley, H. Communication and Persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press; 1953.
O`Keefe, DJ. Persuasion: Theory and Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.; 2002.
Pornpitakpan, C. The persuasiveness of source credibility: a critical review of five decades` evidence. J Appl Soc Psychol 2004, 34:243–281.
Peters, RG, Covello, VT, McCallum, DB. The determinants of trust and credibility in environmental risk communication: an empirical study. Risk Anal 1997, 17:43–54.
Moser, SC, Dilling, L. Making climate hot: communicating the urgency and challenge of global climate change. Environment 2004, 46:32–46.
Kahan, D. Fixing the communications failure. Nature 2010, 463:296–297.
Dean, C, Am, I. Making Myself Clear? A Scientist`s Guide to Talking to the Public. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 2009.
Meredith, D. Explaining Research: How to Reach Key Audiences to Advance Your Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010.
Petty, RE, Cacioppo, JT. Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Adv Consum Res 1984, 11:668–672.
Chaiken, S, Liberman, A, Eagly, AH. %22Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context%22. In: Uleman, S, Bargh, JA, eds. Unintended Thought. New York: Guilford; 1989, 212–252.
Evans, JSBT. Dual‐processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 2008, 59:255–278.
Petty, RE, Cacioppo, JT. Attitudes and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches. Brown: Dubuque; 1981.
Chaiken, S. Heuristic versus systematic information‐processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. J Pers Soc Psychol 1980, 39:752–766.
Nisbet, MC, Scheufele, DA. What`s next for science communication? Promising directions and lingering distractions. Am J Bot 2009, 96:1767–1778.
Johnson, BT, Eagly, AH. Effects of involvement on persuasion: a meta‐analysis. Psychol Bull 1989, 106:290–314.
Sperber, D, Clément, F, Heintz, C, Mascaro, O, Mercier, H, Origgi, G, Wilson, D. Epistemic vigilance. Mind Lang 2010, 25:359–393.
Akerlof, GA. The market for “lemons”: quality uncertainty and the market mechanism. Q J Econ 1970, 84:488–500.
Wildman, SS. Communication and economics: two imperial disciplines and too little collaboration. J Commun 2008, 58:693–706.
Bacharach, M, Gambetta, D. %22Trust in signs%22. In: Cook, KS, ed. Trust in Society. New York: Russell Sage Foundation; 2001, 148–184.
Gambetta, D, Hamill, H. Streetwise: How Taxi Drivers Establish Their Customers` Trustworthiness. Russell Sage Foundation: New York, NY; 2005.
Moran, R. %22Getting told and being believed%22. In: Lackey, J, Sosa, E, eds. The Epistemology of Testimony. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 2006, 272–306.
Stampe, D. On the acoustic behavior of rational animals. 1967.
Kauffeld, FJ. %22Speech acts, utterances as%22. In: Encyclopedia of Rhetoric. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2001.
Goodwin, J. Accounting for the appeal to the authority of experts. Argumentation 2011, 25:285–296.
Goodwin, J. %22Trust in experts as a principal‐agent problem%22. In: Reed, C, Tindale, CW, eds. Dialectics, Dialogue and Argumentation: An Examination of Douglas Walton`s Theories of Reasoning and Argument. London: College Publications; 2010, 133–143.
Kahan, DM, Jenkins‐Smith, H, Braman, D. Cultural cognition of scientific consensus. J Risk Res 2011, 14:147–174.
Bier, VM. On the state of the art: risk communication to the public. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 2001, 71:139–150.
Kauffeld, FJ. Presumptions and the distribution of argumentative burdens in acts of proposing and accusing. Argumentation 1998, 12:245–266.
Kloor K. Some climate scientists make overtures to their critics. Yale Forum on Climate Change %26 The Media; 2012. Available at: http://www.yaleclimatemediaforum.org/2012/04/some‐climate‐scientists‐make‐overtures‐to‐their‐critics/.
Beckert, J. %22Trust and markets%22. In: Bachmann, R, Zaheer, A, eds. Handbook of Trust Research. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing; 2012, 318–331.
Meyer, G, Sandøe, P. Going public: good scientific conduct. Sci Eng Ethics 2012, 18:173–197.
Bowman, T, Maibach, E, Mann, M, Moser, S, Somerville, R. Creating a common climate language. Science 2009, 324:36b.
Beck, S. Between tribalism and trust: the IPCC under the “public microscope”. Nat Culture 2012, 7:151–173.
Dietz, T, Stern, PC. Public Participation in Environmental Assessment and Decision Making. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2008.
Mitchell, RB, Clark, WC, Cash, DW. %22Information and influence%22. In: Mitchell, RB, Clark, WC, Cash, DW, Dickson, NM, eds. Global Environmental Assessments: Information and Influence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2006, 307–338.
Wolf, J, Moser, SC. Individual understandings, perceptions, and engagement with climate change: Insights from in‐depth studies across the world. WIREs Clim Chang 2011, 2:547–569.
Wynne, B. %22Misunderstood misunderstanding: social identities and public uptake of science%22. In: Irwin, A, Wynne, B, eds. Misunderstanding Science? The Public Reconstruction of Science and Technology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1992, 1–18.
Leiserowitz A, Maibach E, Roser‐Renouf C, Smith N. Global Warming`s Six Americas, June 2010; 2010. Available at: http://www.climatechangecommunication.org/images/files/Six_Americas_June_2010(1).pdf.
Curry J. Climate Etc.; 2012. Available at: http://judithcurry.com/.
A question of trust. Nature 2010, 466:7.
Ensminger, J. %22Reputations, trust, and the principal agent problem%22. In: Cook, KS, ed. Trust in Society. New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation; 2001, 185–201.