1 Hope, C. %22Integrated assessment models%22. In: Helm, D, ed. Climate Change Policy
, chapter 4. Oxford: Oxford University Press
; 2005, 77–98.
2 Füssel, H‐M, Mastrandrea, MD. %22Integrated assessment modeling of climate change%22. In: Schneider, S H, Rosencranz, A, Mastrandrea, M, eds. Climate Change Science and Policy
, chapter 14. Washington, DC: Island Press
; 2010, 150–161.
3 Tol, RSJ, Fankhauser, S. On the representation of impact in integrated assessment models of climate change. Environ Model Assess 1998, 3: 63–74.
4 Yohe, GW. The tolerable windows approach: lessons and limitations. An editorial comment. Clim Change 1999, 41: 283–295.
5 Stanton, EA, Ackerman, F, Kartha, S. Inside the integrated assessment models: four issues in climate economics. Clim Dev 2009, 1: 166–184.
6 Hitz, S, Smith, J. Estimating global impacts from climate change. Glob Environ Change 2004, 14: 201–218.
7 Lecocq, F, Shalizi, Z. How Might Climate Change Affect Economic Growth in Developing Countries? A Review of the Growth Literature with a Climate Lens. Policy Research Working Paper 4315, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2007.
8 de Bruin, K, Dellink, R, Agrawala, S. Economic Aspects of Adaptation to Climate Change: Integrated Assessment Modelling of Adaptation Costs and Benefits. OECD Environment Working Papers No. 6, OECD, 2009.
9 Patt, AG, van Vuuren, DP, Berkhout, F, Aaheim, A, Hof, AF, et al.
Adaptation in integrated assessment modeling: where do we stand? Clim Change (accepted).
10 Dickinson, T. The compendium of adaptation models for climate change: first edition. Toronto: Environment Canada. 2007. Available at : http://www.prevention
11 Zickfeld, K, Bruckner, T. Reducing the risk of abrupt climate change: emissions corridors preserving the Atlantic thermohaline circulation. Integr Assess 2003, 4: 106–115.
12 Mendelsohn, R, Schlesinger, M, Williams, L. Comparing impacts across climate models. Integr Assess 2000, 1: 37–48.
13 Hinkel, J, Klein, RJT. Integrating knowledge to assess coastal vulnerability to sea‐level rise: the development of the DIVA tool. Glob Environ Change 2009, 19: 384–395.
14 Arnell, NW, Cannell, MGR, Hulme, M, Kovats, R S, Mitchell, JFC, et al.
The consequences of CO2
stabilisation for the impacts of climate change. Clim Change 2002, 53: 413–446.
15 Parry, ML, Rosenzweig, C, Iglesias, A, Livermore, M, Fischer, G. Effects of climate change on global food production under SRES emissions and socio‐economic scenarios. Glob Environ Change 2004, 14: 53–67.
16 Grossmann, WD, Magaard, L, von Storch, H. Using Economic Change for Adaptation to Climate Risks—A Modeling Study
. Geesthacht: GKSS 2003/3, GKSS
17 Hallegatte, S, Hourcade, J‐C, Dumas, P. Why economic dynamics matter in assessing climate change damages: illustration on extreme events. Ecol Econ 2007, 62: 330–340.
18 Lecocq, F, Shalizi, Z. Balancing Expenditures on Mitigation of and Adaptation to Climate Change: An Exploration of Issues Relevant to Developing Countries. Policy Research Working Paper 4299, World Bank, Washington, DC, 2007.
19 Nordhaus, WD, Popp, D. What is the value of scientific knowledge? An application to global warming using the PRICE model. Energy J 1997, 18: 1–45.
20 Popp, D. ENTICE: endogenous technological change in the DICE model of global warming. J Environ Econ Manag 2004, 48: 742–768.
21 Popp, D. ENTICE‐BR: the effects of backstop technology R%26D on climate policy models. Energy Econ 2006, 28: 188–222.
22 Nordhaus, W. A Question of Balance: Weighing the Options on Global Warming Policies
. New Haven, CI: Yale University Press
23 de Bruin, KC, Dellink, RB, Tol, RSJ. AD‐DICE: an implementation of adaptation in the DICE model. Clim Change 2009, 95: 63–81.
24 Manne, A, Richels, R. The impact of learning‐by‐doing on the timing and costs of CO2
abatement. Energy Econ 2004, 26: 603–619.
25 Manne, A, Richels, R. MERGE: An Integrated Assessment Model for Global Climate Change
2004. Available at : http://www.stanford.edu/group/MERGE/
26 Nordhaus, W D, Boyer, J. Warming the World: Economic Models of Global Warming
. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
27 Yang, Z, Nordhaus, WD. Magnitude and direction of technological transfers for mitigating GHG emissions. Energy Econ 2006, 28: 730–741.
28 Bosetti, V, Carraro, C, Galeotti, M, Massetti, E, Tavoni, M. WITCH: A World Induced Technical Change Hybrid Model. Energy J 2006, 27 (Special Issue “Hybrid Modelling of Energy Environment Policies: Reconciling Bottom‐up and Top‐down”): 13–38.
29 Bosetti, V, Massetti, E, Tavoni, M. The WITCH Model: Structure, Baseline, Solutions. FEEM Working Paper No. 10.2007, FEEM, 2007.
30 Hof, AF, de Bruin, KC, Dellink, RB, den Elzen, MGJ, van Vuuren, DP. The effect of different mitigation strategies on international financing of adaptation. Environ Sci Policy 2009, 12: 832–843.
31 Kurosawa, A, Yagita, H, Zhou, W, Tokimatsu, K, Yanagisawa, Y. Analysis of carbon emission stabilization targets and adaptation by integrated assessment model. Energy J 1999, 20 (Kyoto Special Issue): 157–175.
32 Tol, RSJ. The double trade‐off between adaptation and mitigation for sea level rise: an application of FUND. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 2007, 12: 741–753.
33 Anthoff, D, Tol, RSJ. The Climate Framework for Uncertainty, Negotiation and Distribution (FUND), Technical Description, Version 3.3, 2008.
34 Kemfert, C. An integrated assessment model of economy‐energy‐climate—the model WIAGEM. Integr Assess 2002, 3: 281–298.
35 Tol, RSJ. Estimates of the damage costs of climate change. Part II: dynamic estimates. Environ Resour Econ 2002, 21: 135–160.
36 Roson, R, Tol, RSJ. An integrated assessment model of economy‐energy‐climate—the model Wiagem: a comment. Integr Assess J 2006, 6: 75–82.
37 Kemfert, C. An integrated assessment of economy, energy and climate. The model WIAGEM—a reply to comment by Roson and Tol. Integr Assess J 2006, 6: 45–49.
38 Hope, CW, Anderson, J, Wenman, P. Policy analysis of the greenhouse effect—an application of the PAGE model. Energy Policy 1993, 15: 328–338.
39 Hope, C. The marginal impact of CO2
from PAGE2002: an integrated assessment model incorporating the IPCC`s five reasons for concern. Integr Assess J 2006, 6: 19–56.
40 Ackerman, F, Stanton, EA, Hope, C, Alberth, S. Did the Stern Review Underestimate U.S. and Global Climate Damages? Working Paper WP‐US‐0802, Stockholm Environment Institute, Stockholm, 2008.
41 Hope, C. Optimal carbon emissions and the social cost of carbon over time under uncertainty. Integr Assess J 2008, 8: 107–122.
42 Hope, C. How deep should the deep cuts be? Optimal CO2
emissions over time under uncertainty. Clim Policy 2009, 9: 3–8.
43 Brenkert, AL, Smith, SJ, Kim, SH, Pitcher, HM. Model Documentation for the MiniCAM. Technical Report PNNL‐14337, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, College Park, MD, 2003.
44 Sands, RD, Leimbach, M. Modeling agriculture and land use in an integrated assessment framework. Clim Change 2003, 56: 185–210.
45 Kainuma, M, Matsuoka, Y, Morita, T., eds. Climate Policy Assessment: Asia‐Pacific Integrated Modeling
. Tokyo: Springer
46 Bouwman, AF, Kram, T, Klein Goldewijk, K, eds. Integrated Modeling of Global Environmental Change
. Bilthoven: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP)
47 Toth, FL, Bruckner, T, Füssel, H‐M, Leimbach, M, Petschel‐Held, G, et al.
Exploring options for global climate policy: a new analytical framework. Environment 2002, 44: 22–34.
48 Toth, FL, Bruckner, T, Füssel, H‐M, Leimbach, M, Petschel‐Held, G. Integrated assessment of long‐term climate policies: part 1—model presentation. Clim Change 2003, 56: 37–56.
49 Füssel, H‐M, Toth, FL, van Minnen, JG, Kaspar, F. Climate impact response functions as impact tools in the tolerable windows approach. Clim Change 2003, 56: 91–117.
50 Warren, R, de la Nava Santos, S, Arnell, NW, Bane, M, Barker, T, et al.
Development and illustrative outputs of the Community Integrated Assessment System (CIAS), a multi‐institutional modular integrated assessment approach for modelling climate change. Environ Model Software 2008, 23: 592–610.
51 Sokolov, AP, Schlosser, CA, Dutkiewicz, S, Paltsev, S, Kicklighter, DW, et al.
The MIT Integrated Global System Model (IGSM) Version 2: Model Description and Baseline Evaluation. Report No. 124, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA, 2005.
52 Schlosser, C A, Sokolov, AP, Kicklighter, DW. A Global Land System Framework for Integrated Climate‐Change Assessments. Report No. 147, MIT Joint Program on the Science and Policy of Global Change, Cambridge, MA, 2007.
53 Dowlatabadi, H. Sensitivity of climate change mitigation estimates ot assumptions about technical change. Energy Econ 1998, 20: 473–493.
54 Dowlatabadi, H. Bumping against a gas ceiling. Clim Change 2000, 46: 391–407.
55 Parry, M, Arnell, N, McMichael, T, Nicholls, R, Martens, P, et al.
Millions at risk: defining critical climate change threats and targets. Glob Environ Change 2001, 11: 181–183.
56 Schneider, SH, Kuntz‐Duriseti, K, Azar, C. Costing non–linearities, surprises, and irreversible events. Pac Asian J Energy 2000, 10: 81–106.
57 Tol, RSJ, Verheyen, R. State responsibility and compensation for climate change damages—a legal and economic assessment. Energy Policy 2004, 32: 1109–1130.
58 Alcamo, J, Kreileman, E. %22Emission scenarios and global climate protection%22. In: Alcamo, J, Leemans, R, Kreileman, E, eds. Global Change Scenarios of the 21st Century. Results from the IMAGE 2.1 Model
. Oxford: Pergamon Press
; 1998, 163–192.
59 Füssel, H‐M, van Minnen, JG. Climate impact response functions for terrestrial ecosystems. Integr Assess 2001, 2: 183–197.
60 Gjerde, J, Grepperud, S, Kverndokk, S. Optimal climate policy under the possibility of a catastrophe. Resour Energy Econ 1999, 21: 289–317.
61 Roughgarden, T, Schneider, SH. Climate change policy: quantifying uncertainties for damages and optimal carbon taxes. Environment 1999, 27: 415–429.
62 Keller, K, Tan, K, Morel, FMM, Bradford, DF. Preserving the ocean circulation: implications for climate policy. Clim Change 2000, 47: 17–43.
63 Mastrandrea, MD, Schneider, SH. Integrated assessment of abrupt climatic changes. Clim Policy 2001, 1: 433–449.
64 Azar, C, Lindgren, K. Catastrophic events and stochastic cost–benefit analysis of climate change. Clim Change 2003, 56: 245–255.
65 Keller, K, Bolker, BM, Bradford, DF. Uncertain climate thresholds and optimal economic growth. J Environ Econ Manag 2004, 48: 723–741.
66 Yohe, G, Schlesinger, ME, Andronova, NG. Reducing the risk of a collapse of the Atlantic thermohaline circulation. Integr Assess J 2006, 6: 57–73.
67 Link, PM, Tol, RSJ. Possible economic impacts of a shutdown of the thermohaline circulation: an application of FUND. Portuguese Econ J 2004, 3: 99–114.
68 Nicholls, R, Tol, R, Vafeidis, A. Global estimates of the impact of a collapse of the West Antarctic ice sheet: an application of FUND. Clim Change 2008, 91: 171–191.
69 Anthoff, D, Hepburn, C, Tol, RSJ. Equity weighting and the marginal damage costs of climate change. Ecol Econ 2009, 68: 836–849.
70 Edmonds, J, Wise, M, Pitcher, H, Richels, P, Wigley, T, et al.
An integrated assessment of climate change and the accelerated introduction of advanced energy technologies: an application of MiniCAM 1.0. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 1996, 1: 311–319.
71 Stern, N. The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review
. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
72 Downing, TE, Anthoff, D, Butterfield, R, Ceronsky, M, Grubb, M, et al. Social Cost of Carbon: A Closer Look at Uncertainty
. London: DEFRA
73 Yohe, GW, Lasco, RD. %22Perspectives on climate change and sustainability%22. In: IPCC, ed. Climate Change 2007: Climate Change Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability
, chapter 20. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
; 2007, 811–841.
74 Fisher, B, Nakicenovic, N. %22Issues related to mitigation in the long‐term context%22. In: IPCC, ed. Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change
, chapter 3. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
; 2007, 169–250.
75 Negishi, T. General Equilibrium Theory and International Trade
. Amsterdam: North‐Holland
76 Wright, EL, Erickson, JD. Incorporating catastrophes into integrated assessment: science, impacts, and adaptation. Clim Change 2003, 57: 265–286.
77 O`Neill, B, Oppenheimer, M. Climate change impacts are sensitive to the concentration stabilization path. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2004, 101: 16411–16416.
78 Yohe, G, Andronova, N, Schlesinger, M. To hedge or not against an uncertain climate future. Science 2004, 306: 416–417.
79 Mastrandrea, MD, Schneider, SH. Probabilistic integrated assessment of “dangerous” climate change. Science 2004, 304: 571–575.
80 Mastrandrea, M D, Schneider, SH. Probabilistic assessment of “dangerous” climate change and emissions scenarios. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2005, 102: 15728–15735.
81 McInerney, D, Keller, K. Economically optimal risk reduction strategies in the face of uncertain climate thresholds. Clim Change 2008, 91: 29–41.
82 Leemans, R, Kreileman, E, Zuidema, G, Alcamo, J, Berk, M, et al.
The IMAGE User Support System. Global Change Scenarios from IMAGE 2.1. RIVM rapport 481508006 (CD ROM only), 1998.
83 Füssel, H‐M. The ICLIPS impacts tool: a graphical user interface to climate impact response functions for integrated assessments of climate change. Integr Assess 2003, 4: 116–125.
84 Fankhauser, S. Protection vs. retreat—the economic costs of sea level rise. Environ Plann A 1994, 27: 299–319.
85 Tol, RSJ, Fankhauser, S, Smith, JB. The scope for adaptation to climate change: what can we learn from the impact literature? Glob Environ Change 1998, 8: 109–123.
86 Azar, C. Are optimal CO2
emissions really optimal?—four critical issues for economists in the greenhouse. Environ Resour Econ 1998, 11: 1–15.
87 Schneider, SH. Integrated assessment modeling of global climate change: transparent rational tool for policy making or opaque screen hiding value‐laden assumptions. Environ Model Assess 1997, 2: 229–249.
88 Smith, JB, Schellnhuber, H‐J, Mirza, MMQ. %22Vulnerability to climate change and reasons for concern: a synthesis%22. In: McCarthy, JJ, Canziani, OF, Leary, NA, Dokken, DJ, White, KS, eds. Climate Change 2001: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability
, chapter 19. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2001, 913–967.
89 Kuntz‐Duriseti, K. Evaluating the economic value of the precautionary principle: using cost benefit analysis to place a value on precaution. Environ Sci Policy 2004, 7: 291–301.
90 Hall, DC, Behl, RJ. Integrating economic analysis and the science of climate instability. Ecol Econ 2006, 57: 442–465.
91 Jaeger, C, Schellnhuber, H‐J, Brovkin, V. Stern`s review and Adam`s fallacy. Clim Change 2008, 89: 207–218.
92 Agrawala, S, Fankhauser, S, eds. Economic Aspects of Adaptation to Climate Change: Costs, Benefits and Policy Instruments
. Paris: OECD