IPCC. In: Pachauri, RK, Reisinger, A, eds. Climate Change 2007, Synthesis Report. Geneva, IPCC: 2007.
Oreskes, N. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 2004, 306: 1686.
Hulme, M. Why We Disagree about Climate Change: Understanding Controversy, Inaction and Opportunity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009.
Hoggan, J. Climate Cover‐up. Vancouver: Greystone Books; 2009.
National Research Council. Global Environmental Change: Understanding the Human Dimensions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1992.
National Research Council. In: Stern, P, Dietz, T, Ruttan, VW, Socolow, RH, Sweeney, J, eds. Environmentally Significant Consumption: Research Directions. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1997.
Douglas, M, Wildavsky, A. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1982.
Strauss, S, Orlove, BS. Weather, Climate, Culture. Oxford: Berg Publisher; 2003.
Dunlap, RE, Van Liere, KD. The new environmental paradigm: a proposed measuring instrument and preliminary results. J Environ Educ 1978, 9: 10–19.
Dunlap, RE, Van Liere, KD. Commitment to the dominant social paradigm and environmental concern: an empirical examination. Soc Sci Q 1984, 65: 1013–1028.
Weber, EU, Morris, MW. Cultural differences in judgment and decision making: Insights from constructivist, structuralist approaches. Perspect Psychol Sci 2010. In press.
Weber, EU, Johnson, EJ. Mindful judgment and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 2009, 60: 53–86.
National Research Council. In: Stern, PC, Easterling, WE, eds. Making Climate Forecasts Matter. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1999.
Weber, EU. %22Perception and expectation of climate change: precondition for economic and technological adaptation%22. In: Bazerman, M, Messick, D, Tenbrunsel, A, Wade‐Benzoni, K, eds. Psychological Perspectives to Environmental and Ethical Issues in Management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass; 1997; 314–341.
Kupperman, KO. The puzzle of the American climate in the early colonial period. Am Hist Rev 1982, 87: 1262–1289.
Weber, EU, Shafir, S, Blais, A‐R. Predicting risk‐sensitivity in humans and lower animals: Risk as variance or coefficient of variation. Psychol Rev 2004, 111: 430–445.
Hertwig, R, Barron, G, Weber, EU, Erev, I. Decisions from experience and the effect of rare events. Psychol Sci 2004, 15: 534–539.
Erev, I, Barron, G. On adaptation, maximization, and reinforcement learning among cognitive strategies. Psychol Rev 2005, 112: 912–931.
Yechiam, E, Barron, G, Erev, I. The role of personal experience in contributing to different patterns of response to rare terrorist attacks. J Conflict Resolut 2005, 49: 430–439.
Pew Research Center. No Global Warming Alarm in the U.S., China. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2006.
Pew Research Center. Modest Support for “Cap and Trade” Policy. Fewer Americans See Solid Evidence of Global Warming. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2009a.
Sloman, SA. The empirical case for two systems of reasoning. Psychol Bull 1996, 119: 3–22.
Chaiken, S, Trope, Y. Dual‐process Theories in Social Psychology. New York: Guilford; 1999.
Epstein, S. Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. Am Psychol 1994, 49: 709–724.
Loewenstein, GF, Weber, EU, Hsee, CK, Welch, E. Risk as feelings. Psychol Bull 2001, 127: 267–286.
Marx, SM, Weber, EU, Orlove, BS, Leiserowitz, A, Krantz, DH, et al. Communication and mental processes: experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Glob Environ Change 2007, 17: 47–58.
Arctic Climate Impact Assessment. Impacts of a Warming Arctic. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2004.
Leiserowitz, A, Broad, K. Florida: Public Opinion on Climate Change. A Yale University / University of Miami / Columbia University Poll. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change; 2008; http://environment.yale.edu/uploads/FloridaGlobalWarmingOpinion.pdf.
Whitmarsh, L. Are flood victims more concerned about climate change than other people? The role of direct experience in risk perception and behavioural response. J Risk Res 2008, 11: 351–374.
Schwartz, SH. Are there Universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values? J Soc Issues 1994, 50: 19–45.
Dake, K. Orienting dispositions in the perception of risk: an analysis of contemporary worldviews and cultural biases. J Cross Cult Psychol 1991, 22: 61–82.
O`Connor, RE, Bord, RJ, Fisher, A. The curious impact of knowledge about climate change on risk perceptions and willingness to sacrifice. Risk Decision and Policy 1998, 3: 145–155.
O`Connor, RE, Bord, RJ, Fisher, A. Risk perceptions, general environmental beliefs, and willingness to address climate change. Risk Anal 1999, 19: 461–471.
Opotow, S, Brook, A. %22Identity and exclusion in rangeland conflict%22. In: Clayton, S, Opotow, S, eds. Identity and the Natural Environment: The Psychological Significance of Nature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2003.
Leiserowitz, A, Maibach, E, Roser‐Renouf, C. Global Warming`s “Six Americas”: An Audience Segmentation. New Haven, CT: Yale Project on Climate Change; 2008; http:// environment.yale.edu/uploads/SixAmericas.pdf.
Dunlap, RE, McCright, AM. Social movement identity: validating a measure of identification with the environmental movement. Soc Sci Q 2008, 89: 1045–1065.
Orlove, B, Broad, K, Petty, A. Factors that influence the use of climate forecasts: evidence from the 1997/98 El Nino event in Peru. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2004, 85: 1735–1743.
Roncoli, C. Ethnographic and participatory approaches to research on farmers` responses to climate predictions. Clim Res 2006, 33: 81–99.
Kasperson, RE, Renn, O, Slovic, P, Brown, HS, Emel, J, et al. The social amplification of risk: a conceptual framework. Risk Anal 1988, 8: 177–187.
Weinstein, ND, Lyon, JE, Rothman, AJ, Cuite, CL. Preoccupation and affect as predictors of protection action following natural disaster. Br J Health Psychol 2000, 5: 351–363.
Taylor, SE. Adjustment to threatening events: a theory of cognitive adaptation. Am Psychol 1983, 38: 1161–1173.
American Psychological Association Task Force on the Interface Between Psychology and Global Climate Change. Psychology and Global Climate Change: Addressing a Multi‐faceted Phenomenon and Set of Challenges. Washington, DC: Author; 2009; Retrieved from http://www.apa.org/releases/climate‐change.pdf.
Pew Research Center. Public Praises Science; Scientists Fault Public, Media. Washington, DC: Pew Research Center; 2009b.
Moser, S, Dilling, L. Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change—Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
Weber, EU, Kates, RK, Krantz, D, Leiserowitz, A, Parris, TM, et al. %22Political and societal goodwill%22. In: Sachs, JS, Schlosser, P, eds. Is Sustainable Development Feasible? New York City: Columbia University Press; 2010.
Krosnick, JA, Holbrook, AL, Lowe, L, Visser, PS. The origins and consequences of democratic citizens` policy agendas: a study of popular concern about global warming. Clim Change 2006, 77: 7–43.
Leiserowitz, A, Kates, R, Parris, T. Do global Attitudes and behaviors support sustainable development? Environment 2005, 47: 22–38.
Slovic, P, Fischhoff, B, Lichtenstein, S. %22The psychometric study of risk perception%22. In: Covello, VT, Menkes, J, Mumpower, J, eds. Risk Evaluation and Management. New York, NY: Plenum Press; 1986.
Slovic, P. Perception of risk. Science 1987, 236: 280–285.
Dunlap, RE, Saad, L. Only One in Four Americans are Anxious about the Environment. Princeton, NJ: Gallup News Service; 2001.
Leiserowitz, A. Climate change risk perception and policy preferences: the role of affect, imagery, and values. Clim Change 2006, 77: 45–77.
Slovic, P, Flynn, J, Layman, M. Perceived risk, trust, and the politics of nuclear waste. Science 1991, 254: 1603–1607.
Keller, C, Siegrist, M, Gutscher, H. The role of the affect and availability heuristic in risk communication. Risk Anal 2006, 26: 631–639.
Fischhoff, B, Slovic, P, Lichtenstein, S, Read, S, Combs, B. How safe is safe enough? A psychometric study of attitudes towards technological risks and benefits. Policy Sci 1978, 8: 127–152.
Weber, EU, Siebenmorgen, N, Weber, M. Communicating asset risk: how name recognition and the format of historic volatility information affect risk perception and investment decisions. Risk Anal 2005, 25: 597–609.
Johnson, EJ, Goldstein, D. Do defaults save lives? Science 2003, 302: 1338.
Johnson, E, Hershey, J, Meszaros, J, Kunreuther, H. Framing, probability distortions and insurance decisions. J Risk Uncertain 1993, 7: 35.
Leiserowitz, A. Surveying the impact of “The Day After Tomorrow”. Environment 2004, 46: 23–44.
Hardisty, DH, Weber, EU. Temporal discounting of environmental outcomes: effects of valence outweigh domain differences. J Exp Psychol Gen 2009, 3: 329–340.
Hendrickx, L, Nicolaij, S. Temporal discounting and environmental risks: the role of ethical and loss‐related concerns. J Environ Psychol 2004, 24: 409–422.
Ainslie, G. Specious reward: a behavioral theory of impulsiveness and impulse control. Psychol Bull 1975, 82: 463–496.
Loewenstein, G, Elster, J, eds. Choice Over Time. New York: Russell Sage; 1992.
Trope, Y, Liberman, N. Temporal construal. Psychol Rev 2003, 110: 403–421.
Johnson, EJ, Haeuble, G, Keinan, A. Aspects of endowment: a query theory of loss aversion. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2007, 33: 461–474.
Weber, EU, Johnson, EJ, Milch, K, Chang, H, Brodscholl, J, et al. Asymmetric discounting in intertemporal choice: a query theory account. Psychol Sci 2007, 18: 516–523.
Hardisty, DH, Johnson, EJ, Weber, EU. A dirty word or a dirty world? Attribute framing, political affiliation, and Query Theory. Psychol Sci 2010, 21: 86–92. In press.
Prelec, D, Herrnstein, RJ. %22Preferences and principles, alternative guidelines for choice%22. In: Zeckhauser, R, ed. Strategic Reflections on Human Behavior. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1991.
March, JC, Heath, C. Primer on Decision Making: How Decisions Happen. New York: The Free Press; 1994.
Meltzoff, MA, Moore, MK. %22Persons and representation: why infant imitation is important for theories of human development%22. In: Nadel, J, Butterworth, G, eds. Imitation in Infancy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1999.
Weber, EU. Experience‐based and description‐based perceptions of long‐term risk: why global warming does not scare us (yet). Clim Change 2006, 70: 103–120.
Hansen, J, Marx, S, Weber, EU. The role of climate perceptions, expectations, and forecasts in farmer decision making: the Argentine Pampas and South Florida. Technical Report 04‐01. Palisades, NY: International Research Institute for Climate Prediction (IRI); 2004.
Leone, RC, Anrig, G. The War on Our Freedoms: Civil Liberties in an Age of Terrorism. New York: Century Foundation; 2003.
Slovic, P. %22Trust, emotion, sex, politics, and science: surveying the risk‐assessment battlefield%22. In: Bazerman, M, Messick, D, Tenbrunsel, A, Wade‐Benzoni, K, eds. Psychological Perspectives to Environmental and Ethical Issues in Management. San Francisco, CA: Jossey‐Bass; 1997; 277–313.