Home
This Title All WIREs
WIREs RSS Feed
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Cogn Sci
Impact Factor: 1.489

Linguistic relativity

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

The central question in research on linguistic relativity, or the Whorfian hypothesis, is whether people who speak different languages think differently. The recent resurgence of research on this question can be attributed, in part, to new insights about the ways in which language might impact thought. We identify seven categories of hypotheses about the possible effects of language on thought across a wide range of domains, including motion, color, spatial relations, number, and false belief understanding. While we do not find support for the idea that language determines the basic categories of thought or that it overwrites preexisting conceptual distinctions, we do find support for the proposal that language can make some distinctions difficult to avoid, as well as for the proposal that language can augment certain types of thinking. Further, we highlight recent evidence suggesting that language may induce a relatively schematic mode of thinking. Although the literature on linguistic relativity remains contentious, there is growing support for the view that language has a profound effect on thought. WIREs Cogni Sci 2011 2 253–265 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.104

Figure 1.

Classes and subclasses of hypotheses on how language might affect thought.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Figure 2.

In linguistic determinism, the relationship between language and thought is tight, while the relationship between thought and the world is loose. Research in the cognitive sciences suggests the opposite pattern: a loose relationship between language and thought, and a relatively tight relationship between thought and the world.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Figure 3.

Series of gears in which the first turns clockwise. In which direction will the last gear turn?

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Related Articles

Formalism and functionalism in linguistics
Linguistic evidence and grammatical theory

Browse by Topic

Psychology > Language
blog comments powered by Disqus

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts

In the Spotlight

Stan Klein

Stan Klein

Dr. Stan Klein’s research revolves around understanding self, memory, and consciousness. Klein argues that the unitary self of everyday experience actually is a multiplicity. For example, within memory, there are various, functionally independent systems of self-knowledge, including semantic personal facts, abstract trait self-knowledge, and episodic narratives.  Another aspect of self is its subjectivity. This form of consciousness interacts with the neurally-based aspects of self to produce the human experience of self.

Dr. Klein believes that we need to move beyond studying memory content and focus on how that content is presented to awareness. He argues that it is the manner in which content is apprehended by awareness that determines whether we experience content as episodic or semantic.

Learn More

Twitter: WBPsychology Follow us on Twitter

    RT @BostonGlobe: Broad Institute receives $650 million gift that is largest ever for psychiatric research http://t.co/etYElrhNec