Home
This Title All WIREs
WIREs RSS Feed
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Cogn Sci
Impact Factor: 1.413

Socioeconomic status and cognitive functioning: moving from correlation to causation

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

A growing body of cognitive research uses sophisticated behavioral and neuroimaging measurements to demonstrate associations between family socioeconomic status (SES) and specific cognitive functions. We argue for the value in these kinds of studies of increased sophistication in the measurement and modeling of SES. With regard to measurement, SES combines several components, each of which represents distinct resources that might benefit children's cognitive development in different ways. Policy implications of studies using omnibus SES composites are problematic because there are no ‘treatments’ for enhancing overall SES, although policies abound for enhancing specific components of SES such as family income. Past literature offers guidance regarding how best to measure each of the SES components. With regard to modeling, we point out that the manipulability of economic, educational, and occupational components of SES varies, which provides opportunities for generating experimental or quasi‐experimental variation in some components but not others. Evidence on the causal connections between SES components and child outcomes is summarized. Both experimental and quasi‐experimental studies involving manipulation of family income have demonstrated consistent associations with a number of cognitive measures. Quasi‐experimental increases in maternal education have also shown associations with child achievement. We end with a discussion of useful directions in SES‐related cognitive research. WIREs Cogn Sci 2012, 3:377–386. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1176

Figure 1.

School achievement and engagement gaps between low‐, middle‐ and high‐SES kindergarteners. (Reprinted with permission from Ref 52. Copyright 2011 Russell Sage Foundation). Based on data from the ECLS‐K. ‘Low’, ‘medium’, and ‘high’ refer to quintiles of the SES distribution.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Related Articles

Developmental Psychology

Browse by Topic

Neuroscience > Cognition
blog comments powered by Disqus

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts

Twitter: WBPsychology Follow us on Twitter

    RT .@cathloveday: I’m really loving “Great Myths of the Brain” by @Psych_Writer My goal this term is to get a myth buster into every lecture
    So close to 40,000 followers, free copy Great Myths Brain to no.40,000, retweet to give your followers chance to win http://t.co/fYNsLEIkyV
    RT @FamilyProcess: Our next webinar w/ Dr. Froma Walsh about using a “Family Resilience Framework” is Oct 27 (2-3:30 pm, ET). Register: htt…