1 Bettman, JR, Luce, MF, Payne, JW. Constructive consumer choice processes. J Consum Res 1998, 25: 187–217.
2 Slovic, P. The construction of preference. Am Psychol 1995; 50: 364–371.
3 Griffin, D, Liu, W, Khan, U. A new look at constructed choice processes. Market Lett 2005; 16: 321–333.
4 Kivetz, R, Netzer, O, Schrift, R. The synthesis of preference: bridging behavioral decision research and marketing science. J Consum Psychol 2008, 18: 179–186.
5 Simonson, I. Will I like a “medium” pillow? Another look at constructed and inherent preferences. J Consum Psychol 2008; 18: 155–169.
6 Dhar, R, Novemsky, N. Beyond rationality: the content of preferences. J Consum Psychol 2008; 18: 175–178.
7 Bentham, J. An Introduction to the Principles of Morals and Legislation. London: T. Payne, and Son
8 Farquhar, PH. Utility‐assessment methods. Manage Sci 1984; 30: 1283–1300.
9 Rabin, M. Psychology and economics. J Econ Lit 1998; 36: 11–46.
10 Zajonc, RB. Feeling and thinking—preferences need no inferences. Am Psychol 1980; 35: 151–175.
11 Gawronski, B, Bodenhausen, GV. Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: an integrative review of implicit and explicit attitude change. Psychol Bull 2006; 132: 692–731.
12 Tversky, A, Sattath, S, Slovic, P. Contingent weighting in judgment and choice. Psychol Rev 1988; 95: 371–384.
13 Von Neumann, J, Morgenstern, O. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press
; 1944; xviii, 625p.
14 Tversky, A, Kahneman, D. The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 1981; 211: 453–458.
15 Simonson, I. Choice based on reasons—the case of attraction and compromise effects. J Consum Res 1989; 16: 158–174.
16 Huber, J, Payne, JW, Puto, C. Adding asymmetrically dominated alternatives—violations of regularity and the similarity hypothesis. J Consum Res 1982; 9: 90–98.
17 Lichtenstein, S, Slovic, P. The construction of preference. Cambridge, New York: Cambridge University Press
18 Weber, EU, Johnson, EJ. Mindful judgment and decision making. Annu Rev Psychol 2009; 60: 53–85.
19 Kahneman, D. A perspective on judgment and choice—mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 2003; 58: 697–720.
20 Wang, T, Venkatesh, R, Chatterjee, R. Reservation price as a range: an incentive‐compatible measurement approach. J Market Res 2007; 44: 200–213.
21 Drolet, A, Luce, MF, Simonson, I. When does choice reveal preference? Moderators of heuristic versus goal‐based choice. J Consum Res 2009; 36: 137–147.
22 Payne, JW, Bettman, JR, Schkade, DA. Measuring constructed preferences: towards a building code. J Risk Uncertainty 1999; 19: 243–270.
23 Milch, KF, Weber, EU, Appelt, KC, Handgraaf, MJJ, Krantz, DH. From individual preference construction to group decisions: framing effects and group processes. Org Behav Human Decision Proc 2009; 108: 242–255.
24 Zhang, S, Markman, AB. Processing product unique features: alignability and involvement in preference construction. J Consum Psychol 2001; 11: 13–27.
25 Wang, J, Lee, AY. The role of regulatory focus in preference construction. J Market Res 2006; 43: 28–38.
26 Haubl, G, Murray, KB. Preference construction and persistence in digital marketplaces: the role of electronic recommendation agents. J Consum Psychol 2003; 13: 75–91.
27 Dhar, R, Nowlis, SM, Sherman, SJ. Comparison effects on preference construction. J Consum Res 1999; 26: 293–306.
28 Coupey, E, Irwin, JR, Payne, JW. Product category familiarity and preference construction. J Consum Res 1998; 24: 459–468.
29 Simon, D, Krawczyk, DC, Holyoak, KJ. Construction of preferences by constraint satisfaction. Psychol Sci 2004; 15: 331–336.
30 Simon, D, Krawczyk, DC, Bleicher, A, Holyoak, KJ. The transience of constructed preferences. J Behav Decision Making 2008; 21: 1–14.
31 D`Agostino, F. Two conceptions of reason. Econ Soc 2006; 35: 1–21.
32 Bettman, JR, Luce, MF, Payne, JW. Preference construction and preference stability: putting the pillow to rest. J Consum Psychol 2008; 18: 170–174.
33 Dietz, T, Stern, PC. Toward a theory of choice: socially embedded preference construction. J Socio‐Econ 1995; 24: 261–279.
34 Arvai, J, Gregory, R, Ohlson, D, Blackwell, B, Gray, R. Letdowns, wake‐up calls, and constructed preferences: people`s responses to fuel and wildfire risks. J Forestry 2006; 104: 173–181.
35 Caruso, EM, Shafir, E. Now that I think about it, I`m in the mood for laughs: decisions focused on mood. J Behav Decision Making 2006; 19: 155–169.
36 Dhar, R, Nowlis, SM, Sherman, SJ. Trying hard or hardly trying: an analysis of context effects in choice. J Consum Psychol 2000; 9: 189–200.
37 Fischer, GW, Carmon, Z, Ariely, D, Zauberman, G. Goal‐based construction of preferences: task goals and the prominence effect. Manage Sci 1999; 45: 1057–1075.
38 Hoeffler, S, Ariely, D. Constructing stable preferences: a look into dimensions of experience and their impact on preference stability. J Consum Psychol 1999; 8: 113–139.
39 Yoon, SO, Simonson, I. Choice set configuration as a determinant of preference attribution and strength. J Consum Res 2008; 35: 324–336.
40 Amir, O, Levav, J. Choice construction versus preference construction: the instability of preferences learned in context. J Market Res 2008; 45: 145–158.
41 Bateman, I, Dent, S, Peters, E, Slovic, P, Starmer, C. The affect heuristic and the attractiveness of simple gambles. J Behav Decision Making 2007; 20: 365–380.
42 Drolet, A, Simonson, I, Tversky, A. Indifference curves that travel with the choice set. Market Lett 2000; 11: 199–209.
43 Johnson, EJ, Steffel, M, Goldstein, DG. Making better decisions: from measuring to constructing preferences. Health Psychol 2005; 24: S17–S22.
44 Kramer, T. The effect of measurement task transparency on preference construction and evaluations of personalized recommendations. J Market Res 2007; 44: 224–233.
45 Johnson, EJ, Haubl, G, Keinan, A. Aspects of endowment: a query theory of value construction. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cognit 2007; 33: 461–474.
46 Niedrich, RW, Swain, SD. The effects of exposure‐order and market entry‐information on brand preference: a dual process model. J Acad Market Sci 2008; 36: 309–321.
47 Peters, E, Slovic, P, Gregory, R. The role of affect in the WTA/WTP disparity. J Behav Decision Making 2003; 16: 309–330.
48 Schwarz, N. Attitude research: between Ockham`s razor and the fundamental attribution error. J Consum Res 2006; 33: 19–21.
49 Anderson, NH. Functional measurement and psychophysical judgment. Psychol Rev 1970; 77: 153–170.
50 Shepard, RN. Psychological relations and psychophysical scales—on the status of direct psychophysical measurement. J Math Psychol 1981; 24: 21–57.
51 Schacter, DL, Norman, KA, Koutstaal, W. The cognitive neuroscience of constructive memory. Annu Rev Psychol 1998; 49: 289–318.
52 Loftus, EF, Palmer, JC. Reconstruction of automobile destruction—example of interaction between language and memory. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 1974; 13: 585–589.
53 O`Reilly, RC, Munakata, Y. Computational explorations in cognitive neuroscience: understanding the mind by simulating the brain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
54 Smith, ER. In: Gilbert, DT, Fiske, ST, Gardner, L, eds. The Handbook of Social Psychology. Vols. 1 and 2. 4th ed.
New York: McGraw‐Hill
; 1998; 391–445.
55 Ross, L, Nisbett, RE. The person and the situation: perspectives of social psychology. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press
56 Darley, JM, Batson, CD. From Jerusalem to Jericho—study of situational and dispositional variables in helping behavior. J Personal Soc Psychol 1973; 27: 100–108.
57 Darley, JM, Latane, B. Bystander intervention in emergencies—diffusion of responsibility. J Personal Soc Psychol 1968; 8: 377–383.
58 Bargh, JA, Chartrand, TL. The unbearable automaticity of being. Am Psychol 1999; 54: 462–479.
59 Berger, J, Fitzsimons, G. Dogs on the street, pumas on your feet: how cues in the environment influence product evaluation and choice. J Market Res 2008; 45: 1–14.
60 Van Osselaer, SMJ, Ramanathan, S, Campbell, MC, Cohen, JB, Dale, JK, Herr, PM, Janiszewski, C, Kruglanski, AW, Lee, AY, Read, SJ, et al.
Choice based on goals. Market Lett 2005; 16: 335–346.
61 Custers, R, Aarts, H. Positive affect as implicit motivator: on the nonconscious operation of behavioral goals. J Personal Soc Psychol 2005; 89: 129–142.
62 Kruglanski, AW. In: Higgins, ET, Kruglanski, AW, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. New York: Guilford Press
; 1996; 493–520.
63 Markman, AB, Brendl, CM. The influence of goals on value and choice. Psychol Learn Motivat Adv Res Theory 2000; 39: 97–128.
64 Brendl, CM, Markman, AB, Messner, C. The devaluation effect: activating a need devalues unrelated objects. J Consum Res 2003; 29: 463–473.
65 Markman, AB, Brendl, CM, Kim, K. Preference and the specificity of goals. Emotion 2007; 7: 680–684.
66 Heath, C, Larrick, RP, Wu, G. Goals as reference points. Cognit Psychol 1999; 38: 79–109.
67 Shah, JY, Kruglanski, AW. When opportunity knocks: bottom‐up priming of goals by means and its effects on self‐regulation. J Personal Soc Psychol 2003; 84: 1109–1122.
68 Fishbach, A, Friedman, RS, Kruglanski, AW. Leading us not unto temptation: momentary allurements elicit overriding goal activation. J Personal Soc Psychol 2003; 84: 296–309.
69 Sela, A, Shiv, B. Unraveling priming: when does the same prime activate a goal versus a trait?. J Consum Res 2009; 36: 418–433.
70 Chartrand, TL, Huber, J, Shiv, B, Tanner, RJ. Nonconscious goals and consumer choice. J Consum Res 2008; 35: 189–201.
71 Shah, JY, Friedman, R, Kruglanski, AW. Forgetting all else: on the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. J Personal Soc Psychol 2002; 83: 1261–1280.
72 Forster, J, Liberman, N, Higgins, ET. Accessibility from active and fulfilled goals. J Exp Soc Psychol 2005; 41: 220–239.
73 Fishbach, A, Dhar, R. Goals as excuses or guides: the liberating effect of perceived goal progress on choice. J Consum Res 2005; 32: 370–377.
74 Wilcox, K, Vallen, B, Block, L, Fitzsimons, GJ. Vicarious goal fulfillment: when the mere presence of a healthy option leads to an ironically indulgent decision. J Consum Res 2009; 36: 380–393.
75 Louro, MJ, Pieters, R, Zeelenberg, M. Dynamics of multiple‐goal pursuit. J Personal Soc Psychol 2007; 93: 174–193.
76 Dijksterhuis, A, Bos, MW, Nordgren, LF, van Baaren, RB. On making the right choice: the deliberation‐without‐attention effect. Science 2006; 311: 1005–1007.
77 Sanbonmatsu, DM, Fazio, RH. The role of attitudes in memory‐based decision‐making. J Personal Soc Psychol 1990; 59: 614–622.
78 Mantel, SP, Kardes, FR. The role of direction of comparison, attribute‐based processing, and attitude‐based processing in consumer preference. J Consum Res 1999; 25: 335–352.
79 Savani, K, Markus, HR, Conner, AL. Let your preference be your guide? Preferences and choices are more tightly linked for North Americans than for Indians. J Personal Soc Psychol 2008; 95: 861–876.
80 Chaiken, S. In: Zanna, MP, Olson, JM, Herman, CP, eds. Social Influence. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
; 1987; 3–39.
81 Kruglanski, AW, Webster, DM. Motivated closing of the mind: “seizing” and “freezing”. Psychol Rev 1996; 103: 263–283.
82 Payne, JW, Bettman, JR, Coupey, E, Johnson, EJ. A constructive process view of decision‐making—multiple strategies in judgment and choice. Acta Psychol 1992; 80: 107–141.
83 Dijksterhuis, A. Think different: the merits of unconscious thought in preference development and decision making. J Personal Soc Psychol 2004; 87: 586–598.
84 Pocheptsova, A, Amir, O, Dhar, R, Baumeister, RF. Deciding without resources: resource depletion and choice in context. J Market Res 2009; 46: 344–355.
85 Wright, P. Harassed decision maker—time pressures, distractions, and use of evidence. J Appl Psychol 1974; 59: 555–561.
86 Albarracin, D, Wyer, RS. Elaborative and nonelaborative processing of a behavior‐related communication. Personal Soc Psychol Bull 2001; 27: 691–705.
87 Drolet, A, Luce, MF. The rationalizing effects of cognitive load on emotion‐based trade‐off avoidance. J Consum Res 2004; 31: 63–77.
88 Lerouge, D. Evaluating the benefits of distraction on product evaluations: the mind‐set effect. J Consum Res 2009; 36: 367–379.
89 Feldman, JM, Lynch, JG. Self‐generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. J Appl Psychol 1988; 73: 421–435.
90 Hastie, R, Park, B. The relationship between memory and judgment depends on whether the judgment task is memory‐based or online. Psychol Rev 1986; 93: 258–268.
91 Schneider, W, Shiffrin, RM. Controlled and automatic human information‐processing. 1. Detection, search, and attention. Psychol Rev 1977; 84: 1–66.
92 Fazio, RH, Sanbonmatsu, DM, Powell, MC, Kardes, FR. On the automatic activation of attitudes. J Personal Soc Psychol 1986; 50: 229–238.
93 Levin, IP, Gaeth, GJ. How consumers are affected by the framing of attribute information before and after consuming the product. J Consum Res 1988; 15: 374–378.
94 Lynch, JG. In: Griffin, A, Otnes, C, eds. 16 Paul D. Converse Symposium. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association
; 2005; 88–115.
95 Higgins, ET. In: Higgins, ET, Kruglanski, AW, eds. Social Psychology: Handbook of Basic Principles. New York: Guilford Press
96 Krantz, DH, Kunreuther, HC. Goals and plans in decision making. Judgment Decision Making 2007; 2: 137–168.
97 Van Osselaer, SMJ, Janiszewski, C. A passive goal guidance model of consumer behavior. Working paper