1 Bargh, JA. %22The four horsemen of automaticity: awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition%22. In: Wyer, RS Jr
, Srull, TK, eds. Handbook of Social Cognition. 2nd ed.
Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
; 1994; 1–40.
2 Sumner, P, Nachev, P, Morris, P, Peters, AM, Jackson, SR, Kennard, C, Husain M. Human medial frontal cortex mediates unconscious inhibition of voluntary action. Neuron 2007; 54: 697–711.
3 van Gaal, S, Ridderinkhof, KR, Fahrenfort, JJ, Scholte, HS, Lamme, VAF. Frontal cortex mediates unconsciously triggered inhibitory control. J Neuroscit 2008; 28: 8053–8062.
4 Gibson, JJ. The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
5 Lhermitte, F. Utilization behaviour and its relation to lesions of the frontal lobes. Brain 1983; 106: 237–255.
6 Archibald, S, Mateer, C, Kerns, K. Utilization behavior: clinical manifestations and neurological mechanisms. Neuropsychol Rev 2001; 11: 117–130.
7 Ridderinkhof, KR, Scheres, A, Oosterlaan, J, Sergeant, J. Distribution‐analytical techniques in the study of ADHD: delta plot analyses reveal deficits in response suppression that are eliminated by methylphenidate treatment. J Abnorm Psychol 2005; 114: 197–215.
8 Wylie, SA, van den Wildenberg, WPM, Ridderinkhof, KR, Bashore, TR, Manning, CA, Wooten GF. The effect of Parkinson`s disease on interference control during action selection. Neuropsychologia 2009; 47: 145–157.
9 Bartholow, BD, Dickter, CL, Sestir, MA. Stereotype activation and control of race bias: cognitive control of inhibition and its impairment by alcohol. J Pers Soc Psychol 2006; 90: 272–287.
10 Wiers, RW, Bartholow, BD, van den Wildenberg, E, Thush, C, Engels, RCME, Sher, KJ, Grenarde J, Amese SL, Stacy AW. Automatic and controlled processes and the development of addictive behaviors in adolescents: a review and a model. Pharmacol Biochem Behav 2007; 86: 263–283.
11 Braver, TS, Gray, JR, Burgess, GC. %22Explaining the many varieties of working memory variation: dual mechanisms of cognitive control%22. In: Conway, ARA, Jarrold, C, Kane, MJ, Myiake, A, Towse, JN, eds. Variation in Working Memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press
; 2007; 76–106.
12 Baumeister, RF, Vohs, KD. Handbook of Self‐Regulation: Research, Theory, and Applications. New York: Guilford Press
13 Rabbitt, PM. Errors and error correction in choice‐response tasks. J Exp Psychol 1966; 71: 264–272.
14 Ridderinkhof, KR, Ullsperger, M, Crone, EA, Nieuwenhuis, S. The role of medial frontal cortex in cognitive control. Science 2004; 306: 443–447.
15 Egner, T. Congruency sequence effects and cognitive control. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci 2007; 7: 380–390.
16 Verguts, T, Notebaert, W. Hebbian learning of cognitive control: dealing with specific and nonspecific adaptation. Psychol Rev 2008; 115: 518–525.
17 Wylie, SA, van den Wildenberg, WPM, Ridderinkhof, KR, Bashore, TR, Powell, VC, Manning, CA, Wooten GF. The effect of speed‐accuracy strategy on response interference control in Parkinson`s disease. Neuropsychologia 2009; 47: 1844–1853.
18 Davranche, K, McMorris, T. Specific effects of acute moderate exercise on cognitive control. Brain Cogn 2009; 69: 565–570.
19 Kerns, JG, Cohen, JD, MacDonald, AW III
, Cho, RY, Stenger, VA, Carter, CS. Anterior cingulate conflict monitoring and adjustments in control. Science 2004; 303: 1023–1026.
20 Forstmann, BU, Winkel, J, Wijnen, JG, Danielmeier, C, Groen, I, Derfuss, J, et al.
Your conflict matters to me! Decision‐conflicts observed in others induce behavioral and neural adaptation as if they were our own. Submitted for publication.
21 Miller, EK, Cohen, JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci 2001; 24: 167–202.
22 Frank, MJ, Cohen, MX, Sanfey, AG. Multiple systems in decision making: a neurocomputational perspective. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2009; 18: 73–77.
23 Evans, JS. Dual‐processing accounts of reasoning, judgment, and social cognition. Annu Rev Psychol 2008; 59: 255–278.
24 LeDoux, JE. The Emotional Brain. New York: Simon %26 Schuster
25 Kahneman, D. A perspective on judgment and choice: mapping bounded rationality. Am Psychol 2003; 58: 697–720.
26 Strack, F, Deutsch, R. Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Pers Soc Psychol Rev 2004; 3: 220–247.
27 Sanders, AF. Some aspects of reaction processes. Acta Psychol 1967; 27: 115–130.
28 Kornblum, S, Hasbroucq, T, Osman, A. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus–response compatibility: a model and taxonomy. Psychol Rev 1990; 97: 253–270.
29 Ridderinkhof, KR. %22Activation and suppression in conflict tasks: empirical clarification through distributional analyses%22. In: Prinz, W, Hommel, B, eds. Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action, Vol. XIX. Oxford: Oxford University Press
; 2002; 494–519.
30 McDowell, J. %22Incontinence and practical wisdom in Aristotle%22. In: Lovibond, S, Williams, SG, eds. Essays for David Wiggins: Identity, Truth and Value. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing
; 1996; 95–112.
31 Blasi, G, Goldberg, TE, Weickert, T, Das, S, Kohn, P, Zoltick, B, et al.
Brain regions underlying response inhibition and interference monitoring and suppression. Eur J Neurosci 2006; 23: 1658–1664.
32 Forstmann, BU, Jahfari, S, Scholte, HS, Wolfensteller, U, van den Wildenberg, WPM, Ridderinkhof, KR. Function and structure of the right inferior frontal cortex predict individual differences in response inhibition: a model‐based approach. J Neurosci 2007; 28: 9790–9796.
33 Forstmann, BU, van den Wildenberg, WPM, Ridderinkhof, KR. Neural mechanisms, temporal dynamics, and individual differences in interference control. J Cogn Neurosci 2008; 20: 1854–1865.
34 Garavan, H, Ross, TJ, Stein, EA. Right hemispheric dominance of inhibitory control: an event‐related functional MRI study. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999; 96: 8301–8306.
35 Middleton, FA, Strick, PL. Basal ganglia output and cognition: evidence from anatomical, behavioral and clinical studies. Brain Cogn 2000; 42: 183–200.
36 Mostofsky, SH, Simmonds, DJ. Response inhibition and response selection: two sides of the same coin. J Cogn Neurosci 2008; 20: 751–761.
37 Nachev, P, Kennard, C, Husain, M. Functional role of the supplementary and pre‐supplementary motor areas. Nat Rev Neurosci 2008; 9: 856–869.
38 Picton, TW, Stuss, DT, Alexander, MP, Shallice, T, Binns, MA, Gillingham, S. Effects of focal frontal lesions on response inhibition. Cereb Cortex 2007; 17: 826–838.
39 Rushworth, MF, Hadland, KA, Paus, T, Sipila, PK. Role of the human medial frontal cortex in task switching: a combined fMRI and TMS study. J Neurophysiol 2002; 87: 2577–2592.
40 Simmonds, DJ, Pekar, JJ, Mostofsky, SH. Meta analysis of go/no‐go tasks demonstrating that fMRI activation associated with response inhibition is task dependent. Neuropsychologia 2008; 46: 224–232.
41 Ullsperger, M, von Cramon, DY. Subprocesses of performance monitoring: a dissociation of error processing and response competition revealed by event‐related fMRI and ERPs. Neuroimage 2001; 14: 1387–1401.
42 Wager, TD, Sylvester, CY, Lacey, SC, Nee, DE, Franklin, M, Jonides, C. Common and unique components of response inhibition revealed by fMRI. Neuroimage 2005; 27: 323–340.
43 Hester, R, D`Esposito, M, Coles, MW, Garavan, H. Neural mechanisms for response selection: comparing selection of responses and items from working memory. Neuroimage 2007; 34: 446–454.
44 Curtis, CE, D`Esposito, M. Persistent activity in the prefrontal cortex during working memory. Trends Cogn Sci 2003; 7: 415–423.
45 Mostofsky, SH, Schafer, JG, Abrams, MT, Goldberg, MC, Flower, AA, Boyce, A, et al.
fMRI evidence that the neural basis of response inhibition is task dependent. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2003; 17: 419–30.
46 Aron, AR, Robbins, TW, Poldrack, RA. Inhibition and the right inferior frontal cortex. Trends Cogn Sci 2004; 8: 170–177.
47 Ridderinkhof, KR, van den Wildenberg, WPM, Segalowitz, SJ, Carter, CS. Neurocognitive mechanisms of cognitive control: the role of prefrontal cortex in action selection, response inhibition, performance monitoring, and reward‐based learning. Brain Cogn 2004; 56: 129–140.
48 Walker, R, Husain, M, Hodgson, TL, Harrison, J, Kennard, C. Saccadic eye movement and working memory deficits following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychologia 1998, 36: 1141–1159.
49 Aron, AR, Fletcher, PC, Bullmore, ET, Sahakian, BJ, Robbins, TW. Stop‐signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans. Nat Neurosci 2003; 6: 115–116.
50 Chambers, CD, Bellgrove, MA, Stokes, MG, Henderson, TR, Garavan, H, Robertson, IH, et al.
Executive brake failure following deactivation of human frontal lobe. J Cogn Neurosci 2006; 18: 444–455.
51 Brass, M, Haggard, P. To do or not to do: the neural signature of self‐control. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 9141–9145.
52 Lau, HC, Rogers, RD, Haggard, P, Passingham, RE. Attention to intention. Science 2004; 303: 1208–1210.
53 Tanji, J, Kurata, K. Comparison of movement‐related activity in two cortical motor areas of primates. J Neurophysiol 1982; 48: 633–653.
54 Tehovnik, EJ, Sommer, MA, Chou, IH, Slocum, WM, Schiller, PH. Eye fields in the frontal lobes of primates. Brain Res Rev 2000; 32: 413–448.
55 Chen, LL, Wise, SP. Supplementary eye field contrasted with the frontal eye field during acquisition of conditional oculomotor associations. J Neurophysiol 1995; 73: 1122–1134.
56 Nakamura, K, Sakai, K, Hikosaka, O. Neuronal activity in medial frontal cortex during learning of sequential procedures. J Neurophysiol 1998; 80: 2671–2687.
57 Deiber, MP, Honda, M, Ibanez, V, Sadato, N, Hallett, M. Mesial motor areas in self‐initiated versus externally triggered movements examined with fMRI: effect of movement type and rate. J Neurophysiol 1999; 81: 3065–3077.
58 Jenkins, IH, Jahanshahi, M, Jueptner, M, Passingham, RE, Brooks, DJ. Self‐initiated versus externally triggered movements. II. The effect of movement predictability on regional cerebral blood flow. Brain 2000; 123: 1216–1228.
59 Nachev, P, Rees, G, Parton, A, Kennard, C, Husain, M. Volition and conflict in human medial frontal cortex. Curr Biol 2005; 15: 122–128.
60 Nachev, P, Wydell, H, O`Neill, K, Husain, M, Kennard, C. The role of the pre‐supplementary motor area in the control of action. Neuroimage 2007; 36: 155–163.
61 Derfuss, J, Brass, M, von Cramon, DY. Cognitive control in the posterior frontolateral cortex: evidence from common activations in task coordination, interference control, and working memory. Neuroimage 2004; 23: 604–612.
62 Milham, MP, Banich, MT, Webb, A, Barad, V, Cohen, NJ, Wszalek, T, et al.
The relative involvement of anterior cingulate and prefrontal cortex in attentional control depends on nature of conflict. Brain Res Cogn Brain Res 2001; 12: 467–473.
63 Kennerley, SW, Sakai, K, Rushworth, MF. Organization of action sequences and the role of the pre‐SMA. J Neurophysiol 2004; 91: 978–993.
64 Taylor, PC, Nobre, AC, Rushworth, MF. Subsecond changes in top‐down control exerted by human medial frontal cortex during conflict and action selection: a combined transcranial magnetic stimulation‐electroencephalography study. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 11343–11353.
65 Lu, MT, Preston, JB, Strick, PL. Interconnections between the prefrontal cortex and the premotor areas in the frontal lobe. J Comp Neurol 1994; 341: 375–392.
66 Akkal, D, Dum, RP, Strick, PL. Supplementary motor area and pre‐supplementary motor area: targets of basal ganglia and cerebellar output. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 10659–10673.
67 Aron, AR, Poldrack, RA. Cortical and subcortical contributions to stop signal response inhibition: role of the subthalamic nucleus. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 2424–2433.
68 Cohen, MX, Schoene‐Bake, JC, Elger, CE, Weber, B. Connectivity‐based segregation of the human striatum predicts personality characteristics. Nat Neurosci 2009; 12: 32–34.
69 Inase, M, Tokuno, H, Nambu, A, Akazawa, T, Takada, M. Corticostriatal and corticosubthalamic input zones from the pre‐supplementary motor area in the macaque monkey: comparison with the input zones from the supplementary motor area. Brain Res 1999; 833: 191–201.
70 Haber, SN. The primate basal ganglia: parallel and integrative networks. J Chem Neuroanat 2003; 26: 317–330.
71 Kropotov, JD, Etlinger, SC. Selection of actions in the basal ganglia‐thalamocortical circuits: review and model. Int J Psychophysiol 1999; 31: 197–217.
72 Mink, J. The basal ganglia: focused selection and inhibition of competing motor programs. Prog Neurobiol 1996; 50: 381–425.
73 Picard, N, Strick, PL. Motor areas of the medial wall: a review of their location and functional activation. Cereb Cortex 1996; 6: 342–353.
74 Paus, T. Primate anterior cingulate cortex: where motor control, drive and cognition interface. Nat Rev Neurosci 2001; 2: 417–424.
75 Grosbras, MH, Lobel, E, van de Moortele, PF, LeBihan, D, Berthoz, A. An anatomical landmark for the supplementary eye fields in human revealed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Cereb Cortex 1999; 9: 705–711.
76 Matsuzaka, Y, Aizawa, H, Tanji, J. A motor area rostral to the supplementary motor area (presupplementary motor area) in the monkey: neuronal activity during a learned motor task. J Neurophysiol 1992; 68: 653–662.
77 Luppino, G, Matelli, M, Camarda, R, Rizzolatti, G. Corticocortical connections of area F3 (SMA‐proper) and area F6 (pre‐SMA) in the macaque monkey. J Comp Neurol 1993; 338: 114–140.
78 Johansen‐Berg, H, Behrens, TEJ, Robson, MD, Drobnjak, I, Rushworth, MFS, Brady, JM, Smith, SM, Higham, DJ, Matthews, PM. Changes in connectivity profiles define functionally distinct regions in human medial frontal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004; 101: 13335–13340.
79 Hoshi, E, Tanji, J. Differential roles of neuronal activity in the supplementary and pre‐supplementary motor areas: from information retrieval to motor planning and execution. J Neurophysiol 2004; 92: 3482–3499.
80 Crone, EA, Wendelken, C, Donohue, SE, Bunge, SA. Neural evidence for dissociable components of task‐switching. Cereb Cortex 2006; 16: 475–486.
81 Isoda, M, Hikosaka, O. Switching from automatic to controlled action by monkey medial frontal cortex. Nat Neurosci 2007; 10: 240–248.
82 Nambu, A, Tokuno, H, Takada, M. Functional significance of the cortico‐subthalamo‐pallidal ‘hyperdirect’pathway. Neurosci Res 2002; 43: 111–117.
83 Nambu, A, Takada, M, Inase, M, Tokuno, H. Dual somatotopical representations in the primate subthalamic nucleus: evidence for ordered but reversed body‐map transformations from the primary motor cortex and the supplementary motor area. J Neurosci 1996; 16: 2671–2683.
84 Bogacz, R. Optimal decision‐making theories: linking neurobiology with behavior. Trends Cogn Sci 2007; 11: 118–125.
85 Bogacz, R, Gurney, K. The basal ganglia and cortex implement optimal decision‐making between alternative actions. Neural Comput 2007; 19: 442–477.
86 Grezes, J, Decety, J. Does visual perception of object afford action? Evidence from a neuroimaging study. Neuropsychologia 2002; 40: 212–222.
87 Dreyfus, HL, Kelly, SD. Heterophenomenology: heavy‐handed sleight‐of‐hand. Phenom Cogn Sci 2007; 6: 45–45.
88 Rietveld, E. Unreflective action: a philosophical contribution to integrative neuroscience [dissertation]. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: University of Amsterdam
89 Frijda, NH. The emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press
90 Frijda, NH. The Laws of Emotion. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
91 James, W. Principles of Psychology. Holt %26 Co
92 Hommel, B, Müsseler, J, Aschersleben, G, Prinz, W. The theory of event coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. Behav Brain Sci 2001; 24: 849–878.
93 Wylie, SA, Ridderinkhof, KR, Bashore, TR, van den Wildenberg, WPM. The effect of Parkinson`s disease on the dynamics of online and proactive cognitive control during action selection. J Cogn Neurosci. 22: 2058–2073.
94 Burle, B, Possamaï, C‐A, Vidal, F, Bonnet, M, Hasbroucq, T. Executive control in the Simon effect: an electromyographic and distributional analysis. Psychol Res 2002; 66: 324–339.
95 Goldberg, G. Supplementary motor area structure and function: review and hypotheses. Behav Brain Sci 1985; 8: 567–616.
96 Arbib, MA. From monkey‐like action recognition to human language: an evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behav Brain Sci 2005; 28: 105–167.
97 Rizzolatti, G, Luppino, G. The cortical motor system. Neuron 2001; 31: 889–901.
98 Goodale, MA, Milner, AD. The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford: Oxford University Press
99 Ungerleider, LG, Courtney, SM, Haxby, JV. A neural system for human visual working memory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 883–890.
100 Iacoboni, M, Zaidel, E. Interhemispheric visuo‐motor integration in humans: the role of the superior parietal cortex. Neuropsychologia 2004; 42: 419–425.
101 Snyder, LH, Batista, AP, Andersen, RA. Intention‐related activity in the posterior parietal cortex: a review. Vision Res 2000; 40: 1433–1441.
102 Iacoboni, M, Woods, RP, Mazziotta, JC. Brain–behavior relationships: evidence from practice effects in spatial stimulus–response compatibility. J Neurophysiol 1996; 76: 321–331.
103 Stürmer, B, Leuthold, H, Soetens, E, Schröter, H, Sommer, W. Control over location‐based response activation in the Simon task: behavioral and electrophysiological evidence. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2002; 28: 1345–1363.
104 Stürmer, B, Redlich, M, Irlbacher, K, Brandt, S. Executive control over response priming and conflict: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study. Exp Brain Res 2007; 183: 329–339.
105 van Wouwe, NC, Band, GPH, Pannebakker, MM, Rombouts, SARB, de Bruin, LC, Hommel, B, Ridderinkhof, KR. Goal‐ versus stimulus‐driven components of biased decision‐making: an fMRI study of the AX‐CPT task. Submitted for publication.
106 Wolbers, T, Schoell, ED, Verleger, R, Kraft, S, McNamara, A, Jaskowski, P, et al.
Changes in connectivity profiles as a mechanism for strategic control over interfering subliminal information. Cereb Cortex 2006; 16: 857–864.
107 van Gaal, S, Scholte, HS, Ridderinkhof, KR, Fahrenfort, JJ, Lamme, VAF. Pre‐SMA anatomy predicts individual differences in the ability to resolve conscious and unconscious response conflict. J Cogn Neurosci In press.
108 Rosvold, HE, Mirsky, AF, Sarason, L, Bransome, ED, Beck, LH. A continuous performance test of brain damage. J Consult Psychol 1956; 20: 343–350.
109 Ollman, RT. %22Simple reactions with random countermanding of the “Go`” signal%22. In: Kornblum, S, ed. Attention and Performance IV. New York: Academic Press
; 1973; 571–581.
110 Logan, GD, Cowan, WB. On the ability to inhibit thought and action: a theory of an act of control. Psychol Rev 1984; 91: 295–327.
111 Coxon, JP, Stinear, CM, Byblow, WD. Stop and go: the neural basis of selective movement prevention. J Cogn Neurosci 2009; 21: 1193–1203.
112 van den Wildenberg, WPM, Burle, B, Vidal, F, van der Molen, MW, Ridderinkhof, KR, Hasbroucq, T. Mechanisms and dynamics of cortical motor inhibition in the stop‐signal paradigm: a TMS study. J Cogn Neurosci 2010; 22: 225–239.
113 Eriksen, BA, Eriksen, CW. Effects of noise letters upon the identification of target letters in a non‐search task. Percept Psychophys 1974; 16: 143–149.
114 Simon, JR, Rudell, AP. Auditory SR compatibility: the effect of an irrelevant cue on information processing. J Appl Psychol 1967; 51: 300–304.
115 Stroop, J. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exp Psychol 1935; 18: 643–662.
116 Iverson, SD, Mishkin, M. Perseverative interference in monkey following selective lesions of the inferior prefrontal convexity. Exp Brain Res 1970; 11: 376–386.
117 Chauvel, PY, Rey, M, Buser, P, Bancaud, J. What stimulation of the supplementary motor area in humans tells about its functional organization. Adv Neurol 1996; 70: 199–209.
118 Fried, I. Electrical stimulation of the supplementary motor area. Adv Neurol 1996; 70: 177–185.
119 Ikeda, A, Luders, HO, Burgess, RC, Shibasaki, H. Movement‐related potentials associated with single and repetitive movements recorded from human supplementary motor area. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1993; 89: 269–277.
120 Drewe, EA. Go‐no go learning after frontal lobe lesions in humans. Cortex 1975; 11: 8–16.
121 Floden, D, Stuss, DT. Inhibitory control is slowed in patients with right superior medial frontal damage. J Cogn Neurosci 2006; 18: 1843–1849.
122 Chen, CY, Muggleton, NG, Tzeng, OJ, Hung, DL, Juan, CH. Control of prepotent responses by the superior medial frontal cortex. Neuroimage 2009; 44: 537–545.
123 Burle, B, Vidal, F, Tandonnet, C, Hasbroucq, T. Physiological evidence for response inhibition in choice reaction time tasks. Brain Cogn 2004; 56: 153–164.
124 Buchsbaum, BR, Greer, S, Chang, WL, Berman, KF. Meta‐analysis of neuroimaging studies of the Wisconsin card‐sorting task and component processes. Hum Brain Mapp 2005; 25: 35–45.
125 Leung, HC, Cai, W. Common and differential ventrolateral prefrontal activity during inhibition of hand and eye movements. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 9893–9900.
126 Li, CS, Huang, C, Constable, RT, Sinha, R. Imaging response inhibition in a stop‐signal task: neural correlates independent of signal monitoring and post‐response processing. J Neurosci 2006; 26: 186–192.
127 Ramautar, J, Slagter, HA, Kok, A, Ridderinkhof, KR. Probability effects in the stop‐signal paradigm: the insula and the significance of failed inhibition. Brain Res 2006; 1105: 143–154.
128 Sasaki, K, Gemba, H, Tsujimoto, T. Suppression of visually initiated hand movement by stimulation of the prefrontal cortex in the monkey. Brain Res 1989; 495: 100–107.
129 Sakagami, M, Tsutsui, K, Lauwereyns, J, Koizumi, M, Kobayashi, S, Hikosaka, O. A code for behavioral inhibition on the basis of color, but not motion, in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex of macaque monkey. J Neurosci 2001; 21: 4801–4808.
130 Durston, S, Thomas, KM, Worden, MS, Yang, Y, Casey, BJ. The effect of preceding context on inhibition: an event‐related fMRI study. Neuroimage 2002; 16: 449–453.
131 Garavan, H, Hester, R, Murphy, K, Fassbender, C, Kelly, C. Individual differences in the functional neuroanatomy of inhibitory control. Brain Res 2006; 1105: 130–142.
132 Liddle, PF, Kiehl, KA, Smith, AM. Event‐related fMRI study of response inhibition. Hum Brain Mapp 2001; 12: 100–109.
133 Menon, V, Adleman, NE, White, CD, Glover, GH, Reiss, AL. Error‐related brain activation during a Go/NoGo response inhibition task. Hum Brain Mapp 2001; 12: 131–143.
134 Zheng, D, Oka, T, Bokura, H, Yamaguchi, S. The key locus of common response inhibition network for no‐go and stop signals. J Cogn Neurosci 2008; 20: 1–9.
135 Konishi, S, Nakajima, K, Uchida, I, Kikyo, H, Kameyama, M, Miyashita, Y. Common inhibitory mechanism in human inferior prefrontal cortex revealed by event‐related functional MRI. Brain 1999; 122: 981–991.
136 Chevrier, AD, Noseworthy, MD, Schachar, R. Dissociation of response inhibition and performance monitoring in the stop signal task using event‐related fMRI. Hum Brain Mapp 2007; 28: 1347–1358.
137 Chikazoe, J, Jimura, K, Asari, T, Yamashita, K, Morimoto, H, Hirose, S, et al.
Functional dissociation in right inferior frontal cortex during performance of go/no‐go tasks. Cereb Cortex 2008; 18: 146–152.
138 Rieger, M, Gauggel, S, Burmeister, K. Inhibition of ongoing responses following frontal, nonfrontal and basal ganglia lesions. Neuropsychology 2003; 17: 272–282.
139 Li, CS, Yan, P, Sinha, R, Lee, T‐W. Subcortical processes of motor response inhibition during a stop‐signal task. Neuroimage 2008; 41: 1352–1363.
140 Vink, M, Kahn, RS, Raemaekers, M, van den Heuvel, M, Boersma, M, Ramsey, NF. Function of striatum beyond inhibition and execution of motor responses. Hum Brain Mapp 2005; 25: 336–344.
141 Aron, AR, Behrens, TE, Smith, S, Frank, MJ, Poldrack, RA. Triangulating a cognitive control network using diffusion‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and function MRI. J Neurosci 2007; 27: 3743–3752.
142 van den Wildenberg, WPM, van Boxtel, GJM, van der Molen, MW, Bosch, DA, Speelman, JD, Brunia, CHM. Stimulation of the subthalamic region facilitates the selection and inhibition of motor responses in Parkinson`s disease. J Cogn Neurosci 2006; 18: 626–636.
143 Eagle, DM, Baunez, C, Hutcheson, DM, Lehmann, O, Shah, AP, Robbins, TW. Stop‐signal reaction‐time task performance: role of prefrontal cortex and subthalamic nucleus. Cereb Cortex 2008; 8: 178–188.
144 Ridderinkhof, KR, van den Wildenberg, WPM, Wijnen, J, Burle, B. %22Response inhibition in conflict tasks is revealed in delta plots%22. In: Posner, M, ed. Cognitive Neuroscience of Attention. New York: Guilford Press
; 2004; 369–377.
145 Wijnen, JG, Ridderinkhof, KR. Response inhibition in motor and oculomotor conflict tasks: different mechanisms, different dynamics? Brain Cogn 2007; 63: 260–270.
146 Bub, DN, Masson, MEJ, Lalonde, CE. Cognitive control in children: stroop interference and suppression of word reading. Psychol Sci 2006; 17: 351–357.
147 Wylie, SA, Ridderinkhof, KR, Eckerle, MK, Manning, CA. Inefficient response inhibition in individuals with mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia 2007; 45: 1408–1419.
148 Davelaar, EJ. A computational study of conflict‐monitoring at two levels of processing: reaction time distributional analyses and hemodynamic responses. Brain Res 2008; 1202: 109–119.
149 Mars, RB, Klein, MC, Neubert, FX, Olivier, E, Buch, ER, Boorman, ED, et al.
Short‐latency influence of medial frontal cortex on primary motor cortex during action selection under conflict. J Neurosci 2009; 29: 6926–6931.
150 Chambers, CD, Garavan, H, Bellgrove, MA. Insights into the neural basis of response inhibition from cognitive and clinical neuroscience. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2009; 33: 631–646.
151 Bien, N, Roebroeck, A, Goebel, R, Sack, AT. The brain`s intention to imitate: the neurobiology of intentional versus automatic imitation. Cereb Cortex In press.
152 Bunge, SA, Hazeltine, E, Scanlon, MD, Rosen, AC, Gabrieli, JDE. Dissociable contribution of prefrontal and parietal cortices to response selection. Neuroimage 2002; 17: 1562–1571.
153 Hazeltine, E, Bunge, SA, Scanlon, MD, Gabrieli, JDE. Material‐dependent and material‐independent selection processes in the frontal and parietal lobes: an event‐related fMRI investigation of response competition. Neuropsychologia 2003; 41: 1208–1217.
154 Peterson, BS, Kane, MJ, Alexander, GM, Lacadie, C, Skudlarski, P, Leung, HC, et al.
An event‐related functional MRI study comparing interference effects in the Simon and Stroop tasks. Cogn Brain Res 2002; 13: 427–440.
155 Praamstra, P, Stegeman, DF, Cools, AR, Horstink, MW. Reliance on external cues for movement initiation in Parkinson`s disease: evidence from movement‐related potentials. Brain 1998; 121: 167–177.
156 Seiss, E, Praamstra, P. The basal ganglia and inhibitory mechanisms in response selection: evidence from subliminal priming of motor responses in Parkinson`s disease. Brain 2004; 127: 330–339.
157 Ullsperger, M, von Cramon, DY. The role of intact frontostriatal circuits in error processing. J Cogn Neurosci 2006; 18: 651–664.