This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Energy Environ.

Modern and future nuclear fuel cycles and the relationship with nuclear waste management

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Discussions of nuclear fuel cycles and nuclear waste typically focus on very long‐term radiological hazards and on concerns over proliferation of nuclear weapons. While there are technical solutions to address the radiological hazards for any of the various feasible fuel cycles, there are substantial practical differences that may influence both the cost and political acceptability of waste disposal options. Only full recycle reduces the actual long‐term hazard in a major way. Efficient use of the energy content of uranium will eventually require some form of recycle of used nuclear fuel, but with known recoverable uranium resources, this is not an urgent concern. Proliferation concerns differ among the various fuel cycles and each presents its own challenges, but ultimately, the differences in proliferation risks are more political than technical. At this point, the actual cost of any of the options for closing the fuel cycle is not adequately known to provide guidance. WIREs Energy Environ 2014, 3:323–329. doi: 10.1002/wene.99

Browse by Topic

Nuclear Power > Science and Materials
blog comments powered by Disqus

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts

Twitter: GCB_Bioenergy Follow us on Twitter

    Bio-based materials and chemicals industry is poised to attract nearly $1 billion in investment this year http://t.co/zigLuKa0uU
    Cellulosic ethanol isn't "competing against petroleum products, (it's) competing with other ethanol plants" http://t.co/956GmH87CV
    Second advanced biofuel production plant hones in on the nonfuel side of the business with plastics http://t.co/bho0Dl9J02