Home
This Title All WIREs
WIREs RSS Feed
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol
Impact Factor: 5.186

Understanding specific and nonspecific toxicities: a requirement for the development of dendrimer‐based pharmaceuticals

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Dendrimer conjugates for pharmaceutical development are capable of enhancing the local delivery of cytotoxic drugs. The ability to conjugate different targeting ligands to the dendrimer allows for the cytotoxic drug to be focused at the intended target cell while minimizing collateral damage in normal cells. Dendrimers offer several advantages over other polymer conjugates by creating a better defined, more monodisperse therapeutic scaffold. Toxicity from the dendrimer, targeted and nonspecific, is not only dependent upon the number of targeting and therapeutic ligands conjugated, but can be influenced by the repeating building blocks that grow the dendrimer, the dendrimer generation, as well as the surface termination. WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol 2010 2 249–259

Figure 1.

The core‐shell architecture of a poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimer with an ethylene diamine core with a typical generation numbering scheme. Half‐generation PAMAM dendrimers may have carboxyl or methyl ester terminal groups. Unmodified full‐generation PAMAM dendrimers have amine surface groups.

[ Normal View 8K | Magnified View 20K ]
Figure 2.

Absolute size comparison of PAMAM dendrimers of varied generation to several key proteins. (Reprinted with permission from Ref 31. Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society).

[ Normal View 37K | Magnified View 57K ]
Figure 3.

Schematic of a multifunctional targeted nanodevice based on the PAMAM dendrimer scaffold. (Reprinted with permission from Ref 31. Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society).

[ Normal View 26K | Magnified View 40K ]
Figure 4.

Tumor growth in severely combined immunodeficient (SCID) mice bearing KB xenografts during treatment with tri‐functional G5 dendrimer with folic acid (FA), fluorescein (FI), and methotrexate (MTX). The dose of the conjugate (55.0 mg/kg) was equivalent to the lowest dose of free methotrexate (5.0 mg/kg) is as effective in tumor growth delay as the intermediated dose of free methotrexate (21.7 mg/kg).16.

[ Normal View 6K | Magnified View 15K ]
Figure 5.

Scanning electron microscopy of red blood cell (RBC) incubated with poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimers for 1 h. The cationic dendrimer (generation 4) disrupts the structure the integrity of the cell structure at low concentrations. (Reprinted with permission from Ref 61. Copyright 2000 Elsevier).

[ Normal View 67K | Magnified View 236K ]
Figure 6.

Effect of net charge on amine‐terminated G4 and carboxylic acid‐terminated G3.5 dendrimer‐induced mortality in the zebrafish embryo. (A) Mortality assessed at 120 h post‐fertilization for embryos exposed to G4 or RGD‐G4 dendrimers from 6 to 120 h post‐fertilization. (B) Mortality evaluated at 120 h post‐fertilization for embryos exposed to G3.5 or RGD‐G3.5 dendrimers from 6 to 120 h post‐fertilization. (Reprinted with permission from Ref 67. Copyright 2007 Elsevier).

[ Normal View 3K | Magnified View 9K ]
Figure 7.

Poly(amidoamine) (PAMAM) dendrimer interactions with biological membranes. (I) Atomic force microscopy (AFM) observation of dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine (DMPC) supported lipid bilayers (a), (c), and (e) before and after incubation with (b) amine‐terminated G7 (G7‐NH2), (d) amine‐terminated G5 (G5‐NH2), and (f) acetylated G5 (G5‐Ac) PAMAM dendrimers, respectively. (II) Space‐filling models of chemical structures of (a) G7‐NH2, (b) G5‐NH2, and (c) G5‐Ac PAMAM dendrimers. (III) Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) leakage as a result of cell exposure to PAMAM dendrimers. (a) Size effect of G7‐NH2 and G5‐NH2 on the LDH leakage out of KB and Rat2 cells after incubation at 37°C for 3 h and (b) surface group dependency on the LDH leakage at different temperatures. Note that larger dendrimers (G7‐NH2) induce formation of new nanoscale holes in the bilayers as seen in the AFM images and cause more amount of LDH leakage out of live cells than G5‐NH2. G5‐NH2 dendrimers do not cause new hole formation in the lipid bilayers but instead expand preexisting defects. In contrast, G5‐Ac dendrimers do not cause hole formation, expansion of preexisting defects, or LDH leakage out of live cells. (Reprinted with permission from Ref 31. Copyright 2007 American Chemical Society).

[ Normal View 61K | Magnified View 98K ]

Related Articles

Nanotoxicology: a personal perspective

Browse by Topic

Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Toxicology of Nanomaterials
blog comments powered by Disqus

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts

In the Spotlight

Robert Langer

Robert Langer

works at the interface of biotechnology and materials science. His lab is researching many topics, such as investigating the mechanism of release from polymeric delivery systems with concomitant microstructural analysis and mathematical modeling; studying applications of these systems including the development of effective long-term delivery systems for insulin, anti-cancer drugs, growth factors, gene therapy agents and vaccines; developing controlled release systems that can be magnetically, ultrasonically, or enzymatically triggered to increase release rates; synthesizing new biodegradable polymeric delivery systems which will ultimately be absorbed by the body; creating new approaches for delivering drugs such as proteins and genes across complex barriers such as the blood-brain barrier, the intestine, the lung and the skin; stem cell research including controlling growth and differentiation; and creating new biomaterials with shape memory or surface switching properties.

Learn More

Twitter: WIREsNanomed Follow us on Twitter