Home
This Title All WIREs
WIREs RSS Feed
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Water
Impact Factor: 4.436

Human right to sanitation in the legal and non‐legal literature: the need for greater synergy

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

This review paper analyzes the legal and non‐legal literature on the human right to sanitation (HRS). It shows that despite applying different paradigms in framing the HRS, both literature support the following three main conclusions: (a) state and non‐state actors, particularly NGOs and private service providers, have potentially mutually supportive roles in the implementation of the human right to water and sanitation (HRWS); (b) the implementation is enmeshed in three potential conflicts—between the human rights approach and cost recovery, state provision of services and the implicit legitimization of informal settlements, and the empowerment of vocal rights holders rather than the marginalized rights holders for whom these rights are primarily meant; and (c) HRWS needs to be better linked to other fields and broader issues to ensure complementarities. The paper also highlights important lessons for both legal and non‐legal scholars to learn from each other's research and possibly forge strong multi‐ and interdisciplinary research themes. Non‐legal scholars can benefit from the legal literature's coverage of: (a) the normative content of the HRWS; (b) the theoretical justifications for HRWS; (c) the legal status of HRWS; (d) enforcement mechanisms; and (e) the accountability of duty bearers. Legal scholars can also benefit from the non‐legal literature's coverage of: (a) a broader scope for the HRWS and the indicators and monitoring systems used by non‐lawyers; (b) learning from the community‐led total sanitation (CLTS) experience; (c) the economic justifications for HRWS; (d) the need to link to appropriate technologies; and (e) the accountability of non‐state actors. WIREs Water 2016, 3:678–691. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1162 This article is categorized under: Human Water > Rights to Water Engineering Water > Water, Health, and Sanitation
Human right to water and sanitation (HRWS): Slow to integrate.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
The sanitation ladder must function within the framework of human rights norms and cross‐cutting criteria.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Related Articles

Water ethics on a human‐dominated planet: rationality, context and values in global governance
Modern water and its discontents: a history of hydrosocial renewal
Talking shit: is Community‐Led Total Sanitation a radical and revolutionary approach to sanitation?

Browse by Topic

Human Water > Rights to Water
Engineering Water > Water, Health, and Sanitation

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts