References
1 Aristotle. 2008 (350 B.C.E)
Rhetoric. FQ Publishing. ISBN: 1599865661.
2 Crutzen, PJ, Stoermer, EF. The “Anthropocene”. IGBP Newsletter 1999, 41: 17–18.
3 Solomon, S, Qin, D, Manning, M, Chen, Z, Marquis, M, et al., eds. 2007.
Climate Change 2007. The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change`s Fourth Assessment Report. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press.
4 Parry, ML, Canziani, OF, van der Palutikof, JP, Linden, PJ, Hanson, CE, eds.
Climate Change 2007. Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2007.
5 Smith, JB, Schneider, SH, Oppenheimer, M, Yohe, GW, Hare, W, et al. Assessing dangerous climate change through an update of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) “reasons for concern”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 2009, 106: 4133–4137.
6 Metz, B, Davidson, OR, Bosch, PR, Dave, R, Meyer, LA, eds.
Climate Change 2007: Mitigation of Climate Change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change`s Fourth Assessment Report. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2007.
7 Schellnhuber, HJ. Global warming: stop worrying, start panicking? Proc Natl Acad Sci 2008, 105: 14239–14240.
8 Sawin, E, Jones, AP, Fiddaman, T, Siegel, LS, Wright, D, et al., 2009. %22Current emissions reductions proposals in the lead‐up to COP‐15 are likely to be insufficient to stabilize atmospheric CO2 levels: using C‐ROADS—a simple computer simulation of climate change to support long‐term climate policy development%22.
Climate Change—Global Risks, Challenges, and Decisions Conference.
University of Copenhagen: Copenhagen, Denmark.
9 Solomon, S, Plattner, G‐K, Knutti, R, Friedlingstein, P. Irreversible climate change due to carbon dioxide emissions. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2009, 106: 1704–1709.
10 Weart, S.
The Discovery of Global Warming. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press; 2003.
11 McCright, AM, Dunlap, RE. Challenging global warming as a social problem: an analysis of the conservative movement`s counter‐claims. Social Problems 2001, 47: 499–522.
12 McCright, AM, Dunlap, RE. Defeating Kyoto: the conservative movement`s impact on U.S. climate change policy. Social Problems 2003, 50: 348–373.
13 Union of Concerned Scientists. 2007.
Smoke, Mirrors, and Hot Air: How ExxonMobil Uses Big Tobacco`s Tactics to Manufacture Uncertainty on Climate Science. Cambridge, MA:
Union of Concerned Scientists.
14 Davidson, MD. Parallels in reactionary argumentation in the US congressional debates on the abolition of slavery and the Kyoto Protocol. Climatic Change 2008, 86: 6782.
15 Jacques, PJ, Dunlap, RE, Freeman, M. The organization of denial: conservative think tanks and environmental skepticism. Environmental Politics 2008, 17: 349–385.
16 Cox, R.
Environmental Communication and the Public Sphere. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage Publications; 2006.
17 Moser, SC, Dilling, L, eds.
Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2007.
18 Boykoff, MT. Flogging a dead norm? Media coverage of anthropogenic climate change in United States and United Kingdom, 2003–2006. Area 2007a, 39: 470–481. Available from .
19 Boykoff, MT. From convergence to contention: United States mass media representations of anthropogenic climate change science. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 2007b, 32: 477–489.
20 Boykoff, MT, Boykoff, JM. Balance as bias: global warming and the US prestige press. Global Environmental Change 2004, 14: 125–136.
21 Brossard, D, Shanahan, J, McComas, K. Are issue‐cycles culturally constructed? A comparison of French and American coverage of global climate change. Mass Communication and Society 2004, 7: 359–377.
22 Downs, A. Up and down with ecology: the issue‐attention cycles. Public Interest 1972, 28: 38–50.
23 Gascoigne, T. Climate change: “The” issue in the Australian national election 2007? Science Communication 2008, 29: 522–531.
24 McComas, K, Shanahan, J. Telling stories about global climate change: measuring the impact of narratives on issue cycles. Communication Research 1999, 26: 30–57.
25 Trumbo, C. Constructing climate change: claims and frames in US news coverage of an environmental issue. Public Understanding Sci 1996, 5: 269–283.
26 Nisbet, MC, Myers, T. Twenty years of public opinion about global warming. Public Opinion Quarterly 2007, 71: 444–470.
27 Moser, SC. Toward a deeper engagement of the U.S. public on climate change: an open letter to the 44th president of the United States of America. International Journal for Sustainability Communication (IJSC) 2008, 3: 119–132.
28 Leiserowitz, A, Maibach, E, Roser‐Renouf, C.
Climate Change in the American Mind: Americans` Climate Change Beliefs, Attitudes, Policy Preferences, and Actions. New Haven, CT; Fairfax, VA:
Yale Project on Climate Change, School of Forestry and Environmental Studies, Yale University; and the Center for Climate Change Communication, Department of Communication, George Mason University; 2009a, 56 pp.
29 Oreskes, N. The scientific consensus on climate change. Science 2004, 306: 1686.
30 Doran, PT, Zimmerman, MK. Examining the scientific consensus on climate change. EOS, Transactions of the American Geophysical Union 2009, 90: 22–23.
31 Rahmstorf, S, Cazenave, A, Church, JA, Hansen, JE, Keeling, RF, et al. Recent climate observations compared to projections. Science 2007, 316: 709–710.
32 Raupach, MR, Marland, G, Ciais, P, Le Quere, C, Canadell, JG, et al. Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO
2 emissions. Proc Nat Acad Sci 2007, 104: 10288–10293.
33 Kerr, RA. Arctic summer sea ice could vanish soon but not suddenly. Science 2009, 323: 1655.
34 Wigley, TML. The climate change commitment. Science 2005, 307: 1766–1769.
35 Moser, SC. %22Entering the period of consequences: the explosive U.S. awakening to the need for adaptation%22. In: Ford, J, Ford, LB, eds.
Climate Change Adaptation in Developed Nations. Heidelberg:
Springer Verlag; 2010. In press.
36 Whitmarsh, L, O`Neill, S, Lorenzoni, I, eds.
Engaging the Public with Climate Change and Energy Demand Reduction. London:
Earthscan; 2010. In press.
37 Cialdini, RB.
Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion.
2nd revised ed. New York:
Quill–William Morrow; 1993.
38 Maibach, E, Parrott, RL, eds.
Designing Health Messages: Approaches from Communication Theory and Public Health Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage; 1995.
39 NRC (National Research Council). 1996.
Understanding Risk: Informing Decisions in a Democratic Society. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press.
40 Friedman, SM, Dunwoody, S, Rogers, CL, eds.
Communicating Uncertainty: Media Coverage of New and Controversial Science. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1999.
41 McKenzie‐Mohr, D, Smith, W.
Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community‐Based Social Marketing. Gabriola Island, B.C.:
New Society Publishers; 1999.
42 Slovic, P, ed.
The Perception of Risk. London:
Earthscan; 2000.
43 Morgan, MG, Fischhoff, B, Bostrom, A, Atman, CJ.
Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. New York:
Cambridge University Press; 2001.
44 NRC (National Research Council).
New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press; 2002.
45 Levine, R.
The Power of Persuasion: How We`re Bought and Sold. Hoboken, NJ:
John Wiley %26 Sons; 2003.
46 Dilling, L, Moser, SC. %22Introduction%22. In Moser, SC, Dilling, L, eds.
Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2006, 1–27.
47 Kirkman, R. %22A little knowledge of dangerous things: human vulnerability in a changing climate%22. In Cataldi, SL, Marick, WS, eds.
Merleau‐Ponty and Environmental Philosophy: Dwellings on the Landscapes of Thought. Albany, NY:
SUNY Press; 2007, 19–35.
48 Rosenzweig, C, Karol, D, Vicarelli, M, Neofotis, P, Wu, Q, et al. Attributing physical and biological impacts to anthropogenic climate change. Nature 2008, 453: 353–357.
49 Zwiers, F, Hegerl, G. Climate change: attributing cause and effect. Nature 2008, 453: 296–297.
50 Hegerl, GC, Zwiers, FW, Braconnot, P, Gillett, NP, Luo, Y, Marengo Orsini, JA, et al., %22Understanding and attributing climate change%22. In: Solomon, S, Qin, D, Manning, M, Chen, Z, Marquis, M, et al., eds.
Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2007, 663–745.
51 Bostrom, A, Lashof, D. %22Weather it`s climate change?%22 In Moser, SC, Dilling, L, eds.
Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2007, 31–43.
52 Dunwoody, S. %22The challenge of trying to make a difference using media messages%22. In Moser, SC, Dilling, L, eds.
Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2007, 89–104.
53 Shepard, P.
Nature and Madness. San Francisco, CA:
Sierra Club Books; 1982.
54 Metzner, R. %22The psychopathology of the human‐nature relationship%22. In: Roszak, T, Gomes, ME, Kanner, AD, eds.
Ecopsychology: Restoring the Earth, Healing the Mind. San Francisco, CA:
Sierra Club Books; 1995, 55–67.
55 Bernstein, JS.
Living in the Borderland: The Evolution of Consciousness and the Challenge of Healing Trauma. London, New York:
Routledge; 2005.
56 Glantz, M, ed.
Creeping Environmental Problems and Sustainable Development in the Aral Sea Basin. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 1999.
57 Ruddiman, WF.
Plows, Plagues, and Petroleum: How Humans Took Control of Climate Princeton, NJ:
Princeton University Press, 2005.
58 Barkow, J, Cosmides, L, Tooby, J, eds.
The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture. New York:
Oxford University Press; 1992.
59 Kahneman, D, Slovic, P, Tversky, A, eds.
Judgment Under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. New York:
Cambridge University Press; 1982.
60 Johnson, BB. Testing and expanding a model of cognitive processing of risk information. Risk Analysis 2005, 25: 631–650.
61 De Martino, B, Kumaran, D, Seymour, B, Dolan, RJ. Frames, biases, and rational decision‐making in the human brain. Science 2006, 313: 684–687.
62 Marx, SM, Weber, EU, Orlove, BS, Leiserowitz, A, Krantz, DH, et al. Communication and mental processes: experiential and analytic processing of uncertain climate information. Global Environmental Change 2007, 17: 47–58.
63 Immerwahr, J.
Waiting for a Signal: Public Attitudes Toward Global Warming, the Environment and Geophysical Research. Washington, D.C.:
American Geophysical Union; 1999.
64 O`Neill, S, Nicholson‐Cole, S. “Fear won`t do it”: promoting positive engagement with climate change through visual and iconic representations. Science Communication 2009, 30: 355–379.
65 Monbiot, G. If we behave as if it`s too late, then our prophecy is bound to come true. The Guardian 2009. Available at: . (Accessed March 17, 2009).
66 Dickinson, JL. The people paradox: self‐esteem striving, immortality ideologies, and human response to climate change. Ecology and Society 2009, 14: 34. Available from .
67 Brooks, H 1986. %22The typology of surprises in technology, institutions, and development%22. In: Clark, WC, Munn, RE, eds.
Sustainable Development of the Biosphere. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 325–348.
68 Faber, M, Manstetten, R, Proops, JLR. %22Toward an open future: ignorance, novelty, and evolution%22. In: Costanza, R, Norton, BG, Haskell, BD, eds.
Ecosystem Health: New Goals for Environmental Management. Washington, DC:
Island Press; 1992b, 72–96.
69 Faber, M, Manstetten, R, Proops, JLR. Humankind and the environment: an anatomy of surprise and ignorance. Environmental Values 1992a, 1: 217–241.
70 Funtowicz, SO, Ravetz, JR. Comment: risk management as a postnormal science. Risk Analysis 1992, 12: 95–97.
71 Lempert, RJ. A new decision sciences for complex systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2002, 99(
suppl. 3): 7309–7313.
72 Shackley, S, Young, P, Parkinson, S, Wynne, B. Uncertainty, complexity and concepts of good science in climate change modeling: are GCMs the best tools? Climatic Change 1998, 38: 159–205.
73 Smithson, M.
Ignorance and Uncertainty: Emerging Paradigms. New York, NY:
Springer Verlag, 1988.
74 Wynne, B. Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environ Change 1992, 6: 87–101.
75 Oppenheimer, M, O`Neill, BC, Webster, M, Agrawala, S. The limits of consensus. Science 2007, 317: 1505–1506.
76 Brown, MA. Market failures and barriers as a basis for clean energy policies. Energy Policy 2001, 29: 1197–1207.
77 Atcheson, J. %22The market as messenger: sending the right signals%22. In: Moser, SC, Dilling, L, eds.
Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2007, 339–358.
78 Dilling, L, Farhar, B. %22Making it easy: establishing energy efficiency and renewable energy as routine best practice%22. In: Moser, SC, Dilling, L, eds.
Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2006, 359–382.
79 Agyeman, J, Bullard, R, Evans, B, eds.
Just Sustainabilities: Development in an Unequal World. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press; 2003.
80 Vanderheiden, S.
Atmospheric Justice: A Political Theory of Climate Change. Oxford, New York:
Oxford University Press; 2008.
81 Wolf, J, Brown, K, Conway, D. Ecological citizenship and climate change: perceptions and practice. Environ Politics 2009, 18: 503–521.
82 Manuel‐Navarrete, D, Kay, JJ, Dolderman, D. Ecological integrity discourses: linking ecology with cultural transformation. Human Ecology Review 2004, 11: 215–229.
83 Sarewitz, D. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environmental Science and Policy 2004, 7: 385–403.
84 Schultz, PW. %22Knowledge, information, and household recycling: Examining the knowledge‐deficit model of behavior change%22. In: Dietz, T, Stern, PC, eds.
New Tools for Environmental Protection: Education, Information, and Voluntary Measures. Washington, D.C.:
National Academy Press; 2002, 67–82.
85 Sturgis, P, Allum, N. Science in society: re‐evaluating the deficit model of public attitudes. Public Understanding Sci 2004, 13: 55–74.
86 Bak, H‐J. Education and public attitudes toward science: implications for the “Deficit Model” of education and support for science and technology. Social Science Quarterly 2001, 82: 779–795.
87 Craig, RT. Communication theory as a field. Communication Theory 1999, 9: 199–161.
88 Littlejohn, SW, Foss, KA.
Theories of Human Communication.
9th ed. Belmont, CA:
Thomson Wadsworth; 2008.
89 Dewey, J.
Democracy and Education: An Introduction to the Philosophy of Education. New York:
The Macmillan Company; 1915.
90 Galston, WA. Political knowledge, political engagement, and civic education. Annual Review of Political Science 2001, 4: 217–234.
91 Albert Shanker Institute. 2003.
Education for Democracy. Washington, D.C.:
Albert Shanker Institute.
92 FUTERRA.
Communications Strategy on Climate Change. Recommendations to DEFRA, The Carbon Trust, DTI, The Energy Saving Trust, the Environment Agency, and the UK Climate Impacts Program. London:
FUTERRA; 2005b.
93 Podgórecki, A, Alexander, J, Shields, R, eds.
Social Engineering: The Techniques of Change. Montreal:
McGill‐Queen`s Press; 1996.
94 Major, AM, Atwood, LE. Environmental risks in the news: issues, sources, problems, and values. Public Understanding of Science 2004, 13: 295–308.
95 Jackson, T.
Motivating Sustainable Consumption: A Review of Evidence on Consumer Behaviour and Behavioural Change. A report to the Sustainable Development Research Network. Guilford, UK:
Centre for Environmental Strategy, University of Surrey; 2005.
96 Blake, J. Overcoming the `value‐action gap` in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment 1999, 4: 257–278.
97 Crompton, T.
Weathercocks and Signposts: The Environment Movement at a Crossroads. Godalming, Surrey:
WWF‐UK; 2008.
98 Cook, FL, Tyler, TR, Goetz, EG, Gordon, MT, Protess, D, et al. Media and agenda setting effects on the public, interest group leaders, policy makers, and policy. Public Opinion Quarterly 1983, 47: 16–35.
99 Carvalho, A. Ideological cultures and media discourses on scientific knowledge: re‐reading news on climate change. Public Understanding of Science 2007, 16: 223–243.
100 Antilla, L. Climate of skepticism: US newspaper coverage of the science of climate change. Global Environmental Change 2005, 15: 338–352.
101 Smith, J. Dangerous news: media decision making about climate change risk. Risk Analysis 2005, 25: 1471–1482.
102 De Young, R. Changing behavior and making it stick: the conceptualization and management of conservation behavior. Environment and Behavior 1993, 25: 485–505.
103 Halpern, D, Bates, C, Beales, G, Heathfield, A.
Personal Responsibility and Changing Behaviour; The State of Knowledge and its Implications for Public Policy. U.K. Cabinet Office, Prime Ministers` Strategy Unit, London. 2004. Available from .
104 Bartels, D. Wartime mobilization to counter severe global climate change. Human Ecology 2001, 10: 229–232.
105 Brown, LR.
A Wartime Mobilization. Earth Policy Institute 2008 2009. Available from . [cited April 3, 2009].
106 Schultz, PW, Zelezny, L. Reframing environmental messages to be congruent with American values. Human Ecology Review 2003, 10: 126–136.
107 Costanzo, M, Archer, D, Aronson, E. Energy conservation behavior: the difficult path from information to action. American Psychologist 1986, 41: 521–528.
108 Schultz, PW, Zelezny, L. Values as predictors of environmental attitudes: evidence for consistency across 14 countries. Journal of Environmental Psychology 1999, 19: 255–265.
109 Bator, RJ, Cialdini, RB. New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior: the application of persuasion theory to the development of effective proenvironmental public service announcements. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56: 527–541.
110 De Young, R. New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior: expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56: 509–526.
111 Kaplan, S. New ways to promote proenvironmental behavior: human nature and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56: 491–508.
112 Stern, PC. New environmental theories: toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 2000, 56: 407–424.
113 Gardner, GT, Stern, PC.
Environmental Problems and Human Behavior. Boston, MA:
Pearson Custom Publishing; 2002.
114 Kollmuss, A, Agyeman, J. Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro‐environmental behavior? Environmental Education Review 2002, 8: 239–260.
115 Thøgersen, J, Ölander, F. Human values and the emergence of a sustainable consumption pattern: a panel study. J Econ Psychol 2002, 23: 605–630.
116 Clark, CF, Kotchen, MJ, Moore, MR. Internal and external influences on pro‐environmental behavior: participation in a green electricity program. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2003, 23: 237–246.
117 Oskamp, S, Schultz, PW.
Attitudes and Opinions.
3rd ed. Oxford:
Routledge; 2005.
118 Heath, Y, Gifford, R. Free‐market ideology and environmental degradation: the case of belief in global climate change. Environment and Behavior 2006, 38: 48–71.
119 de Groot, JIM, Steg, L. Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: how to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior 2008, 40: 330–354.
120 Chen, X, Lupi, F, He, G, Liu, J. Linking social norms to efficient conservation investment in payments for ecosystem services. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009, 106:11812–11817. Available from: .
121 Nilsson, A, von Borgstede, C, Biel, A. Willingness to accept climate change strategies: the effect of values and norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2004, 24: 267–277.
122 Griskevicius, V, Cialdini, RB, Goldstein, NJ. Social norms: an underestimated and underemployed lever for managing climate change. International Journal of Sustainability Communication 2008, 3: 5–13.
123 Schultz, PW, Nolan, JM, Cialdini, RB, Goldstein, NJ, Griskevicius, V. The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Science 2008, 18: 429–434.
124 Ockwell, D, Whitmarsh, L, O`Neill, S. Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation: forcing people to be green or fostering grass‐roots engagement? Science Communication 2009, 30: 305–327.
125 Olson, RL. Sustainability as a social vision. Journal of Social Issues 1995, 51: 15–35.
126 Rose, C, Dade, P, Gallie, N, Scott, J.
Climate Change Communications—Dipping A Toe Into Public Motivation. 2005. Available at: .
127 Ereaut, G, Segnit, N.
Warm Words: How Are We Telling the Climate Story and Can We Tell It Better? London, UK:
Institute for Public Policy Research; 2006.
128 Agyeman, J, Doppelt, B, Lynn, K, Hatic, H. %22The climate‐justice link: communicating risk with low‐income and minority audiences%22. In: Moser, SC, Dilling, L, eds.
Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change, Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2007.
129 Michaelis, L. %22Consumption behavior and narratives about the good life%22. In: Moser, SC, Dilling, L, eds.
Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, MA:
Cambridge University Press; 2007, 251–265.
130 Rose, C, Dade, P, Scott, J.
Research Into Motivating Prospectors, Settlers and Pioneers To Change Behaviours That Affect Climate Emissions. Campaign Strategy, 2007.
131 Leiserowitz, A, Maibach, E, Roser‐Renouf, C. %22Global Warming`s “Six Americas”%22.
An Audience Segmentation. New Haven, CT and Fairfax, VA:
Yale Project of Climate Change, Yale School of Forestry %26 Environmental Studies and the Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University; 2008.
132 Maibach, EW, Roser‐Renouf, C, Leiserowitz, A. Communication and marketing as climate change‐intervention assets: a public health perspective. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008, 35: 488–500.
133 Featherstone, H, Weitkamp, E, Ling, K, Burnet, F. Defining issue‐based publics for public engagement: climate change as a case study. Public Understanding of Science 2009, 18: 214–228.
134 Moser, SC. %22Communication strategies to mobilize the climate movement%22. In: Isham, J, Waage, S, eds.
Ignition: What You Can Do to Fight Global Warming and Spark a Movement. Washington, D.C.:
Island Press; 2007a, 73–93.
135 Moser, SC. In the long shadows of inaction: the quiet building of a climate protection movement in the United States. Global Environmental Politics 2007a, 7: 124–144.
136 Schreurs, M, Clark, W, Dickson, N, Jaeger, J. %22Issue attention, framing, and actors: An analysis of patterns across arenas%22. In: Clark, WC, Jaeger, J, van Eijndhoven, J, eds.
Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks: A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion and Acid Rain. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press; 2001, 349–364.
137 Bernstein, S. International institutions and the framing of domestic policies: the Kyoto Protocol and Canada`s response to climate change. Policy Sciences 2002, 35: 203–236.
138 Fischer, F.
Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices. New York:
Oxford University Press; 2003.
139 Corell, E. Framing climate change: impacts for post‐Kyoto policy‐making. Paper presented at the
Annual Meeting of the International Studies Association. Honolulu, Hawaii, Mar 05, 2005.
140 Orr, DW. Framing sustainability. Conservation Biology 2006, 20: 265–268.
141 Nisbet, MC, Mooney, C. Framing science. Science 2007, 316: 56.
142 de Boer, J. %22Framing climate change and climate‐proofing: from awareness to action%22. In: Carvalho, A, ed.
Communicating Climate Change: Discourses, Mediations and Perceptions. Braga:
Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, Universidade do Minho; 2008, 158–169.
143 Lee, N‐J, McLeod, DM, Shah, DV. Framing policy debates: issue dualism, journalistic frames, and opinions on controversial policy issues. Communication Research 2008, 35: 695–718.
144 Pidgeon, NF, Lorenzoni, I, Poortinga, W. Climate change or nuclear power–No thanks! A quantitative study of public perceptions and risk framing in Britain. Global Environmental Change 2008, 18: 69–85.
145 Vihersalo, M. %22Framing climate change in Montreal 2005: an environmental justice perspective%22. In: Carvalho, A ed.
Communicating Climate Change: Discourses, Mediations and Perceptions. Braga:
Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, Universidade do Minho; 2008, 34–52.
146 Nisbet, MC. 2009 Communicating climate change: why frames matter for public engagement. Environment 51: 12–23.
147 Campbell, KM, Gulledge, J, McNeill, JR, Podesta, J, Ogden, P, et al.
The Age of Consequences: The Foreign Policy and National Security Implications of Global Climate Change. Washington, D.C.:
Center for Strategic and International Studies; 2007.
148 Nisbet, MC. 2007. %22Framing climate change as a national security threat%22. In: Nisbet, MC, ed.
ScienceBlogs. New York:
ScienceBlogs, LLC.
149 Walsh, B. Does global warming compromise national security? Time Magazine 2008, Available at .
150 Wardekker, A, Petersen, AC JOvd Sluijs., %22Religious positions on climate change and climate policy in the United States%22. In: Carvalho, A, ed.
Communicating Climate Change: Discourses, Mediations and Perceptions. Braga:
Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, Universidade do Minho; 2008, 53–72.
151 Green, MC, Strange, JJ, Brock, TC, eds.
Narrative Impact: Social and Cognitive Foundations. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2002.
152 FUTERRA.
The Rules of the Game: Evidence Base for the Climate Change Communications Strategy. Recommendations to the Climate Change Communications Working Group (DEFRA, The Carbon Trust, DTI, The Energy Saving Trust, the Environment Agency, and the UK Climate Impacts Program). London: FUTERRA; 2005a.
153 DEFRA (Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs)
Tomorrow`s Climate—Today`s Challenge: Your Guide to Communicating Climate Change. London, UK:
DEFRA; 2006.
154 Leiserowitz, A. %22Communicating the risks of global warming: American risk perceptions, affective images, and interpretive communities%22. In: Moser, SC, Dilling, L, eds.
Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2007, 44–63.
155 Thøgersen, J. A cognitive dissonance interpretation of consistencies and inconsistencies in environmentally responsible behavior. J Env Psychol 2004, 24: 93–103.
156 Bostrom, A, Morgan, MG, Fischhoff, B, Read, D. What do people know about climate change? Part 1. Mental Models. Risk Analysis 1994, 14: 959–970.
157 Lowe, TD, Lorenzoni, I. Danger is all around: eliciting expert perceptions for managing climate change through a mental models approach. Global Environmental Change 2007, 17: 131–146.
158 Sterman, JD, Sweeney, LB. Understanding public complacency about climate change: adults` mental models of climate change violate conservation of matter. Climatic Change 2007, 80: 213–238.
159 Sterman, JD. Risk communication on climate: mental models and mass balance. Science 2008, 322: 532–533.
160 Kaplan, S, Kaplan, R. Creating a larger role for environmental psychology: the reasonable person model as an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2009, 29: 329–339, doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.10.005.
161 Witte, K. Fear control and danger control: a test of the extended parallel process model (EPPM). Commun Monographs 1994, 61: 113–134.
162 Witte, K. %22Fear as motivator, fear as inhibitor: using the extended parallel process model to explain fear appeal successes and failures%22. In: Andersen, PA, Guerrero, LK, eds.
Handbook of Communication and Emotion: Research, Theory, Application, and Contexts. San Diego, CA:
Academic Press; 1998, 423–451.
163 Ruiter, RAC, Verplanken, B, De Cremer, D, Kok, G. Danger and fear control in response to fear appeals: the role of need for cognition. Basic Appl Soc Psycho 2004, 26: 13–24.
164 Moser, SC. %22More bad news: the risk of neglecting emotional responses to climate change information%22. In: Moser, SC, Dilling, L, eds.
Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 64–80.
165 Wilson, E, Sherrell, D. Source effects in communication and persuasion research: a meta‐analysis of effect size. J Acad Marketing Sci 1993, 21: 101–112.
166 Bishr, M, Mantelas, L. A trust and reputation model for filtering and classifying knowledge about urban growth. GeoJournal 2008, 72: 229.
167 Cvetkovich, G, Löfstedt, R, eds.
Social Trust and the Management of Risk: Advances in Social Science Theory and Research. London:
Earthscan; 2000.
168 Cvetkovich, G, Siegrist, M, Murray, R, Tragesser, S. New information and social trust: asymmetry and perseverance of attributions about hazard managers. Risk Analysis 2002, 22: 359–367.
169 Löfstedt, RE.
Risk Management in Post‐Trust Societies. London:
Earthscan; 2009.
170 Jacques, PJ. The rearguard of modernity: environmental skepticism as a struggle of citizenship. Global Environmental Politics 2006, 6: 76–101.
171 Lahsen, M. Experiences of modernity in the greenhouse: a cultural analysis of a physicist “trio” supporting the backlash against global warming. Global Environmental Change 2008, 18: 204–219.
172 Malka, A, Krosnick, JA, Langer, G. The association of knowledge with concern about global warming: trusted information sources shape public thinking. Risk Analysis 2009, 29: 633–647.
173 Arroyo, V, Preston, B. %22Change in the marketplace: business leadership and communication%22. In: Moser, SC, Dilling, L, eds.
Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2007, 319–338.
174 Warner, L, %22Einstein, Roosevelt, and the atom bomb: Lessons learned for scientists communicating climate change%22. In: Moser,, SC, Dilling,, L eds. Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2007, 167–179.
175 Dunlap, RE, McCright, AM. A widening gap: republican and democratic views on climate change. Environment 2008, 50: 26–35.
176 Carroll, J.
Polluted Drinking Water Is Public`s Top Environmental Concern: Concern about Global Warming Inching Up. The Gallup Poll Princeton, NJ:
Gallup News Service; 2007.
177 Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. 2008,
A Deeper Partisan Divide Over Global Warming. Washington, D.C.:
Pew Research Center for the People %26 the Press.
178 Nisbet, MC, Kotcher, JE. A two‐step flow of influence? Opinion‐leader campaigns on climate change. Science Communication 2009, 30: 328–354.
179 Moser, SC. %22Costly knowledge—unaffordable denial: the politics of public understanding and engagement on climate change%22. In: Boykoff, MT, ed.
The Politics of Climate Change. Oxford:
Routledge; 2009.
180 Braverman, J. Testimonials versus informational persuasive messages: the moderating effect of delivery mode and personal involvement. Communication Research 2008, 35: 666–694.
181 Chaiken, S. Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 1980, 39: 752–766.
182 Dillard, JP, Pfau, M, eds.
The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage; 2002.
183 Johnson‐Cartee, KS, Copeland, GA.
Strategic Political Communication: Rethinking Social Influence, Persuasion, and Propaganda. Lanham, MD:
Rowman %26 Littlefield; 2003.
184 Slater, MD. Integrating application of media effects, persuasion, and behavior change theories to communication campaigns: a stages‐of‐change framework. Health Communication 1999, 11: 335–354.
185 Lee, E‐J, Lee, J, Schumann, DW. The influence of communication source and mode on consumer adoption of technological innovations. Journal of Consumer Affairs 2002, 36: 1–27.
186 Hayes, R, Matusov, E. Designing for dialogue in place of teacher talk and student silence. Culture Psychology 2005, 11: 339–357.
187 Nagda, BRA. Breaking barriers, crossing borders, building bridges: communication processes in intergroup dialogues. Journal of Social Issues 2006, 62: 553–576.
188 Tan, S, Brown, J. The world cafe in Singapore: creating a learning culture through dialogue. J Appl Behav Sci 2005, 41: 83–90.
189 Regan, K. %22A role for dialogue in communication about climate change%22. In: Moser, SC, Dilling, L, eds.
Creating a Climate for Change: Communicating Climate Change and Facilitating Social Change. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2007, 213–222.
190 Wheatley, MJ.
Turning to One Another: Simple Conversations to Restore Hope to the Future. Berkeley, CA:
Berrett‐Koehler Publishers; 2002.
191 Stevenson, T. From vision into action. Futures 2006, 38: 667–672.
192 Norton, A, Leaman, J.
The Day After Tomorrow: Public Opinion on Climate Change. London:
MORI Social Research Institute; 2004.
193 Lowe, T, Brown, K, Dessai, S, de Franca Doria, M, Haynes, K, et al. Does tomorrow ever come? Disaster narrative and public perceptions of climate change. Public Understanding of Science 2006, 15: 435–457.
194 Leiserowitz, A. Before and after the day after tomorrow: a U.S. study of climate change risk perception. Environment 2004, 46: 22–37.
195 Leiserowitz, A. The international impact of the day after tomorrow. Environment 2005, 47: 41–44.
196 Leiserowitz, A.
Surveying the Impact of Live Earth on American Public Opinion. A Yale University, Gallup, and ClearVision Institute Study. New Haven, CT:
Yale University, The Climate Project; Gallup Poll, ClearVision Institute; 2008.
197 Saad, L. %22Did Hollywood`s Glare Heat Up Public Concern About Global Warming? Concern about global warming is up slightly over past year%22.
Gallup Poll. Princeton, NJ:
Gallup News Service; 2007.
198 Wang, Z, Walther, JB, Pingree, S, Hawkins, RP. Health information, credibility, homophily, and influence via the internet: web sites versus discussion groups. Health Commun 2008, 23: 358–368.
199 Walther, JB. Computer‐mediated communication: Impersonal, interpersonal and hyperpersonal interaction. Commun Res 1996, 21: 3–43.
200 Mollica, KA, Gray, B, Trevino, LK. Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers` social networks. Organization Science 2003, 14: 123–136.
201 McPherson, M, Smith‐Lovin, L, Cook, J. Birds of a feather: homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology 2001, 27: 415–444.
202 Perse, EM, Courtright, JA. Normative images of communication media: mass and interpersonal channels in the new media environment. Human Communication Research 2006, 19: 485–503.
203 Enli, GS. Redefining public service broadcasting: multi‐platform participation. Convergence 2008, 14: 105–120.
204 Doyle, KO. Introduction: “Thinking differently” about the new media. American Behavioral Scientist 2008, 52: 3–7.
205 Yzer, MC, Southwell, BG. New communication technologies, old questions. American Behav Scientist 2008, 52: 8–20.
206 Coren, MJ.
Growing Role for New Media Foreseen as Climate Science/Public Opinion diverge. The Yale Forum on Climate Change & the Media (April 6). 2009. Available from .
207 Shneiderman, B. A national initiative for social participation. Science 2009, 323: 1426–1427.
208 Dede, C. Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. Science 2009, 323: 66–69.
209 Greenfield, PM. Technology and informal education: what is taught, what is learned. Science 2009, 323: 69–71.
210 Huang, E. Teaching button‐pushing versus teaching thinking: the state of new media education in US universities. Convergence 2009, 15: 233–247.
211 Sheppard, SRJ. Landscape visualisation and climate change: the potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environmental Science and Policy 2005, 8: 637–654.
212 Thomas, J, Jones, A, Saxby, T, Carruthers, T, Abal, E, Dennison, W.
Communicating Science Effectively: A Practical Handbook for Integrating Visual Elements. London:
IWA Publishing; 2006.
213 Knigge, L, Cope, M. Grounded visualization: integrating the analysis of qualitative and quantitative data through grounded theory and visualization. Environment and Planning A 2006, 38: 2021–2037.
214 Elwood, S. Geographic information science: new geovisualization technologies—emerging questions and linkages with GIScience research. Progress in Human Geography 2009, 33: 256–263.
215 Manzo, K. 2009 Imaging vulnerability: the iconography of climate change. Area in press, doi: 10.1111/j.1475–4762.2009.00887.x.
216 Met Office.
Earth Outreach KML: Climate Change in Our World. Google Earth 2009. Available from . [cited April 14, 2009].
217 Compaine, BM, Gomery, D.
Who Owns the Media? Competition and Concentration in the Mass Media Industry.
3rd ed. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2000.
218 Alexander, A, Owers, J, Carveth, R, Hollifield, CA, Greco, AN, eds.
Media Economics: Theory and Practice. Mahwah, NJ:
Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 2004.
219 Croteau, D, Hoynes, W.
The Business of Media: Corporate Media and the Public Interest.
2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Pine Forge Press; 2006.
220 Pew Project for Excellence in Journalism.
The State of the News Media 2008. An Annual Report on American Journalism. Washington, D.C.:
Pew Project for Excellence in Journalism; 2008.
221 Nature. 2009. Filling the void. Nature 458: 260.
222 Pew Project for Excellence in Journalism.
The State of the News Media 2009. An Annual Report on American Journalism. Washington, D.C.:
Pew Project for Excellence in Journalism; 2009.
223 Ward, B. A higher standard than ‘balance’ in journalism on climate change science. Clim Change 2008, 86: 13–17.
224 Ward, B. Journalism ethics and climate change reporting in a period of intense media uncertainty. Ethics Sci Env Politics 2009, 9: 13–15. Available at .
225 The Royal Society, Research Councils UK, and The Wellcome Trust.
Science Communication—Excellence in Communication: Survey of Factors Affecting Science Communication by Scientists and Engineers. London:
The Royal Society; 2006.
226 Reddy, C. Scientist citizens. Science 2009, 323: 1405.
227 Treise, D, Weigold, MF. Advancing science communication: a survey of science communicators. Sci Commun 2002, 23: 310–322.
228 Hartz, J, Chappell, R.
Worlds Apart: How the Distance between Science and Journalism Threatens America`s Future. Nashville, TN:
First Amendment Center; 1997.
229 Hicks, MA, Berger, JG, Generett, GG. From hope to action: creating spaces to sustain transformative habits of mind and heart. Journal of Transformative Education 2005, 3: 57–75.
230 Klockner, CA, Matthies, E. How habits interfere with norm‐directed behaviour: a normative decision‐making model for travel mode choice. Journal of Environmental Psychology 2004, 24: 319–327.
231 Knussen, C, Yule, F. “I`m not in the habit of recycling”: the role of habitual behavior in the disposal of household waste. Environment and Behavior 2008, 40: 683–702.
232 Leiserowitz, A, Maibach, E, Roser‐Renouf, C.
Saving Energy at Home and on the Road: A Survey of Americans` Energy Saving Behaviors, Intentions, Motivations, and Barriers. New Haven, CT and Fairfax, VA:
Yale Project of Climate Change, Yale School of Forestry %26 Environmental Studies and the Center for Climate Change Communication, George Mason University; 2009b.
233 Semenza, JC, Hall, DE, Wilsond, DJ, Bontempo, BD, Sailor, DJ, et al. Public perception of climate change: voluntary mitigation and barriers to behavior change. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2008, 35: 479–487.
234 Lorenzoni, I, Nicholson‐Cole, S, Whitmarsh, L. Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change 2007, 17: 445–459.
235 Farbotko, C. Tuvalu and climate change: constructions of environmental displacement in The Sydney Morning Herald. Geografiska Annaler, Series B: Human Geography 2005, 87: 279–293.
236 Biernacki, W, Bokwa, A, Domański, B, Domañski, J, Janas, K, Pado, T. %22Mass media as a source of information about extreme natural phenomena in Southern Poland%22. In Carvalho, A, ed.
Communicating Climate Change: Discourses, Mediations and Perceptions. Braga:
Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, Universidade do Minho; 2008, 190–200.
237 Cabecinhas, R, Lázaro, A, Carvalho, A. %22Media uses and social representations of climate change%22. In: Carvalho, A, ed.
Communicating Climate Change: Discourses, Mediations and Perceptions. Braga:
Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, Universidade do Minho; 2008, 170–189.
238 Carvalho, A, Pereira, E. %22Communicating climate change in Portugal: a critical analysis of journalism and beyond%22. In: Carvalho, A, ed.
Communicating Climate Change: Discourses, Mediations and Perceptions. Braga:
Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, Universidade do Minho; 2008, 126–156.
239 Ferlini, CR, Crúz‐Mena, J. %22Climate change and the daily press: did we miss the point entirely?%22. In: Carvalho, A, ed.
Communicating Climate Change: Discourses, Mediations and Perceptions. Braga:
Centro de Estudos de Comunicação e Sociedade, Universidade do Minho; 2008, 110–125.