1 A report on the royal commission on vaccination. Nature 1896, 55:15–17.
2 Royal Commission. A Report On Vaccination and Its Results, Based On the Evidence Taken by the Royal Commission During the Years 1889–1897, Vol 1, The Text of the Commission Report. London: New Sydenham Society
3 National Academy of Sciences. Our Study Process: Insuring Independent, Objective Advice. Washington, DC: The National Academy of Sciences
4 Clark, WC, Jaeger, J, von Eijndhoven, J, Dickson, NM, eds. Social Learning Group. Learning to Manage Global Environmental Risks, Vols. 1 and 2: A Comparative History of Social Responses to Climate Change, Ozone Depletion and Acid Rain. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
5 Jasanoff, S. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press
6 Jasanoff, S. %22Acceptable evidence in a pluralistic society.%22 In: Mayo, DG, Hollander, RD, eds. Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press
; 1994, 29–47.
7 Jasanoff, S. Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States. Princeton: Princeton University Press
8 Science and Policy Associates. Joint Climate Project to Address Decision Makers Uncertainties: Report of Findings. Washington, DC: Science and Policy Associates
9 Mayo, DG, Hollander, RD, eds. Acceptable Evidence: Science and Values in Risk Management. Oxford: Oxford University Press
10 Bernabo, JC. %22Communication among scientists, decision‐makers and society: developing policy‐relevant global climate change research.%22 In: Zwerver, S, Van Rompaey, RSAR, Kok, MTJ, Berk, MM, ed. Climate Change Research: Evaluation and Policy Implications. Amsterdam: Elsevier
; 1995, 103–117.
11 Bernabo, JC. %22Improving integrated assessments for applications to decision making.%22 In: Schneider, T, ed. Air Pollution in the 21st Century: Priority Issues and Policy, Studies in Environmental Science 72. Amsterdam: Elsevier
; 1998, 183–197.
12 Patt, AG. Extreme outcomes: the strategic treatment of low probability events in scientific assessments. Risk Decision Policy 1999, 4:1–15.
13 Patt, AG, Assessing model‐based and conflict‐based uncertainty. Global Environ Change 2007, 17:37–46.
14 Sarewitz, D. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Policy 2004, 385–403.
15 Farrell, AE, Jager, J, eds. Designing Processes for the Effective Use of Science in Decisionmaking. Washington, DC: RFF Press
16 Douglas, M. Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London: Routledge Classics
; 2002 (original publication date 1966).
17 Douglas, M, Wildavsky, A. Risk and Culture: Essays on the Selection of Technological and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley: University of California Press
18 Jasanoff, S. Risk Management and Political Culture: A Comparative Study of Science in the Policy Context. New York: Russell Sage Foundation
19 Shrader‐Frechette, K. Risk and Rationality: Philosophical Foundations for Populist Reforms. Berkeley: University of California Press
20 Beck, U. Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications Ltd
21 Slovic, P, ed. The Perception of Risk. Virginia: Earthscan Publications Ltd.
22 Morgan, GM, Fishhoff, B, Bostrom, A, Atman, CJ. Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
23 Morgan, GM, Henrion, M. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
24 Sunstein, CR. Risk and Reason: Safety, Law, and the Environment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
25 Pidgeon, NR, Kasperson, E, Slovic, P, eds. The Social Amplification of Risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
26 Revesz, RL, Livermore, MA. Retaking Rationality: How Cost‐Benefit Analysis Can Better Protect the Environment and Our Health.Oxford: Oxford University Press
27 Oppenheimer, M, O`Neill, BC, Webster, M. Negative learning. Clim Change 2008, 89:155–172.
28 Lempert, R, Nakicenovic, N, Sarewitz, D, Schlesinger, M. Characterizing climate‐change uncertainties for decision‐makers: an editorial essay. Clim Change 2004, 65:1–9.
29 Moss, RH, Schneider, SH. A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
30 Betz, G. Probabilities in climate policy advice: a critical comment. Clim Change 2007, 85:1–9.
31 Kandlikar, M, Risbey, J, Dessai, S. Representing and communicating deep uncertainty in climate‐change assessments. C R Geosci 2005, 337:443–455.
32 Walker, WE, Harremoes, P, Rotmans, J, Van Der Sluijs, JP, Van Asselt, MBA, Janssen, P, Krayer Von Krauss, MP. Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model‐based decision support. Integ Assess 2003, 4:5–17.
33 Schneider, SH. What is ‘dangerous’ climate change? Nature 2001, 411:19–19.
34 Oppenheimer, M, O`Neill, BC, Webster, M, Agrawala, S. The limits of consensus. Science 2007, 317: 1505–1506.
35 Solomon, S, Alley, R, Gregory, J, Lemke, P, Manning, M. A closer look at the IPCC report. Science 2008, 319:409–410.
36 Oppenheimer, M, O`Neill, B, Webster, M, Agrawala, S. A closer look at the IPCC report: response. Science 2008, 319:410.
37 Rahmstorf, S, Cazenave, A, Church, JA, Hansen, JE, Keeling, RF, Parker, DE, Somerville, RCJ. Recent climate observations compared to projections. Science 2007, 316:709.
38 Raupach, MR, Marland, G, Ciais, P, Le Quere, C, Canadell, JG, Klepper, G, Field, CB, Global and regional drivers of accelerating CO2
emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:10288–10293.
39 Pielke, RA. Climate predictions and observations. Nature Geosci 2008, 1:206.
40 Swart, R, Bernstein, L, Ha‐Duong, M, Patersen, A. Agreeing to disagree: uncertainty management in assessing climate change, impacts and responses by the IPCC. Clim Change 2009, 92:1–29.
41 Watson, R. Interview by Keynyn Brysse, 13 March 2009, Norwich, UK. MP3 recording.
42 Pyle, J. Interview by Keynyn Brysse, 17 March 2009, Cambridge, UK. MP3 recording.
43 Tuck, A. Interview by Keynyn Brysse, 24 June 2009, Boulder, Colorado, MP3 recording.
44 Morgan, GM, Cantor, R, Clark, WC, Fisher, A, Jacoby, HD, Janetos, AC, Kinzig, AP, Melillo, J, Street, RB, Wilbanks, TJ, Learning from the US assessment of climate change impacts. Environ Sci Technol 2005, 39:9023–9032.
45 InterAcademy Council. Committee to Review the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change Assessments: Review of The Processes and Procedures of the IPCC
. The Netherlands: Bejo Druk & Print; 2010.
46 Webster, M. Communicating climate change uncertainty to policy‐makers and the public: an editorial comment. Clim Change 2003, 61:1–8.
47 Webster, M. Uncertainty and the IPCC. An editorial comment. Clim Change 2009, 92:37–40.
48 Mastrandrea, MD, Field, CB, Stocker, TF, Edenhofer, O, Ebi, KL, Frame, DJ, Held, H, Kriegler, E, Mach, KJ, Matschoss, PR, et al. Guidance Note for Lead Authors of the IPCC Fifth Assessment Report on Consistent Treatment of Uncertainties. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), 2010.
49 Oreskes, N, Belitz, K. %22Philosophical issues in model assessment.%22 In: Anderson, MG, Bates, PD, eds. Model Validation: Perspectives in Hydrological Science. London: John Wiley and Sons, Ltd.
; 2001, 23–41.
50 Stainforth, DA, Aina, T, Christensen, C, Collins, M, Faull, N, Frame, DJ, Kettleborough, A, Knight, , MSA, Murphy, JM, Piani, C et al. Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature, 2005, 433:403–406.
51 O`Reilly, J, Oppenheimer, M, Oreskes, N. The Rapid Disintegration of Predictions: Climate Change, Bureaucracy, and the West Antarctic Ice Sheet 2011, in press.
52 Jackson, CS, Sen, MK, Huerta, G, Deng, Y, Bowman, KP. Error reduction and convergence in climate prediction. J Clim 2008, 21:6698–6709.
53 Reifen, C, Toumi, R. Climate projections: past performance no guarantee of future skill? Geophys Res Lett 2009, 36:3704.
54 Murphy, J, Sexton, D, Barnett, D, Jones, G, Webb, M, Collins, M, Stainforth, D. Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 2004, 430:768–772.
55 Piani, C, Frame, DJ, Stainforth, DA, Allen, MR. Constraints on climate change from a multithousand member ensemble of simulations. Geophys Rev Lett 2005, L23825.
56 Draper, D. Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty. J R Stat Soc Ser B: Stat Methodol 1995, 57:45–97.
57 Oreskes, N, Shrader‐Frechette, K, Belitz, K. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 1994, 263:641–646.
58 Funtowicz, SO, Ravetz, JR. %22Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of postnormal science.%22 In: Krimsky, S, Golding, D, eds. Social Theories of Risk. Westport, CT: Praeger
; 1992, 251–274.
59 Goldstein, M, Rougier, J. Reified Bayesian modeling and inference for physical systems. J Stat Plann Inf 2009, 139:1221–1239.
60 Lavine, M, Heger, GC, Lozier, S. Discussion of reified Bayesian modeling and inference for physical systems by Michael Goldstein and Jonathan Rougier. J Stat Plann Inf 2009, 139:1243–1245.
61 Metropolis, N. The beginning of the Monte Carlo method. Los Alamos Sci 1987, 125–130.
62 Vose, D. Risk Analysis A: Quantitative Guide. 2nd ed.
West Sussex: John Wiley %26 Sons
63 Kriegler, E, Hall, JW, Held, H, Dawson, R, Schellnhuber, HJ. Imprecise probability assessment of tipping points in the climate system. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 106:5041–5046.
64 Manning, M. The difficulty of communicating uncertainty. Clim Change 2003, 61:9–16.
65 Farman, JC, Gardiner, BG, Shanklin, JD. Large losses of total ozone in Antarctica reveal seasonal ClOx
interaction. Nature 1985, 315:207–210.
66 Molina, MJ, Rowland, FS. Stratospheric sink for chlorofluoromethanes: chlorine atom catalysed destruction of ozone. Nature 1974, 249:810–812.
67 World Meteorological Organization. Atmospheric Ozone 1985: Assessment of Our Understanding of the Processes Controlling its Present Distribution and Change. 3 Vols. Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project—Report No. 16. WMO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1986.
68 Rowland, FS. Chlorofluorocarbons and the depletion of stratospheric ozone. Am Sci 1989, 77:36–45.
69 J Geophys Res: Atmos
1989, 94:D9, D14. These special issues, published on 30 August and 30 November respectively, include 62 papers describing results from various expeditions to investigate Antarctic ozone depletion in 1986 and 1987.
70 National Aeronautics and Space Administration, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Science Foundation, Chemical Manufacturers Association. Chile September 30, 1987, Fact Sheet: Initial findings from Punta Arenas. Available at: http://cloud1.arc.nasa.gov/aaoe/project/statement.html
. (Accessed Online January 7, 2011).
71 Roan, S. Ozone Crisis: The 15‐Year Evolution of a Sudden Global Emergency. New York: John Wiley %26 Sons
; 1989 270.
72 Halvorson, T. An alarming and mysterious “hole” in Antarctica`s protective ozone shield is getting worse and may have global ramifications, a group of scientists reported Wednesday. USA Today
30 September 1987.
73 National Academy of Sciences, Panel on Atmospheric Chemistry. Halocarbons: Effects on Stratospheric Ozone. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
74 Cadle, RD, Crutzen, P, Ehhalt, D. Heterogeneous chemical reactions in the stratosphere. J Geophys Res 1975, 24:3381–3385.
75 Krishnan, PN, Salomon, RE. Solubility of hydrogen chloride in ice. J Phys Chem 1969, 73:2680–2683.
76 McElroy, MB, Salawitch, RJ, Wofsy, SC, Logan, JA. Reductions of Antarctic ozone due to synergistic interactions of chlorine and bromine. Nature 1986, 321:759–762.
77 Molina, MJ, Tso, T, Molina, LT, Wang, FC. Antarctic stratospheric chemistry of chlorine nitrate, hydrogen chloride, and ice: release of active chlorine. Science 1987, 238:1253–1257.
78 Rowland, FS. Interview by Keynyn Brysse, 5 March 2009, Irvine: California, MP3 recording.
79 Ha‐Duong, M, Megie, G, Hauglustaine, D. A pro‐active stratospheric ozone protection scenario. Global Environ Change 2003, 13:43–49.
80 Crutzen, P, Oppenheimer, M. Learning about ozone depletion. Clim Change 2008, 89:143–154.
81 Oreskes, N. %22Reconciling representation with reality: unitisation as an example for science and public policy%22. In: Lentsch, J, Weingart, P, eds. The Politics of Science Advice: Institutional Design for Quality Assurance Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
; 2011, 37–53.
82 Parson, EA. Protecting the Ozone Layer: Science and Strategy. Oxford: Oxford University Press
83 Wuebbles, DJ. Chlorocarbon emission scenarios: potential impact on stratospheric ozone. J Geophys Res 1983, 88:1433–1443.
84 World Meteorological Organization. Scientific Assessment of Stratospheric Ozone: 1989, 2 Vols. Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project—Report No. 20. WMO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1989.
85 Hoffman, JS, Gibbs, MJ. Future Concentrations of Stratospheric Chlorine and Bromine. EPA Report 400/1‐88/005. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air and Radiation, Washington, DC, 1988.
86 Daniel, JS, Solomon, S, Albritton, DL. On the evaluation of halocarbon radiative forcing and global warming potentials. J Geophys Res 1995, 100:1271–1285.
87 World Meteorological Organization. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 2006, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project—Report No. 50. WMO, Geneva, Switzerland, 2006.
88 Norman, C. Satellite data indicate ozone depletion. Science 1981, 213:1088–1089.
89 World Meteorological Organization. Report of the International Ozone Trends Panel 1988, 2 Vols. Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project—Report No. 18. WMO, Geneva, Switzerland, 1988.
90 Stolarski, RS, Butler, DM, Rundel, RD. Uncertainty propagation in a stratospheric model 2: Monte Carlo analysis of imprecisions due to reaction rates. J Geophys Res 1978, 83:3074–3078.
91 Stolarski, RS, Douglass, AR. Parameterization of the photochemistry of stratospheric ozone including catalytic loss processes. J Geophys Res 1985, 90:10709–10718.
92 World Meteorological Organization. The Stratosphere 1981, Theory and Measurements. WMO Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project—Report No. 11. Geneva, Switzerland, 1981.
93 World Meteorological Organization. Scientific Assessment of Ozone Depletion: 1991, Global Ozone Research and Monitoring Project—Report No. 25. Geneva, Switzerland, 1991.
94 Committee on Models in the Regulatory Decision Process. Models in Environmental Regulatory Decision Making
. Washington, DC: National Academy of Sciences–National Research Council, Board on Environmental Studies and Toxicology; 2007.
95 American Association for the Advancement of Science. The Conference of the American Association for the Advancement of Science Studying the Response of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet to CO2‐Induced Climatic Warming
. University of Maine at Orono, 8–10 April 1980.
96 Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee (CDAC). Increasing Carbon Dioxide and the West Antarctic Ice Sheet: Notes on an Informal Workshop, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, 1982.
97 Mercer, JH. Antarctic ice and Sangamon sea level. Int Assoc Sci Hydrol Symp 1968, 79:217–225.
98 Mercer, JH. West Antarctic ice sheet and CO2
greenhouse effect: a threat of disaster. Nature 1978, 271:321–325.
99 Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee (CDAC). Changing Climate: Report of the Carbon Dioxide Assessment Committee. Washington, DC: National Academy Press
100 President`s Science Advisory Committee (PSAC). Restoring the Quality of Our Environment. Report of the Environmental Pollution Panel. Washington, DC: The White House
101 Houghton, JT, Ding, Y, Griggs, DJ, Noguer, M, van der Linden, PJ, Dai, X, Maskell, K, Johnson, CA, eds. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2001: The Scientific Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
102 Solomon, S, Qin, D, Manning, M, Chen, Z, Marquis, M, Averyt, KB, Tignor, M, Miller, HL, eds. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
103 Schneider, SH. Science as a Contact Sport: Inside the Battle to Save Earth`s Climate Washington, DC: National Geographic
104 Milne, GA, Gehrels, WR, Hughes, CW, Tamisiea, ME. Identifying the causes of sea‐level change Published online: 14 June 2009, doi:10.1038/ngeo544
105 Pfeffer, WT, Harper, JT, O`Neel, S. Kinematic constraints on glacier contributions to 21st‐ century sea level rise. Science 2008, 321:1340
106 Rahmstorf, S. A semi‐empirical approach to projecting future sea‐level rise. Science 2007, 315:368–370.
107 Rignot, E. Changes in West Antarctic ice stream dynamics observed with ALOS PALSAR data. Geophys Res Lett 2008, 35:L12505.
108 Velicogna, I. Increasing rates of ice mass loss from the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets revealed by GRACE. Geophys Res Lett 2009, 36:L19503.
109 Vermeer, M, Rahmstorf, S. Global sea level linked to global temperature. Proc Natl Acad Sci 2009, 106:21527–21532.
110 Wingham, DJ, Wallis, DW, Shepherd, A. Spatial and temporal evolution of Pine Island Glacier thinning, 1995–2006. Geophys Res Lett 2009, 36:L17501.
111 Oreskes, N. The Rejection of Continental Drift. Oxford: Oxford University Press
112 Vaughan, D. The Challenger Launch Decision. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
113 Eden, L. Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge, and Nuclear Weapons Devastation. Ithaca, NY, London: Cornell University Press
114 Tetlock, PE. Theory‐driven reasoning about plausible pasts and probable futures in world politics: are we prisoners of our own preconceptions? Am J Polit Sci 1999, 43:335–366.
115 Galison, P. How Experiments End. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press
116 Petroski, H. To Engineer Is Human: The Role of Failure in Successful Design Knopf. New York: Doubleday
117 Petroski, H. Idem Design Paradigms: Case Histories of Error and Judgment in Engineering. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
118 Oreskes, N, LeGrand, HE, eds. Plate Tectonics: An Insider`s History of the Modern Theory of the Earth. Boulder: Westview Press