This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Clim Change
Impact Factor: 3.462

The legacy of climategate: revitalizing or undermining climate science and policy?

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

The release of emails from a server at the University of East Anglia's Climate Research Unit (CRU) in November 2009 and the following climategate controversy have become a topic for interpretation in the social sciences. This article picks out some of the most visible social science comments on the affair for discussion. These comments are compared to an account of what can be seen as problematic practices by climate scientists. There is general agreement in these comments that climate science needs more openness and transparency. But when evaluating climategate a variety of responses is seen, ranging from the apologetic to the highly critical, even condemning the practices in question. It is argued that reluctance to critically examine the climategate affair, including suspect practices of scientists, has to do with the nature of the debate which is highly politicized. A call is made for more reflection on this case which should not be closed off because of political expediency. WIREs Clim Change 2012 doi: 10.1002/wcc.166

Browse by Topic

The Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge
blog comments powered by Disqus

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts

Twitter: earth_wise Follow us on Twitter

    Today the @IMA2014RSA starts - discover the Journal of Metamorphic Geology, with an impact factor of 4.374: http://t.co/QqoV7H9nom
    Today marks the first day of the British Society for Geomorphology annual meeting! #BSG_2014
    RT @ProfPHaygarth: We are looking for two new Editors for our great EJSS Journal @Soil_Science - please pass on http://t.co/4TjrOPiy3p than…