National Academy of Public Administration (NAPA). Building Strong for Tomorrow: NOAA Climate Service. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy of Public Administration; 2010, 116.
World Meteorological Organization (WMO). Climate Knowledge for Action: A Global Framework for Climate Services—Empowering the Most Vulnerable. Geneva, Switzerland: World Meteorological Organization; 2011, 248.
U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP). The National Global Change Research Plan: 2012–2021. A Report by the U.S. Global Change Research Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Washington, DC, USA: U.S. Global Change Research Program; 2012. Available at http://library.globalchange.gov/u‐s‐global‐change‐research‐program‐strategic‐plan‐2012‐2021.
Dessai, S, Hulme, M, Lempert, R, Pielke, R Jr. %22Climate prediction: a limit to adaptation?%22 In: Adger, WN, Lorenzoni, I, O`Brien, KL, eds. Adapting to Climate Change: Thresholds, Values, Governance. Cambridge, UK: University Press; 2009.
Meyer, R. The public values failures of climate science in the US. Minerva 2011, 49:47–70. doi:10.1007/ s11024‐011‐9164‐4.
Shapiro, M, Shukla, J, Brunet, G, Nobre, C, Beland, M, Dole, R, Trenberth, K, Anthes, R, Asrar, G, Barrie, L, et al. An earth‐system prediction initiative for the twenty‐first century. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2010, 91: 1377–1388.
Piao, S., Ciais, P., Huang, Y., Shen, Z., Peng, S., Li, J., Zhou, L., Liu, H., Ma, Y., Ding, Y., et al. The impact of climate change on water resources and agriculture in China. Nature 2010, 467:43–51.
Barron, EJ. Beyond climate science. Science 2009, 326:643.
Collins, M. Ensembles and probabilities: a new era in the prediction of climate change. Phil Trans R Soc A 2007, 365:1957–1970.
Goddard, L, Baethgen, W, Kirtman, B, Meehl, G. The urgent need for improved climate models and predictions. EOS 2009, 90:39.
Doherty, SJ, Bojinski, S, Henderson‐Sellers, A, Noone, K, Goodrich, D, Bindoff, NL, Church, JA, Hibbard, KA, Karl, TR, Kajfez‐Bogataj, L, et al. Lessons learned from IPCC AR4: Scientific developments needed to understand, predict, and respond to climate change. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2009, 90:497–513.
Shukla, J, Hagedorn, R, Hoskins, B, Kinter, J, Marotzke, J, Miller, M, Palmer, TN, Slingo, J. Revolution in climate prediction is both necessary and possible: A declaration at the World Modelling Summit for Climate Prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2009, 90:175–178.
Cox, P, Stephenson, D. A changing climate for prediction. Science 2007, 317:207–208.
Hurrell, J, Meehl, GA, Bader, D, Delworth, TL, Kirtman, B, Wielicki, B. A unified approach to climate system prediction. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2009, 90:1819–1832.
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007: Climate change. In: Solomon, S, Qin, D, Manning, M, Chen, Z, Marquis, M, Averyt, KB, Tignor, M, Miller, HL, eds. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis: Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press; 2007, 996.
Parson, E, Burkett, V, Fisher‐Vanden, K, Keith, D, Mearns, L, Pitcher, H, Rosenzweig, C, Webster, M. Global Change Scenarios: Their Development and Use. Sub‐report 2.1B of Synthesis and Assessment Product 2.1 by the U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. Washington, DC, USA: Department of Energy, Office of Biological %26 Environmental Research; 2007, 106.
Morgan, MG, Keith, DW. Improving the way we think about projecting future energy use and emissions of carbon dioxide. Clim Change 2008, 90:189–215.
Bray, D, von Storch, H. “Prediction” or “projection”? The nomenclature of climate science. Sci Commun 2009, 30:534–543. doi:10.1177/1075547009333698
Lemos, MC, Rood, RB. Climate projections and their impact on policy and practice. WIREs Clim Change 2010, 1:670–682.
Rosentrater, LD. Representing and using scenarios for responding to climate change. WIREs Clim Change 2010, 1:253–259.
Rubino, A. What will a new generation of world climate research and computing facilities bring to climate long‐term predictions? Theor Appl Climatol 2011, 106: 473–479. doi:10.1007/s00704‐011‐0448‐2.
Smith, LA, Stern, N. Uncertainty in science and its role in climate policy. Phil Trans R Soc A 2011, 369: 4818–4841.
Hulme, M, Dessai, S. Predicting, deciding, learning: can one evaluate the ‘success’ of national climate scenarios? Environ Res Lett 2008, 3:045013.
Randall, DA, Wood, RA, Bony, S, Colman, R, Fichefet, T, Fyfe, J, Kattsov, V, Pitman, A, Shukla, J, Srinivasan, J, et al. %222007: Cilmate models and their evaluation.%22 In: Solomon, S, Qin, D, Manning, M, Chen, Z, Marquis, M, Averyt, KB, Tignor, M, Miller, HL, eds. Climate Change 2007: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 2007.
Randall, D, Khairoutdinov, M, Arakawa, A, Grabowski, W. Breaking the cloud parameterization deadlock. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2003, 84:1547–1564.
Stephens, GL, L`Ecuyer, T, Forbes, R, Gettlemen, A, Golaz, JC, Bodas‐Salcedo, A, Suzuki, K, Gabriel, P, Haynes, J. Dreary state of precipitation in global models. J Geophys Res 2010, 115:D24211. doi:10.1029/ 2010JD014532.
Liepert, BG, Previdi, M. Inter‐model variability and biases of the global water cycle in CMIP3 coupled climate models. Environ Res Lett 2012, 7: doi:10. 1088/1748‐9326/7/1/014006.
Shukla, J. Monsoon mysteries. Science 2007, 318:204–205.
Kidston, J, Gerber, EP. Intermodel variability of the poleward shift of the austral jet stream in the CMIP3 integrations linked to biases in 20th century climatology. Geophys Res Lett 2010, 37:L09708. doi:10.1029/2010GL042873.
Neale, R, Richter, JH, Jochum, M. The impact of convection on ENSO: from a delayed oscillator to a series of events. J Clim 2008, 21:5904–5924.
Hirsch, RM. A perspective on nonstationarity and water management. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2011, 47:436–446.
Castro, CL, Pielke, RA Sr, Leoncini, G. Dynamical downscaling: assessment of value retained and added using the Regional Atmospheric Modeling System (RAMS). J Geophys Res 2005, 110:D05108. doi:10.1029/2004/D004721.
Pielke, RA Sr, Wilby, RL. Regional climate downscaling: what`s the point? EOS 2012, 93:52–53.
Navarra, A, Kinter, JL III, Tribbia, J. Crucial experiments in climate science. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2010, 91:343–352.
Giorgi, F. Climate change prediction. Clim Change 2005, 73:239–265.
Dessai, S, Hulme, M. Does climate adaptation policy need probabilities? Clim Policy 2004, 4:107–128.
Hawkins, E, Sutton, R. The potential to narrow uncertainty in regional climate predictions. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2009, 90:1095–1107.
Pielke, RA Sr, Pitman, A, Niyogi, D, Mahmood, R, McAlpine, C, Hossain, F, Klein, K, Golewijk, U, Nair, R, Betts, S, et al. Land use/land cover changes and climate: modeling analysis and observational evidence. WIREs Clim Change 2011, 2:828–850.
Palmer, TN, Alessandri, A, Andersen, U, Cantelaube, P, Davey, M, Delecluse, P, Deque, M, Diez, E, Doblas‐Reyes, FJ, Feddersen, H, et al. Development of a European multimodel ensemble system for seasonal‐to‐interannual prediction (DEMETER). Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2004, 85:853–872.
Boer, GJ, Lambert, SJ. Multi‐model decadal potential predictability of precipitation and temperature. Geophys Res Lett 2008, 35:L05706. doi:10.1029/2008GL033234.
Hargreaves, JC. Skill and uncertainty in climate models. WIREs Clim Change 2010, 1:556–564.
Raisanen, J. How reliable are climate models? Tellus 2007, 59A:2–29..
Knutti, R. The end of model democracy? Clim Change 2010. doi:10.1007/s10584‐010‐9800‐2.
Stainforth, DA, Allen, MR, Tredger, ER, Smith, LA. Confidence, uncertainty, and decision‐support relevance in climate predictions. Phil Trans R Soc A 2007a, 365: 2145–2161.
Stainforth, DA, Downing, TE, Washington, R, Lopez, A, New, M. Issues in the interpretation of climate model ensembles to inform decisions. Phil Trans R Soc A 2007b, 365:2163–2177.
Rastetter, EB. Validating models of ecosystem response to global change. BioScience 1996, 46:190–198.
Boer, GJ. Changes in interannual variability and decadal potential predictability under global warming. J Clim 2009, 22:3098–3109.
Reifen, C, Toumi, R. Climate projections: past performance no guarantee of future skill. Geophys Res Lett 2009, 36:L13704. doi:10.1029/2009GL038082.
Macadam, I, Pitman, AJ, Whetton, PH, Abramowitz, G. Ranking climate models by performance using actual values and anomalies: Implications for climate change impact assessments. Geophys Res Lett 2010, 37:L16704. doi:10.1029/2010GL043877.
Wilby, RL. Evaluating climate model outputs for hydrological applications—opinion. Hydrol Sci J 2010, 55:1090–1093.
Hagedorn, R, Doblas‐Reyes, FJ, Palmer, TN. The rationale behind the success of multi‐model ensembles in seasonal forecasting—I. Basic concept. Tellus 2005, 57A:219–233.
Gleckler, PJ, Taylor, KE, Doutriaux, C. Performance metrics for climate models. J Geophys Res 2008, 113:D06104. doi:10.1029/2007JD008972.
Weigel, AP, Knutti, R, Liniger, MA, Appenzeller, C. Risks of model weighting in multimodel climate projections. J Clim 2010, 23:4175–4191.
Schaller, N, Mahlstein, I, Cernak, J, Knutti, R. Analyzing precipitation projections: a comparison of different approaches to climate model evaluation. J Geophys Res 2011, 116:D10118. doi:10.1029/2010JD014963.
Pirtle, Z, Meyer, R, Hamilton, A. What does it mean when climate models agree? A case for assessing independence among general circulation models. Environ Sci Policy 2010, 13:351–361. doi:10.1016/j.envsci.2010.04.004.
Knutti, R, Abramowitz, G, Collins, M, Eyring, V, Gleckler, PJ, Hewitson, B, Mearns, L. %22Good practice guidance paper on assessing and combining multi model climate projections.%22 In: Stocker, TF, Qin, D, Plattner, GK, Tignor, M, Midgley, PM, eds. Meeting Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Expert Meeting on Assessing and Combining Multi Model Climate Projections. Bern, Switzerland: IPCC Working Group I Technical Support Unit, University of Bern; 2010.
Keenlyside, NS, Ba, J. Prospects for decadal climate prediction. WIREs Clim Change 2010, 1:627–635.
Murphy, JM, Sexton, DMH, Barnett, DN, Jones, GS, Webb, MJ, Collins, M, Stainforth, DA. Quantification of modeling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 2004, 430:768–772.
Stainforth, DA, Aina, T, Christensen, C, Collins, M, Faull, N, Frame, DJ, Kettleborough, JA, Knight, S, Martin, A, Murphy, JM, et al. Uncertainty in predictions of the climate response to rising levels of greenhouse gases. Nature 2005, 433:403–406.
Stott, PA Forest, CE. Ensemble climate predictions using climate models and observational constraints. Phil Trans R Soc Lond 2007, 365A:2029–2052.
Roe, GH, Baker, MB. Why is climate sensitivity so unpredictable? Science 2007, 318:629–632.
Lemoine, DM. Climate sensitivity distributions dependence on the possibility that models share biases J Clim 2010, 23:4395–4415.
Pennell, C, Reichler, T. 2011 On the effective number of climate models J Clim 24: 2358–2367.
Weitzman, ML. On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change Rev Econ Stat 2009, 91:1–19.
National Research Council (NRC). Informing Decisions in a Changing Climate. Panel on Strategies and Methods for Climate‐Related Decision Support, Committee on the Human Dimensions of Global Change. Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press; 2009, 188.
Cash, DW, Borck, JC, Patt, AG. Countering the loading‐dock approach to linking science and decision making: comparative analysis of El Nino/Southern Oscillation (ENSO) forecasting systems Sci Tech Hum Val 2006, 31:465–494.
Cash, DW, Clark, WC, Alcock, F, Dickson, NM, Eckley, N, Guston, DH, Jager, J, Mitchell, RB. Knowledge systems for sustainable development Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:8086–8091.
Guston, DH. Stabilizing the boundary between politics and science: the role of the office of technology transfer as a boundary organization Social Stud Sci 1999, 1:87–111.
Farrell, A, VanDeveer, SD, Jager, J. Environmental assessments: four under‐appreciated elements of design. Glob Environ Change 2001, 11:311–333.
Fischhoff, B. What forecasts (seem to) mean. Int J Forecast 1994, 10:387–403.
In: Sarewitz, D, Pielke, RA Jr. Byerly, R Jr, eds. Prediction: Science, Decision Making, and the Future of Nature. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2000, 405. pp.
Pielke, RA Jr, Conant, RT. Best practices in prediction for decision‐making: lessons from the atmospheric and earth sciences. Ecology 2003, 84:1351–1358.
Sarewitz, D, Pielke, RA Jr. The neglected heart of science policy: Reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environ Sci Policy 2007, 10:5–16.
Changnon, SA, Kunkel, KE. Rapidly expanding uses of climate data and information in agriculture and water resources: causes and characteristics of new applications. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 1999, 80:821–830.
Jacobs, K, Garfin, G, Lenart, M. More than just talk: connecting science and decision‐making. Environment 2005, 47:8–21.
Rayner, S, Lach, D, Ingram, H. Weather forecasts are for wimps: why water resource managers do not use climate forecasts. Clim Change 2005, 69:197–227.
Miles, EL, Snover, AK, Whitely Binder, LC, Sarachik, ES, Mote, PW, Mantua, N. An approach to designing a national climate service. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2006, 103:19616–19623.
Vogel, C, O`Brien, K. Who can eat information? Examining the effectiveness of seasonal climate forecasts and regional climate risk‐management strategies. Clim Res 2006, 33:111–122.
Lemos, MC. What influences innovation adoption by water managers? Climate information use in Brazil and the US. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2008, 44: 1388–1396.
Baethgen, WE, Carriquiry, M, Ropelewski, C. Tilting the odds in maize yields. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2009, 90:179–183.
Ziervogel, G, Johnston, P, Matthew, M, Mukheibir, P. Using climate information for supporting climate change adaptation in water resource management in South Africa. Clim Change 2010, 103:537–554.
Buizer, J, Jacobs, K, Cash, D. Making short‐term climate forecasts useful: linking science and action. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010. doi:10.1073/pnas.0900518107.
Moser, SC, Luers, AL. Managing climate risks in California: the need to engage resource managers for successful adaptation to change. Clim Change 2008, 87: S309–S322.
Johnson, TE, Weaver, CP. A framework for assessing climate change impacts on water and watershed systems. Environ Manag 2009, 43:118–134.
Matthews, JH, Wickel, AJ. Embracing uncertainty in freshwater climate change adaptation: a natural history approach. Clim Dev 2009, 1:269–279.
Gober, P, Kirkwood, CW, Balling, RC Jr, Ellis, AW, Deitrick, S. Water planning under climatic uncertainty in Phoenix: Why we need a new paradigm. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2010, 100:356–372.
White, . DD, Wutich, A, Larson, KL, Gober, P, Lant, T, Senneville, C. Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: water managers` assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater. Sci Pub Policy 2010, 34:219–232.
Reid, WV, Chen, D, Goldfarb, L, Hackmann, H, Lee, YT, Mokhele, K, Ostrom, E, Raivio, K, Rockstrom, J, Schnellnhuber, HJ, et al. Earth system science for global sustainability: grand challenges. Science 2010, 330:916–917.
New, M, Cuellar, M, Lopez, A. Probabilistic regional and local climate projections: False dawn for impacts assessment and adaptation. In: IPCC TGICA Expert Meeting ‘Integrating Analysis of Regional Climate Change and Response Options’. Meeting Report. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change; 2010.
Lempert, R, Nakicenovic, N, Sarewitz, D, Schlesinger, M. Characterizing climate‐change uncertainties for decision‐makers. Clim Change 2004, 65:1–9.
Morgan, MG, Henrion, M. Uncertainty: A Guide to Dealing with Uncertainty in Quantitative Risk and Policy Analysis. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1990, 346.
Lempert, RJ, Groves, DG, Popper, SW, Bankes, SC. A general, analytic method for generating robust strategies and narrative scenarios. Manage Sci 2006, 52: 514–528.
Polasky, S, Carpenter, SR, Folke, C, Keeler, B. Decision‐making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change. Trends Ecol Evol 2011, 26:398–404.
Hall, J. Probabilistic climate scenarios may misrepresent uncertainty and lead to bad adaptation decisions. Hydrol Proc 2007, 21:1127–1129.
Ranger, N, Millner, A, Dietz, S, Fankhauser, S, Lopez, A, Ruta, G. Adaptation in the UK: A Decision‐Making Process. Policy brief, Centre for Climate Change Economics and Policy, Leeds and London, UK; 2010.
Brown, C. The end of reliability. ASCE J Wat Res Plann Manage 2010, 2:146–148.
Brown, C, Ghile, Y, Laverty, M, Li, K. Decision scaling: Linking bottom‐up vulnerability analysis with climate projections in water sector. Water Resour Res 48:1–12 doi:10.1029/ 2011WR011212.
Brown, C, Werick, W, Leger, W, Fay, D. A decision‐analytic approach to managing climate risks: application to the Upper Great Lakes. J Am Water Resour Assoc 2011, 47:524–534.
Carter, TR, Jones, RN, Lu, SBX, Conde, C, Mearns, LO, O`Neill, BC, Rounsevell, MDA, Zurek, MB. %22New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions.%22 In: Parry, ML, Canziani, OF, Palutikof, JP, Linden, P. J. v. d., Hanson, CE, eds. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007, 33–171.
Dessai, S, Hulme, M. Assessing the robustness of adaptation decisions to climate change uncertainties: a case study on water resources management in the East of England. Glob Environ Change 2007, 17:59–72.
Wilby, RL, Dessai, S. Robust adaptation to climate change. Weather 2010, 65:180–185.
Groves, DG, Lempert, RJ. A new analytic method for finding policy‐relevant scenarios. Glob Environ Change 2007, 17:73–85.
Lempert, RJ, Collins, MT. Managing the risk of uncertain threshold responses: Comparison of robust, optimum, and precautionary approaches. Risk Anal 2007, 27:1009–1026.
Lempert, RJ, Groves, DG. Identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for water management agencies in the American west. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2010, 77:960–974.
Lempert, RJ, Sriver, RL, Keller, K. Characterizing Uncertain Sea Level Rise Projections to Support Investment Decisions. Prepared for California Energy Commission Public Interest Energy Research Program; 2012.
Hall, J, Lempert, RJ, Keller, K, Hackbarth, A, Mijere, C, McInerney, DJ. Robust climate policies under uncertainty: a comparison of robust decision making and Info‐gap methods. Risk Anal 2012, 32:1657–1672. doi:10.1111/j1539‐6924.2012.01802.x.
Ben‐Haim, Y. Information‐Gap Decision Theory: Decisions under Severe Uncertainty. New York, NY, USA: Academic Press; 2001.
US Climate Change Program (CCSP). Best practice approaches for characterizing, communicating, and incorporating scientific uncertainty in decisionmaking. In: Morgan, M, Dowlatabadi, H, Henrion, M, Keith, D, Lempert, R, McBride, S, Small, M, Wilbanks, T, eds. U.S. Climate Change Science Program and the Subcommittee for Global Change Research, Washington, DC.
Ravetz, JR. %22Models as metaphors.%22 In: Kasemir, B, Jager, J, Jaeger, CC, Gardner, MT, eds. Public Participation in Sustainability Science. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2003, 62–78.
Oreskes, N, Shrader‐Frechette, K, Belitz, K. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 1994, 263:641–646.
Demeritt, D. The construction of global warming and the politics of science. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2001, 91: 307–337.
Sterman, JD. Risk communication on climate: mental models and mass balance. Science 2008, 322: 532–533.
Sterman, JD. All models are wrong: Reflections on becoming a systems scientist. Syst Dyn Rev 2002, 18: 501–531.
Oreskes, N. %22Why predict? Historical perspectives on prediction in earth science.%22 In: Sarewitz, D, Pielke, RA Jr, Byerly, R Jr, eds. Prediction: Science, Decision Making, and the Future of Nature. Washington, DC: Island Press; 2000, 405.
Bankes, S. Exploratory modeling for policy analysis. Oper Res 1993, 41:435–449.
Jones, RN. An environmental risk assessment/ management framework for climate change impact assessments. Nat Hazards 2001, 23:197–230.
Brekke, LD, Maurer, EP, Anderson, JD, Dettinger, MD, Townsley, ES, Harrison, A, Pruitt, T. Assessing reservoir operations risk under change. Water Resour Res 2009, 45:W04411. doi:10.1029/2008WR006941.
Pielke, RA Sr. Ben, K, Brasseur, G, Calvert, J, Chahine, M, Dickerson, RR, Entekhabi, D, Foufoula‐Georgiou, E, Gupta, H, Krajewski, W, et al. Climate change: the need to consider human forcings besides greenhouse gases. EOS 2009, 90:413.
West, JM, Julius, SH, Kareiva, P, Enquist, C, Lawler, JJ, Petersen, B, Johnson, AE, Shaw, MR. US natural resources and climate change: concepts and approaches for management adaptation. Environ Manag 2009, 44:1001–1021.
Lempert, R, Kalra, N. Managing climate risks in developing countries with Robust Decision Making. World Resources Report. Washington, DC, 2012. Available at: http://www.worldresourcesreport.org.
McDaniels, T, Mills, T, Gregory, R, Ohlson, D. Using expert judgments to explore robust alternatives for forest management under climate change. Risk Anal 2012. doi:10.1111/j1539‐6924.2012.01822.
Schwartz, P. The Art of the Long View—Planning for the Future in an Uncertain World. New York, NY: Currency‐Doubleday; 1996.
Lempert, RJ. Scenarios that illuminate vulnerabilities and robust responses. Clim Change 2012. In press.
Milly, PCD, Betancourt, J, Falkenmark, M, Hirsch, RM, Kundzewicz, ZW, Lettenmaier, DP, Stoffer, RJ. Stationarity is dead: Whither water management? Science 2008, 319:573–574.
Inland Empire Utilities Agency (IEUA). Regional Urban Water Management Plan. Chino, CA.: Inland Empire Utilities Agency; 2005.
Groves, DG, Yates, D, Tebaldi, C. Developing and applying uncertain global climate change projections for regional water management planning. Water Resour Res 2008, 44:W12413. doi:10.1029/2008WR006964.
Yates, D, Purkey, D, Sieber, J, Huber‐Lee, A, Galbraith, H. WEAP21—a demand‐, priority‐, and preference‐driven water planning model: part 1. Water Int 2005, 30:487–500.
Bryant, BP, Lempert, RJ. Thinking inside the box: a participatory, computer‐assisted approach to scenario discovery. Technol Forecast Soc Change 2010, 77:34–49.
Millner, A. Climate prediction for adaptation: who needs what?. Clim Change 2012, 110:143–167.
National Research Council (NRC). Abrupt Climate Change: Inevitable Surprises. Washington, DC, USA: National Academies Press; 2002.
Schneider, SH, Semenov, S, Patwardhan, A, Burton, I, Magadza, CHD, Oppenheimer, M, Pittock, AB, Rahman, A, Smith, JB, Suarez, A, et al. %22Assessing key vulnerabilities and the risk from climate change.%22 In: Parry, ML, Canziani, OF, Palutikof, JP, van der Linden, PJ, Hanson, CE, eds. Climate Change 2007: Impacts, Adaptation and Vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 2007, 779–810.
Keller, K, Schlesigner, M, Yohe, G. Managing the risk of climate thresholds: uncertainties and information needs. Clim Change 2008, 91:5–10.
Lenton, TM, Held, H, Kriegler, E, Hall, JW, Lucht, W, Rahmstorf, S, Schellnhuber, HJ. Tipping elements in the Earth`s climate system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:1786–1793.
Milne, GA, Gehrels, WR, Hughes, CW, Tamisiea, ME. Identifying the causes of sea‐level change. Nat Geosci 2009, 2:471–478.
Cayan, DR, Bromirski, PD, Hayhoe, K, Tyree, M, Dettinger, MD, Flick, RE. Climate change projections of sea level extremes along the California coast. Clim Change 2008, 87:S57–S73.
Pollard, D. A retrospective look at coupled ice sheet‐climate modeling. Clim Change 2010, 100:173–194.
Rosenzweig, C. Climate Change Adaptation in New York City: Building a Risk Management Response. New York: 2010.
Oppenheimer, M, O`Neill, BC, Webster, M, Agrawala, S. The limits of consensus. Science 2007, 317: 1505–1506.
Rahmstorf, S. A new view on sea level rise. Nat Rep Clim Change 2010, 4:44–45.
Pfeffer, WT, Harper, JT, O`Neel, S. Kinematic constraints on glacier contributions to 21st‐century sea‐level rise. Science 2008, 321:1340–1343.
Co‐CAT. State of California Sea‐Level Rise Interim Report, edited, Coastal and Ocean Working Group of the California Action Team, 2010. Available at: www.opc.ca.gov/webmaster/ftp/project…/SLR_Guidance_Document.pdf.
Rahmstorf, S. A semi‐empirical approach to projecting future sea‐level rise. Science 2007, 315:368–370.
Wilby, RL. Wells of wisdom. Nat Clim Change 2011, 1:302–303.
Prudhomme, C, Wilby, RL, Crooks, S, Kay, AL, Reynard, NS. Scenario‐neutral approach to climate change impact studies: application to flood risk. J Hydrol 2011, 390:198–209.
Held, IM. The gap between simulation and understanding in climate modeling. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 2005, 86:1609–1614.
U.S. Global Change Research Program (USGCRP). Scenarios for Research and Assessment of Our Climate Future: Issues and Methodological Perspectives for the U.S. National Climate Assessment. National Climate Assessment Report Series: Volume 6. U.S. Global Change Research Program, Washington, DC, USA, 2011. Available at: http://library.globalchange.gov/national‐climate‐assessment‐scenarios‐for‐research‐and‐assessment‐of‐our‐climate‐future
Revell, DL, Battalio, R, Spear, B, Ruggiero, P, Vandever, J. A methodology for predicting future coastal hazards due to sea‐level rise on the California Coast. Clim Change 2011, 109:S251–S276. doi:10.1007/s10584‐011‐0315‐2.
Murphy, JM, Booth, BBB, Collins, M, Harris, GR, Sexton, DMH, Webb, MJ. A methodology for probabilistic predictions of regional climate change from perturbed physics ensembles. Phil Trans R Soc A 2007, 365:1993–2028.