Home
This Title All WIREs
WIREs RSS Feed
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Clim Change
Impact Factor: 4.571

Climate change and International River Boundaries: fixed points in shifting sands

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

The impacts of climate change will have far reaching consequences for transboundary water resources, particularly through the effects of changing frequency and intensity of extreme events, such as floods and their impacts on river channel systems. Watercourses have been used as boundaries throughout history for a variety of reasons, and as both a natural resource and political structure, they present a number of unique challenges. Despite academic studies looking broadly at the effects of changes in runoff on river ecosystems and their resources, less attention has been paid to the socio‐political interactions and consequences for river functionality, in particular, as a boundary. We review the historical and legal role of International River Boundaries highlighting the paradox that exists between the stability needed for a boundary and the dynamism of fluvial landscapes in a changing climate. We draw attention to the fact that geopolitical concerns exist at other unstable border situations, such as ice‐covered boundaries and lakes. We examine the knowledge gaps that exist in relation to understanding the physical impacts of climate change on terrestrial earth systems. We present an exploratory analysis of physical and political risk in Southern Africa that highlights two cases of potential risk. The paper ends with a discussion of actions to address the physical and social dimensions of this strategic issue. WIREs Clim Change 2014, 5:835–848. doi: 10.1002/wcc.306

Conflict of interest: The authors have declared no conflicts of interest for this article.

(a–c): International River Boundaries in Southern Africa (shown in dark blue lines) (outlines derived from the IRBD; Data accessed from https://www.dur.ac.uk/ibru/resources/irbd/), watercourses and lakes (shown in light blue), remaining International Political Boundaries (shown in green lines) and % change in mean annual runoff (MAR) for the 2080s using a global hydrological model driven with the Coupled Model Intercomparison Project (CMIP3) multimodel scenarios (results obtained from Fung et al.), for a dry case (driest 10 percentile), average (median), and wet case (wettest 90 percentile) (Figure (a–c), respectively). Red numbers in Figure (a) can be cross‐referenced with Table , and red boxes in Figure (b) indicate two potential hotspots of IRB risk identified during our analysis (LO = Lower Orange, L–C = Linyanti–Chobe).
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
The main characteristics of two potential hotspots of IRB risk in Southern Africa (letters in white refer to text description).
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Related Articles

Climate, War, Security, Conflict, and Peace

Browse by Topic

Assessing Impacts of Climate Change > Evaluating Future Impacts of Climate Change

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts