Abbott,, K. W. (2014). Strengthening the transnational regime complex for climate change. Transnational Environmental Law, 3(1), 57–88. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102513000502
Adler,, D. (2018). US climate change litigation in the age of Trump: Year one. Sabin Center for Climate Change Law Working Paper (February 2018). Retrieved from http://columbiaclimatelaw.com/files/2018/02/Adler-2018-02-U.S.-Climate-Change-Litigation-in-the-Age-of-Trump-Year-One.pdf
Allan,, B. B. (2017). Producing the climate: States, scientists, and the constitution of global governance objects. International Organization, 71(1), 131–162. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0020818316000321
Allen,, M. (2011). The scientific basis for climate change liability. In R. Lord,, S. Goldberg,, L. Rajamani,, & J. Brunnée, (Eds.), Climate change liability: Transnational law and practice (pp. 8–22). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139084383.004
Allen,, K. (2018). Strict US market rules limit corporate sellers of green bonds. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/baa217c4-157c-11e8-9376-4a6390addb44
Allen,, M. R., Pall,, P., Stone,, D. A., Scott,, P., Frame,, D. J., Min,, S.‐K., … Yukimoto,, S. (2007). Scientific challenges in the attribution of harm to human influence on climate. Pennsylvania Law Review, 155(6), 1353–1400.
Alston,, P. (2017). The populist challenge to human rights. Journal of Human Rights Practice, 9(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/hux007
Andersen,, E. (2005). Out of the closets and into the courts: Legal opportunity structure and gay rights litigation. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
Andonova,, L. B., Betsill,, M. M., & Bulkeley,, H. (2009). Transnational climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 9(2), 52–73. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep.2009.9.2.52
Armour,, J., Awrey,, D., Davies,, P., Enriques,, L., Gordon,, J. N., Mayer,, C., & Payne,, J. (2016). Principles of financial regulation. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Atapattu,, S. (2016). Human rights approaches to climate change: Challenges and opportunities. London, England: Routledge.
Averill,, M. (2008). Climate litigation: Ethical implications and societal impacts. Denver University Law Review, 85(4), 899–918.
Averill,, M. (2009). Linking climate litigation and human rights. Review of European Community %26 International Environmental Law, 18, 139–147. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2009.00636.x
Bartel,, R., McFarland,, R., & Hearfield,, C. (2014). Taking a de‐binarised envirosocial approach to reconciling the environment vs economy debate: Lessons from climate change litigation for planning in NSW, Australia. The Town Planning Review, 85(1), 67–96. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2014.6
Benjamin,, L. (2016). The responsibilities of carbon major companies: Are they (and is the law) doing enough? Transnational Environmental Law, 5(2), 353–378. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102516000194
Benjamin,, L. (2017). The duty of due consideration in the Anthropocene: Climate risk and English directorial duties. Carbon Climate Law Review, 2, 90–99. https://doi.org/10.21552/cclr/2017/2/5
Benjamin,, L. (2018). Institutional investors and carbon major companies: Private environmental governance post‐paris. George Washington Journal of Energy and Environmental Law, 9(1), 5–20.
Bennett,, A., & Checkel,, J. (Eds.). (2014). Process tracing: From metaphor to analytic tool (strategies for social inquiry). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139858472
Bergkamp,, L. (2015). Adjudicating scientific disputes in climate science: The limits of judicial competence and the risks of taking sides. Environmental Liability, 3, 80–102. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2679252
Bergkamp,, L., & Hanekamp,, J. C. (2015). Climate change litigation against states: The perils of court‐made climate policies. European Energy and Environmental Law Review, 24(5), 102–114.
Bergkamp,, L., & Stone,, S. J. (2015). The Trojan horse of the Paris agreement on climate change: How multi‐level, non‐hierarchical governance poses a threat to constitutional government. Environmental Liability, 4, 119–140. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2715145
Biniaz,, S. (2017). Act locally, reflect globally: A checklist of options for U.S. cities and states to engage internationally in climate action. Sabin Center for Climate Change Law Paper. Retrieved from http://columbiaclimatelaw.com/files/2017/05/Biniaz-May_2017-Act-Locally-Reflect-Globally-.pdf
Blumm,, M., & Wood,, M. (2015). No ordinary lawsuit’: Climate change, due process, and the public trust doctrine. The American University Law Review, 67(1), 1–87.
Bodansky,, D. (2017). The role of the international court of justice in addressing Climate Change: Some preliminary reflections. Arizona State Law Journal, 49(Special Issue), 689–712.
Bogojević,, S. (2013). EU Climate Change litigation. Law %26 Policy, 35, 184–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12005
Bouwer,, K. (2015, 22 May). Climate consciousness in daily legal practice. OUPblog. Retrieved from https://blog.oup.com/2015/05/climate-consciousness-daily-legal-practice/
Bouwer,, K. (2018). The unsexy future of climate change litigation. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(3), 483–506. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqy017
Bridgeman,, N. L. (2003). Human rights litigation under the ATCA as a proxy for environmental claims. Yale Human Rights and Development Law Journal, 6(1), 1–44
Bulkeley,, H., Andonova,, L. B., Betsill,, M., Compagnon,, D., Hale,, T., Hoffman,, M. J., … Roger,, C. (2014). Transnational climate change governance. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Bulkeley,, H., & Betsill,, M. (2005). Rethinking sustainable cities: Multilevel governance and the `urban` politics of climate change. Environmental Politics, 14(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1080/0964401042000310178
Burger,, M., Gundlach,, J., Kreilhuber,, A., Ognibene,, L., Kariuki,, A., & Gachie,, A. (2017). The status of climate change litigation. A global review. New York, NY: United Nations Environment Programme.
Burkett,, M. (2011). Climate justice and the elusive climate tort. Yale Law Journal Online, 121(115). Retrieved from http://yalelawjournal.org/forum/climate-justice-and-the-elusive-climate-tort
Burns,, W. C. G., & Osofsky,, H. M. (Eds.). (2009). Adjudicating Climate Change—State, national and international approaches. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Butterfield,, B. (2018). The potential role of climate change litigation in furthering the mitigation objectives of the Paris agreement. Asia Pacific Journal of Environmental Law, 21, 29–49. https://doi.org/10.4337/apjel.2018.01.02
Caney,, S. (2005). Cosmopolitan justice, responsibility, and global Climate Change. Leiden Journal of International Law, 18(4), 747–775. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0922156505002992
Carlarne,, C. (2010). Climate law and policy in the EU and the US. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Carney,, M. (2018). A transition in thinking and action. Remarks given by Mark Carney, Governor of the Bank of England International Climate Risk Conference for Supervisors, De Nederlandsche Bank, Amsterdam, April 6, 2018. Retrieved from https://www.bankofengland.co.uk/-/media/boe/files/speech/2018/a-transition-in-thinking-and-action-speech-by-mark-carney.pdf
Carnwath,, J. S. C. (2016). Climate change adjudication after Paris: A reflection. Journal of Environmental Law, 28(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw009
ClientEarth. (2018, 20 August). A survey of UK attitudes towards climate change and its impacts. Retrieved from https://www.documents.clientearth.org/library/download-info/clientearths-climate-snapshot/
Coglianese,, G. (1996). Litigating within relationships: Disputes and disturbance in the regulatory process. Law and Society Review, 30(4), 735–765. https://doi.org/10.2307/3054116
Colares,, J. F., & Ristovski,, K. (2014). Pleading patterns and the role of litigation as a driver of Federal Climate Change Legislation. Jurimetrics, 54(4), 329–373. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/24395696
Cox,, R. (2016). A climate change litigation precedent: Urgenda Foundation v The State of The Netherlands. Journal of Energy %26 Natural Resources Law, 34(2), 143–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2016.1147887
Cummings,, S., & Rhode,, D. (2009). Public interest litigation: Insights from theory and practice. Fordham Urban Law Journal, 36(4), 603–651.
de Graaf,, K. J., & Jans,, J. H. (2015). The Urgenda decision: Netherlands liable for role in causing dangerous global climate change. Journal of Environmental Law, 27(3), 517–527. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqv030
Divisek,, P. (2011). Climate change torts: American electric power Connecticut. Macquarie Journal of International and Comparative Environmental Law, 7(1), 108–110.
Doherty,, B., & Hayes,, G. (2011). Having your day in court: Judicial opportunity and tactical choice in anti‐GMO campaigns in France and the United Kingdom. Comparative Political Studies, 47(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414012439184
Duffy,, M. (2018). Australian private securities class actions and public interest: Assessing the `private attorney‐general` by reference to the rationales of public enforcement. Australian Journal of Corporate Law, 32(2), 162–193.
Dumas,, M. (2017). Taking the law to court: Citizen suits and the legislative process. American Journal of Political Science, 61(4), 944–957. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12302
Duyck,, S., Jodoin,, S., & Johl,, A. (Eds.). (2018). Routledge handbook of human rights and climate governance. London, New York: Routledge.
Eisenstat,, F. (2011). American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut: How one less legal theory available in the effort to curb emissions is actually one step forward for the cause. Tulane Environmental Law Journal, 25(1), 221–230.
Epp,, C. R. (1998). The rights revolution: Lawyers, activists, and supreme courts in comparative perspective. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Epp,, C. R. (2009). Making rights real: Activists, bureaucrats, and the creation of the legalistic state. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Falkner,, R. (2016). The Paris agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107–1125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2346.12708
Faure,, M. G., & Nollkaemper,, A. (2007). International liability as an instrument to prevent and compensate for Climate Change. Stanford Journal of International Law, 26, 123–180.
Ferreira,, P. (2016). ‘Common but differentiated responsibilities’ in the National Courts: Lessons from Urgenda v. The Netherlands. Transnational Environmental Law, 5(2), 329–351. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102516000248
Fisher,, E. (2013). Climate change litigation, obsession and expertise: Reflecting on the scholarly response to Massachusetts v. EPA. Law %26 Policy, 35(3), 236–260. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12006
Fisher,, E., Scotford,, E., & Barritt,, E. (2017). The legally disruptive nature of climate change. Modern Law Review, 80(2), 173–201. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12251
Flynn,, J. (2012). Climate of confusion: Climate Change litigation in the wake of American electric power v. Connecticut. Georgia State University Law Review, 29(3), 823–864.
Franta,, B. (2017). Litigation in the fossil fuel divestment movement. Law %26 Policy, 39(4), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12086
Frumhoff,, P. C., Heede,, R., & Oreskes,, N. (2015). The climate responsibilities of industrial carbon producers. Climatic Change, 132(2), 157–171. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-015-1472-5
Galanter,, M. (1974). Why the "haves" come out ahead: Speculations on the limits of legal Change. Law and Society Review, 9(1), 95–160. https://doi.org/10.2307/3053023
Ganguly,, G., Setzer,, J., & Heyvaert,, V. (2018). If at first you Don`t succeed: Suing corporations for climate change. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 38, 841–868. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqy029
Gerrard,, M., & Freeman,, J. (2007). Global climate change and U.S. law. Chicago: American Bar Association.
Ghaleigh,, N. S. (2010). ‘Six honest serving men’: Climate change litigation as legal mobilization and the utility of typologies. Climate Law, 1(1), 31–61.
Giddens,, A. (2009). Politics of climate change. London, England: Polity Press.
Grain. (2018, July). Emissions impossible: How big meat and dairy are heating up the planet. Retrieved from https://www.grain.org/article/entries/5976-emissions-impossible-how-big-meat-and-dairy-are-heating-up-the-planet
Grossman,, D. A. (2003). Warming up to a not‐so‐radical idea: Tort‐based climate change litigation. Columbia Journal of Environmental Law, 28, 1.
Gupta,, J. (2007). Legal steps outside the Climate convention: Litigation as a tool to address climate change. Review of European Community %26 International Environmental Law, 16, 76–86. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2007.00541.x
Haines,, F., & Reichman,, N. (2008). The problem that is global warming: Introduction. Law %26 Policy, 30(4), 385–393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9930.2008.00288.x
Harrington,, J. (2007). Climate change, human rights and the right to be cold. Fordham Environmental Law Review, 18(3), 513–536.
Harrison,, K., & Sundstrom,, L. (Eds.). (2010). Global commons, domestic decisions: The comparative politics of climate change. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Hayes,, G. (2013). Negotiating proximity: Expert testimony and collective memory in the trials of environmental activists in France and the United Kingdom. Law %26 Policy, 35(3), 208–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12004
He,, X. (2018). Legal and policy pathways of climate change adaptation: Comparative analysis of the adaptation practices in the United States, Australia and China. Transnational Environmental Law, 7(2), 347–373. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102518000092
Heede,, R. (2014). Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010. Climatic Change, 122(1–2), 229–241. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-013-0986-y
Heiskanen,, H. P. (2018). Climate change and the European court of human rights. In Routledge handbook of human rights and Climate governance (pp. 319–324) Lonon, New York: Routledge.
Hilson,, C. (2002). New social movements: The role of legal opportunity. Journal of European Public Policy, 9(2), 238–255. https://doi.org/10.1080/13501760110120246
Hilson,, C. J. (2010). Climate change litigation: An explanatory approach (or bringing grievance back in). In F. Fracchia, & M. Occhiena, (Eds.), Climate change: la risposta del diritto (pp. 421–436). Napoli: Editoriale Scientifica.
Hilson,, C. J. (2012). UK climate change litigation: between hard and soft framing. In S. Farrall,, T. Ahmed,, & D. French, (Eds.), Criminological and legal consequences of climate change. Oxford: Hart 2010.
Hilson,, C. J. (2018). Framing time in climate change litigation. Oñati Socio‐Legal Series. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3179384
Hilson,, C. J. (2019). Climate change litigation and the narrative turn: Law, courts and populism. In S. Sterett, & L. E. Walker, (Eds.), Research handbook on law and courts. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
Hinteregger,, M. (2017). Civil liability and the challenges of climate change: A functional analysis. Journal of European Tort Law, (2), 238–259. https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2017-0010
Hodas,, D. R. (2000). Standing and climate change: Can anyone complain about the weather? Journal of Transnational Law %26 Policy, 9(supplement Issue), 451–486.
Hopgood,, S. (2013). The endtimes of human rights. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Hsu,, S.‐L. (2008). A realistic evaluation of climate change litigation through the lens of a hypothetical lawsuit. University of Colorado Law Review, 79(3), 701–766.
Hughes,, S., & Romero‐Lankao,, P. (2014). Science and institution building in urban climate‐change policymaking. Environmental Politics, 23(6), 1023–1042. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2014.921459
Humby,, T.‐L. (2018). The Thabametsi case: Case no 65662/16 Earthlife Africa Johannesburg v Minister of Environmental Affairs. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(1), 145–155. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqy007
Humphreys,, S. (2009). Human rights and climate change. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
IPCC. (2018). Global warming of 1.5°C—Summary for policymakers. Retrieved from http://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_final.pdf
Jasanoff,, S. (1995). Science at the bar: Law, science, and technology in America. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Jasanoff,, S. (2013). A world of experts: Science and global environmental constitutionalism. Environmental Affairs Law Review, 40(2), 439–452.
Jasanoff,, S. (2018). Science, common sense %26 judicial power in US courts. Daedalus, 147(4), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00517.
Jodoin,, S., Snow,, S. & Corobow,, A. (forthcoming). Realizing the right to be cold? Tracing the impact of the 2005 Inuit petition on human rights and climate justice.
Jordan,, A., Huitema,, D., Van Asselt,, H., & Forster,, J. (Eds.). (2018). Governing climate change: Polycentricity in action? Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108284646.
Keck,, T. (2009). Beyond backlash: Assessing the impact of judicial decisions on LGBT rights. Law and Society Review, 43(1), 158–186. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5893.2009.00370.x
Keele,, D. M. (2018). Climate change litigation and the national environmental policy act. Journal of Environmental Law, 30(2), 285–309. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqx030
Keohane,, R. O., & Victor,, D. G. (2011). The regime complex for climate change. Perspectives on Politics, 9(1), 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1537592710004068
Knox,, J. (2009). Climate change and human rights law. Virginia Journal of International Law, 50(1), 163–218.
Kysar,, D. (2011). What climate change can do about tort law. Environmental Law, 41(1), 1–71.
Kysar,, D. (2018). The public life of private law: Tort law as a risk regulation mechanism. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 9(1), 48–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2017.79
Lee,, M. (2018). The sources and challenges of norm generation in tort law. European Journal of Risk Regulation, 9(1), 34–47. https://doi.org/10.1017/err.2017.76
Lemos,, M. C., Kirchhoff,, C. J., & Ramprasad,, V. (2012). Narrowing the climate information usability gap. Nature Climate Change, 2, 789–794. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate1614
Ley,, A. J. (2018). Mobilizing doubt: The legal mobilization of Climate denialist groups. Law %26 Policy, 40(3), 221–242. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12103
Lima,, L. C. (2015). The evidential weight of experts before the ICJ: Reflections on the whaling in the Antarctic case. Journal of International Dispute Settlement, 6(3), 621–635. https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlids/idv022
Limon,, M. (2009). Human rights and climate change: Constructing a case for political action. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 33(2), 439–476.
Lin,, J. (2012). Climate change and the courts. Legal Studies, 32, 35–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-121X.2011.00206.x
Lin,, J. (2015). Climate change litigation in Asia and the Pacific. In G. van Calster,, W. Vandenberghe,, & L. Reins, (Eds.), Research handbook on climate change mitigation law. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
Lord,, R., Goldberg,, S., Rajamani,, L., & Brunnée,, J. (2011). Climate change liability: Transnational law and practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Lyster,, R. (2016). Climate justice and disaster law. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Manus,, P. (2014). Kivalina at the supreme court: A lost opportunity for federal common law. Pittsburgh Journal of Environmental and Public Health Law, 8(2), 223–288.
Marjanac,, S., & Patton,, L. (2018). Extreme weather event attribution science and climate change litigation: An essential step in the causal chain? Journal of Energy %26 Natural Resources Law, 36, 265–298. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2018.1451020
Marjanac,, S., Patton,, L., & Thornton,, J. (2017). Acts of God, human influence and litigation. Nature Geoscience, 10, 616–619. https://doi.org/10.1038/ngeo3019
Markell,, D. L., & Ruhl,, J. B. (2010). An empirical survey of climate change litigation in the United States. FSU College of Law, Business %26 Economics. Public Law Research Paper, 433, 10644–10655. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1585341
Markell,, D. L., & Ruhl,, J. B. (2012). An empirical assessment of climate change in the courts: A new jurisprudence or business as usual? Florida Law Review, 64(1), 15–86.
Mayer,, B. (2014). State responsibility and climate change governance: A light through the storm. Chinese Journal of International Law, 13(3), 539–575. https://doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmu030
McAdam,, D. (2017). Social movement theory and the prospects for climate change activism in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 20, 189–208. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-052615-025801
McCann,, M. (1994). Rights at work: Pay equity reform and the politics of legal mobilization. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
McCormick,, S., Simmens,, S. J., Glicksman,, R., Paddock,, L., Kim,, D., & Whited,, B. (2018a). The role of health in climate litigation. American Journal of Public Health, 108(2), S104–S108.
McCormick,, S., Simmens,, S. J., Glicksman,, R. L., Paddock,, L., Kim,, D., Whited,, B., & Davies,, W. (2018b). Science in litigation, the third branch of U.S. Climate Policy. Science, 357(6355), 979–980.
McGinnis,, M. D. (2015). Polycentric governance in theory and practice: Dimensions of Aspiration and Practical Limitations. Prepared for Ostrom Workshop, 14 December 2015. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Bloomington.
McInerney‐Lankford,, S. (2009). Climate Change and human rights: An introduction to legal issues. Harvard Environmental Law Review, 33, 431.
Melnick,, R. S. (1983). Regulation and the courts: The case of the clean air act. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
Michaelowa,, A. (2007). Environmental progress through litigation? Climate Policy, 7(6), 543–544. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2007.9685677
Michaelowa,, K., & Michaelowa,, A. (2017). Transnational climate governance initiatives: Designed for effective climate change mitigation? International Interactions, 43(1), 129–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/03050629.2017.1256110
Miles,, W. J., & Swan,, N. K. (2017). Climate change and dispute resolution. Dispute Resolution International, 11(2), 117–132.
Millner,, F., & Ruddock,, K. (2011). Climate litigation: Lessons learned and future opportunities. Alternative Law Journal, 36(1), 27–32. https://doi.org/10.1177/1037969X1103600106
Nachmany,, M., & Setzer,, J. (2018). Policy brief global trends in climate change legislation and litigation: 2018 snapshot. Grantham Research Institute on Climate Change and the Environment. Retrieved from http://www.lse.ac.uk/GranthamInstitute/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Global-trends-in-climate-change-legislation-and-litigation-2018-snapshot-3.pdf
Nosek,, G. (2018). Climate change litigation and narrative: How to use litigation to tell compelling climate stories. William %26 Mary Environmental Law and Policy Review, 42, 733–783.
Nyinevi,, C. (2015). Universal civil jurisdiction: An option for global justice in climate change litigation. Journal of Politics and Law, 8(3), 135–148.
O`Donnell,, T. (2016). Legal geography and coastal climate change adaptation: The Vaughan litigation. Geographical Research, 54, 301–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/1745-5871.12170
OHCHR. (2009). Report of the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for human rights on the relationship between climate change and human rights (UN Doc. A/HRC/10/61), 15 January 2009.
Okereke,, C., & Coventry,, P. (2016). Climate justice and the international regime: Before, during, and after Paris. WIREs Climate Change, 7(6), 834–851. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.419
Okonkwo,, T. (2017). Protecting the environment and people from climate change through climate change litigation. Journal of Politics and Law, 10(5), 66–77. https://doi.org/10.5539/jpl.v10n5p66
Osofsky,, H. M. (2005a). The geography of climate change litigation: Implications for transnational regulatory governance. Washington University Law Quarterly, 83(6), 1789–1856.
Osofsky,, H. M. (2005b). Complexities of addressing the impacts of climate change on indigenous peoples through international law petitions: A case study of the Inuit petition to the Inter‐American Commission on Human Rights. In R. S. Abate, & E. A. Kronk, (Eds.), Climate change and indigenous peoples: The search for legal remedies. Cheltenham, England: Edward Elgar.
Osofsky,, H. M. (2007a). Local approaches to transnational corporate responsibility: Mapping the role of subnational climate change litigation. Pacific McGeorge Global Business Development Law Journal, 20(1), 143–160.
Osofsky,, H. M. (2007b). The intersection of scale, science, and law in Massachusetts v. EPA. Proceedings of the Annual Meeting (American Society of International Law), 101, 61–65. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0272503700025180
Osofsky,, H. M. (2010). The continuing importance of climate change litigation. Climate Law, 1, 3–29. https://doi.org/10.3233/CL-2010-002
Osofsky,, H. M., & Peel,, J. (2013). The role of litigation in multilevel Climate Change governance: Possibilities for a lower carbon future? Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 30, 303. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2523994
Ostrom,, E. (2009). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change (World Bank Policy Research Working Paper Series no. 5095). Retrieved from http://ssrn.com/abstract=1494833
Ostrom,, E. (2010). Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environmental Change, 20(4), 550–557. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.07.004
Peel,, J. (2007). The role of Climate Change litigation in Australia`s response to global warming. University of Melbourne Legal Studies Research Paper No. 269. Environmental and Planning Law Journal, 24(2), 90–105.
Peel,, J. (2011). Issues in climate change litigation. Carbon and Climate Law Review, 5(1), 15–24. https://doi.org/10.21552/CCLR/2011/1/162
Peel,, J., Godden,, L., & Keenan,, R. (2012). Climate change law in an era of multi‐level governance. Transnational Environmental Law, 1(2), 245–280. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102512000052
Peel,, J., & Lin,, J. (2018). Transnational climate litigation: the contribution of the Global South. Work‐in‐progress draft presented at the American Society of International Law Mid‐Year Research Forum, November 9–10, 2018 (copy on file with authors).
Peel,, J., & Osofsky,, H. M. (2013). Climate change litigation`s regulatory pathways: A comparative analysis of the United States and Australia. Law %26 Policy, 35(3), 150–183. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12003
Peel,, J., & Osofsky,, H. M. (2015). Climate change litigation regulatory pathways to cleaner energy. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Peel,, J., & Osofsky,, H. M. (2018). A rights turn in climate change litigation? Transnational Environmental Law, 7(1), 37–67. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102517000292
Peeters,, M. (2016). Urgenda foundation and 886 individuals v. The State of The Netherlands: The dilemma of more ambitious greenhouse gas reduction action by EU member states. Review of European, Comparative %26 International Environmental Law, 25(1), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1111/reel.12146
Posner,, E. (2007). Climate Change and international human rights litigation: A critical appraisal. University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 155(6), 1925–1946.
Preston,, B. J. (2009). Climate change litigation. Journal of the Judicial Commission of New South Wales, 9(2), 205–236.
Preston,, B. J. (2011a). Climate change litigation (part 1). Carbon %26 Climate Law Review, 5(1), 3–14.
Preston,, B. J. (2011b). Climate change litigation (part 2). Carbon %26 Climate Law Review, 2, 244–263.
Preston,, B. J. (2016a). The contribution of the courts in tackling climate change. Journal of Environmental Law, 28(1), 11–17. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw004
Preston,, B. J. (2016b). The role of the courts in facilitating climate change adaptation. The Asia‐Pacific Centre for Environmental Law Climate Change Adaptation Platform. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2829287
Rajamani,, L. (2007). Public interest environmental litigation in India: Exploring issues of access, participation, equity, effectiveness and sustainability. Journal of Environmental Law, 19(3), 293–321. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqm020
Rayner,, S. (2010). How to eat an elephant: A bottom‐up approach to climate policy. Climate Policy, 10(2), 615–621. https://doi.org/10.3763/cpol.2010.0138
Ritchie,, H., Reay,, D. S., & Higgins,, P. (2018). The impact of global dietary guidelines on climate change. Global Environmental Change, 49, 46–55.
Rosenberg,, G. N. (2008). The hollow hope: Can courts bring about social change. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
Roy,, S., & Woerdman,, E. (2016). Situating Urgenda v The Netherlands within comparative climate change litigation. Journal of Energy %26 Natural Resources Law, 34(2), 165–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/02646811.2016.1132825
Sands,, P. (2016). Climate Change and the rule of law: Adjudicating the future in international law. Journal of Environmental Law, 28(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1093/jel/eqw005
Schatz,, J. (2009). Climate change litigation in Canada and the USA. Review of European Community %26 International Environmental Law, 18, 129–138. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9388.2009.00635.x
Schiermeier,, Q. (2015). Landmark court ruling tells Dutch government to do more on climate change. Nature. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/news/landmark-court-ruling-tells-dutch-government-to-do-more-on-climate-change-1.17841
Setzer,, J. (2017). How subnational governments are rescaling environmental governance: The case of the Brazilian state of São Paulo. Journal of Environmental Policy %26 Planning, 19(5), 503–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2014.984669
Setzer,, J., & Bangalore,, M. (2017). Regulating climate change in the courts. In A. Averchenkova,, S. Fankhauser,, & M. Nachmany, (Eds.), Trends in climate change legislation (pp. 175–192). London, England: Edward Elgar.
Setzer,, J., & Benjamin,, L. (2019). Climate litigation—Regulatory lessons (for the global north) from the global south. Transnational Environmental Law. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Setzer,, J., & Nachmany,, M. (2018). National governance: The State`s role in steering polycentric action. In A. Jordan,, D. Huitema,, H. van Asselt,, & J. Forster, (Eds.), Governing climate change (pp. 47–62). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Shelton,, D. (2003). The environmental jurisprudence of international human rights tribunals. In R. Piolotti, & J. D. Taillant, (Eds.), Linking human rights and the environment (pp. 11–18). Tucson, AZ: The University of Arizona Press.
Simma,, B. (2012). The international court of justice and scientific expertise. In Proceedings of the ASIL annual meeting (Vol. 106, pp. 230–233). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Solana,, J. (2018). The Power of the Eurosystem to Promote Environmental Protection. University of Oslo Faculty of Law Research Paper No. 2018‐23. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3241341
Sorenson,, Q. M. (2012). Native Village of Kivalina v. ExxonMobil Corp.: The end of climate change tort litigation. Trends, 44(3), 1–6. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/trends44%26i=85
Spitzer,, M., & Burtscher,, B. (2017). Liability for climate change: Cases, challenges and concepts. Journal of European Tort Law, 2017(2), 137–175. https://doi.org/10.1515/jetl-2017-0009
Starr,, D. (2016). The carbon accountant. Science, 353(6302), 858–861. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.353.6302.858
Ugochukwu,, B. (2018). Litigating the impacts of climate change: The challenge of legal Polycentricity. Global Journal of Comparative Law, 7, 91–114. https://doi.org/10.1163/2211906X-00701005
Van Zeben,, J. (2015). Establishing a governmental duty of care for climate change mitigation: Will Urgenda turn the tide? Transnational Environmental Law, 4(2), 339–357. https://doi.org/10.1017/S2047102515000199
Vanhala,, L. (2013). The comparative politics of courts and climate change. Environmental Politics, 22(3), 447–474. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2013.765686
Vanhala,, L. (2016). Legal mobilization under neo‐corporatist governance: Environmental NGOs before the Conseil d`Etat in France, 1975–2010. Journal of Law and Courts, 4(1), 103–130. https://doi.org/10.1086/684649
Vanhala,, L. (2017). Process tracing in the study of environmental politics. Global Environmental Politics, 17(4), 88–105. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00434
Vanhala,, L. (2018). Is legal mobilization for the birds? Legal opportunity structures and environmental nongovernmental organisations in the United Kingdom, France, Finland and Italy. Comparative Political Studies, 51(3), 380–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010414017710257
Vanhala,, L., & Hestbaek,, C. (2016). Framing climate change loss and damage in UNFCCC negotiations. Global Environmental Politics, 16(4), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1162/GLEP_a_00379
Vanhala,, L., & Hilson,, C. (2013). Climate change litigation: Symposium introduction. Law %26 Policy, 35(3), 141–149. https://doi.org/10.1111/lapo.12007
Vanhala,, L., & Kinghan,, J. (2018). Literature review on the use and impact of litigation. The Public Law Project (PLP) Research Paper. Retrieved from https://publiclawproject.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Literature-Review.pdf
Vollmer,, A. R. (2018). Mobilizing human rights to combat climate change through litigation. In Routledge handbook of human rights and climate governance (pp. 359–371). London, England: Routledge.
Watts,, K. A., & Wildermuth,, A. J. (2008). Massachusetts v. EPA: Breaking new ground on issues other than global warming. Northwestern University Law Review, 102(1), 1029–1046.
Weaver,, R. H., & Kysar,, D. A. (2017). Courting disaster: Climate Change and the adjudication of catastrophe. Notre Dame Law Review, 93(1), 295–356. Retrieved from https://heinonline.org/HOL/P?h=hein.journals/tndl93%26i=305
Wilensky,, M. (2015). Climate change in the courts: An assessment of non‐U.S. Climate litigation. Duke Environmental Law %26 Policy Forum, 26(1), 131–179.
Williams,, J. (2012). The impact of climate change on indigenous people—The implications for the cultural, spiritual, economic and legal rights of indigenous people. The International Journal of Human Rights, 16(4), 648–688. https://doi.org/10.1080/13642987.2011.632135
Wuerth,, I. (2016, 14 November). International law in the age of trump: A post‐human rights agenda. Lawfare blog. Retrieved from https://www.lawfareblog.com/international-law-age-trump-post-human-rights-agenda
Zemans,, F. K. (1983). Legal mobilization: The neglected role of the law in the political system. American Political Science Review, 77(3), 690–703. https://doi.org/10.2307/1957268