Home
This Title All WIREs
WIREs RSS Feed
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Clim Change
Impact Factor: 7.057

Evolution of international carbon markets: lessons for the Paris Agreement

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Abstract The Paris Agreement will greatly benefit from the past experience with international market mechanisms for greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions and related regulatory systems, which have gone through four periods with specific challenges. The first period 1997–2004 operationalized the mechanisms defined in the Kyoto Protocol, the Clean Development Mechanism (CDM) and Joint Implementation (JI). Pilot activities in different sectors were undertaken by the public sector, and the first baseline and monitoring methodologies officially approved. Between 2005 and 2011, the carbon markets expanded massively. The EU emission trading scheme (EU ETS) was linked to the Kyoto mechanisms, creating demand for carbon credits from the private sector. During this “gold rush” period criticism emerged with regarding the uneven geographical distribution of projects, as well as environmental integrity problems related to baselines and additionality. The next period saw a collapse in carbon prices between 2012 and 2014, limiting the development of new projects. The quantitative limits on the use of offsets in the EU ETS were reached and the failure to agree on a new international regime resulted in a drying up of demand from governments. The 2015–2018 period is characterized by a gradual stabilization of the international climate regime. The Paris Agreement adopted in 2015 increases complexity through global participation in mitigation. Future carbon markets will therefore face both old challenges—supply–demand balance, environmental integrity, transaction costs—and new ones—interactions with other policies and national targets, and sectoral/policy baselines and additionality checks preventing hot air proliferation. This article is categorized under: The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Policies, Instruments, Lifestyles, Behavior
Accumulated number of CDM projects. Source: UNEP DTU ()
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Annual average CER, ERU and EU allowance prices 2004–2016. Data sources: Point carbon (EUAs), Bluenext/EEX (secondary CERs/ERUs), World Bank reports on the state of the carbon markets
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Geographical distribution of PoAs and CDM projects until 2017. Source: UNEP DTU ()
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Differing fortunes of international carbon markets over time. Source: Authors
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Browse by Topic

The Carbon Economy and Climate Mitigation > Policies, Instruments, Lifestyles, Behavior

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts