Aden,, N. (2018). Necessary but not sufficient: the role of energy efficiency in industrial sector low‐carbon transformation. Energy Efficiency, 11, 1083–1101.
Andrade,, J., & Puppim de Oliveira,, J. (2015). The role of the private sector in global climate and energy governance. Journal of Business Ethics, 130, 375–387.
Ascui,, F. (2014). A review of carbon accounting in the social and environmental accounting literature: What can it contribute to the debate? Social and Environmental Accountability Journal, 34(1), 6–28.
Bates,, J. (2017). Big data, open data and the climate risk market. In B. Brevini, & G. Murdock, (Eds.), Carbon capitalism and communication. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
Beck,, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London, England: Sage.
Beck,, U. (1999). World risk society. Cambridge, England: Policy Press.
Becque,, R., & Stewart,, E. (2014, November 11). Making sense of science to calculate carbon reduction targets. GreenBiz. Retrieved from https://www.greenbiz.com/article/make-sense-science-calculate-corporate-carbon-reduction-targets
Beggington,, J., Schneider,, T., Stevenson,, L., & Fox,, A. (in press). Fossil fuel reserves and resources reporting and unburnable carbon: Investigating conflicting accounts. Critical Perspectives on Accounting. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cpa.2019.04.004
Beymer‐Farris,, B., & Bassett,, T. (2012). The REDD menace: Resurgent protection in Tanzaniea`s mangrove forests. Global Environmental Change, 22, 332–341.
Bohm,, S., Misoczky,, M., & Moog,, S. (2012). Greening capitalism? A Marxist critique of carbon markets. Organization Studies, 33(11), 1617–1638.
Botzem,, S., & Dobusch,, L. (2012). Standardization cycles: A process perspective on the formation and diffusion of transnational standards. Organization Studies, 33(5/6), 737–762.
Brander,, M., Gillenwater,, M., & Ascui,, F. (2018). Creative accounting: A critical perspective on the market‐based method for reporting purchased electricity (scope 2) emissions. Energy Policy, 112, 29–33.
Bulkeley,, H. (2001). Governing climate change: The politics of risk society. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 26(4), 430–447.
Bulkeley,, H., Andonova,, L., Betsil,, M., Compagnon,, D., Hale,, T., Hoffman,, M., … Vandeveer,, S. D. (2014). Transnational climate change governance. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
Bumpus,, A., Tansey,, J., Henriquez,, B. L. P., & Okereke,, C. (Eds.). (2014). Carbon governance, climate change and business transformation. London, England: Routledge.
Bumpus,, A., & Liverman,, D. (2008). Accumulation by decarbonization and the governance of carbon offsets. Economic Geography, 84(2), 127–155.
CC %26 CSO. (2013). Assessing corporate emissions performance through the lens of climate science. Retrieved from http://www.sustainableorganizations.org/Climate_Counts_2013_CarbonStudy.pdf
Christophers,, B. (2018). Risk capital: Urban political ecology and entanglements of financial and environmental risk in Washington, D.C. Environment %26 Planning E: Nature and Space, 1(1), 144–164.
Cole,, D. H. (2015). Advantages of a polycentric approach to climate change policy. Nature Climate Change, 5, 114–118.
Cummins,, C., & Aden,, N. (2014). Connecting corporate emission targets with climate. Retrieved from http://www.wri.org/blog/2014/05/connecting-corporate-emissions-targets-climate-science
Dorsch,, M., & Flachsland,, C. (2017). A polycentric approach to global climate governance. Global Environmental Politics, 17(2), 45–64.
Falkner,, R. (2016). The Paris agreement and the new logic of international climate politics. International Affairs, 92(5), 1107–1125.
Faria,, P., & Labutong,, N. (2015, March). A review of climate science based GHG target setting methodologies for companies. CDP White Paper.
Faria,, P., & Labutong,, N. (2019). A description of four science‐based corporate GHG target‐setting methods. Sustainability Accounting, Management and Policy. https://doi.org/10.1108/SAMPJ-03-2017-0031
Fazey,, I., Moug,, P., Allen,, S., Beckmann,, K., Blackwood,, D., Bonaventura,, M., … Wolstenholme,, R. (2018). Transformation in a changing climate: A research agenda. Climate and Development, 10(3), 197–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/17565529.2017.1301864
Giesekam,, J., Tingley,, D. D., & Cotton,, I. (2018). Aligning carbon targets for construction with (inter)national climate change mitigation commitments. Energy %26 Buildings, 165, 106–117.
Gorgen,, M., Jacob,, A., Nerlinger,, M., Riordan,, R., Rohleder,, M., & Wilkens,, M. (2018). Carbon risk. Social science research network. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2930897
Hale,, J. (2018). Measuring transition risk in fund portfolios: The Morningstar portfolio carbon risk score. White Paper prepared for Morningstar. Retrieved from https://www.morningstar.com/lp/measuring-transition-risk?cid=RED_RES0002
Hamilton,, T. (2013). Beyond market signals: Negotiating marketplace politics and corporate responsibilities. Economic Geography, 89(3), 285–307.
Heede,, R. (2014). Tracing anthropogenic carbon dioxide and methane emissions to fossil fuel and cement producers, 1854–2010. Climate Change, 122(1–2), 229–241.
Hunt,, E., Levin,, S., & McCarthy,, T. (2017, June 2). Paris climate agreement: World reacts as Trump pulls out of global accord—As it happened. The Guardian. Retrieved from https://www.theguardian.com/environment/live/2017/jun/01/donald-trump-paris-climate-agreement-live-news
IPCC. (2013). The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, England and New York, NY: University Press. Retrieved from http://www.climatechange2013.org/images/report/WG1AR5_SPM_FINAL.pdf
IPCC. (2014). Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, England and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press. Retrieved from http://report.mitigation2014.org/spm/ipcc_wg3_ar5_summary-for-policymakers.pdf
IPCC. (2018). Special report on global warming of 1.5°C. Retrieved from https://report.ipcc.ch/sr15/pdf/sr15_spm_final.pdf
Jänicke,, R. (2012). Dynamic governance of clean‐energy markets: How technical innovation could accelerate climate policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 22(1), 50–59.
Johnson,, L. (2010). Climate change and the risk industry: The multiplication of fear and value. In P. Robbins,, M. Watt,, & R. Peet, (Eds.), Global political ecology. London, England and New York, NY: Routledge.
Jordan,, A., & Huitema,, D. (2014). Innovations in climate policy: Invention, diffusion and evaluation. Environmental Politics, 23(5), 715–734.
Khalamayzer,, A. (2018, January 9). Why voluntary climate risk disclosure is going mainstream. Green Biz. Retrieved from https://www.greenbiz.com/article/why-voluntary-climate-risk-disclosure-going-mainstream
Knox‐Hayes,, J. (2010). Constructing carbon market spacetime: Climate change and the onset of neo‐modernity. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 100(4), 953–962.
Knox‐Hayes,, J. (2016). The cultures of markets: The political economy of climate governance. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Knox‐Hayes,, J., & Levy,, D. (2011). The politics of carbon disclosure as climate governance. Strategic Organization, 9(1), 91–99.
Kolk,, A. (2004). A decade of sustainability reporting: Developments and significance. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 3(1), 51–64.
Kolk,, A., Levy,, D., & Pinkse,, J. (2008). Corporate responses in an emerging climate regime: The institutionalization and commensuration of carbon disclosure. European Accounting Review, 17(4), 719–745.
Kollmuss,, A., Zink,, H., & Polycap,, C. (2008). Making sense of the voluntary carbon market: A comparison of carbon offset standards. Berlin, Germany: WWF.
Krabbe,, O., Linthorst,, G., Blok,, K., Grijns‐Graus,, W., van Vurren,, D. P., Hone,, N., … Pineda,, A. (2015). Aligning corporate greenhouse‐gas emissions targets with climate goals. Nature Climate Change, 5, 1057–1060.
Lansing,, D. (2010). Carbon`s calculatory spaces: The emergence of carbon offsets in Costa Rica. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(4), 710–725.
Lash,, J., & Wellington,, F. (2007, March). Competitive advantage on a warming planet. Harvard Business Review.
Lash,, S., Szerszynski,, B., & Wynne,, B. (1996). Risk, environment %26 modernity: Towards a new ecology. London, England: Sage.
Levy,, D. L., & Spicer,, A. (2013). Contested imaginaries and the cultural political economy of climate change. Organization, 20(5), 659–678.
Lippert,, I. (2013). Enacting environments: An ethnography of the digitalization and naturalization of emissions (PhD dissertation in sociology). University of Ausburg, Ausburg, Germany.
Lipschutz,, R., & Rowe,, J. (2005). Globalization, governmentality, and global politics: Regulation for the rest of us? New York, NY: Routledge.
Lovell,, H. (2015). The making of low carbon economies. London, England: Routledge.
MacKenzie,, D. (2009). Making things the same: Gases, emission rights and the politics of carbon markets. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(3–4), 440–455.
Marland,, G., Kowalczyk,, T., & Cherry,, T. (2015). “‘Green fluff”? The role of corporate sustainability initiatives in effective climate policy. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(6), 934–936.
McAfee,, K. (2012). The contradictory logic of global ecosystem services markets. Development and Change, 43(1), 105–131.
Morseletto,, P., Biermann,, F., & Pattberg,, P. (2017). Governing by targets: Reduction ad unum and evolution of the two‐degree climate target. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 17(7), 655–676.
Newell,, P., & Paterson,, M. (2010). Climate capitalism: Global warming and the transformation of the global economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Newell,, P., Pattberg,, P., & Schroeder,, H. (2012). Multi‐actor governance and the environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 37, 365–387.
Nisbet,, M. (2014). Disruptive ideas: Public intellectuals and their arguments for action on climate change. WIREs Climate Change, 5(4), 809–823.
Nyberg,, D., & Wright,, C. (2016). Performative and political: Corporate constructions of climate change risk. Organization, 23(5), 617–638.
Oels,, A. (2013). Rendering climate change governable by risk: From profitability to contingency. Geoforum, 45, 17–29.
Okereke,, C. (2016). Business. In K. Backstrand, & E. Lovbrand, (Eds.), Research handbook on climate governance (pp. 127–133). Cheltenham, England: Elgar Press.
Ormond,, J. (2015). New regimes of responsibilization: Practicing product carbon footprinting in the new economy. Economic Geography, 91(4), 428–448.
Ostrom,, E. (2009). A polycentric approach for coping with climate change. World Bank. Working Paper 5095.
Paterson,, M., & Stripple,, J. (2010). My space: Governing individuals` carbon emissions. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 28(2), 341–362.
Prudham,, S. (2009). Pimping climate change: Richard Branson, global warming and the performance of green capitalism. Environment and Planning A, 41, 1594–1613.
Randers,, J. (2012). Greenhouse gas emissions per unit of value added (“GEVA”): A corporate guide to voluntary climate action. Energy Policy, 48(2012), 46–55.
Rockstrom,, J., Gaffney,, O., Rogelj,, J., Meinshausen,, M., Nakicenovic,, N., & Schellnhuber,, H. J. (2017). A roadmap for rapid decarbonization. Science, 355(6331), 1269–1271.
Sandor,, R. L., Bettelheim,, E. C., & Swingland,, I. R. (2002). An overview of a free‐market approach to climate change and conservation. In I. R. Swingland, (Ed.), Capturing carbon and conserving biodiversity: The market approach (pp. 56–69). London, England: Earthscan.
Sapinski,, J. P. (2016). Constructing climate capitalism: Corporate power and the global climate policy‐planning network. Global Networks, 16(1), 89–111.
SBTi. (2014). Mind the science, mind the gap: Stakeholder consultation workshop feedback. Retrieved from https://sciencebasedtargets.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/Goal_Setting_Workshop_Summary_for_Website.pdf
SBTi. (2017, July 19). Science‐based target setting manual. Version 3.0. Retrieved from https://sciencebasedtargets.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/04/SBT-Manual-Draft.pdf
SBTi. (2019, April). SBTi call to action guidelines. Version 1.5. Retrieved from https://sciencebasedtargets.org/wp-content/uploads/2018/10/C2A-guidelines.pdf
Stewart,, E., & Deodhar,, A. (2009). A corporate finance approach to climate stabilizing targets (C‐FACT). Autodesk White Paper. Retrieved from https://sciencebasedtargets.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/greenhouse_gas_white_paper000.pdf
Stripple,, J., & Bulkeley,, H. (Eds.). (2014). Governing the climate: New approaches to rationality, power, and politics. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Subramanian,, P. (2018, June 14). Responsible investing: The impact of carbon risk on your portfolio. The Edge Markets. Retrieved from http://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/responsible-investing-impact-carbon-risk-your-portfolio
Trancik,, J. E., Chang,, M. T., Karapataki,, C., & Stokes,, L. C. (2014). Effectiveness of a segmental approach to climate policy. Environment Science %26 Policy, 48, 27–35.
Trexler,, M., & Schendler,, A. (2015). Science‐based carbon targets for the corporate world: The ultimate sustainability commitment, or a costly distraction. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 19(6), 931–933.
Tuppen,, C. (2008). Climate stabilization intensity targets: A new approach to setting corporate climate change targets. British Telecom White Paper. Retrieved from https://www.btplc.com/Purposefulbusiness/Energyandenvironment/Our31methodology/CSI_Methodology.pdf
UNFCCC. (1992). The United Nations framework convention on climate change. 1992 FCCC/INFORMAL/84 GE.05‐62220 (E) 200705.
Volcovici,, V. (2017, June 5). Bloomberg delivers U.S. pledge to continue Paris climate goals to UN. Reuters. Retrieved from https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-climate-paris-idUSKBN18W2DQ
Walenta,, J. (2018). The limits to private sector climate change action: The geographies of corporate climate governance. Economic Geography, 94(5), 461–484.
World Resource Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2004). Greenhouse gas protocol: Corporate standard (Revised ed.). Washington, DC: World Resource Institute and World Business Council for Sustainable Development.