Home
This Title All WIREs
WIREs RSS Feed
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Comput Mol Sci
Impact Factor: 8.127

Quantum and molecular mechanical Monte Carlo techniques for modeling condensed‐phase reactions

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

A recent review (Acevedo O, Jorgensen WL. Advances in quantum and molecular mechanical (QM/MM) simulations for organic and enzymatic reactions. Acc Chem Res 2010, 43:142–151) examined our use and development of a combined quantum and molecular mechanical (QM/MM) technique for modeling organic and enzymatic reactions. Advances included the pairwise‐distance‐directed Gaussian (PDDG)/PM3 semiempirical QM (SQM) method, computation of multidimensional potentials of mean force (PMF), incorporation of on‐the‐fly QM in Monte Carlo simulations, and a polynomial quadrature method for rapidly treating proton‐transfer reactions. This article serves as a follow‐up on our progress. Highlights include new reactions, alternative SQM methods, a polarizable OPLS force field, and novel solvent environments, e.g., ‘on water’ and room temperature ionic liquids. The methodology is strikingly accurate across a wide range of condensed‐phase and antibody‐catalyzed reactions including substitution, decarboxylation, elimination, isomerization, and pericyclic classes. Comparisons are made to systems treated with continuum‐based solvents and ab initio or density functional theory (DFT) methods. Overall, the QM/MM methodology provides detailed characterization of reaction paths, proper configurational sampling, several advantages over implicit solvent models, and a reasonable computational cost. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2014, 4:422–435. This article is categorized under: Electronic Structure Theory > Combined QM/MM Methods
Thermodynamic cycle for mutation of A to B in two solvents.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Computed free energies (kcal/mol) for competitive proton abstraction pathways toward dienol intermediate formation; R = phenyl‐NHCOCH3. (Reproduced with permission from Ref . Copyright 2009, American Chemical Society)
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Free‐energy profile (kcal/mol) for the Kemp elimination of 5‐nitro‐benzisoxazole in antibody 4B2. The reaction coordinate for the proton transfer is OHCH with OH + CH = 2.85 Å. Maximum free‐energy values truncated to 30 kcal/mol for clarity. (Reproduced with permission from Ref . Copyright 2009, American Chemical Society)
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Antibody 4B2 catalyzed (a) Kemp elimination of 5‐nitro‐benzisoxazole and (b) allylic rearrangement of α‐cyclopent‐1‐en‐1‐yl‐p‐acetamidophenone (R = NHCOCH3) via a dienol or dienolate intermediate.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Illustration of the ‘on water’ allyl p‐tolyl ether transition structure from the QM/MM/MC Claisen rearrangement calculations. (Reproduced with permission from Ref . Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society)
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Claisen rearrangement of (a) allyl p‐R‐phenyl ethers, R = CH3, Br, and OCH3 and (b) allyl naphthyl ether; and (c) the Diels‐Alder reaction between cyclopentadiene and 1,4‐naphthoquinone, methyl vinyl ketone, and acrylonitrile.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Illustration of the encapsulation of the β‐elimination solute with piperidine transition state (given as a CPK space‐filling model) by nearby ions from [BMIM][BF4] (shown as sticks).
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
β‐Elimination reaction of 1,1,1‐tribromo‐2,2‐bis(3,4‐dimethoxyphenyl)ethane.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Reaction coordinates, RNH–RCH and RNO, used to locate stationary points from free‐energy maps obtained via PMF simulations for the Kemp elimination of benzisoxazole using piperidine. Illustrated structure corresponds to the transition state computed from QM/MM calculations.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Henry reaction between formaldehyde and nitromethane and between benzaldehyde and nitropropane.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Typical configuration for the transition structure for the Menshutkin reaction between triethylamine and ethyl iodide in water. Nearby hydrogen‐bonding water molecules are shown.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Menshutkin reaction between triethylamine and ethyl iodide.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Browse by Topic

Electronic Structure Theory > Combined QM/MM Methods

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts