This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Comput Mol Sci
Impact Factor: 14.016

Organocatalysis: Cinchona catalysts

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

The resurgence of asymmetric organocatalysis has been accompanied by the development of countless synthetic methodologies making use of Cinchona alkaloids (or their derivatives) as catalysts. Although important steps have been made in the understanding of the mode of action of this class of compounds, the development of new catalytic methodologies is largely carried out using experiment‐driven approaches. This overview presents a selection of computational results on the behavior of Cinchona alkaloids with respect to their structure, the way they interact with other species, and, ultimately, their catalytic activity. The twofold aim of this contribution is to provide organic chemists with accessible information on computational results as well as to present theoretical chemists an overview of the methods commonly used to model Cinchona organocatalysts, and how they are comparable to experimental results. © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2011 1 142–152 DOI: 10.1002/wcms.2

This article is categorized under:

  • Structure and Mechanism > Molecular Structures
  • Electronic Structure Theory > Density Functional Theory
  • Theoretical and Physical Chemistry > Reaction Dynamics and Kinetics
Figure 1.

The structure of Cinchona alkaloids.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Figure 2.

Main stable conformations of Cinchona alkaloids.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Figure 3.

Model chromatographic selectors, chiral analytes, and representative interactions.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Figure 4.

Surface modifiers, α‐ketoesters employed as substrates in asymmetric heterogeneous hydrogenation and schematic representation of the donor/acceptor interaction between them.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Figure 5.

A representative asymmetric dihydroxylation ligand and a schematic view of its π interactions with an aromatic substrate.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Figure 6.

R3N+CH···X interactions in the complex between a nitronate, an N‐carbamoyl imine, and a model ammonium catalyst.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Figure 7.

An epi‐C9‐thiourea catalyst and a schematic representation of its (experimentally observed) solution dimer.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Figure 8.

Bifunctional catalysis in the asymmetric addition of β‐ketoesters to N‐phenyl maleimide.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Figure 9.

Asymmetric intramolecular cyclopropanation using a C2′‐methylated Cinchona derivative.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Figure 10.

Asymmetric (formal) [1,3]‐sigmatropic rearrangement of allyl trichloroacetimidates.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Figure 11.

Mechanistic duality in tertiary amine/thiourea organocatalysis exemplified for a conjugate addition. EWG, electron withdrawing group.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Browse by Topic

Electronic Structure Theory > Density Functional Theory
Theoretical and Physical Chemistry > Reaction Dynamics and Kinetics
Structure and Mechanism > Molecular Structures

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts