1 Zwitserlood, P. The locus of the effects of sentential‐semantic context on spoken‐word processing. Cognition 1989, 32:25–64.
2 Shillcock, RC. %22Lexical hypotheses in continuous speech.%22 In: Altmann, G, ed. Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge: MIT Press
; 1990, 24–29.
3 Luce, PA, Cluff, MS. Delayed commitment in spoken word recognition: evidence from cross‐modal priming. Percept Psychophys 1998, 60:484–490.
4 Tabossi, P, Collina, S, Mazzetti, M, Zoppello, M. Syllables in the processing of spoken Italian. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 2000, 26:758–775.
5 Tanenhaus, MK, Spivey‐Knowlton, MJ, Eberhard, KM, Sedivy, JC. Integration of visual and linguistic information in spoken language comprehension. Science 1995, 268:1632–1634.
6 Whalen, D. Subcategorical phonetic mismatches and lexical access. Percept Psychophys 1991, 50:351–360.
7 Connine, CM, Blasko, DG, Titone, DG. Do the beginnings of spoken words have a special status in auditory word recognition? J Mem Lang 1993, 32:193–210.
8 Connine, CM, Titone, D, Deelman, T, Blasko, DG. Similarity mapping in spoken word recognition. J Mem Lang 1997, 37:463–480.
9 Gaskell, MG, Marslen‐Wilson, WD. Phonological variation and inference in lexical access. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 1996, 22:144–158.
10 Gaskell, MG, Marslen‐Wilson, WD. Mechanisms of phonological inference. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 1998, 24:380–396.
11 Gaskell, MG, Marslen‐Wilson, WD. Representation and competition in the perception of spoken words. Cogn Psychol 2002, 45:220–266.
12 Andruski, JE, Blumstein, SE, Burton, M. The effect of subphonemic differences on lexical access. Cognition 1994, 52:163–187.
13 Dahan, D, Magnuson, JS, Tanenhaus, MK, Hogan, EM. Tracking the time course of subcategorical mismatches: evidence for lexical competition. Lang Cogn Process 2001, 16:507–534.
14 Marslen‐Wilson, WD, Warren, P. Levels of perceptual representation and process in lexical access: words, phonemes and features. Psychol Rev 1994, 101:653–675.
15 McQueen, JM, Norris, D, Cutler, A. Competition in spoken word recognition: spotting words in other words. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1994, 20:621–638.
16 Vitevitch, MS, Luce, PA. When words compete: levels of processing in spoken‐word recognition. Psychol Sci 1998, 9:325–329.
17 Vitevitch, MS, Luce, PA. Probabilistic phonotactics and neighborhood activation in spoken‐word recognition. J Mem Lang 1999, 40:374–408.
18 Luce, PA, Goldinger, SD, Auer, ET , Jr. Vitevitch, MS. Phonetic priming, neighborhood activation, and parsyn. Percept Psychophys 2000, 62:615–625.
19 Dumay, N, Frauenfelder, UH, Content, A. The role of the syllable in lexical segmentation in French: word‐spotting data. Brain Lang 2002, 81:144–161.
20 McQueen, JM. Segmentation of continuous speech using phonotactics. J Mem Lang 1998, 39:21–46.
21 van der Lugt, A. The use of sequential probabilites in the segmentation of speech. Percept Psychophys 2001, 63:811–823.
22 Weber, A, Cutler, A. First‐language phonotactics in second‐language listening. J Acoust Soc Am 2006, 119:597–607.
23 Cutler, A, Butterfield, S. Rhythmic cues to speech segmentation: evidence from juncture misperception. J Mem Lang 1992, 31:218–236.
24 Pallier, C, Sebastián‐Gallés, N, Felguera, T, Christophe, A, Mehler, J. Attentional allocation within the syllable structure of spoken words. J Mem Lang 1993, 32:373–389.
25 Vroomen, J, van Zon, M, de Gelder, B. Cues to speech segmentation: evidence from juncture misperceptions and word spotting. Mem Cogn 1996, 24:744–755.
26 Quené, H. Durational cues for word segmentation in Dutch. J Phonet 1992, 20:331–350.
27 Quené, H. Segment durations and accent as cues to word segmentation in Dutch. J Acoust Soc Am 1993, 94:2027–2035.
28 Turk, AE, Shattuck‐Hufnagel, S. Word‐boundary related duration patterns in English. J Phonet 2000, 28:397–440.
29 Forster, KI. %22Accessing the mental lexicon.%22 In: Wales, RJ, Walker, EW, eds. New Approaches to Language Mechanisms. Amsterdam: North‐Holland
30 Morton, J. The integration of information in word recognition. Psychol Rev 1969, 76:165–178.
31 Marr, D. Vision San Francisco: W. H.: Freeman
32 Norris, D. %22How do computational models help us build better theories?%22 In: Cutler, AM, ed. Twenty‐First Century Psycholinguistics: Four Cornerstones
. NJ: Lawrence, Erlbaum
33 Scharenborg, O, Boves, L. Computational modelling of spoken‐word recognition processes: design choices and evaluation. Pragmat Cogn 2010, 18:136–164.
34 Tanenhaus, MK, Magnuson, J, Dahan, D, Chambers, C. Eye movements and lexical access in spoken‐language comprehension: evaluating the linking hypothesis between fixations and linguistic processing. J Psycholing Res 2000, 29:557–580.
35 Marslen‐Wilson, WD, Tyler, LK. The temporal structure of spoken language understanding. Cognition 1980, 8:1–71.
36 Marslen‐Wilson, WD, Welsh, A. Processing interactions and lexical access during word recognition in continuous speech. Cogn Psychol 1978, 10:29–63.
37 Cole, RA. Listening for mispronunciations: a measure of what we hear during speech. Percept Psychophys 1973, 1:153–156.
38 Taft, M, Hambly, G. Exploring the cohort model of spoken word recognition. Cognition 1986, 22:259–282.
39 Marslen‐Wilson, WD. Functional parallelism in spoken word‐recognition. Cognition 1987, 25:71–102.
40 Marslen‐Wilson, WD. %22Activation, competition and frequency in lexical access.%22 In: Altman, GTM, ed. Cognitive Models of Speech Processing: Psycholinguistic and Computational Perspectives. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
; 1990, 148–172.
41 Marslen‐Wilson, WD, Brown, CM, Tyler, LK. Lexical representations in spoken language comprehension. Lang Cogn Process 1988, 3:1–16.
42 Luce, PA. A computational analysis of uniqueness points in auditory word recognition. Percept Psychophys 1986, 39:155–158.
43 Bard, EG, Shillcock, RC, Altmann, GE. The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets in spontaneous speech: evidence of subsequent context. Percept Psychophys 1988, 44:395–408.
44 McClelland, JL, Elman, JL. The TRACE model of speech perception. Cogn Psychol 1986, 18:1–86.
45 McClelland, JL, Rumelhart, DE. An interactive activation model of context effects in letter perception, Part 1: an account of basic findings. Psychol Rev 1981, 88:375–405.
46 Dahan, D, Magnuson, J, Tanenhaus, M. Time course of frequency effects in spoken‐word recognition: evidence from eye movements. Cogn Psychol 2001, 42:361–367.
47 Ganong, WF. Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. J Exp Psychol: Hum Percept Perform 1980, 6:110–125.
48 Foss, DJ, Blank, MA. Identifying the speech codes. Cogn Psychol 1980, 12:1–31.
49 Allopenna, PD, Magnuson, JS, Tanenhaus, MK. Tracking the time course of spoken word recognition using eye movements: evidence for continuous mapping models. J Mem Lang 1998, 38:419–439.
50 Norris, D. Shortlist: a connectionist model of continuous speech recognition. Cognition 1994, 52:189–234.
51 McQueen, JM, Jesse, A, Norris, D. No lexical‐prelexical feedback during speech perception or: is it time to stop playing those Christmas tapes? J Mem Lang 2009, 61:1–18.
52 Norris, D, McQueen, JM, Cutler, A. Merging information in speech recognition: feedback is never necessary. Behav Brain Sci 2000, 23:299–370.
53 Norris, D, McQueen, JM. Shortlist B: a Bayesian model of continuous speech recognition. Psychol Rev 2008, 115:357–395.
54 Magnuson, JS, McMurray, B, Tanenhaus, MK, Aslin, RN. Lexical effects on compensation for coarticulation: the ghost of Christmash past. Cogn Sci 2003, 27:285–298.
55 McQueen, JM. The ghost of Christmas future: didn`t Scrooge learn to be good? Commentary on Magnuson, McMurray, Tanenhaus, and Aslin (2003). Cogn Sci 2003, 27:795–799.
56 Norris, D, McQueen, JM, Cutler, A. Perceptual learning in speech. Cogn Psychol 2003, 47:204–238.
57 Cutler, A, Norris, D. %22Monitoring sentence comprehension.%22 In: Cooper, WE, Walker, ECT, eds. Sentence Processing: Psycholinguistic Studies Presented to Merrill Garrett. Hillsdale: Erlbaum
58 Cutler, A, Norris, D. The role of strong syllables in segmentation for lexical access. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1988, 14:113–121.
59 Norris, D, McQueen, JM, Cutler, A. Competition and segmentation in spoken‐word recognition. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1995, 21:1209–1228.
60 Vroomen, J, de Gelder, B. Metrical segmentation and lexical inhibition in spoken word recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1995, 21:98–108.
61 Norris, D, McQueen, JM, Cutler, A, Butterfield, S. The possible‐word constraint in the segmentation of continuous speech. Cogn Psychol 1997, 34:191–243.
62 Grosjean, F. The recognition of words after their acoustic offsets: evidence and implications. Percept Psychophys 1985, 38:299–310.
63 Scharenborg, O, Norris, D, ten Bosch, L, McQueen, J. How should a speech recognizer work? Cogn Sci 2005, 29:867–918.
64 Smits, R, Warner, N, McQueen, JM, Cutler, A. Unfolding of phonetic information over time: a database of Dutch diphone perception. J Acoust Soc Am 2003, 113:563–574.
65 Luce, PA, Pisoni, DB. Recognizing spoken words: the neighborhood activation model. Ear Hear 1998, 19:1–36.
66 Marslen‐Wilson, WD, Gaskell, MG. Leading up the lexical garden‐path: Segmentation and ambiguity in spoken word recognition. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2002, 28:218–244.
67 Salverda, AP, Dahan, D, McQueen, J. The role of prosodic boundaries in the resolution of lexical embedding in speech comprehension. Cognition 2003, 90:51–89.
68 Shatzman, KB, McQueen, JM. Segment duration as a cue to word boundaries in spoken‐word recognition. Percept Psychophys 2006, 68:1–16.
69 Cutler, A. Native Listening: Language Experience and the Recognition of Spoken Words. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
; 2012, in press.
70 Luce, RD. Individual Choice Behavior. Oxford: John Wiley
71 Cluff, MS, Luce, PA. Similarity neighborhoods of spoken two‐syllable words: retroactive effects on multiple activation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1990, 16:551–563.
72 Goldinger, SD, Luce, PA, Pisoni, DB. Priming lexical neighbors of spoken words: effects of competition and inhibition. J Mem Lang 1989, 28:501–518.
73 Magnuson, JS, Mirman, D, Harris, HD. %22Computational models of spoken word recognition.%22 In: Spivey, M, McRae, K, Joanisse, M, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Cambridge University Press
; in press.
74 Hintzman, DL. Schema abstraction in a multiple‐trace memory model. Psychol Rev 1986, 93:411–428.
75 Goldinger, SD. Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychol Rev 1998, 105:251–279.
76 Hintzman, DL, Block, R, Inskeep, N. Memory for mode of input. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 1972, 11:741–749.
77 McQueen, JM, Mitterer, H. %22Lexically‐driven perceptual adjustments of vowel categories.%22 Poster Presented at the ISCA Workshop on Plasticity in Speech Perception. London: 2005.
78 Pitt, MA, McQueen, JM. Is compensation for coarticulation mediated by the lexicon? J Mem Lang 1998, 39:347–370.
79 Goldinger, SD. Words and voices: episodic traces in spoken word identification and recognition memory. J Exp Psychol Lang Mem Cogn 1996, 22:1166–1183.
80 Gaskell, MG, Marslen‐Wilson, WD. Integrating form and meaning: a distributed model of speech perception. Lang Cogn Process 1997, 12:613–656 (Special cognitive models of speech processing: psycholinguistic and computational perspectives on the lexicon).
81 Hinton, GE, McClelland, JL, Rumelhart, DE. %22Distributed representations.%22 In: Rumelhart, DE, McClelland, JL, eds., vol. 1. Parallel Distributed Processing: Explorations in the Microsstructure of Cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
82 Smolensky, P. On the proper treatment of connectionism. Behav Brain Sci 1988, 11:1–74.
83 Weber, A, Crocker, MW. On the nature of semantic constraints on lexical access. J Psycholing Res 2011, Advance online publication. doi:10.1007/s10936‐011‐9184‐0.
84 Fodor, JA. Modularity of Mind: An Essay on Faculty Psychology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
85 Norris, D, Cutler, A, McQueen, JM, Butterfield, S. Phonological and conceptual activation in speech comprehension. Cogn Psychol 2006, 53:146–193.
86 McQueen, JM. %22Speech perception.%22 In: Lamberts, K, Goldstone, R, eds. The Handbook of Cognition. London: Sage Publications
; 2005, 255–275.
87 Klatt, DH. Speech perception: a model of acoustic‐phonetic analysis and lexical access. J Phonet 1979, 7:279–312.
88 Stevens, KN. Toward a model for lexical access based on acoustic landmarks and distinctive features. J Acoust Soc Am 2002, 111:1872–1891.
89 Grossberg, S, Myers, CW. The resonant dynamics of speech perception: Interword integration and duration‐dependent backward effects. Psychol Rev 2000, 107:735–767.
90 Massaro, DW. Perceiving Talking Faces: From Speech Perception to A Behavioral Principle. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press
91 Collins, AM, Quillian, MR. Retrieval time from semantic memory. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 1969, 8:240–247.
92 Smith, EE, Shoben, EJ, Rips, LJ. Structure and process in semantic memory: a featural model for semantic decisions. Psychol Rev 1974, 81:214–241.
93 Collins, AM, Loftus, EF. A spreading‐activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol Rev 1975, 82:407–428.
94 Anderson, JR. ACT: a simple theory of complex cognition. Am Psychol 1996, 51:355–365.
95 Bölte, J, Coenen, E. Is phonological information mapped onto semantic information in a one‐to‐one manner? Brain Lang 2002, 81:384–397.
96 Butterworth, B. Lexical representation. In: Butterworth, B, ed., vol. 2. Language Production.
London: Academic Press
; 1983, 257–332.
97 Taft, M, Forster, KI. Lexical storage and retrieval of prefixed words. J Verb Learn Verb Behav 1975, 14:630–647.
98 Clahsen, H. Lexical entries and rules of language: a multidisciplinary study of German inflection. Behav Brain Sci 1999, 22:991–1060.
99 Schreuder, R, Baayen, H., Modeling morphological processing. In: Feldman, LB, ed. Morphological Aspects of Language Processing.
Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum
; 1995, 131–154.
100 Marslen‐Wilson, WD. Access to lexical representations: cross‐linguistic issues. Lang Cogn Process 2001, 16:699–708.
101 Marslen‐Wilson, WD. %22Morphology and language.%22 In: Brown, K, ed. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics. Oxford: Elsevier
102 Marslen‐Wilson, WD, Tyler, LK, Waksler, R, Older, L. Morphology and meaning in the English mental lexicon. Psychol Rev 1994, 101:3–33.
103 Ernestus, M, Baayen, H. Paradigmatic effects in auditory word recognition: the case of alternating voice in Dutch. Lang Cogn Process 2007, 22:1–24.
104 Baayen, H, McQueen, JM, Dijkstra, T, Schreuder, R. %22Frequency effects in regular inflectional morphology: revisiting Dutch plurals.%22 In: Baayen, H, Schreuder, R, eds. Morphological Structure in Language Processing. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter
; 2003, 355–390.
105 McClelland, JL, Mirman, D, Holt, LL. Are there interactive processes in speech perception? Trends Cogn Sci 2006, 10:363–369.
106 McQueen, JM, Norris, D, Cutler, A. Are there really interactive processes in speech perception? Trends Cogn Sci 2006, 10:533.
107 Goldinger, SD. %22A complementary‐systems approach to abstract and episodic speech perception.%22 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences., Dudweiler: Pirrot; 2007, 49–54.
108 Cutler, A, Weber, A. %22Listening experience and phonetic‐to‐lexical mapping in L2.%22 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Dudweiler: Pirrot; 2007, 43–48.
109 Norman, K, O’Reilly, R. Modeling hippocampal and neocortical contributions to recognition memory: a complementary learning systems approach. Psychol Rev 2003, 110:611–646.
110 Connine, CM, Ranbom, L, Patterson, DJ. On the representation of phonological variant frequency in spoken word recognition. Percept Psychophys 2008, 70:403–411.
111 Elman, JL, McClelland, JL. %22Exploiting lawful variability in the speech wave.%22 In: Perkell, JS, Klatt, DH, eds. Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates