References
1 Newell, A.
Unified theories of cognition. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press; 1990.
2 Anderson, JR.
The Architecture of Cognition. Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.; 1983.
3 Gray, WD, Young, RM, Kirschenbaum, SS. Introduction to this special issue on cognitive architectures and human‐computer interaction. Hum‐Comput Interact 1998, 12:301–309.
4 Ritter, FE, Young, RM. Embodied models as simulated users: Introduction to this special issue on using cognitive models to improve interface design. Int J Hum‐Comput St 2001, 55:1–14.
5 Anderson, JR. How can the human mind occur in the physical universe? New York:
Oxford; 2007.
6 Anderson, JR.
Rules of the mind. Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum; 1993.
7 Meyer, DE, Kieras, D E. A computational theory of executive cognitive processes and multiple‐task performance: Part 1. Basic mechanisms. Psychol Rev 1997, 104:3–65.
8 Anderson, JR, Bothell, D, Byrne, MD, Douglass, S, Lebiere, C, Qin, Y. An integrated theory of the mind. Psychol Rev 2004, 111:1036–1060.
9 Simon, HA.
The Sciences of the Artificial.
3rd ed. Cambridge:
Mass MIT Press; 1996.
10 Newell, A. %22You can`t play 20 questions with nature and win: Projective comments on the papers of this symposium.%22 In: Chase, WG, ed.
Visual Information Processing. New York:
Academic Press; 1973, 283–308.
11 Cooper, RP. The role of falsification in the development of cognitive architectures: insights from a Lakatosian analysis. Cognitive Sci 2007, 31:509–533.
12 Norman, DA. %22Twelve issues for cognitive science.%22 In: Aitkenhead, AM, Slack, JM, eds.
Issues in Cognitive Modeling. Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum; 1985, 309–336.
13 Anderson, JR, Lebiere, C. The Newell test for a theory of cognition. Behav Brain Sci 2003, 26:587–640.
14 Block, N. On a confusion about a function of consciousness. Behav Brain Sci 1995, 18:227–287.
15 Bringsjord, S. Animals, zombanimals, and the total Turing test: the essence of artificial intelligence. JoLLI 2000, 9:397–418.
16 Hunt, E, Luce, RD. Soar as a world view, not a theory. Behav Brain Sc 1992, 15:447–448.
17 Tadepalli, P. Cognitive architectures have limited explanatory power. Behav Brain Sc 2003, 26:622–623.
18 Roberts, S, Pashler, H. How persuasive is a good fit? A comment on theory testing. Psychol Rev 2000, 107:358–367.
19 Laird, JE, Newell, A, Rosenbloom, PS. Soar: an architecture for general intelligence. Artif Intell 1987, 33:1–64.
20 Polk, TA, Newell, A. Deduction as verbal reasoning. Psychol Rev 1995, 102:533–566.
21 Jones, RM, Laird, JE, Nielsen, PE, Coulter, K J, Kenny, P, Koss, FV. Automated intelligent pilots for combat flight simulation. AI Mag 1999, 20:27–41.
22 Laird, , JE.
Extending the Soar Cognitive Architecture. Paper presented at the First Conference on Artificial General Intelligence, Memphis, TN:
IOS Press; 2008.
23 Sun, R. %22The CLARION cognitive architecture: extending cognitive modeling to social simulation%22 In: Sun, R, ed.
Cognition and Multi‐Agent Interaction. New York:
Cambridge University Press; 2006.
24 Langley, P, Choi, D. %22A unified cognitive architecture for physical agents.%22
Proceedings of the Twenty‐First National Conference on Artificial Intelligence. Boston:
AAAI Press; 2006.
25 Cassimatis, NL. A cognitive substrate for human‐level intelligence. AI Mag 2006, 27:45–56.
26 Anderson, JR, Bower, G. Human Associative Memory. Washington, DC:
Winston; 1973.
27 Anderson, JR, Bothell, D, Lebiere, C, Matessa, M. An integrated theory of list memory. J Mem Lang 1998, 38:341–380.
28 Salvucci, DD. Modeling driver behavior in a cognitive architecture. Hum Factors 2006, 48:362–380.
29 Gobet, F, Lane, P. %22The CHREST architecture of cognition: listening to empirical data.%22 In: Davis, D, ed.
Visions of Mind: Architectures for Cognition and Affect. Hershey, PA:
Information Science Publishing; 2005, 204–224.
30 Liu, Y, Feyen, R, Tsimhoni, O. Queueing network‐model human processor (QN‐MHP): a computational architecture for multitask performance in human‐machine systems. ACM T on Comput‐Hum Int 2006, 13:37–70.
31 O`Reilly, RC, Munakata, Y.
Computational Explorations in Cognitive Neuroscience: Understanding the Mind by Simulating the Brain. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press; 2000.
32 Atallah, HE, Frank, MJ, O`Reilly, R. Hippocampus, cortex, and basal ganglia: Insights from computational models of complementary learning systems. Neurobiol Learn Mem 2004, 82:253–267.
33 Jilk, DJ, Lebiere, C, O`Reilly, R, Anderson, JR. SAL: an explicitly pluralistic cognitive architecture. J Exp Theor Artif In 2008, 20:197–218.
34 Chong, RS, Laird, JE. %22Identifying dual‐task executive process knowledge using EPIC‐Soar.%22 In: Shafto, M, Langley, P, eds. Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum; 1997, 107–112.
35 Taatgen, NA, Rijn, HV, Anderson, JR. An integrated theory of prospective time interval estimation: the role of cognition, attention and learning. Psychol Rev 2007, 114:577–598.
36 Hudlicka, E. %22Reasons for emotions: modeling emotions in integrated cognitive systems.%22 In: Gray, WD, ed.
Integrated Models of Cognitive Systems. New York:
Oxford University Press; 2007, 263–278.
37 Marinier, RP, Laird, JE. %22Computational modeling of mood and feeling from emotion.%22
Proceedings of 29th Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Nashville:
Cognitive Science Society; 2007, 461–466.
38 Gunzelmann, G, Gross, JB, Gluck, KA, Dinges, DF. Sleep deprivation and sustained attention performance: Integrating mathematical and cognitive modeling. Cognitive Sci 2009, 33:880–910.
39 Ritter, FE, Reifers, A, Klein, LC, Quigley, K, Schoelles, M. %22Using cognitive modeling to study behavior moderators: Pre‐task appraisal and anxiety.%22 In
Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA:
Human Factors and Ergonomics Society; 2004, 2121–2125.
40 Lathrop, SD, Laird, JE. Towards incorporating visual imagery into a cognitive architecture,
Eighth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, 2007.
41 Lyon, DR, Gunzelmann, G, Gluck, KA. A computational model of spatial visualization capacity. Cognitive Psychol 2008, 57:122–152.
42 Harrison, AM, Schunn, CD. %22ACT‐R/S:Look Ma, no “cognitive map”%22! In: Detje, F, Doerner, D, Schaub, H, eds.
Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling. Bamberg, Germany:
Universitats‐Verlag Bamberg; 2003, 129–134.
43 Kennedy, WG, Bugajska, MD, Harrison, AM, Trafton, JG. “Like‐Me” simulation as an effective and cognitively plausible basis for social robotics. Int J Soc Econ 2009, 1:181–194.
44 Lewis, RL, Vasishth, S. An activation‐based model of sentence processing as skilled memory retrieval. Cognitive Sc 2005, 29:375–419.