1 Lisker, L. “Voicing” in English: a catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in Trochees. Lang Speech 1986, 29:3–11.
2 Holt, LL, Lotto, AJ. Speech perception within an auditory cognitive science framework. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2008, 17:42–46.
3 Yost, WA. Fundamentals of Hearing: An Introduction. Massachusetts: Academic Press
4 de Cheveigné, A. %22Pitch perception models.%22 In: Plack, CJ, Oxenham, AJ, Fay, RR, Popper, AN, eds. Pitch: Neural Coding and Perception. New York: Springer Science and Business Media
; 2005, 169–233.
5 Javel, E, McGee, J, Walsh, EJ, Farley, GR, Gorga, MP. Suppression of auditory nerve responses. II. Suppression threshold and growth, iso‐suppression contours. J Acoust Soc Am 1983, 74:801–813.
6 Cherry, EC. Some experiments on the recognition of speech, with one and with two ears. J Acoust Soc Am 1953, 25:975–979.
7 Bregman, AS. Auditory Scene Analysis. Massachusetts: MIT Press
8 Miller, GA, Heise, GA. The trill threshold. J Acoust Soc Am 1950, 22:637–638.
9 Bregman, AS, Campbell, J. Primary auditory stream segregation and perception of order in rapid sequences of tones. J Exp Psychol 1971, 89:244–249.
10 Bregman, AS. Auditory streaming is cumulative. J Exp Psychol 1978, 4:380–387.
11 Anstis, S, Saida, S. Adaptation to auditory streaming of frequency‐modulated tones. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1985, 11:257–271.
12 Izumi, A. Auditory stream segregation in Japanese monkeys. Cognition 2002, 82:113–122.
13 MacDougall‐Shackleton, SA, Hulse, SH, Gentner, TQ, White, W. Auditory scene analysis by European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris): perceptual segregation of tone sequences. J Acoust Soc Am 1998, 103:3581–3587.
14 Fay, RR. Spectral contrasts underlying auditory stream segregation in goldfish (Carassius auratus). J Assoc Res Otolaryngol 2000, 1:120–128.
15 Micheyl, C, Carlyon, RP, Gutschalk, A, Melcher, JR, Oxenham, AJ, Rauschecker, JP, Tian, B, Courtenay, WE. The role of auditory cortex in the formation of auditory streams. Hear Res 2007, 229:116–131.
16 Pressnitzer, D, Sayles, M, Micheyl, C, Winter, I. Perceptual organization of sound begins in the auditory periphery. Curr Biol 2008, 18:1124–1128.
17 Bey, C, McAdams, S. Schema‐based processing in auditory scene analysis. Percept Psychophys 2002, 64:844–854.
18 Snyder, JS, Carter, OL, Lee, SK, Hannon, EE, Alain, C. Effects of context on auditory stream segregation. J Exp Psychol 2008, 34:1007–1016.
19 Carlyon, RP, Cusack, R, Foxton, JM, Robertson, IH. Effects of attention and unilateral neglect on auditory stream segregation. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2001, 27:115–127.
20 Dorman, MF, Cutting, JE, Raphael, LJ. Perception of temporal order in vowel sequences with and without formant transitions. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1975, 1:121–129.
21 Gregg, MK, Samuel, AG. Change deafness and the organizational properties of sounds. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2008, 34:974–990.
22 Luck, SJ, Vogel, EK. The capacity of visual working memory for features and conjunctions. Nature 1997, 390:279–281.
23 Mitroff, SR, Simons, DJ, Levin, DT. Nothing compares 2 views: change blindness can occur despite preserved access to the changed information. Percept Psychophys 2004, 66:1268–1281.
24 Pick, HL, Warren, DH, Hay, JC. Sensory conflict in judgments of spatial direction. Percept Psychophys 1969, 6:203–205.
25 Warren, DH, Welch, RB, McCarthy, TJ. The role of visual‐auditory “compellingness” in the ventriloquism effect: implications for transitivity among the spatial senses. Percept Psychophys 1981, 30:557–64.
26 Alais, D, Burr, D. The ventriloquist effect results from near‐optimal bimodal integration. Curr Biol 2004, 14:257–262.
27 Ernst, MO, Banks, MS. Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 2002, 415:429–433.
28 Welch, RB, DuttonHurt, LD, Warren, DH. Contributions of audition and vision to temporal rate perception. Percept Psychophys 1986, 39:294–300.
29 Recanzone, GH. Auditory influences on visual temporal rate perception. J Neurophys 2003, 89:1078–1093.
30 Stevens, SS, Newman, EB. The localization of actual sources of sound. Am J Psychol 1936, 48:297–306.
31 Rayleigh, L. On our perception of sound direction. Philos Mag 1907, 13:214–232.
32 Hofman, PM, Van Riswick, JG, Van Opstal, AJ. Relearning sound localization with new ears. Nat Neurosci 1998, 1:417–421.
33 Darwin, CJ. Auditory grouping. Trends Cogn Sci 1997, 1:327–333.
34 Beerends, JG, Houtsma, AJM. Pitch identification of simultaneous dichotic two‐tone complexes. J Acoust Soc Am 1986, 80:1048–1056.
35 Hartmann, WM, Johnson, D. Stream segregation and peripheral channeling. Music Percept 1991, 9:155–184.
36 Darwin, CJ. %22Spatial hearing and perceiving sources.%22 In: Yost, WA, Popper, AN, Fay, RR, eds. Auditory Perception of Sound Sources. New York: Springer Science and Business Media
; 2008, 215–232.
37 Ihlefeld, A, Shinn‐Cunningham, B. Disentangling the effects of spatial cues on selection and formation of auditory objects. J Acoust Soc Am 2008, 124:2224–2235.
38 Gaver, WW. Everyday Listening and Auditory Icons. California: University of California
39 Lutfi, RA, Oh, EL. Auditory discrimination of material changes in a struck‐clamped bar. J Acoust Soc Am 1997, 102:3647–3656.
40 Tucker, S, Brown, GJ. Modeling the auditory perception of size, shape and material: applications to the classification of transient sonar sounds. 114th Auditory Engineering Society Convention. Amsterdam: The Netherlands; 2003, 22–25.
41 Kunkler‐Peck, AJ, Turvey, MT. Hearing shape. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 2000, 26:279–294.
42 Lutfi, RA. %22Human sound source identification.%22 In: Yost, WA, Popper, AN, Fay, RR, eds. Auditory Perception of Sound Sources. New York: Springer Science and Business Media
; 2008, 13–42.
43 Liberman, AM, Harris, KS, Hoffman, HS, Griffith, BC. The discrimination of speech sounds within and across phoneme boundaries. J Exp Psychol 1957, 54:358–368.
44 Cutting, JE. Plucks and bows are categorically perceived, sometimes. Percept Psychophys 1982, 31:462–476.
45 Massaro, DW. %22Categorical partition: a fuzzy logical model of categorization behavior.%22 In: Harnad, S, ed. Categorical Perception: The Groundwork of Cognition. Massachusetts: Cambridge University Press
; 1987, 254–283.
46 Schouten, B, Gerrits, E, Van Hessen, A. The end of categorical perception as we know it. Speech Commun 2003, 41:71–80.
47 Lotto, AJ. Language acquisition as complex category formation. Phonetica 2000, 57:189–196.
48 Guenther, FH, Husain, FT, Cohen, MA, Shinn‐Cunningham, BG. Effects of categorization and discrimination training on auditory perceptual space. J Acoust Soc Am 1999, 106:2900–2912.
49 Sullivan, SC, Lotto, AJ, Newlin, ET, Diehl, RL. Sensitivity to changing stimulus distribution characteristics in auditory categorization. J Acoust Soc Am 2005, 118:1896.
50 Smits, R, Sereno, J, Jongman, A. Categorization of sounds. J Exp Psychol 2006, 32:733–754.
51 Hazan, V, Barrett, S. The development of phonemic categorization in children aged 6–12. J Phon 2000, 28:377–396.
52 Nittrouer, S. The role of temporal and dynamic signal components in the perception of syllable‐final stop voicing by children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am 2004, 115:1777–1790.
53 Iverson, P, Kuhl, PK, Akahane‐Yamada, R, Diesch, E, Tohkura, Y, Kettermann, A, Siebert, C. A perceptual interference account of acquisition difficulties for non‐native phonemes. Cognition 2003, 87:47–57.
54 Lotto, AJ, Sato, M, Diehl, RL. %22Mapping the task for the second language learner: the case of Japanese acquisition of /r/ and /l/.%22 In: Slifka, J, Manuel, S, Matthies, M, eds. From Sound to Sense: 50+ Years of Discoveries in Speech Communication. Massachusetts
: MIT Press; 2004, C181–C186.
55 Francis, AL, Kaganovich, N, Driscoll‐Huber, C. Cue‐specific effects of categorization training on the relative weighting of acoustic cues to consonant voicing in English. J Acoust Soc Am 2008, 124:1234–1251.
56 Holt, LL, Lotto, AJ. Cue weighting in auditory categorization: implications for first and second language acquisition. J Acoust Soc Am 2006, 119:3059–3071.
57 Kuhl, PK, Williams, KA, Lacerda, F, Stevens, KN, Lindblom, B. Linguistic experience alters phonetic perception in infants by 6 months of age. Science 1992, 255:606–608.
58 Kluender, KR, Lotto, AJ, Holt, LL, Bloedel, SL. Role of experience for language‐specific functional mappings of vowel sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 1998, 104:3568–3582.
59 Lutfi, RA, Liu, CJ. Individual differences in source identification from synthesized impact sounds. J Acoust Soc Am 2007, 122:1017–1028.
60 Lively, SE, Logan, JS, Pisoni, DB. Training Japanese listeners to identify English /r/ and /l/. II: The role of phonetic environment and talker variability in learning new perceptual categories. J Acoust Soc Am 1993, 94:1242–1255.
61 Guinan, JJ Jr. Olivocochlear efferents: anatomy, physiology, function, and the measurement of efferent effects in humans. Ear Hear 2006, 27:589–607.
62 Maison, S, Micheyl, C, Collet, L. Influence of focused auditory attention on cochlear activity in humans. Psychophysiology 2001, 38:35–40.
63 Broadbent, DE. Perception and Communication. London: Pergamon Press
64 Lotto, AJ, Holt, LL. Putting phonetic context effects into context: a commentary on Fowler (2006). Percept Psychophys 2006, 68:178–183.