Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals

Advanced Review

Victor R. Schinazi, Tyler Thrash, Daniel‐Robert Chebat

Published Online: Dec 18 2015

DOI: 10.1002/wcs.1375

Full article on Wiley Online Library: HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Spatial navigation in the absence of vision has been investigated from a variety of perspectives and disciplines. These different approaches have progressed our understanding of spatial knowledge acquisition by blind individuals, including their abilities, strategies, and corresponding mental representations. In this review, we propose a framework for investigating differences in spatial knowledge acquisition by blind and sighted people consisting of three longitudinal models (i.e., convergent, cumulative, and persistent). Recent advances in neuroscience and technological devices have provided novel insights into the different neural mechanisms underlying spatial navigation by blind and sighted people and the potential for functional reorganization. Despite these advances, there is still a lack of consensus regarding the extent to which locomotion and wayfinding depend on amodal spatial representations. This challenge largely stems from methodological limitations such as heterogeneity in the blind population and terminological ambiguity related to the concept of cognitive maps. Coupled with an over‐reliance on potential technological solutions, the field has diffused into theoretical and applied branches that do not always communicate. Here, we review research on navigation by congenitally blind individuals with an emphasis on behavioral and neuroscientific evidence, as well as the potential of technological assistance. Throughout the article, we emphasize the need to disentangle strategy choice and performance when discussing the navigation abilities of the blind population. WIREs Cogn Sci 2016, 7:37–58. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1375

This article is categorized under:

Psychology > Learning
Neuroscience > Cognition
Neuroscience > Plasticity

Four possible outcomes of studying the interaction between spatial strategies and performances in spatial tasks. The two left cells lead to inconclusive or uninterpretable results with respect to the abilities of the blind and sighted. Future research should focus on the outcomes in the two right cells.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

A schematic depiction of the neural correlates (i.e., functional and structural) of navigation by the blind. Indicators are organized by study and task. The color of each indicator represents study, and the shape represents type of task. Indicators are placed over the approximate regions corresponding to each study.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Three models of differences in spatial knowledge acquisition between blind and sighted individuals. On the x‐axis is the amount of experience with a particular environment or task. On the y‐axis is the extent of spatial knowledge acquisition. Because of the lack of vision, blind individuals start at a disadvantage in each of these models. (a) Convergent model: the difference between blind and sighted individuals decreases over time until reaching a similar level of spatial knowledge. (b) Cumulative model: the difference between blind and sighted individuals increases with experience. (c) Persistent model: blind and sighted individuals continue to acquire spatial knowledge with experience, but differences in spatial knowledge remain constant.

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

References

Golledge, GR. Geography and the disabled: a survey with special reference to vision impaired and blind populations. Trans Inst Br Geogr 1993, 18:63–85.
Imrie, R, Hall, P. Inclusive Design: Designing and Developing Accessible Environments. London: Spon Press; 2001.
Maidenbaum, S, Abboud, S, Amedi, A. Sensory substitution: closing the gap between basic research and widespread practical visual rehabilitation. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014, 41:3–15.
Giudice, NA, Legge, GE. %22Blind navigation and the role of technology%22. In: Helal, AS, Mokhtari, M, Abdulrazak, B, eds. The Engineering Handbook of Smart Technology for Aging, Disability, and Independence. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley %26 Sons; 2008, 479–500.
Hersh, MA, Johnson, MA, eds. Assistive Technology for Visually Impaired and Blind People. London: Springer; 2008.
Loomis, JM, Klatzky, RL, Giudice, NA. %22Sensory substitution of vision: importance of perceptual and cognitive processing%22. In: Manduchi, R, Kurniawan, S, eds. Assistive Technology for Blindness and Low Vision. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press; 2012, 162–191.
Siegel, AW, White, SH. The development of spatial representations of large‐scale environments. Adv Child Dev Behav 1975, 10:9–55.
Gaunet, F, Thinus‐Blanc, C. Early‐blind subjects’ spatial abilities in the locomotor space: exploratory strategies and reaction‐to‐change performance. Perception 1996, 25:967–981.
Hölscher, C, Meilinger, T, Vrachliotis, G, Brösamle, M, Knauff, M. Up the down staircase: wayfinding strategies in multi‐level buildings. J Environ Psychol 2006, 26:284–299.
Millar, S. Models of sensory deprivation: the nature/nurture dichotomy and spatial representation in the blind. Int J Behav Dev 1988, 11:69–87.
Haber, L, Haber, RN, Pennigroth, S, Novak, K, Radgowski, H. Comparison of nine methods of indicating the direction of objects: data from blind subjects. Perception 1993, 22:35–47.
Warren, DH. Childhood visual impairment: perspectives on research design and methodology. J Vis Impair Blind 1978, 72:404–411.
Warren, DH. Blindness and Early Childhood Development. 2nd ed. New York: American Foundation for the Blind; 1984.
Chess, S, Gordon, SG. Psychosocial development and human variance. Rev Res Educ 1984, 11:3–62.
Holbrook, C, Mamer, L, MacCuspie, A, McConnell, D. The Impact of Vision Loss on the Development of Children from Birth to 12 Years: A Literature Review. Toronto, Canada: The Canadian National Institute of the Blind; 2000.
Schinazi, VR. Representing space: the development, content and accuracy of mental representations by the blind and visually impaired. PhD Thesis, University College London, 2008.
Fletcher, FJ. Spatial representation in blind children. 1: development compared to sighted children. J Vis Impair Blind 1980, 74:381–385.
Loomis, JM, Klatzky, RL, Giudice, NA. %22Representing 3D space in working memory: spatial images from vision, touch, hearing, and language%22. In: Lacey, S, Lawson, R, eds. Multisensory Imagery: Theory %26 Applications. New York: Springer; 2013, 131–155.
Montello, DR. %22Navigation%22. In: Shah, P, Miyake, A, eds. The Cambridge Handbook of Visuospatial Thinking. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2005.
Long, RG, Giudice, NA. %22Establishing and maintaining orientation for mobility%22. In: Wiener, WR, Welsh, RL, Blasch, BB, eds. Foundations of Orientation and Mobility, Volume 1 (History and Theory). New York: AFB Press; 2010, 45–62.
Wang, RF, Spelke, ES. Updating egocentric representations in human navigation. Cognition 2000, 77:215–250.
Heft, H. %22The ecological approach to navigation: a Gibsonian perspective%22. In: Portugali, J, ed. The Construction of Cognitive Maps. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996.
Wang, RF, Brockmole, JR. Simultaneous spatial updating in nested environments. Psychon Bull Rev 2003, 10:981–986.
Waller, D, Hodgson, E. Transient and enduring spatial representations under disorientation and self‐rotation. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2006, 32:867–882.
Shelton, AL, McNamara, TP. Systems of spatial reference in human memory. Cogn Psychol 2001, 43:274–310.
Zaehle, T, Jordan, K, Wustenberg, T, Baudewig, J, Dechent, P, Mast, FW. The neural basis of the egocentric and allocentric spatial frame of reference. Brain Res 2007, 1137:92–103.
Mou, W, McNamara, TP. Intrinsic frames of reference in spatial memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2002, 15:887–897.
Levinson, SC. %22Frames of reference and Molyneux`s question: cross‐linguistic evidence%22. In: Bloom, P, Peterson, MA, Nadel, L, Garrett, M, eds. Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1996, 109–169.
Klatzky, RL. %22Allocentric and egocentric spatial representations: definitions, distinctions, and interconnections%22. In: Freksa, C, Habel, C, Wender, KF, Klatzky, RL, eds. An Interdisciplinary Approach to Representation and Processing of Spatial Knowledge. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag; 1998, 1–17.
Pasqualotto, A, Spiller, MJ, Jansari, AS, Proulx, MJ. Visual experience facilitates allocentric spatial representation. Behav Brain Res 2013, 236:175–179.
Iachini, T, Ruggiero, G, Ruotolo, F. Does blindness affect egocentric and allocentric frames of reference in small and large scale spaces? Behav Brain Res 2014, 273:73–81.
Montello, RD, Golledge, GR. Scale and Detail in the Cognition of Geographinc Information: Report of Spacialist Meeting of Project Varenius. Santa Barbara, CA: National Centre for Geographic Information and Analysis; 1999.
Wolbers, T, Wiener, JM. Challenges for identifying the neural mechanisms that support spatial navigation: the impact of spatial scale. Front Hum Neurosci 2014, 8:571.
Wolbers, T, Hegarty, M. What determines our navigational abilities? Trends Cogn Sci 2010, 14:138–146.
Pingel, TJ, Schinazi, VR. The relationship between scale and strategy in search‐based way finding. Cartogr Perspect 2014, 77:33–45.
Espinosa, MA, Ochaíta, E. Using tactile maps to improve the practical spatial knowledge of adults who are blind. J Vis Impair Blind 1998, 92:338–345.
Hermelin, B, O`Connor, N. Location and distance estimates by blind and sighted children. Q J Exp Psychol 1975, 27:295–301.
Lederman, SJ, Klatzky, RL, Barber, PO. Spatial and movement‐based heuristics for encoding pattern information through touch. J Exp Psychol Gen 1985, 114:33–49.
Herman, JE, Herman, TG, Chatman, SP. Constructing cognitive maps from partial information: a demonstration study with congenitally blind subjects. J Vis Impair Blind 1983, 77:195–198.
Ungar, S. Can the visually impaired children use tactile maps to estimate directions? J Vis Impair Blind 1994, 88:221–228.
Edwards, R, Ungar, S, Blades, M. Route descriptions by visually impaired and sighted children from memory and from maps. J Vis Impair Blind 1998, 92:512–521.
Ungar, S. The ability of visually impaired children to locate themselves on a tactile map. J Vis Impair Blind 1996, 90:526–531.
Ungar, S, Blades, M. Teaching visually impaired children to make distance judgements from a tactile map. J Vis Impair Blind 1997, 91:163–177.
Casey, SM. Cognitive mapping by the blind. J Vis Impair Blind 1978, 72:297–301.
Jacobson, RD. Cognitive mapping without sight: four preliminary studies of spatial learning. J Environ Psychol 1998, 18:289–305.
Gagnon, L, Schneider, FC, Siebner, HR, Paulson, OB, Kupers, R, Ptito, M. Activation of the hippocampal complex during tactile maze solving in congenitally blind subjects. Neuropsychologia 2012, 50:1663–1671.
Kupers, R, Chebat, DR, Madsen, KH, Paulson, OB, Ptito, M. Neural correlates of virtual route recognition in congenital blindness. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2010, 107:12716–12721.
Taube, JS, Valerio, S, Yoder, RM. Is navigation in virtual reality with FMRI really navigation? J Cogn Neurosci 2013, 25:1008–1019.
Meilinger, T, Riecke, BE, Bülthoff, HH. Local and global reference frames for environmental spaces. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2014, 67:542–569.
Greenauer, N, Waller, D. Micro‐ and macroreference frames: specifying the relations between spatial categories in memory. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2010, 36:938–957.
Cohen, LG, Celnik, P, Pascual‐Leone, A, Corwell, B, Falz, L, Dambrosia, J, Honda, M, Sadato, N, Gerloff, C, Catalá, MD, et al. Functional relevance of cross‐modal plasticity in blind humans. Nature 1997, 389:180–183.
Sadato, N, Pascual‐Leone, A, Grafman, J, Deiber, MP, Ibañez, V, Hallett, M. Neural networks for Braille reading by the blind. Brain 1998, 121:1213–1229.
Burton, H, McLaren, DG, Sinclair, RJ. Reading embossed capital letters: an fMRI study in blind and sighted individuals. Hum Brain Mapp 2006, 27:325–339.
Ptito, M, Kupers, R. Cross‐modal plasticity in early blindness. J Integr Neurosci 2005, 4:479–488.
Montello, RD. %22A new framework for understanding the acquisition of spatial knowledge in large‐scale environments%22. In: Egenhofer, JM, Golledge, GR, eds. Spatial and Temporal Reasoning in Geographic Information System. New York: Oxford University Press; 1998, 143–154.
Chrastil, ER. Neural evidence supports a novel framework for spatial navigation. Psychon Bull Rev 2013, 20:208–227.
Dodge, M, Kitchin, R. Mapping Cyberspace. New York: Routledge; 2001.
Shettleworth, SJ. Cognition, Evolution, and Behavior. New York: Oxford University Press; 2010.
Golledge, GR. Representing, interpreting and using cognized environments. Pap Proc Reg Sci Assoc 1978, 41:169–204.
Shemyakin, F. %22Orientation in space%22. In: Ananyev, B, ed. Psychological Science in the USSR. Washington, DC: US Office of Technical Reports; 1962, 186–255.
Piaget, J, Inhelder, B. The Child`s Conception of Space. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1956.
Blades, M. %22Wayfinding theory and research: the need for a new appraoch%22. In: Mark, DM, Frank, AU, eds. Cognitive and Linguistic Aspects of Geographic Science. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1991, 137–165.
Foley, JE, Cohen, AJ. Working mental representations of the environment. Environ Behav 1984, 16:713–729.
Schinazi, VR, Epstein, RA. Neural correlates of real‐world route learning. Neuroimage 2010, 53:725–735.
Ishikawa, T, Montello, RD. Spatial knowledge acquistion from direct experience in the environment: individual differences in the development of metric knowledge and the integration of separately learned places. Cogn Psychol 2006, 52:93–129.
Schinazi, VR, Nardi, D, Newcombe, NS, Shipley, TF, Epstein, RA. Hippocampal size predicts rapid learning of a cognitive map in humans. Hippocampus 2013, 23:515–528.
Cheng, K, Shettleworth, SJ, Huttenlocher, J, Rieser, JJ. Bayesian integration of spatial information. Psychol Bull 2007, 133:625–637.
Newcombe, N, Huttenlocher, J. %22Development of spatial cognition%22. In: Kuhn, D, Siegler, RS, eds. Handbook of Child Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley %26 Sons; 2006, 734–776.
Millar, S. Understanding and Representing Space: Theory and Evidence from Studies with Blind and Sighted Children. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1994.
Millar, S. %22Modaility and mind: convergent active processing in interrelated networks as a model of development and perception%22. In: Heller, MA, ed. Touch, Representation and Blindness. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press; 2000, 99–141.
Tinti, C, Adenzato, M, Tamietto, M, Cornoldi, C. Visual experience is not necessary for efficient survey spatial cognition: evidence from blindness. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove) 2006, 59:1306–1328.
Chen, E, Matthews, KA, Boyce, WT. Socioeconomic differences in children`s health: how and why do these relationships change with age? Psychol Bull 2002, 128:295–329.
Klatzky, LR, Golledge, GR, Loomis, JM, Cicinelli, JG, Pellegrino, JW. Performance of blind and sighted persons on spatial tasks. J Vis Impair Blind 1995, 89:70–82.
Blanco, F, Travieso, D. Haptic exploration and mental estimation of distances in a fictitious island: from mind`s eye to mind`s hand. J Vis Impair Blind 2003, 97:298–300.
Thinus‐Blanc, C, Gaunet, F. Representation of space in blind persons: vision as a spatial sense? Psychol Bull 1997, 121:20–42.
Kitchin, RM, Jacobson, RD. Techniques to collect and analyze the cognitive map knowledge of persons with visual impairment or blindness: issues of validity. J Vis Impair Blind 1997, 91:360–376.
Juurmaa, J. Transposition in mental spatial manipulation: a theoretical analysis. Am Found Blind Res Bull 1973, 26:87–134.
Postma, A, Zuidhoek, S, Noordzij, ML, Kappers, AML. Differences between early‐blind, late‐blind, and blindfolded‐sighted people in haptic spatial‐configuration learning and resulting memory traces. Perception 2007, 36:1253–1265.
Carreiras, M, Codina, B. Spatial cognition of the blind and sighted: visual and amodal hypothesis. Cah Psychol Cogn 1992, 12:51–78.
Hollins, M, Kelley, EK. Spatial updating in blind and sighted people. Percept Psychophys 1988, 43:380–388.
Klatzky, LR, Loomis, JM, Golledge, GR. %22Encoding spatial representations through nonvisually guided locomotion: tests of human path integration%22. In: Medin, D, ed. The Psychology of Learning and Motivation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1997, 41–84.
Klatzky, RL, Loomis, JM, Golledge, RG, Fujita, N, Pellegrino, JW. Navigation without vision by blind and sighted. Bull Psychon Soc 1990, 28:484.
Loomis, JM, Klatzky, RL, Golledge, RG, Cicinelli, JG, Pellegrino, JW, Fry, PA. Nonvisual navigation by blind and sighted: assessment of path integration ability. J Exp Psychol Gen 1993, 122:73–91.
Landau, B, Gleitman, H, Spelke, E. Spatial knowledge and geometric representation in a child blind from birth. Science 1981, 213:1275–1278.
Landau, B, Spelke, E, Gleitman, H. Spatial knowledge in a young blind child. Cognition 1984, 16:225–260.
Liben, L. %22Conceptual issues in the development of spatial cognition%22. In: Stiles‐Davis, J, Krtichersky, M, Bellugi, U, eds. Spatial Cognition: Brain Bases and Development. Hillsdale, NJ: Earlbaum; 1988, 167–194.
Corazzini, LL, Tinti, C, Schmidt, S, Mirandola, C, Cornoldi, C. Developing spatial knowledge in the absence of vision: allocentric and egocentric representations generated by blind people when supported by auditory cues. Psychol Belg 2010, 50:327.
Passini, R, Proulx, G. Wayfinding without vision: an experiment with congenitally, totally blind people. Environ Behav 1988, 20:227–252.
Golledge, RG, Kitchin, R, Blades, M, Jacobson, RD. Cognitive maps, spatial abilities, and human wayfinding. In: Paper presented at the Tokyo Metropolitan University Coloquium, Tokyo, Japan, 2000.
von Senden, M. Space and Sight; the Perception of Space and Shape in the Congenitally Blind before and after Operation. Glencoe, IL: Free Press; 1960.
Cleaves, WT, Royal, RW. Spatial memory for configurations by congenitally blind, lare blind and sighted adults. J Vis Impair Blind 1979, 73:13–19.
Bigelow, EA. Spatial mapping of familiar locations in blind children. J Vis Impair Blind 1991, 85:113–117.
Worchel, P. Space perception and orientation in the blind. Psychol Monogr 1951, 65:1–28.
Brambring, M. The structure of haptic space in the blind and sighted. Psychol Res 1976, 38:283–302.
Kerr, HN. The role of “visual imagery” experiments: evidence from the congenitally blind. J Environ Psychol 1983, 112:265–277.
Heller, MA, Kennedy, J. Perspective taking, pictures and the blind. Percept Psychophys 1990, 45:459–466.
Dodds, AG. Mental rotation and visual imagery. J Vis Impair Blind 1983, 77:16–18.
Carpenter, PA, Eisenberg, P. Mental rotation and the frame of reference in blind and sighted individuals. Percept Psychophys 1978, 23:117–124.
Marmor, GS, Zaback, LA. Mental rotation by the blind: does mental rotation depend on visual imagery? J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 1976, 2:515–521.
Coluccia, E, Mammarella, IC, Cornoldi, C. Centred egocentric, decentred egocentric, and allocentric spatial representations in the peripersonal space of congenital total blindness. Perception 2009, 38:679–693.
Pasqualotto, A, Newell, FN. The role of visual experience on the representation and updating of novel haptic scenes. Brain Cogn 2007, 65:184–194.
Juurmaa, J, Lehtinen‐Railo, S. Visual experience and access to spatial knowledge. J Vis Impair Blind 1994, 88:157–170.
Rieser, JJ, Guth, DA, Hill, EW. Sensitivity to perspective structure while walking without vision. Perception 1986, 15:173–188.
Rieser, JJ, Lockman, JJ, Pick, LH. The role of visual experience in knowldge of spatial layout. Percept Psychophys 1980, 28:185–190.
Veraart, C, Wanet‐Defalque, MC. Representation of locomotor space by the blind. Percept Psychophys 1987, 42:132–139.
Dodds, AG, Howarth, CI, Carter, DC. The mental maps of the blind: the role of previous visual experience. J Vis Impair Blind 1982, 76:5–12.
Passini, R, Proulx, G, Rainville, C. The spatio‐cognitive abilities of the visually impaired population. Environ Behav 1990, 22:91–116.
Herman, JF, Chatman, SP, Roth, S. Cognitive mapping in blind people: acquisition of spatial relationships in a large‐scale environment. J Vis Impair Blind 1983, 77:161–166.
Byrne, RW, Salter, E. Distances and directions in the cognitive maps of the blind. Can J Psychol 1983, 37:293–299.
Rieser, JJ, Hill, EW, Talor, CR, Bradfield, A, Rosen, S. Visual experience, visual field size, and the development of nonvisual sensitivity to the spatial structure of outdoor neighborhoods explored by walking. J Exp Psychol Gen 1992, 121:210–221.
Hollyfield, RM, Foulke, E. The spatial cogntion of blind pedestrians. J Vis Impair Blind 1983, 77:204–210.
Rosa, A, Ochaíta, AE. Psicología de La Ceguera. Madrid: Alianza; 1993.
Hatwell, Y. Privation Sensorielle et Intelligence, Effets de La Câecitâe Prâecoce Sur La Genáese Des Structures Logiques de L`intelligence. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France; 1966.
Simpkins, KE, Siegel, AJ. The blind child`s construction of the projective straight line. J Vis Impair Blind 1979, 73:233–239.
Simpkins, KE. Development of the concept of space. J Vis Impair Blind 1979, 73:81–85.
Adelson, E, Fraiberg, S. Gross motor development in infants blind from birth. Child Dev 1974, 45:114–126.
Brambring, M. Divergent development of gross motor skills in children who are blind and sighted. J Vis Impair Blind 2006, 100:620–634.
Hatton, DD, Bailey, DB, Burchinal, MR, Ferrell, KA. Developmental growth cruves of preschool children with vision impairments. Child Dev 1997, 68:788–806.
Foulke, E, Hatlen, P. A collaboration of two technologies. Part 2: perceptual and cognitive training: its nature and importance. Br J Vis Impair 1992, 10:47–49.
Reynell, J. Developmental patterns of visually handicapped children. Child Care Health Dev 1978, 4:291–303.
Stephens, B, Grube, C. Development of paigetian reasoning in congenitally blind children. J Vis Impair Blind 1982, 76:133–143.
Lacey, S, Stilla, R, Sreenivasan, K, Deshpande, G, Sathian, K. Spatial imagery in haptic shape perception. Neuropsychologia 2014, 60:144–158.
Tcheang, L, Bülthoff, HH, Burgess, N. Visual influence on path integration in darkness indicates a multimodal representation of large‐scale space. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2011, 108:1152–1157.
Lacey, S, Sathian, K. %22Representation of object form in vision and touch%22. In: Murray, M, Wallace, M, eds. The Neural Bases of Multisensory Processes. Boca Raton, FL: CRC; 2012.
Cattaneo, Z, Vecchi, T. Supramodality effects in visual and haptic spatial processes. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2008, 34:631–642.
Bregman, AS, Pinker, S. Auditory streaming and the building of timbre. J Psychol 1978, 32:19–31.
Ruggiero, G, Ruotolo, F, Iachini, T. Egocentric/allocentric and coordinate/categorical haptic encoding in blind people. Cogn Process 2012, 13(Suppl 1):S313–S317.
Duchowski, A. Eye Tracking Methodology: Theory and Practice. London: Springer Science %26 Business Media; 2007.
Chebat, D‐R, Maidenbaum, S, Amedi, A. Navigation using sensory substitution in real and virtual mazes. PLoS ONE 2015, 10:e0126307.
Loomis, JM, Klatzky, RL. %22Functional equivalence of spatial representations from vision, touch, and hearing: relevance for sensory substitution%22. In: Rieser, JJ, Ashmead, DH, Ebner, FF, Corn, AL, eds. Blindness and Brain Plasticity in Navigation and Object Perception. New York: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates; 2007, 155–184.
Loomis, J, Lippa, Y, Klatzky, R, Golledge, R. Spatial updating of locations specified by 3‐D sound and spatial language. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2002, 28:335–345.
Klatzky, RL, Lippa, Y, Loomis, JM, Golledge, RG. Encoding, learning, and spatial updating of multiple object locations specified by 3‐D sound, spatial language, and vision. Exp Brain Res 2003, 149:48–61.
Avraamides, MN, Loomis, JM, Klatzky, RL, Golledge, RG. Functional equivalence of spatial representations derived from vision and language: evidence from allocentric judgments. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2004, 30:801–814.
Giudice, NA, Betty, MR, Loomis, JM. Functional equivalence of spatial images from touch and vision: evidence from spatial updating in blind and sighted individuals. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 2011, 37:621–634.
Loomis, JM, Klatzky, RL, McHugh, B, Giudice, NA. Spatial working memory for locations specified by vision and audition: testing the amodality hypothesis. Atten Percept Psychophys 2012, 74:1260–1267.
Anderson, JR. Arguments concerning representations for mental imagery. Psychol Rev 1978, 85:249–277.
Tolman, EC. Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol Rev 1948, 55:189–208.
Downs, MR. %22Maps and mapping as metaphors for spatial representations%22. In: Liben, L, Patterson, A, Newcombe, N, eds. Spatial Representation and Behavior across the Life Span. New York: Academic Press; 1981, 143–166.
O`Keefe, J, Dostrovsky, J. The hippocampus as a spatial map. Preliminary evidence from unit activity in the freely‐moving rat. Brain Res 1971, 34:171–175.
O`Keefe, J, Nadel, L. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford: Clarendon Press; 1978.
O`Keefe, J, Conway, DH. Hippocampal place units in the freely moving rat: why they fire where they fire. Exp Brain Res 1978, 31:573–590.
Downs, R, Stea, D. Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behaviour. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1973.
Tversky, B. %22Cognitive maps, cognitive collages, and spatial mental models%22. In: Frank, AU, Campari, I, eds. Spatial Information Theory: A Theoretical Basis for GIS. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag; 1993, 14–24.
Kitchin, RM. Cognitive maps: what are they and why study them? J Environ Psychol 1994, 14:1–19.
Peuquet, DJ. Representations of Space and Time. New York: Guilford Press; 2002.
Montello, RD. %22The geometry of environmental knowledge%22. In: Frank, AU, Campari, I, Formentini, U, eds. Theories and Methods of Spatial Reasoning in Geographic Space. Berlin: Springer‐Verlag; 1992, 136–152.
Kuipers, BJ. The map in the head metaphor. Environ Behav 1982, 14:202–220.
Portugali, J. The Construction of Cognitive Maps. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1996.
Gärling, T, Böök, A, Lindberg, E, Arce, C. Evidence of a response bias explanation of noneuclidean cognitive maos. Prof Geogr 1991, 42:143–149.
Golledge, GR, Hubert, LJ. Some comments on non‐Euclidean mental maps. Environ Plan A 1982, 14:107–118.
Thorndyke, P, Hayes‐Roth, B. Differences in spatial knowledge acquired from maps and navigation. Cogn Psychol 1982, 14:560–581.
Sholl, JM. Cognitive maps as orienting schemata. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1987, 13:615–628.
Lloyd, R. Cognitive maps: encoding and decoding information. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 1989, 79:101–124.
Golledge, RG. %22Human wayfinding and cognitive maps%22. In: Golledge, RG, ed. Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and Other Spatial Processes. Baltimore, MD: John Hopkins University Press; 1999.
Hafting, T, Fyhn, M, Molden, S, Moser, MB, Moser, EI. Microstructure of a spatial map in the entorhinal cortex. Nature 2005, 436:801–806.
Whitlock, JR, Sutherland, RJ, Witter, MP, Moser, M‐B, Moser, EI. Navigating from hippocampus to parietal cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:14755–14762.
Epstein, RA, Vass, LK. Neural systems for landmark‐based wayfinding in humans. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 2014, 369:20120533.
Ekstrom, AD, Kahana, MJ, Caplan, JB, Fields, TA, Isham, EA, Newman, EL, Fried, I. Cellular networks underlying human spatial navigation. Nature 2003, 425:184–188.
Jacobs, J, Weidemann, CT, Miller, JF, Solway, A, Burke, JF, Wei, X‐X, Suthana, N, Sperling, MR, Sharan, AD, Fried, I, et al. Direct recordings of grid‐like neuronal activity in human spatial navigation. Nat Neurosci 2013, 16:1188–1190.
Morgan, LK, MacEvoy, SP, Aguirre, GK, Epstein, RA. Distances between real‐world locations are represented in the human hippocampus. J Neurosci 2011, 31:1238–1245.
Wolbers, T, Buchel, C. Dissociable retrosplenial and hippocampal contributions to successful formation of survey representations. J Neurosci 2005, 25:3333–3340.
Ghaëm, O, Mellet, E, Crivello, F, Tzourio, N, Mazoyer, B, Berthoz, A, Denis, M. Mental navigation along memorized routes activates the hippocampus, precuneus, and insula. Neuroreport 1997, 8:739–744.
Maguire, EA, Frith, CD, Burgess, N, Donnett, JG, O`Keefe, J. Knowing where things are: parahippocampal involvement in encoding object locations in virtual mental imagery. J Cogn Neurosci 1998, 10:61–76.
Wolbers, T, Wiener, JM, Mallot, HA, Buchel, C. Differential recruitment of the hippocampus, medial prefrontal cortex, and the human motion complex during path integration in humans. J Neurosci 2007, 27:9408–9416.
Maguire, EA, Gadian, DG, Johnsrude, IS, Good, CD, Ashburner, J, Frackowiak, RSJ, Frith, CD. Navigation‐related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000, 97:4398–4403.
Woollett, K, Maguire, EA. Acquiring “the knowledge” of London`s layout drives structural brain changes. Curr Biol 2011, 21:2109–2114.
Abrahams, S, Pickering, A, Polkey, CE, Morris, RG. Spatial memory deficits in patients with unilateral damage to the right hippocampal formation. Neuropsychologia 1997, 35:11–24.
Holdstock, JS, Mayes, AR, Cezayirli, E, Isaac, CL, Aggleton, JP, Roberts, N. A comparison of egocentric and allocentric spatial memory in a patient with selective hippocampal damage. Neuropsychologia 2000, 38:410–425.
Feigenbaum, JD, Morris, RG. Allocentric versus egocentric spatial memory after unilateral temporal lobectomy in humans. Neuropsychology 2004, 18:462–472.
Packard, MG, McGaugh, JL. Inactivation of hippocampus or caudate nucleus with lidocaine differentially affects expression of place and response learning. Neurobiol Learn Mem 1996, 65:65–72.
Hartley, T, Maguire, EA, Spiers, HJ, Burgess, N. The well‐worn routed and the path less traveled: distinct nerural bases of route following and wayfinding in humans. Neuron 2003, 37:877–888.
Iaria, G, Petrides, M, Dagher, A, Pike, B, Bohbot, VD. Cognitive strategies dependent on the hippocampus and caudate nucleus in human navigation: variability and change with practice. J Neurosci 2003, 23:5945–5952.
Bohbot, VD, Lerch, J, Thorndycraft, B, Iaria, G, Zijdenbos, AP. Gray matter differences correlate with spontaneous strategies in a human virtual navigation task. J Neurosci 2007, 27:10078–10083.
Burgess, N. Spatial cognition and the brain. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2008, 1124:77–97.
Nadel, L, Hardt, O. The spatial brain. Neuropsychology 2004, 18:473–476.
Ekstrom, AD, Arnold, AEGF, Iaria, G. A critical review of the allocentric spatial representation and its neural underpinnings: toward a network‐based perspective. Front Hum Neurosci 2014, 8:803.
Epstein, R, Kanwisher, N. A cortical representation of the local visual environment. Nature 1998, 392:598–601.
Epstein, RA, Parker, WE, Feiler, AM. Where am I now? Distinct roles for parahippocampal and retrosplenial cortices in place recognition. J Neurosci 2007, 27:6141–6149.
Epstein, RA. Parahippocampal and retrosplenial contributions to human spatial navigation. Trends Cogn Sci 2008, 12:388–396.
Konkle, T, Oliva, A. A real‐world size organization of object responses in occipitotemporal cortex. Neuron 2012, 74:1114–1124.
Marchette, SA, Vass, LK, Ryan, J, Epstein, RA. Anchoring the neural compass: coding of local spatial reference frames in human medial parietal lobe. Nat Neurosci 2014, 17:1598–1606.
Taube, JS, Muller, RU, Ranck, JB. Head‐direction cells recorded from the postsubiculum in freely moving rats. II: effects of environmental manipulations. J Neurosci 1990, 10:436–447.
Fortin, M, Voss, P, Lord, C, Lassonde, M, Pruessner, J, Saint‐Amour, D, Rainville, C, Lepore, F. Wayfinding in the blind: larger hippocampal volume and supranormal spatial navigation. Brain 2008, 131(Pt 11):2995–3005.
Wolbers, T, Klatzky, RL, Loomis, JM, Wutte, MG, Giudice, NA. Modality‐independent coding of spatial layout in the human brain. Curr Biol 2011, 21:984–989.
He, C, Peelen, MV, Han, Z, Lin, N, Caramazza, A, Bi, Y. Selectivity for large nonmanipulable objects in scene‐selective visual cortex does not require visual experience. Neuroimage 2013, 79:1–9.
Chan, CCH, Wong, AWK, Ting, K‐H, Whitfield‐Gabrieli, S, He, J, Lee, TMC. Cross auditory‐spatial learning in early‐blind individuals. Hum Brain Mapp 2012, 33:2714–2727.
De Volder, AG, Catalan‐Ahumada, M, Robert, A, Bol, A, Labar, D, Coppens, A, Michel, C, Veraart, C. Changes in occipital cortex activity in early blind humans using a sensory substitution device. Brain Res 1999, 826:128–134.
Bubic, A, Striem‐Amit, E, Amedi, A. %22Large‐scale brain plasticity following blindness and the use of sensory substitution devices%22. In: Kaiser, J, Naumer, MJ, eds. Multisensory Object Perception in the Primate Brain. New York: Springer; 2010, 351–380.
Cattaneo, Z, Vecchi, T. Blind Vision: The Neuroscience of Visual Impairment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2011.
Burton, H. Visual cortex activity in early and late blind people. J Neurosci 2003, 23:4005–4011.
Weeks, R, Horwitz, B, Aziz‐Sultan, A, Tian, B, Wessinger, CM, Cohen, LG, Hallett, M, Rauschecker, JP. A positron emission tomographic study of auditory localization in the congenitally blind. J Neurosci 2000, 20:2664–2672.
Gougoux, F, Zatorre, RJ, Lassonde, M, Voss, P, Lepore, F. A functional neuroimaging study of sound localization: visual cortex activity predicts performance in early‐blind individuals. PLoS Biol 2005, 3:e27.
Zangaladze, A, Epstein, CM, Grafton, ST, Sathian, K. Involvement of visual cortex in tactile discrimination of orientation. Nature 1999, 401:587–590.
Renier, L, De Volder, AG, Rauschecker, JP. Cortical plasticity and preserved function in early blindness. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2014, 41:53–63.
Amedi, A, Merabet, LB, Bermpohl, F, Pascual‐Leone, A. The occipital cortex in the blind: lessons about plasticity and vision. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 2005, 14:306–311.
Noppeney, U, Friston, KJ, Ashburner, J, Frackowiak, R, Price, CJ. Early visual deprivation induces structural plasticity in gray and white matter. Curr Biol 2005, 15:R488–R490.
Leporé, N, Voss, P, Lepore, F, Chou, Y‐Y, Fortin, M, Gougoux, F, Lee, AD, Brun, C, Lassonde, M, Madsen, SK, et al. Brain structure changes visualized in early‐ and late‐onset blind subjects. Neuroimage 2010, 49:134–140.
Kupers, R, Ptito, M. %22Insights from darkness: what the study of blindness has taught us about brain structure and function%22. In: Green, AM, Chapman, CE, Kalaska, JF, Lepore, F, eds. Progress in Brain Research, vol. 192. Amsterdam: Elsevier B.V.; 2011, 17–31.
Yang, C, Wu, S, Lu, W, Bai, Y, Gao, H. Anatomic differences in early blindness: a deformation‐based morphometry MRI study. J Neuroimaging 2014, 24:68–73.
Chebat, D‐R, Chen, J‐K, Schneider, F, Ptito, A, Kupers, R, Ptito, M. Alterations in right posterior hippocampus in early blind individuals. Neuroreport 2007, 18:329–333.
Leporé, N, Shi, Y, Lepore, F, Fortin, M, Voss, P, Chou, Y‐Y, Lord, C, Lassonde, M, Dinov, I, Toga, AW, et al. Patterns of hippocampal shape and volume differences in blind subjects. Neuroimage 2009, 46:949–957.
Voss, P, Fortin, M, Corbo, V, Pruessner, JC, Lepore, F. Assessment of the caudate nucleus and its relation to route learning in both congenital and late blind individuals. BMC Neurosci 2013, 14:113.
Kober, SE, Wood, G, Kampl, C, Neuper, C, Ischebeck, A. Electrophysiological correlates of mental navigation in blind and sighted people. Behav Brain Res 2014, 273:106–115.
Halko, MA, Connors, EC, Sánchez, J, Merabet, LB. Real world navigation independence in the early blind correlates with differential brain activity associated with virtual navigation. Hum Brain Mapp 2014, 35:2768–2778.
Deutschländer, A, Stephan, T, Hüfner, K, Wagner, J, Wiesmann, M, Strupp, M, Brandt, T, Jahn, K. Imagined locomotion in the blind: an fMRI study. Neuroimage 2009, 45:122–128.
Reich, L, Maidenbaum, S, Amedi, A. The brain as a flexible task machine: implications for visual rehabilitation using noninvasive vs. invasive approaches. Curr Opin Neurol 2012, 25:86–95.
Humayun, MS, de Juan, E Jr, Weiland, JD, Dagnelie, G, Katona, S, Greenberg, R, Suzuki, S. Pattern electrical stimulation of the human retina. Vision Res 1999, 39:2569–2576.
Oozeer, M, Veraart, C, Legat, V, Delbeke, J. Simulation of intra‐orbital optic nerve electrical stimulation. Med Biol Eng Comput 2005, 43:608–617.
Dowling, J. Current and future prospects for optoelectronic retinal prostheses. Eye (Lond) 2009, 23:1999–2005.
Dobelle, WH. Artificial vision for the blind by connecting a television camera to the visual cortex. ASAIO J 2000, 46:3–9.
Normann, RA, Maynard, EM, Guillory, KS, Warren, DJ. Cortical implants for the blind. IEEE Spectr 1996, 33:54–59.
Luo, YH‐L, Zhong, JJ, da Cruz, L. The use of Argus® II retinal prosthesis by blind subjects to achieve localisation and prehension of objects in 3‐dimensional space. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol 2015, 253:1907–1914.
Merabet, LB, Rizzo, JF, Amedi, A, Somers, DC, Pascual‐Leone, A. What blindness can tell us about seeing again: merging neuroplasticity and neuroprostheses. Nat Rev Neurosci 2005, 6:71–77.
Gothe, J, Brandt, SA, Irlbacher, K, Roricht, S, Sabel, BA, Meyer, B‐U. Changes in visual cortex excitability in blind subjects as demonstrated by transcranial magnetic stimulation. Brain 2002, 125:479–490.
Garcia, S, Petrini, K, Rubin, GS, Da Cruz, L, Nardini, M. Visual and non‐visual navigation in blind patients with a retinal prosthesis. PLoS ONE 2015, 10:e0134369.
Scherlen, A‐C, Dumas, JC, Guedj, B, Vignot, A. “RecognizeCane”: the new concept of a cane which recognizes the most common objects and safety clues. In: 29th Annual International Conference of the IEEE on Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBS 2007), vol. 2007, Lyon, France, 6357–6360.
Bourbakis, N. Sensing surrounding 3‐D space for navigation of the blind: a prototype system featuring vibration arrays and data fusion provides a near real‐time feedback. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag 2008, 27:49–55.
Johnson, LA, Higgins, CM. A navigation aid for the blind using tactile‐visual sensory substitution. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006, 1:6289–6292.
Mann, S, Huang, J, Janzen, R, Lo, R, Rampersad, V, Chen, A, Doha, T. Blind navigation with a wearable range camera and vibrotactile helmet. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM International Conference on Multimedia (MM’11). New York: ACM Press; 2011, 1325.
José, J, Farrajota, M, Rodrigues, JMF, du Buf, HJ. The SmartVision local navigation aid for blind and visually impaired persons. Int J Digit Content Technol Appl 2011, 5:362–375.
Kammoun, S, Parseihian, G, Gutierrez, O, Brilhault, A, Serpa, A, Raynal, M, Oriola, B, Macé, MJ‐M, Auvray, M, Denis, M, et al. Navigation and space perception assistance for the visually impaired: the NAVIG project. IRBM 2012, 33:182–189.
Pressl, B, Wieser, M. %22A computer‐based navigation system tailored to the needs of blind people%22. In: Miesenberger, K, Klaus, J, Zagler, WL, Karshmer, AI, eds. Computers Helping People with Special Needs, vol. 4061. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2006.
Sai Santhosh, S, Sasiprabha, T, Jeberson, R. %22BLI–NAV embedded navigation system for blind people%22. In: Recent Advances in Space Technology Services and Climate Change 2010 (RSTS %26 CC‐2010). Chennai, India: IEEE; 2010, 277–282.
Schmitz, B, Becker, S, Blessing, A, Großmann, M. Acquisition and presentation of diverse spatial context data for blind navigation. In: 2011 IEEE 12th International Conference on Mobile Data Management, vol 1. Luleå, Sweden: IEEE; 2011, 276–284.
Serrão, M, Shahrabadi, S, Moreno, M, José, JT, Rodrigues, JI, Rodrigues, JMF, du Buf, JMH. Computer vision and GIS for the navigation of blind persons in buildings. Univ Access Inf Soc 2014, 14:67–80.
Dakopoulos, D, Bourbakis, NG. Wearable obstacle avoidance electronic travel aids for blind: a survey. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern C Appl Rev 2010, 40:25–35.
Meijer, PBL. An experimental system for auditory image representation. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1992, 1992:112–121.
Bach‐y‐Rita, P, Collins, C, Saunders, F, White, B, Scadden, L. Vision substitution by tactile image projection. Nature 1969, 221:963–964.
Elli, GV, Benetti, S, Collignon, O. Is there a future for sensory substitution outside academic laboratories? Multisens Res 2014, 27:271–291.
Spence, C. The skin as a medium for sensory substitution. Multisens Res 2014, 27:293–312.
Farcy, R, Leroux, R, Jucha, A, Damaschini, R, Grégoire, C, Zogaghi, A. Electronic travel aids and electronic orientation aids for blind people: technical, rehabilitation, and everyday life points of view. In: Conference %26 Workshop on Assistive Technologies for People with Vision %26 Hearing Impairments Technology for Inclusion, Kufstein, Austria, 2006.
Shoval, S, Borenstein, J, Koren, Y. The NavBelt—a computerized travel aid for the blind based on mobile robotics technology. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 1998, 45:1376–1386.
Segond, H, Weiss, D, Sampaio, E. Human spatial navigation via a visuo‐tactile sensory substitution system. Perception 2005, 34:1231–1249.
Chebat, D‐R, Schneider, FC, Kupers, R, Ptito, M. Navigation with a sensory substitution device in congenitally blind individuals. Neuroreport 2011, 22:342–347.
Amedi, A, Stern, WM, Camprodon, JA, Bermpohl, F, Merabet, L, Rotman, S, Hemond, C, Meijer, P, Pascual‐Leone, A. Shape conveyed by visual‐to‐auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex. Nat Neurosci 2007, 10:687–689.
Poirier, C, De Volder, AG, Scheiber, C. What neuroimaging tells us about sensory substitution. Neurosci Biobehav Rev 2007, 31:1064–1070.
Hirahara, Y, Sakurai, Y, Shiidu, Y, Yanashima, K, Magatani, K. Development of the navigation system for the visually impaired by using white cane. In: 2006 International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society, vol 1. New York: IEEE; 2006, 4893–4896.
Ando, B. A smart multisensor approach to assist blind people in specific urban navigation tasks. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng 2008, 16:592–594.
Velazquez, R, Bazan, O. Preliminary evaluation of podotactile feedback in sighted and blind users. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010, 2010:2103–2106.
Adame, RM, Möller, K, Seeman, E. Wearable navigation aids for visually impaired people based on vibrotactile skin stimuli. In: Roa Romero LM, ed. IFMBE Proceedings: XIII Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2013, vol 41. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2014.
Bousbia‐Salah, M, Bettayeb, M, Larbi, A. A navigation aid for blind people. J Intell Robot Syst 2011, 64:387–400.
Chen, H‐E, Lin, Y‐Y, Chen, C‐H, Wang, I‐F. BlindNavi: a navigation app for the visually impaired smartphone user. In: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI EA’15). New York: ACM Press; 2015, 19–24.
Caperna, S, Cheng, C, Cho, J, Fan, V, Luthra, A, O`Leary, B, Sheng, J, Sun, A, Stearns, L, Tessler, R, et al. A navigation and object location device for the blind. PhD Thesis, University of Maryland, College Park, 2009.
De Felice, F, Renna, F, Attolico, G, Distante, A. A haptic/acoustic application to allow blind the access to spatial information. In: Second Joint EuroHaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Environment and Teleoperator Systems (WHC’07). Washington, DC: IEEE; 2007, 310–315.
Hub, A, Hartter, T, Kombrink, S, Ertl, T. Real and virtual explorations of the environment and interactive tracking of movable objects for the blind on the basis of tactile‐acoustical maps and 3D environment models. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2008, 3:57–68.
Hara, M, Shokur, S, Yamamoto, A, Higuchi, T, Gassert, R, Bleuler, H. Virtual environment to evaluate multimodal feedback strategies for augmented navigation of the visually impaired. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2010, 2010:975–978.
Takatori, N, Nojima, K, Matsumoto, M, Yanashima, K, Magatani, K. Development of voice navigation system for the visually impaired by using IC tags. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2006, 1:5181–5184.
Bologna, G, Deville, B, Pun, T. Blind navigation along a sinuous path by means of the see color interface. In: Mira J, Ferrández JM, Álvarez JR, de la Paz F, Toledo FJ, eds. Bioinspired Applications in Artificial and Natural Computation, vol 5602. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer; 2009.
Durette, B, Louveton, N, Alleysson, D, Herault, J. Visuo‐auditory sensory substitution for mobility assistance: testing TheVIBE. In: Workshop on Computer Vision Applications for the Visually Impaired, Marseille, France, 2008, 1–29.
Kärcher, SM, Fenzlaff, S, Hartmann, D, Nagel, SK, König, P. Sensory augmentation for the blind. Front Hum Neurosci 2012, 6:37.
Kammoun, S, Jouffrais, C, Guerreiro, T, Nicolau, H, Jorge, J. Guiding blind people with haptic feedback. In: Pervasive 2012 Workshop on Frontiers in Accessibility for Pervasive Computing, Newcastle, UK, 2012, 217–226.
Kamiński, Ł, Bruniecki, K. Mobile navigation system for visually impaired users in the urban environment. Metrol Meas Syst 2012, 19:245–256.
Marston, JR, Loomis, JM, Klatzky, RL, Golledge, RG, Smith, E. Evaluation of spatial displays for navigation without sight. ACM Trans Appl Percept 2006, 3:110–124.
Kalia, AA, Legge, GE, Roy, R, Ogale, A. Assessment of indoor route‐finding technology for people with visual impairment. J Vis Impair Blind 2010, 104:135–147.
Legge, GE, Beckmann, PJ, Tjan, BS, Havey, G, Kramer, K, Rolkosky, D, Gage, R, Chen, M, Puchakayala, S, Rangarajan, A. Indoor navigation by people with visual impairment using a digital sign system. PLoS ONE 2013, 8:e76783.
Ganz, A, Schafer, J, Puleo, E, Wilson, C, Robertson, M. Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of PERCEPT indoor navigation system for visually impaired users. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012, 2012:5815–5818.
Ivanov, R. Indoor navigation system for visually impaired. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies and Workshop for PhD Students in Computing on International Conference on Computer Systems and Technologies (CompSysTech’10). New York: ACM Press; 2010, 143.
Merabet, LB, Connors, EC, Halko, MA, Sánchez, J. Teaching the blind to find their way by playing video games. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e44958.
Lahav, O, Schloerb, DW, Kumar, S, Srinivasan, MA. A virtual environment for people who are blind—a usability study. J Assist Technol 2012, 6:1–21.
Lahav, O, Schloerb, DW, Srinivasan, MA. Newly blind persons using virtual environment system in a traditional orientation and mobility rehabilitation program: a case study. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol 2012, 7:420–435.
Cardin, S, Thalmann, D, Vexo, F. A wearable system for mobility improvement of visually impaired people. Vis Comput 2006, 23:109–118.
Guerrero, LA, Vasquez, F, Ochoa, SF. An indoor navigation system for the visually impaired. Sensors 2012, 12:8236–8258.
Sánchez, J, de la Torre, N. Autonomous navigation through the city for the blind. In: Proceedings of the 12th international ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and accessibility (ASSETS’10). New York: ACM Press; 2010, 195.
Bhatlawande, SS, Mukhopadhyay, J, Mahadevappa, M. Ultrasonic spectacles and waist‐belt for visually impaired and blind person. In: 2012 National Conference on Communications (NCC). Kharagpur, India: IEEE; 2012, 1–4.
Hartcher‐O`Brien, J, Auvray, M, Hayward, V. Perception of distance‐to‐obstacle through time‐delayed tactile feedback. In: 2015 I.E. World Haptics Conference (WHC). Evanston, IL: IEEE; 2015, 7–12.
Stoll, C, Palluel‐Germain, R, Richard Fristot, V, Pellerin, D, Alleysson, D, Graff, C. Navigating from a depth image converted into sound. Appl Bionics Biomech 2015, 2015:9.
Riehle, TH, Anderson, SM, Lichter, PA, Giudice, NA, Sheikh, SI, Knuesel, RJ, Kollmann, DT, Hedin, DS. Indoor magnetic navigation for the blind. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc 2012, 2012:1972–1975.
Dunai, L, Peris‐Fajarnés, G, Lluna, E, Defez, B. Sensory navigation device for blind people. J Navig 2013, 66:349–362.
Lahav, O, Mioduser, D. Haptic‐feedback support for cognitive mapping of unknown spaces by people who are blind. Int J Hum Comput Stud 2008, 66:23–35.
Maidenbaum, S, Levy‐Tzedek, S, Chebat, D‐R, Amedi, A. Increasing accessibility to the blind of virtual environments, using a virtual mobility aid based on the “EyeCane”: feasibility study. PLoS One 2013, 8:e72555.
Buchs, G, Maidenbaum, S, Amedi, A. %22Obstacle identification and avoidance using the “EyeCane”: a tactile sensory substitution device for blind individuals%22. In: Auvray, M, Duriez, C, eds. Haptics: Neuroscience, Devices, Modeling, and Applications, Versailles, France, 2014, 96–103.
Warren, DH. Blindness and Early Childhood Development. New York: American Foundation for the Blind; 1977.
Moore, JE, Graves, WH, Patterson, JB. Foundations of Rehabilitation Counseling with Persons Who Are Blind or Visually Impaired. New York: AFB Press; 1997.
Huebner, KM. %22Visual impairment%22. In: Holbrook, C, Koenig, AJ, eds. Foundations of Education, Vol. I: History and Theory of Teaching Children and Youths With Visual Impairments. New York: AFB Press; 2000.
Fletcher, FJ. Spatial representation in blind children. 3: effects of individual differences. J Vis Impair Blind 1981, 75:46–49.
Hill, EW, Rieser, JJ, Hill, MM, Hill, M, Halpin, J, Halpin, R. How persons with visual impairments explore novel spaces: strategies of good and poor performers. J Vis Impair Blind 1993, 87:295–301.
Hill, E, Ponder, P. Orientation and Mobility Techniques: A Guide for the Practitioner. New York: American Foundation for the Blind; 1976.
Tellevik, JM. Influence of spatial exploration patterns on cognitive mapping by blindfolded sighted persons. J Vis Impair Blind 1992, 86:221–224.
Gaunet, F, Martinez, J‐L, Thinus‐Blanc, C. Early‐blind subjects’ spatial representation of manipulatory space: exploratory strategies and reaction to change. Perception 1997, 26:345–366.

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

Spatial navigation by congenitally blind individuals

Related Articles

Browse by Topic

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox