Borgman, C. Big Data, Little Data, No Data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 2015 Available at: https://mitpress.mit.edu/big‐data.
Boyd, D, Crawford, K. Critical questions for big data. Infor Commun Soc 2012, 15:662–679. doi:10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878.
Lohr,, S. Big Data`s Impact in the World. The New York Times, February, 2012. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/02/12/sunday‐review/big‐datas‐impact‐in‐the‐world.html.
Marcus,, G. Steamrolled by big data. The New Yorker, March 13, 2013. Available art: http://www.newyorker.com/tech/elements/steamrolled‐by‐big‐data.
McAfee,, A., & Brynjolfsson,, E. Big data: the management revolution HBR, (October, 2012). Available at: https://hbr.org/2012/10/big‐data‐the‐management‐revolution/ar.
Press,, G. A very short history of big data. Forbes, May 9, 2013. Available at: http://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2013/05/09/a‐very‐short‐history‐of‐big‐data/
Anderson,, C. The end of theory: the data deluge makes the scientific method obsolete, June2008. Available at: http://archive.wired.com/science/discoveries/magazine/16‐07/pb_theory/. (Accessed December 31, 2015).
Laney,, D. 3D data management: controlling data volume, velocity, and variety (Tech. Rep.). META Group, February 2001. Available at: http://blogs.gartner.com/doug‐laney/files/2012/01/ad949‐3D‐Data‐Management‐Controlling‐Data‐Volume‐Velocity‐and‐Variety.pdf.
IBM. [CT000], March 2015. Available at: http://www‐01.ibm.com/software/au/data/bigdata/.
Elman, JL, Bates, EA, Johnson, MH, Karmiloff‐Smith, A, Parisi, D, Plunkett, K. Rethinking Innateness: A Connectionist Perspective on Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press; 1998.
Gottlieb, G. Normally occurring environmental and behavioral influences on gene activity: from central dogma to probabilistic epigenesis. Psychol Rev 1998, 105:792–802. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.105.4.792-802.
Oyama, S, Taylor, P, Fogel, A, Lickliter, R, Sterelny, PK, Smith, KC, van der, Weel C. The Ontogeny of Information: Developmental Systems and Evolution. Durham, NC: Duke University Press; 2000.
Vygotsky, LS. Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1980.
Rietveld, CA, Conley, D, Eriksson, N, Esko, T, Medland, SE, Vinkhuyzen, AAE, Yang, J, Boardman, JD, Chabris, CF, Dawes, CT, et al. Replicability and robustness of genome‐wide‐association studies for behavioral traits. Psychol Sci 2014, 25:1975–1986. doi:10.1177/0956797614545132.
Sweeney,, L. (n.d). Identifiability. Available at: http://dataprivacylab.org/projects/identifiability/index.html.
Pearson, H. Massive UK baby study cancelled. Nature 2015, 526:620–621. doi:10.1038/526620a.
Tamis‐LeMonda,, C. Language, cognitive, and socio‐emotional skills across the first 6 years in U.S. children from African‐American, Dominican, Mexican, and Chinese backgrounds. Databrary, 2013. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.17910/B7CC74
Bayley, N. Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development. New York, NY: Harcourt Assessment; 2006.
Rothbart, MK. Measurement of temperament in infancy. Child Dev 1981, 52:569–578.
Goldsmith, H, Rothbart, M. The Laboratory Temperament Assessment Battery (Lab‐Tab). University of Wisconsin; 1993.
Mayer, DL, Beiser, AS, Warner, AF, Pratt, EM, Raye, KN, Lang, JM. Monocular acuity norms for the Teller Acuity Cards between ages one month and four years. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995, 36:671–685.
Salomão, SR, Ventura, DF. Large sample population age norms for visual acuities obtained with Vistech‐Teller Acuity Cards. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 1995, 36:657–670.
Teller, DY, McDonald, MA, Preston, K, Sebris, SL, Dobson, V. Assessment of visual acuity in infants and children; the acuity card procedure. Dev Med Child Neurol 1986, 28:779–789.
Lewin,, T. More students are taking both the ACT and SAT. The New York Times, August 2013. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/08/04/education/edlife/more‐students‐are‐taking‐both‐the‐act‐and‐sat.html
Lardinois,, F. (n.d). Gmail now has 900M active users, 75% on mobile. Available at: http://social.techcrunch.com/2015/05/28/gmail‐now‐has‐900m‐active‐users‐75‐on‐mobile/.
Protalinski,, E. Facebook passes 1.23 billion monthly active users, January 29, 2014. Available at: http://thenextweb.com/facebook/2014/01/29/facebook‐passes‐1‐23‐billion‐monthly‐active‐users‐945‐million‐mobile‐users‐757‐million‐daily‐users/.
Meyer,, R. Everything we know about Facebook`s secret mood manipulation experiment. The Atlantic, June 2014. Available at: http://www.theatlantic.com/technology/archive/2014/06/everything‐we‐know‐about‐facebooks‐secret‐mood‐manipulation‐experiment/373648/.
Goodman, A, Pepe, A, Blocker, AW, Borgman, CL, Cranmer, K, Crosas, M, DiStefano, R, Gil, Y, Groth, P, Hedstrom, M, et al. Ten simple rules for the care and feeding of scientific data. PLoS Comput Biol 2014, 10:e1003542. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1003542.
Lohr,, S. %22For big‐data scientists, ‘Janitor work’ is key hurdle to insights%22. The New York Times, August 2014. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2014/08/18/technology/for‐big‐data‐scientists‐hurdle‐to‐insights‐is‐janitor‐work.html.
Eisenberg, N. Thoughts on the Future of Data Sharing—Association for Psychological Science, June 2015. Available at: https://www.psychologicalscience.org/index.php/publications/observer/2015/may‐june‐15/thoughts‐on‐the‐future‐of‐data‐sharing.html. (Accessed December 31, 2015).
The White House. Consumer data privacy in a networked world: a framework for protecting privacy and promoting innovation in the global digital economy. J Priv Confid 2012, 4:95–142. Available at: http://repository.cmu.edu/jpc/vol4/iss2/5.
Bhattacharjee,, Y. Diederik Stapel`s audacious academic fraud. The New York Times, April 2013. Available at: http://www.nytimes.com/2013/04/28/magazine/diederik‐stapels‐audacious‐academic‐fraud.html.
Singal,, J. The case of the amazing gay‐marriage data: how a graduate student reluctantly uncovered a huge scientific fraud, May 29, 2015. Available at: http://nymag.com/scienceofus/2015/05/how‐a‐grad‐student‐uncovered‐a‐huge‐fraud.html.
Ioannidis, JPA. Why most published research findings are false. Chance 2005, 18:40–47. doi:10.1080/09332480.2005.10722754.
Nosek, BA, Spies, JR, Motyl, M. Scientific Utopia II. Restructuring incentives and practices to promote truth over publishability. Perspect Psychol Sci 2012, November, 7:615–631. Available at: http://pps.sagepub.com/content/7/6/615.
Collaboration, OS. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological. Science 2015, 349:aac4716. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/349/6251/aac4716.
Rosenthal, R. The file drawer problem and tolerance for results. Psychol Bull 1979, 86:638–641.
Bishop,, D. Novelty, interest and replicability, January 19, 2012. Available at: http://deevybee.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/novelty‐interest‐and‐replicability.html.
Ascoli, GA. The ups and downs of neuroscience shares. Neuroinformatics 2006, 4:213–215. doi:10.1385/NI%3A4%3A3%3A213.
Bishop,, D. Publishing replication failures: some lessons from history, July 11, 2015. Available at: http://deevybee.blogspot.com/2015/07/publishing‐replication‐failures‐some.html.
Nosek, BA, Alter, G, Banks, GC, Borsboom, D, Bowman, SD, Breckler, SJ, Buck, S, Chambers, CD, Chin, G, Christensen, G, et al. Promoting an open research culture. Science 2015, 348:1422–1425. Available at: http://www.sciencemag.org/content/348/6242/1422.
Maunsell, J. Announcement regarding supplemental material. J Neurosci 2010, 30:10599–10600. Available from http://www.jneurosci.org/content/30/32/10599.
Group, A. D. S. W. Data Sharing: Principles and Considerations for Policy Development. American Psychological Association, June 2015. Available at: http://www.apa.org/science/leadership/bsa/data‐sharing‐report.aspx.
Data Ownership. (n.d.). Data Ownership. Office of Research Integrity, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: https://ori.hhs.gov/education/products/n_illinois_u/datamanagement/dotopic.html.
Fernald, A. Getting beyond the ‘convenience sample’ in research on early cognitive development. Behav Brain Sci 2010, 33:91–92.
Karasik, LB, Adolph, KE, Tamis‐LeMonda, CS, Bornstein, MH. Weird walking: cross‐cultural research on motor development. Behav Brain Sci 2010, 33:95–96.
Henrich, J, Heine, SJ, Norenzayan, A. The weirdest people in the world? Behav Brain Sci 2010, 33:61–83; discussion 83–135.
Maxwell, SE. The persistence of underpowered studies in psychological research: causes, consequences, and remedies. Psychol Methods 2004, 9:147–163.
Button, KS, Ioannidis, JPA, Mokrysz, C, Nosek, BA, Flint, J, Robinson, ESJ, Munafo, MR. Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience. Nat Rev Neurosci 2013, 14:365–376. Available at: http://www.nature.com/nrn/journal/v14/n5/abs/nrn3475.html.
Graham,, M. Big data and the end of theory? The Guardian, March 2012. Available at: http://www.theguardian.com/news/datablog/2012/mar/09/big‐data‐theory.