Home
This Title All WIREs
WIREs RSS Feed
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Cogn Sci
Impact Factor: 3.175

Mental rotation: an examination of assumptions

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Since first presented by Shepard and Metzler, Science 1971, 171: 701–703, mental rotation has been described as a rotary transformation of a visual stimulus allowing it to be represented in a new orientation. For a given stimulus, the transformation is thought to occur at a constant speed, though speed may vary between stimuli; three‐dimensional abstract shapes made out of blocks tend to be rotated much more slowly than alphanumeric characters or line drawings of common objects. Rotation is also presumed to be performed through the shortest angle. These assumptions are based upon the fact that response times tend to increase with angle of rotation, peaking at 180° of separation for abstract block figures or from upright for common objects and alphanumeric stimuli. The symmetry about 180° provides evidence supporting rotation through the shortest angle. In order to determine the shortest direction, the current orientation of the stimulus is assumed to be known prior to mental rotation. Moreover, in order to determine the current orientation of a common object or alphanumeric stimulus, it is assumed the stimulus is identified prior to mental rotation because the current orientation is defined by what the object is. In mirror/normal discriminations or left/right facing discriminations of rotated stimuli response times are often examined by collapsing over response options as this variable is assumed to be uninteresting in terms of mental rotation. This article examines these assumptions, and suggests that many of them are not entirely safe. WIREs Cogn Sci 2017, 8:e1443. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1443 This article is categorized under: Psychology > Theory and Methods
Examples of stimuli employed in (a) same/different discriminations with 3D abstract block figures (b) alphanumeric mirror/normal discriminations (c) left/right object facing discriminations (d) top/bottom discriminations.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Illustration showing how preparing clockwise and counterclockwise mental rotation could polarize the horizontal axis into a left and right side based upon the movement direction of the top, or bottom, of the stimulus.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Stylized response time functions depicting the pattern expected in a one horse race (dashed black line with open squares) and a two horse race model where the redundancy gain is reduced as the distances become unequal (solid black line with filled circles).
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Browse by Topic

Psychology > Theory and Methods

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts