References
1 Chomsky, N.
Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press; 1965.
2 Chomsky, N. %22Beyond explanatory adequacy%22. In: Belletti, A, ed.
Structures and Beyond—The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Oxford:
Oxford University Press; 2004, 104–131.
3 Bresnan, J.
Theory of Complementation in English Syntax, PhD thesis, MIT, 1972.
4 Chomsky, N. %22Remarks on nominalization%22. In: Roderick, J, Rosenbaum, P, ed.
Readings in English Transformational Grammar. Waltham, MA:
Ginn; 1970, 184–221.
5 Fillmore, CJ. The position of embedding transformations in a grammar. Word 1963; 19: 208–231.
6 Hauser, MD, Chomsky, N, Fitch, WT. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science 2002; 298: 1569–1579.
7 Postal, P. On the surface verb ‘Remind’. Linguistic Inquiry 1970, 37–120.
8 Katz, JJ, Postal, P.
An Integrated Theory of Linguistic Descriptions. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press.
9 Bach, E.
An Introduction to Transformational Grammars. New York:
Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1964.
10 Jackendoff, R.
Some Rules of Semantic Interpretation for English, PhD thesist, MIT, 1969.
11 Fiengo, R.
Semantic Conditions on Surface Structure, PhD thesis, MIT, 1974.
12 Fiengo, R. On trace theory. Linguistic Inquiry 1977; 8: 35–62.
13 Chomsky, N.
Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht, The Netherlands:
Foris; 1981.
14 Baker, MC.
Atoms of Language. New York:
Basic Books; 2001.
15 Yang, CD.
Knowledge and Learning in Natural Language. New York:
Oxford University Press; 2002.
16 Borer, H.
Parametric Syntax. Dordrecht:
Foris; 1984.
17 Chomsky, N.
The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press; 1995.
18 Kayne, RS.
Parameters and Universals. Oxford:
Oxford University Press; 2000.
19 Kayne, RS.
Movement and Silence. Oxford:
Oxford University Press; 2005.
20 Manzini, R, Savoia, ML.
L Dialetti Italiani e Romanci.
Morfosintassi generativa. Edizioni dell`Orso, Alessandria, 2005.
21 Newmeyer, FJ.
Possible and Probable Languages: A Generative Perspective on Linguistic Typology. Oxford:
Oxford University Press; 2005.
22 Boeckx, C. %22Approaching parameters from below%22. In: Di Sciullo, A‐M, Boeckx, C, eds.
Biolinguistics: Language Evolution and Variation. Oxford:
Oxford University Press. In press.
23 Lasnik, H, Saito, M.
Move α. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press; 1992.
24 Ross, JR.
Constraints on Variables in Syntax, PhD thesis, MIT, 1967.
25 Huang, CTJ.
Logical Relations in Chinese and the Theory of Grammar, PhD thesis, MIT, 1982.
26 Chomsky, N. Three factors in language design. Linguistic Inquiry 2005; 36: 1–22.
27 Uriagereka, J.
Rhyme and Reason. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press; 1998.
28 Kayne, RS.
The Antisymmetry of Syntax. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press; 1994.
29 Bresnan, J. Sentence stress and syntactic transformations. Language 1971; 47: 257–281.
30 Lasnik, H.
Analyses of Negation in English, PhD thesis, MIT, 1972.
31 Chomsky, N. %22Derivation by phase%22. In: Michael, K, ed.
Ken Hale: A Life in Language. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press;.2001, 1–52.
32 Epstein, SD, Groat, E, Kawashima, R, Kitahara, H.
A Derviational Approach to Syntactic Relations. Oxford:
Oxford University Press; 1998.
33 Epstein, SD. %22Un‐principled syntax: the derivation of syntactic relations%22. In: Epstein, SD, Hornstein, N, eds.
Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press; 1999, 317–345.
34 Uriagereka, J. %22Multiple spell‐out%22. In: Epstein, SD, Hornstein, N, eds.
Working Minimalism. Cambridge, MA:
The MIT Press; 1999, 251–282.
