Home
This Title All WIREs
WIREs RSS Feed
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Cogn Sci
Impact Factor: 3.175

Bilingualism

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Abstract The cognitive and linguistic processes involved in the acquisition and use of two languages are systematically different from those processes engaged in monolingual language use, leading to detectable changes in language and cognitive outcomes for bilinguals. The present article describes these differences and offers speculation on possible mechanisms. Measures of linguistic proficiency and processing are often poorer in bilinguals than in monolinguals: bilingual children have a smaller vocabulary in each language than comparable monolingual children in that language and bilingual adults take longer to retrieve specific words than monolinguals. In contrast, measures of nonverbal executive control, including the ability to selectively attend to relevant information, inhibit distraction, and shift between tasks is generally better in bilinguals than in monolinguals. These two types of outcomes are illustrated and explained through behavioral and neuroimaging evidence. The implications of these effects of bilingualism on cognitive and linguistic processing are considered in terms of both their clinical and theoretical consequences. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This article is categorized under: Linguistics > Language in Mind and Brain Psychology > Language

Mean standard score (M = 100, SD = 15) on English Peabody Picture Vocabulary Test by age and language group. Language group differences are significant at each age with no interaction between age group and language group. Sample includes 1738 children, with 722 monolinguals and 966 bilinguals who represent a large range of non‐English languages as the other language. (From Bialystok et al. Ref 26).

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Mean reaction time (RT) by decade for monolinguals and bilinguals. (a) Mean RT for control condition. (b) Mean RT cost as the difference between congruent and incongruent trials (Simon effect). (From Bialystok et al. Ref 72)..

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Related Articles

Aging and cognition
Developmental Psychology

Browse by Topic

Psychology > Language
Linguistics > Language in Mind and Brain

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts