References
1 Simon, HA.
The Sciences of the Artificial.
3rd ed. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press; 1996.
2 Committee on Learning Science in Informal Environments, National Research Council. In: Bell, P, Lewenstein, B, Shouse, AW, Feder, MA, eds.
Learning Science in Informal Environments: People, Places, and Pursuits. Washington, DC:
National Academy Press; 2009.
3 Shaffer, DW. Pedagogical praxis: the professions as models for post‐industrial education. Teach Coll Rec 2004, 106: 1401–1421.
4 Kaput, J. %22Democratizing access to calculus: new routes using old roots%22. In: Schoenfeld, A, ed.
Mathematical Thinking and Problem Solving. Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum; 1994, 77–155.
5 Lee, CD. %22Revisiting playing in the Dark : The Hidden Games of Racialization in literacy studies and school reform%22. In: Stuart, G, ed.
Literacy as a Civil Right: Reclaiming Social Justice in Literacy Teaching. New York:
Peter Lang; 2008.
6 Lee, CD. A culturally based cognitive apprenticeship: teaching African American high school students skills in literary interpretation. Reading Res Q 1995, 30: 608–630.
7 Cobb, P, Yackel, E, Wood, T. A constructivist alternative to the representational view of mind. J Res Math Educ 1992, 23: 2–33.
8 Steffe, LP, Thompson, PW. Interaction or intersubjectivity? A reply to Lerman. J Res Math Educ 2000, 31: 191–209.
9 von Glasersfeld, E.
Radical Constructivism: A Way of Knowing and Learning. Washington, DC:
The Falmer Press; 1995.
10 Brown, AL, Campione, JC. %22Guided discovery in a community of learners%22. In: McGilly, K, ed.
Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press/Bradford Books; 1994, 229–270.
11 Greeno, JG. On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educ Researcher 1997, 26: 5–17.
12 Greeno, JG. The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. Am Psychol 1998, 53: 5–26.
13 Hutchins, E.
cognition in the wild, Cambridge MA:
MIT Press; 1995.
14 Pea, RD. %22Practices of distributed intelligences and designs for education%22. In: Salomon, G, ed.
Distributed cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. New York:
Cambridge University Press; 1993, 88–110.
15 Salomon, G. %22No distribution without individual`s cognition: a dynamic interactional view%22. In: Salomon, G, ed.
Distributed Cognitions. Psychological and Educational Considerations. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 1993, 111–138.
16 Salomon, G, Perkins, DN. Individual and social aspects of learning. Rev Res Educ 1998, 23: 1–24.
17 Lave, J, Wenger, E.
Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge, England:
Cambridge University Press; 1991.
18 Scardamalia, M, Bereiter, C. Computer support for knowledge‐building communities. J Learn Sci 1994, 3: 265–283.
19 Sfard, A.
Thinking as Communicating: Human Development, the Growth of Discourses, and Mathematizing. New York:
Cambridge University Press; 2008.
20 Hmelo‐Silver, CE. Problem‐based learning: what and how do students learn? Educ Psychol Rev 2004, 16: 235–266.
21 Kolodner, JL, Camp, PJ, Crismond, D, Fasse, B, Gray, J,
et al. Problem‐based learning meets case‐based reasoning in the middle‐school science classroom: putting learning by Design
TM into practice. J Lear Sci 2003, 12: 495–547.
22 Bransford, JD, Schwartz, DL. %22Rethinking transfer: a simple proposal with multiple implications%22. In: Iran‐Nejad, A, Pearson, PD, eds.
Review of Research in Education., vol. 24, Washington, DC:
American Educational Research Association; 1999, 61–101.
23 Ellis, AB. A taxonomy for categorizing generalizations: generalizing actions and reflection generalizations. J Lear Sci 2007, 16: 221–262.
24 Alibali, MW. %22Mechanisms of change in the development of mathematical reasoning%22. In: Kail, R, ed.
Advances in Child Development %26 Behavior., vol. 33, New York:
Academic Press; 2005, 79–123.
25 Siegler, RS.
Emerging Minds: The Process of Change in Children`s Thinking. New York: Oxford; 1996.
26 Bronfenbrenner, U.
The Ecology of Human Development: Experiments by Nature and Design. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press; 1979.
27 Strom, D, Kemeny, V, Lehrer, R, Forman, E. Visualizing the emergent structure of children`s mathematical argument. Cogn Sci 2001, 25: 733–773.
28 Vosniadou, S, Brewer, WF. Mental models of the earth: a study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognit Psychol 1992, 24: 535–585.
29 Grannott, N, Parziale, J.
Microdevelopment: Transition Processes in Development and Learning. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2002.
30 Bransford, JD, Barron, B, Pea, R, Meltzoff, A, Kuhl, P,
et al. %22Foundations and opportunities for an interdisciplinary science of learning%22. In: Sawyer, K, ed.
The Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. New York:
Cambridge University Press; 2006, 19–34.
31 Gardner, H.
The Mind`s New Science: A History of the Cognitive Revolution(Revised Edition). New York:
Basic Books; 1990.
32 Burkhardt, H, Schoenfeld, AH. Improving educational research: toward a more useful, more influential, and better‐funded enterprise. Educ Researcher 2003, 32: 3–14.
33 Strauss, S. %22Cognitive development and science education: toward a middle level model%22. In: Sigel, I, Renninger, KA, eds.
Handbook of Child Psychology: Vol. 4. Child Psychology in Practice. New York:
John Wiley %26 Sons; 1998, 357–400.
34 Kelly, E, Lesh, R. %22
Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education%22. In: Kelly, AE, Lesh, R, eds.
Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands:
Kleuwer Academic Press; 2000, 35–44.
35 Koedinger, KR, Anderson, JR, Hadley, WH, Mark, M. Intelligent tutoring goes to school in the big city. Int J Artificial Intell Educ 1997, 8: 30–43.
36 French, A, Nathan, MJ. %22Under the microscope of research and into the classroom: reflections on early algebra learning and instruction%22. In: Masingila, JO, ed.
Teachers Engaged in Research. Greenwich, CT:
Information Age Publishing; 2006, 49–68.
37 Rose, M.
The Mind at Work. New York:
Viking; 2004.
38 Stokes, DE.
Pasteur`s Quadrant. Washington, DC:
Brookings Institution Press; 1997.
39 Brown, AL. Design experiments: theoretical and methodological challenges in creating complex interventions in classroom settings. J Lear Sci 1992, 2: 141–178.
40 Siegler, RS. Three aspects of cognitive development. Cognit Psychol 1976, 8: 481–520.
41 Donovan, MS, Bransford, JD.
How Students Learn: History, Mathematics, and Science in the Classroom. Washington, DC:
National Academies Press; 2005.
42 Pashler, H, Bain, PM, Bottge, BA, Graesser, A, Koedinger, K,
et al. Organizing Instruction and Study to Improve Student Learning. IES Practice Guide. Washington, DC:
National Center for Education Research; 2007.
43 Miller, ML. %22A structured planning and debugging environment for elementary programming%22. In: Sleeman, D, Brown, JS, eds.
Intelligent Tutoring Systems. New York:
Academic Press; 1982.
44 Anderson, JR.
Rules of the Mind. Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum; 1993.
45 Polson, M, Richardson, J.
Foundations of Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum; 1988.
46 Anderson, JR, Conrad, FG, Corbett, AT. Skill acquisition and the LISP Tutor. Cogn Sci 1989, 13: 467–506.
47 Linn, MC, Lee, H‐S, Tinker, R, Husic, F, Chiu, JL. Teaching and assessing knowledge integration in science. Science 2006, 313: 1049–1050.
48 Ohlsson, S. Cognitive Science and instruction: why the revolution is not here (yet). Learn Instruction 1990, 2: 561–600.
49 Regian, JW, Shute, VJ.
Cognitive approaches to automated instruction. Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum; 1992.
50 Nathan, MJ. The impact of theories of learning on learning environment design. Interactive Learn Environments 1998, 5: 135–160.
51 Glaser, R. Components of a psychology of instruction: toward a science of design. Rev Educ Res 1976, 46: 1–24.
52 Schwartz, DL, Martin, T, Nasir, N. %22Designs for knowledge evolution: towards a prescriptive theory for integrating first‐ and second‐hand knowledge%22. In: Gardenfors, P, Johansson, P, eds.
Cognition, Education, and Communication Technology. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum; 2005, 21–54.
53 Clark, RC, Mayer, RE.
e‐Learning and the Science of Instruction: Proven Guidelines for Consumers and Designers of Multimedia Learning. San Francisco:
Jossey‐Bass; 2003.
54 Graesser, AC, Person, N, Harter, D. Tutoring Research Group Teaching tactics and dialog in AutoTutor. Int J Artificial Intell Educ 2001, 12: 257–279.
55 Sweller, J, van Merrienboer, JJG, Paas, FGWC. Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ Psychol Rev 1998, 10: 251–296.
56 Glennan, TK, Bodilly, S, Galegher, J, Kerr, KA.
Expanding the Reach of Education Reforms: Perspectives from Leaders in the Scale‐up of Educational Interventions. Santa Monica, CA:
RAND. 2004. Retrieved February 14, 2009, from RAND_MG248.pdf.
57 Stevenson, HW, Stigler, JW.
The Learning Gap: Why Our Schools Are Failing and What We Can Learn from Japanese and Chinese Education. New York:
Simon and Schuster; 1994.
58 Spillane, JP. Cognition and policy implementation: District policymakers and the reform of mathematics education. Cogn Instruction 2000, 18: 141–179.
59 Hall, R. Schedules of practical work for the analysis of case studies of learning and development. J Lear Sci 2001, 10: 203–222.
60 Carpenter, TP, Fennema, E, Peterson, PL, Chiang, P, Loef, M. Using knowledge of children`s mathematics thinking in classroom teaching: an experimental study. Am Educ Res J 1989, 26: 499–531.
61 Villasenor, A
Jr, Kepner, HS
Jr. Arithmetic from a problem‐solving perspective: an urban implementation. J Res Math Educ 1993, 24: 62–69.
62 Romberg, TA, Carpenter, TC, Dremock, F.
Understanding Math and Science Matters. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum; 2005.
63 Gamoran, A, Anderson, CW, Quiroz, PA, Secada, WG, Williams, T,
et al. Transforming Teaching in Math and Science: How Schools and Districts Can Support Change. New York:
Teachers College Press; 2003.
64 Connor, CM, Morrison, FJ, Fishman, BJ, Schatschneider, C, Underwood, P. Algorithm‐guided reading instruction. Science 2007, 315: 464–465.
65 Cobb, P, diSessa, A, Lehrer, R, Schauble, L. Design experiments in educational research. Educ Researcher 2003, 32: 9–13.
66 Collins, A. %22Towards a design science of education%22. In: Scanlon, E, O`Shea, T, eds.
New Directions in Educational Technology. Berlin:
Springer; 1992, 15–22.
67 Design‐Based Research Collective. Design‐based research: an emerging paradigm for educational inquiry. Educ Researcher 2003, 32: 5–8.
68 Sandoval, WA, Bell, P. Design‐based research methods for studying learning in context: introduction. Educational Psychologist 2004, 39: 199–201.
69 Koedinger, KR. %22Toward evidence for instructional design principles: Examples from Cognitive Tutor Math 6%22. In: Mewborn, D, Sztajn, P, White, D, Wiegel, H, Bryant, R, Nooney, K, eds.
Proceedings of the Twenty‐fourth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Columbus, OH:
ERIC Clearinghouse for Science, Mathematics, and Environmental Education; 2002.
70 Barab, SA, Kirshner, D. Guest editors` introduction: rethinking methodology in the Learning Sciences. J Lear Sci 2001, 10: 5–15.
71 Lesh, R, Lehrer, R. %22Iterative refinement cycles for videotape analyses of conceptual change%22. In: Kelly, A, Lesh, R, eds.
Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. Dordrecht, Netherlands:
Kleuwer Academic Press; 2000, 665–708.
72 Lesh, R, Kelly, A. %22Multi‐tiered teaching experiments%22. In: Kelly, AE, Lesh, R, eds.
Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum; 2000, 197–205.
73 Cobb, P. %22Conducting teaching experiments in collaboration with teachers%22. In: Kelly, AE, Lesh, R, eds.
Handbook of Research Design in Mathematics and Science Education. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum; 2000, 307–333.
74 Gibson, JJ.
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, MA:
Houghton Mifflin; 1979.
75 Norman, D.
The Psychology of Everyday Things. New York:
Basic Books; 1988.
76 Glenberg, A. What memory is for: creating meaning in the service of action. Behav Brain Sci 1997, 20: 1–55.
77 Barsalou, LW. Perceptual symbol systems. Behav Brain Sci 1999, 22: 577–660.
78 Vygotsky, LS.
Thought and language. (A Kozulin (Trans.)). Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press; 1986.
79 Latour, B. On interobjectivity. Mind Culture Activity 1996, 3: 228–245.
80 Schwartz, D. The emergence of abstract representations in dyad problem solving. J Lear Sci 1995, 4: 321–354.
81 Greeno, JG. %22Positioning, problematizing, and reconciling: aspects of productive cognition and learning in a situative perspective%22. In: Koschmann, T, ed.
Theorizing Learning Practice. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum; 2005.
82 Nathan, MJ, Eilam, B, Kim, Suyeon. To disagree, we must also agree: How intersubjectivity structures and perpetuates discourse in a mathematics classroom. J Lear Sci 2007, 16: 525–565.
83 Roschelle, J. Learning by collaborating: Convergent conceptual change. J Lear Sci 1992, 2: 235–276.
84 Tomasello, M, Carpenter, M. Shared intentionality. Dev Sci 2007, 10: 121–125.
85 Gutiérrez, K, Rogoff, B. Cultural ways of learning: individual traits or repertoires of practice. Educ Researcher 2003, 32: 19–25.
86 Glenberg, A, de Vega, M, Graesser, AC. %22Framing the debate%22. In: de Vega, M, Glenberg, A, Graesser, AC, eds.
Symbols and Embodiment: Debates on Meaning and Cognition. Oxford, UK:
Oxford University Press; 2008, 1–10.
87 Wilson, M. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon Bull Rev 2006, 9: 625–636.
88 Lakoff, G, Johnson, M.
Metaphors We Live.
2nd ed. Chicago:
The University of Chicago Press; 1980/2003.
89 Lakoff, G, Núñez, R.
Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics Into Being. New York:
Basic Books; 2001.
90 Abrahamson, D. %22Embodied spatial articulation: a gesture perspective on student negotiation between kinesthetic schemas and epistemic forms in learning mathematics%22. In: McDougall, DE, Ross, JA, eds.
Proceedings of the Twenty Sixth Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, vol 2. Toronto, Ontario:
Preney; 2004, 791–797.
91 Alibali, MW, Nathan, MJ. %22Teachers` gestures as a means of scaffolding students` understanding: evidence from an early algebra lesson%22. In: Goldman, R, Pea, R, Barron, BJ, Derry, S, eds.
Video Research in the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum; 2007, 349–365.
92 Clement, JJ. The role of imagistic simulation in scientific thought experiments. Topics Cogn Sci 2009, 1: 686–710.
93 Glenberg, AM, Gutierrez, T, Levin, JR, Japuntich, S, Kaschak, MP. Activity and imagined activity can enhance young children`s reading comprehension. J Educ Psychol 2004, 96: 424–436.
94 Hostetter, AB, Alibali, MW. Visible embodiment: gestures as simulated action. Psychon Bull Rev 2008, 15: 495–514.
95 Schwartz, DL, Black, T. Inferences through imagined actions: knowing by simulated doing. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn 1999, 25: 116–136.
96 Glenberg, AM, Robertson, DA. Indexical understanding of instructions. Discourse Process 1999, 28: 1–26.
97 Collins, A, Brown, JS, Newman, S. %22Cognitive apprenticeship: teaching the craft of reading, writing, and mathematics%22. In: Resnick, LB, ed.
Knowing, Learning and Instruction: Essays in Honor of Robert Glaser. Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum; 1989, 453–494.
98 Resnick, LB. Learning in school and out. Educ Researcher 1987, 16: 13–20.
99 Hall, R, Stevens, R. %22Teaching/learning events in the workplace: a comparative analysis of their organizational and interactional structure%22. In: Cottrell, GW, ed.
Proceedings of the Eighteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ:
Erlbaum; 1996, 160–165.
100 Brown, JS, Collins, A, Duguid, S. Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educ Researcher 1989, 18: 32–42.
101 Scribner, S, Cole, M.
The Psychology of Literacy. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press; 1981.
102 Clancey, WJ. Situated action: a neuropsychological interpretation response to Vera and Simon. Cogn Sci 1993, 17: 87–116.
103 Cole, M, Engestrom, Y. %22A cultural‐historical approach to distributed cognition%22. In: Salomon, G, ed.
Distributed Cognitions: Psychological and Educational Considerations. New York:
Cambridge University Press; 1993, 1–46.
104 Heath, SB.
Ways with Words: Language, Life, and Work in Communities and Classrooms. New York:
Cambridge University Press; 1983.
105 Anderson, JR, Greeno, JG, Reder, LM, Simon, HA. Perspectives on learning, thinking, and activity. Educ Researcher 2000, 29: 11–13.
106 Stahl, G, Koschmann, T, Suthers, D. %22Computer‐supported collaborative learning: an historical perspective%22. In: Sawyer, RK, ed.
Cambridge Handbook of the Learning Sciences. Cambridge, UK:
Cambridge University Press; 2006, 409–426.
107 Newell, A.
Unified Theories of Cognition. Cambridge, MA:
Harvard University Press; 1990.
108 Lemke, JL. Across the scales of time: artifacts, activities, and meanings in Ecosocial Systems. Mind Culture Activity 2000, 7: 273–290.
109 Lemke, JL. The long and the short of it: comments on multiple time‐scale studies of human activity. J Learn Sci 2001, 10: 17–26.
110 Ritter, S, Anderson, JR, Koedinger, KR, Corbett, A. Cognitive Tutor: applied research in mathematics education. Psychon Bull Rev 2007, 14: 249–255.
111 Koedinger, KR, Anderson, JR. Abstract planning and perceptual chunks: elements of expertise in geometry. Cogn Sci 1990, 14: 511–550.
112 Koedinger, KR, Alibali, M, Nathan, MJ. Trade‐offs between grounded and abstract representations: evidence from algebra problem solving. Cogn Sci 2008, 32: 366–397.
113 Koedinger, KR, Nathan, MJ. The real story behind story problems: effects of representations on quantitative reasoning. J Lear Sci 2004, 13: 129–164.
114 Anderson, JR, Corbett, AT, Koedinger, K, Pelletier, R. Cognitive tutors: lessons learned. J Learn Sci 1995, 4: 167–207.
115 Koedinger, KR, Aleven, V. Exploring the assistance dilemma in experiments with Cognitive Tutors. Educ Psychol Rev 2007, 19: 239–264.
116 Schofield, JW, Eurich‐Fulcer, R, Britt, CL. Teachers, computer tutors, and teaching: the artificially intelligent tutor as an agent for classroom change. Am Educ Res J 1994, 31: 579–607.
117 Gluck, KA.
Eye movements and algebra tutoring. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Carnegie Mellon University. 1999.
118 Anderson, JR, Gluck, K. %22What role do cognitive architectures play in intelligent tutoring systems?%22 In: Klahr, D, Carver, SM, eds.
Cognition and Instruction: Twenty‐five Years of Progress. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum; 2001, 227–262.
119 Anderson, JR, Betts, SA, Ferris, JL, & Fincham, JM.
Can neural imaging investigate learning in an educational task? In
Proceedings of the 36th Annual Carnegie Symposium on Cognition, June 2–3, Pittsburgh, PA: Carnegie Mellon University. 2009.
120 Anderson, JR.
How Can the Human Mind Occur in the Physical Universe?:
Oxford University Press; 2007.
121 Nasir, N. Points ain`t everything: emergent goals and average and percent understandings in the play of basketball among African‐American students. Anthropol Educ Q 2000b, 31: 283–305.
122 Nasir, N. Average and percent on the court: Statistics learning in basketball. Manuscript submitted for publication. 2001.
123 Reisman, S. Dominoes: a computer simulation of cognitive processes. Simulation Games 1972, 3: 155–164.
124 Nasir, N. Identity, goals, and learning: mathematics in cultural practice. Mathematical Thinking Learn 2002, 4: 211–245.
125 Ogbu, J. Understanding cultural diversity and learning. Educ Researcher 1992, 21: 5–14.
126 Nasir, NS, Saxe, GB. Ethnic and academic identities: a cultural practice perspective on emerging tensions and their management in the lives of minority students. Educ Researcher 2003, 32: 14–18.
127 Lynham, SA. The general method of theory‐building research in applied disciplines. Adv Developing Human Resources 2002, 4: 221–241.
128 Bruer, JT.
Schools for Thought: A Science of Learning in the Classroom. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press; 1993.
129 Carver, SM, Klahr, D, eds.
Cognition and Instruction: 25 Years of Progress. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum; 2001.
130 McGilly, K.
Classroom Lessons: Integrating Cognitive Theory and Classroom Practice. Cambridge, MA:
MIT Press; 1994.
131 Klahr, D, Chen, Z, Toth, EE. %22Cognitive development and science education: ships passing in the night or beacons of mutual illumination?%22 In: Carver, SM, Klahr, D, eds.
Cognition and Instruction: 25 years of progress. Mahwah, NJ:
Erlbaum; 2001.
132 Bruner, JS.
Toward a Theory of Instruction. New York:
Norton; 1968.
133 Schofield
et al.