Home
This Title All WIREs
WIREs RSS Feed
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Cogn Sci

Animal visual perception

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Perception processes can be investigated at the physical (concerning the stimulation from the environment to the receptors), physiological (the processes taking place in the neural system), and psychological (the ‘sense’ of perception, the outcome produced by the physical stimulation and the physiological processes) level. The present paper focuses on visual perception, mainly from a psychological level of investigation, and revises comparative literature, highlighting both similarities and differences in the visual structures and functions in different animal classes. For this purpose, the structure of the current eyes is described in a comparative perspective, as well as perceptual organization and object recognition processes, color perception, three‐dimensional structuring of the image, and motion perception. Finally, the literature about comparative susceptibility to various visual illusions will be discussed, as illusory perception has been revealed to be a most useful tool to unveil the perceptual algorithms shared by the different species. In spite of major differences between animal species in the structures in charge of perception and in the adaptations to specific ecological niches, experimental data presented here will lead to the conclusion that a number of basic perceptual principles of organization and functioning are shared between species. WIREs Cogn Sci 2011 2 106–116 DOI: 10.1002/wcs.97

Figure 1.

Eye evolution. Clockwise from top: the photosensitive patch of the proto‐eye; eye with a cup‐shaped photoreceptor layer; the pinhole eye; the camera‐like eye with primitive lens.

[ Normal View 23K | Magnified View 68K ]
Figure 2.

Herz experiment with jays. Birds were trained to identify the X‐labeled element within a configuration of identical elements. The X‐labeled elements in (a) and (b) were easier to learn than that in (c).

[ Normal View 4K | Magnified View 10K ]
Figure 3.

Stimuli employed by Kanizsa et al.27 with mice. Training stimuli (a) and testing stimuli (b and c).

[ Normal View 3K | Magnified View 7K ]
Figure 4.

In the apparatus employed by Reichardt47 to study the optomotor response in insects, a fly suspended in a rotating drum adjusts its direction of flight according to the striped pattern.

[ Normal View 9K | Magnified View 28K ]
Figure 5.

The Müller‐Lyer illusion consists in the fact that the length of the upper horizontal bar is estimated as shorter than that of the lower bar, due to the orientation of the brackets.

[ Normal View 3K | Magnified View 9K ]
Figure 6.

In the experiment by Zanforlin,76 chicks had been trained on a triangle as the positive stimulus, then recognized as positive the figure to the left, which produces the perception of a triangle through illusory contours.

[ Normal View 17K | Magnified View 22K ]

Browse by Topic

Cognitive Biology > Evolutionary Roots of Cognition
Psychology > Comparative Psychology
Psychology > Perception and Psychophysics
blog comments powered by Disqus

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts

In the Spotlight

Konrad Körding

Konrad Körding

Konrad Körding is Assistant Professor of Physiology and Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation at the Rehabilitation Institute of Chicago, part of Northwestern University. Before joining Northwestern in 2006, Professor Körding worked in three different research groups, most recently in 2004-2005 at MIT, studying machine learning and hierarchical Bayesian models.


Professor Körding is a member of the Swiss Society for Neuroscience, the German Society for Neuroscience, the Society for Neuroscience (USA) and the Electronic Frontier Foundation.

Professor Körding’s current research with the Bayesian Behavior group aims to improve rehabilitation procedures through a greater understanding of motor learning. In order to do this the team studies how people move, and how these movements are affected by uncertainty.

Learn More

Twitter: WIREsCogScience Follow us on Twitter