1 von Uexküll, J. %22A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: a picture book of invisible worlds%22. In: Schiller, C, ed. Instinctive Behavior: The Development of a Modern Concept. New York: International Universities Press
2 Darwin, C. On the Origin of Species. London: John Murray
3 Lamb, TD, Collin, SP, Pugh, EN Jr
. Evolution of the vertebrate eye: opsins, photoreceptors, retina and eye cup. Nat Rev Neurosci 2007, 8:960–976.
4 Nilsson, DE. Eye evolution: a question of genetic promiscuity. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2007, 14:407–414.
5 Land, MF. The optical structures of animal eyes. Curr Biol 2005, 15:R319–R323.
6 Jacobs, GH. Primate photopigments and primate colour vision. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:577–581.
7 Osorio, D, Vorobyev, M. A review of the evolution of animal colour vision and visual communication signals. Vision Res 2008, 48:2042–2051.
8 Briscoe, AD. Reconstructing the ancestral butterfly eye: focus on the opsins. J Exp Biol 2008, 211:1805–1813.
9 Bowmaker, JK. %22Visual pigments of fishes%22. In: Douglas, RH, Djamgoz, MBA, eds. The Visual System of Fish. London New York Tokyo Melbourne Madras: Chapman and Hall
; 1990, 81–107.
10 Neumeyer, C. Tetrachromatic colour vision in goldfish: evidence from colour mixture experiments. J Comp Physiol A 1992, 171:639–649.
11 Bowmaker, JK, Thorpe, A, Douglas, RH. Ultraviolet‐sensitive cones in the goldfish. Vis Res 1991, 31:349–352.
12 Hart, NS, Vorobyev, M. Modelling oil droplet absorption spectra and spectral sensitivities of bird cone photoreceptors. J Comp Physiol A 2005, 191:381–392.
13 Martin, GR, Osorio, D. %22Vision in birds%22. In: Masland, RH, Albright, TD, eds. The Senses, vol. 1. London: Academic Press
; 2008, 25–52.
14 Jacobs, GH. Comparative Colour Vision. London: Academic Press
15 De Valois, RL, Morgan, HC, Polson, MC, Hull, EM. Psychophysical studies of monkey vision. I. Macaque luminosity and colour vision tests. Vis Res 1974, 14:53–67.
16 Jacobs, GH, Neitz, J. Inheritance of colour vision in a New World monkey (Saimiri sciureus
). Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1987, 84:2545–2549.
17 Varela, FJ, Palacios, A, Goldsmith, TH. %22Color vision of birds%22. In: Bischof, HJ, Zeigler, HP, eds. Avian Vision and Cognition. Cambridge: The MIT press
18 Arikawa, K, Wakakuwa, M, Qiu, X, Kurasawa, M, Stavenga, DG. Sexual dimorphism of short‐wavelength photoreceptors in the small white butterfly, Pieris rapae crucivora
. J Neurosci 2005, 25:5935–5942.
19 Matsuno, T, Fujita, K. A comparative psychophysical approach to visual perception in primates. Primates 2009, 50:121–130.
20 Kanizsa, G. Organization in Vision. Essays on Gestalt Perception. New York: Praeger
21 Tinbergen, N. The Study of Instinct. New York: Oxford University Press
22 Cuthill, IC, Bennett, ATD. Mimicry and the eye of the beholder. Proc R Soc Lond B 1993, 253:203–204.
23 Hertz, M. Wahrnehmungpsychologische Untersuchungen am Eichelhäher. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Psychologie 1928, 7:144–194.
24 Tinbergen, N. Über die Orientierung des Bienenwolfes Philanthus triangulum Fabricius. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologie 1932, 16:305–335.
25 Michotte, A, Thinès, G, Crabbé, G. Les compléments amodaux des structures perceptive. Louvain: Studia Psychologica, Publications Universitaires
26 Vallortigara, G. %22Visual cognition and representation in birds and primates%22. In: Rogers, LJ, Kaplan, G, eds. Vertebrate Comparative Cognition: Are Primates Superior to Non‐Primates? New York: Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers
; 2004, 57–94.
27 Kanizsa, G, Renzi, P, Conte, S, Compostela, C, Guerani, L. Amodal completion in mouse vision. Perception 1993, 22:713–721.
28 Sato, A, Kanazawa, S, Fujita, K. Perception of object unity in a chimpanzee (Pan troglodytes
). Jpn Psychol Res 1997, 39:191–199.
29 Fujita, K. Perceptual completion in rhesus monkeys (Macaca mulatta
) and pigeons (Columba livia
) . Percept Psychophys 2001, 63:115–125.
30 Fujita, K, Giersch, A. What perceptual rules do capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella
) follow in completing partly occluded figures? J Exp Psychol: Anim Behav Process 2005, 31:387–398.
31 Deruelle, C, Barbet, I, Dèpy, D, Fagot, J. Perception of partly occluded figures by baboons (Papio papio
). Perception 2000, 9:1483–1497.
32 Fagot, J, Barbet, I, Parron, C, Deruelle, C. Amodal completion by baboons (Papio papio
): contribution of background depth cues. Primates 2006, 47:145–150.
33 Regolin, L, Vallortigara, G. Perception of partly occluded objects by young chicks. Percept Psychophys 1995, 57:971–976.
34 Sovrano, VA, Bisazza, A. Recognition of partly occluded objects by fish. Anim Cogn 2007, 11:161–166.
35 Cerella, J. The pigeon`s analysis of pictures. Pattern Recognit 1980, 12:1–6.
36 Sekuler, AB, Lee, JAJ, Shettleworth, SJ. Pigeons do not complete partly occluded figures. Perception 1996, 25:1109–1120.
37 Nieder, A, Wagner, H. Perception and neuronal coding of subjective contours in the owl. Nat Neurosci 1999, 2:660–663.
38 Lea, SEG, Slater, AM, Ryan, CME. Perception of object unity in chicks: a comparison with the human infant. Infant Behav Dev 1996, 19:501–504.
39 Di Pietro, NT, Wasserman, EA, Young, ME. Effects of occlusion on pigeons` visual object recognition. Perception 2002, 31:1299–1312.
40 Cutting, JE, Vishton, PM. %22Perceiving layout and knowing distances: the integration relative potency and contextual use of different information about depth%22. In: Epstein, W, Rogers, S, eds. Handbook of Perception and Cognition: Perception of Space and Motion. San Diego: Academic
; 1995, 69–117.
41 Forkman, B, Vallortigara, G. Minimization of modal contours. An essential cross‐species strategy in disambiguating relative depth. Anim Cogn 1999, 4:181–185.
42 Gunderson, VM, Yonas, A, Sargent, PL, Grant‐Webster, KS. Infant macaque monkeys respond to pictorial depth. Psychol Sci 1993, 4:93–98.
43 Yonas, A, Cleaves, W, Pettersen, L. Development of sensitivity to pictorial depth. Science 1978, 200:77–79.
44 Timney, B, Keil, K. Horses are sensitive to pictorial depth cues. Perception 1996, 25:1121–1128.
45 Forkman, B. Hens use occlusion to judge depth in a two‐dimensional picture. Perception 1998, 27:861–867.
46 Cavoto, BR, Cook, RG. The contribution of monocular depth cues to scene perception by pigeons. Psychol Sci 2006, 17:628–634.
47 Reichardt, W. %22Movement perception in insects%22. In: Reichardt, W, ed. Processing of Optical Data by Organisms and Machines. New York: Academic
; 1969, 465–493.
48 Wallace, GK. Visual scanning in the desert locust Schistocerca gregaria
Forskal. J Exp Biol 1959, 36:512–525.
49 Sobel, EC. The locust`s use of motion parallax to measure distance. J Comp Physiol A 1990, 167:579–588.
50 Kral, K, Poteser, M. Motion parallax as a source of distance information in locusts and mantids. J Insect Behav 1997, 10:145–163.
51 Srinivasan, MV, Lehrer, M, Horridge, GA. Visual figure‐ground discrimination in the honeybee: the role of motion parallax at boundaries. Proc R Soc Lond B 1990, 238:331–350.
52 Srinivasan, MV, Lehrer, M, Kirchner, WH, Zhang, SW. Range perception through apparent image speed in freely flying honeybees. Vis Neurosci 1991, 6:519–535.
53 Srinivasan, MV, Pinter, RB, Osorio, D. Matched filtering in the visual system of the fly: large monopolar cells in the lamina are optimized to detect moving edges and blobs. Proc R Soc Lond B 1990, 240:279–293.
54 Emmerton, J. The pigeon`s discrimination of movement patterns (Lissajous figures) and contour‐dependent rotational invariance. Perception 1986, 15:573–588.
55 Dittrich, WH, Lea, SEG. Motion as a natural category for pigeons: generalization and a feature‐positive effect. J Exp Anal Behav 1993, 59:115–129.
56 Hodos, W, Smith, L, Bonbright, JC Jr.
Detection of the velocity of movement of visual stimuli by pigeons. J Exp Anal Behav 1975, 25:143–156.
57 Siegel, RK. Apparent movement detection in the pigeon. J Exp Anal Behav 1970, 14:93–97.
58 Siegel, RK. Apparent movement and real movement detection in pigeons: stimulus generalization. J Exp Anal Behav 1971, 16:189–192.
59 Mascalzoni, E, Regolin, L, Vallortigara, G. Mom`s shadow: structure‐from‐motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure. Anim Cogn 2009, 12:389–400.
60 Johansson, G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Percept Psychophys 1973, 14:201–211.
61 Blake, R. Cats perceive biological motion. Psychol Sci 1993, 4:54–57.
62 Omori, E, Watanabe, S. Discrimination of Johansson`s stimuli in pigeons. Int J Comp Psychol 1996, 9:92.
63 Dittrich, WH, Lea, SEG, Barrett, J, Gurr, PR. Categorisation of natural movements by pigeons: visual concept discrimination and biological motion. J Exp Anal Behav 1998, 70:281–299.
64 Siegel, RM, Andersen, RA. Perception of three‐dimensional structure from motion in monkey and man. Nature 1988, 331:259–261.
65 Tomonaga, M. Visual search for biological motion patterns in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes
). Psychologia 2001, 44:46–59.
66 Regolin, L, Tommasi, L, Vallortigara, G. Visual perception of biological motion in newly hatched chicks as revealed by an imprinting procedure. Anim Cogn 2000, 3:53–60.
67 Herman, LM, Morel‐Samuels, P, Pack, AA. Bottlenosed dolphin and human recognition of veridical and degraded video displays of an artificial gestural language. J Exp Psychol: Gen 1990, 119:215–230.
68 Nakamura, N, Fujita, K, Ushitani, T, Miyatat, H. Perception of the standard and the reversed Müller‐Lyer figures in pigeons (Columba livia
) and humans (Homo sapiens
). J Comp Psychol 2006, 120:252–261.
69 Suganuma, E, Pessoa, VF, Monge‐Fuentes, V, Castro, BM, Tavares, MCE. Perception of the Müller‐Lyer illusion in capuchin monkeys (Cebus apella
). Behav Brain Res 2007, 182:67–72.
70 Pepperberg, IM, Vicinay, J, Cavanagh, P. Processing of the Müller‐Lyer illusion by a Grey parrot (Psittacus erithacus
). Perception 2008, 37:765–781.
71 Barbet, I, Fagot, J. Perception of the corridor illusion by baboons (Papio papio
). Behav Brain Res 2002, 132:111–115.
72 Imura, T, Tomonaga, M, Yagi, A. The effects of linear perspective on relative size discrimination in chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes
) and humans (Homo sapiens
). Behav Processes 2008, 77:306–312.
73 Fujita, K, Blough, DS, Blough, PM. Pigeons see the Ponzo illusion. Anim Learn Behav 1991, 19:283–293.
74 Fujita, K. Perception of the Ponzo illusion by rhesus monkeys, chimpanzees, and humans: similarity and difference in the three primate species. Percept Psychophys 1997, 59:284–292.
75 Nieder, A. Seeing more than meets the eye: processing of illusory contours in animals. J Comp Physiol A 2002, 188:249–260.
76 Zanforlin, M. Visual perception of complex forms (anomalous surfaces) in chicks. Ital J Psychol 1981, 1:1–16.
77 Bravo, M, Blake, R, Morrison, S. Cats see subjective contours. Vision Res 1988, 28:861–865.
78 De Weerd, P, Desimone, R, Ungerleider, LG. Cue‐dependent deficits in grating orientation discrimination after V4 lesions in macaques. Vis Neurosci 1996, 13:529–538.
79 Sovrano, VA, Bisazza, A. Perception of subjective contours in fish. Perception 2009, 38:579–590.
80 van Hateren, JH, Srinivasan, M, Wait, PB. Pattern recognition in bees: orientation discrimination. J Comp Physiol A 1990, 167:649–654.
81 Clara, E, Regolin, L, Vallortigara, G, Zanforlin, M. Domestic chicks perceive stereokinetic illusions. Perception 2006, 35:983–992.
82 Clara, E, Regolin, L, Vallortigara, G, Rogers, L. Perception of the stereokinetic illusion by the common marmoset (Callithrix jacchus
). Anim Cogn 2007, 10:135–140.
83 Kellman, PJ, Spelke, E‐S. Perception of partly occluded objects in infancy. Cognit Psychol 1983, 15:483–524.
84 Slater, A, Morison, V, Somers, M, Mattock, A, Brown, E, Taylor, D. Newborn and older infants` perception of partly occluded objects. Infant Behav Dev 1990, 13:33–49.
85 Valenza, E, Leo, I, Gava, L, Simion, F. Perceptual completion in newborn human infants. Child Dev 2006, 77:1810–1821.
86 Vallortigara, G, Regolin, L. Gravity bias in the interpretation of biological motion by inexperienced chicks. Curr Biol 2006, 16:279–280.
87 Simion, F, Regolin, L, Bulf, H. A predisposition for biological motion in the newborn baby. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2008, 105:809–813.