Briscoe, J, Small, S. Morphogen rules: design principles of gradient‐mediated embryo patterning. Development 2015, 142:3996–4009.
Rogers, KW, Schier, AF. Morphogen gradients: from generation to interpretation. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 2011, 27:377–407.
Meinhardt, H. Space‐dependent cell determination under the control of a morphogen gradient. J Theor Biol 1978, 74:307–321.
Crick, F. Diffusion in embryogenesis. Nature 1970, 225:420–422.
Wolpert, L. Positional information and the spatial pattern of cellular differentiation. J Theor Biol 1969, 25:1–47.
Alexandre, C, Baena‐Lopez, A, Vincent, JP. Patterning and growth control by membrane‐tethered Wingless. Nature 2014, 505:180–185.
Dessaud, E, Yang, LL, Hill, K, Cox, B, Ulloa, F, Ribeiro, A, Mynett, A, Novitch, BG, Briscoe, J. Interpretation of the sonic hedgehog morphogen gradient by a temporal adaptation mechanism. Nature 2007, 450:717–720.
van Boxtel, AL, Chesebro, JE, Heliot, C, Ramel, MC, Stone, RK, Hill, CS. A temporal window for signal activation dictates the dimensions of a nodal signaling domain. Dev Cell 2015, 35:175–185.
Lewis, WH. Experimental studies on the development of the eye in amphibia. I. On the origin of the lens. Rana palustris. Am J Anat 1904, 3:505–536.
Nusslein‐Volhard, C, Frohnhofer, HG, Lehmann, R. Determination of anteroposterior polarity in Drosophila. Science 1987, 238:1675–1681.
Spemann, H, Mangold, H. Über Induktion von Embryonalanlagen durch Implantation artfremder Organisatoren. Arch Mikrosk Anat Entwicklungsmech 1924, 100:599–638.
Wagner, M, Thaller, C, Jessell, T, Eichele, G. Polarizing activity and retinoid synthesis in the floor plate of the neural tube. Nature 1990, 345:819–822.
Waddington, CH. Organisers and Genes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1940.
Placzek, M, Yamada, T, Tessier‐Lavigne, M, Jessell, T, Dodd, J. Control of dorsoventral pattern in vertebrate neural development: induction and polarizing properties of the floor plate. Dev Suppl 1991, 2:105–122.
Echelard, Y, Epstein, DJ, St‐Jacques, B, Shen, L, Mohler, J, McMahon, JA, McMahon, AP. Sonic hedgehog, a member of a family of putative signaling molecules, is implicated in the regulation of CNS polarity. Cell 1993, 75:1417–1430.
Marti, E, Bumcrot, DA, Takada, R, McMahon, AP. Requirement of 19K form of sonic hedgehog for induction of distinct ventral cell types in CNS explants. Nature 1995, 375:322–325.
Riddle, RD, Johnson, RL, Laufer, E, Tabin, C. Sonic hedgehog mediates the polarizing activity of the ZPA. Cell 1993, 75:1401–1416.
Roelink, H, Porter, JA, Chiang, C, Tanabe, Y, Chang, DT, Beachy, PA, Jessell, TM. Floor plate and motor neuron induction by different concentrations of the amino‐terminal cleavage product of sonic hedgehog autoproteolysis. Cell 1995, 81:445–455.
Alexandre, C, Jacinto, A, Ingham, PW. Transcriptional activation of hedgehog target genes in Drosophila is mediated directly by the cubitus interruptus protein, a member of the GLI family of zinc finger DNA‐binding proteins. Genes Dev 1996, 10:2003–2013.
Dominguez, M, Brunner, M, Hafen, E, Basler, K. Sending and receiving the hedgehog signal: control by the Drosophila Gli protein cubitus interruptus. Science 1996, 272:1621–1625.
Von Ohlen, T, Lessing, D, Nusse, R, Hooper, JE. Hedgehog signaling regulates transcription through cubitus interruptus, a sequence‐specific DNA binding protein. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1997, 94:2404–2409.
Eaton, S, Kornberg, TB. Repression of ci‐D in posterior compartments of Drosophila by engrailed. Genes Dev 1990, 4:1068–1077.
Schwartz, C, Locke, J, Nishida, C, Kornberg, TB. Analysis of cubitus interruptus regulation in Drosophila embryos and imaginal disks. Development 1995, 121:1625–1635.
Panchision, DM, McKay, RD. The control of neural stem cells by morphogenic signals. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2002, 12:478–487.
Panchision, DM, Pickel, JM, Studer, L, Lee, SH, Turner, PA, Hazel, TG, McKay, RD. Sequential actions of BMP receptors control neural precursor cell production and fate. Genes Dev 2001, 15:2094–2110.
Oosterveen, T, Kurdija, S, Alekseenko, Z, Uhde, CW, Bergsland, M, Sandberg, M, Andersson, E, Dias, JM, Muhr, J, Ericson, J. Mechanistic differences in the transcriptional interpretation of local and long‐range Shh morphogen signaling. Dev Cell 2012, 23:1006–1019.
Oosterveen, T, Kurdija, S, Enstero, M, Uhde, CW, Bergsland, M, Sandberg, M, Sandberg, R, Muhr, J, Ericson, J. SoxB1‐driven transcriptional network underlies neural‐specific interpretation of morphogen signals. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2013, 110:7330–7335.
Peterson, KA, Nishi, Y, Ma, W, Vedenko, A, Shokri, L, Zhang, X, McFarlane, M, Baizabal, JM, Junker, JP, van Oudenaarden, A, et al. Neural‐specific Sox2 input and differential Gli‐binding affinity provide context and positional information in Shh‐directed neural patterning. Genes Dev 2012, 26:2802–2816.
Kutejova, E, Sasai, N, Shah, A, Gouti, M, Briscoe, J. Neural progenitors adopt specific identities by directly repressing all alternative progenitor transcriptional programs. Dev Cell 2016, 36:639–653.
Nishi, Y, Zhang, X, Jeong, J, Peterson, KA, Vedenko, A, Bulyk, ML, Hide, WA, McMahon, AP. A direct fate exclusion mechanism by sonic hedgehog‐regulated transcriptional repressors. Development 2015, 142:3286–3293.
Ballas, N, Mandel, G. The many faces of REST oversee epigenetic programming of neuronal genes. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2005, 15:500–506.
Chong, JA, Tapia‐Ramirez, J, Kim, S, Toledo‐Aral, JJ, Zheng, Y, Boutros, MC, Altshuller, YM, Frohman, MA, Kraner, SD, Mandel, G. REST: a mammalian silencer protein that restricts sodium channel gene expression to neurons. Cell 1995, 80:949–957.
Schoenherr, CJ, Anderson, DJ. The neuron‐restrictive silencer factor (NRSF): a coordinate repressor of multiple neuron‐specific genes. Science 1995, 267:1360–1363.
Ooi, L, Wood, IC. Chromatin crosstalk in development and disease: lessons from REST. Nat Rev Genet 2007, 8:544–554.
Chen, ZF, Paquette, AJ, Anderson, DJ. NRSF/REST is required in vivo for repression of multiple neuronal target genes during embryogenesis. Nat Genet 1998, 20:136–142.
Ballas, N, Grunseich, C, Lu, DD, Speh, JC, Mandel, G. REST and its corepressors mediate plasticity of neuronal gene chromatin throughout neurogenesis. Cell 2005, 121:645–657.
Bruce, AW, Donaldson, IJ, Wood, IC, Yerbury, SA, Sadowski, MI, Chapman, M, Gottgens, B, Buckley, NJ. Genome‐wide analysis of repressor element 1 silencing transcription factor/neuron‐restrictive silencing factor (REST/NRSF) target genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2004, 101:10458–10463.
Grimes, JA, Nielsen, SJ, Battaglioli, E, Miska, EA, Speh, JC, Berry, DL, Atouf, F, Holdener, BC, Mandel, G, Kouzarides, T. The co‐repressor mSin3A is a functional component of the REST‐CoREST repressor complex. J Biol Chem 2000, 275:9461–9467.
Andres, ME, Burger, C, Peral‐Rubio, MJ, Battaglioli, E, Anderson, ME, Grimes, J, Dallman, J, Ballas, N, Mandel, G. CoREST: a functional corepressor required for regulation of neural‐specific gene expression. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:9873–9878.
Ballas, N, Battaglioli, E, Atouf, F, Andres, ME, Chenoweth, J, Anderson, ME, Burger, C, Moniwa, M, Davie, JR, Bowers, WJ, et al. Regulation of neuronal traits by a novel transcriptional complex. Neuron 2001, 31:353–365.
Lunyak, VV, Burgess, R, Prefontaine, GG, Nelson, C, Sze, SH, Chenoweth, J, Schwartz, P, Pevzner, PA, Glass, C, Mandel, G, et al. Corepressor‐dependent silencing of chromosomal regions encoding neuronal genes. Science 2002, 298:1747–1752.
Roopra, A, Qazi, R, Schoenike, B, Daley, TJ, Morrison, JF. Localized domains of G9a‐mediated histone methylation are required for silencing of neuronal genes. Mol Cell 2004, 14:727–738.
Shi, Y, Lan, F, Matson, C, Mulligan, P, Whetstine, JR, Cole, PA, Casero, RA, Shi, Y. Histone demethylation mediated by the nuclear amine oxidase homolog LSD1. Cell 2004, 119:941–953.
Chen, TP, Dent, SYR. Chromatin modifiers and remodellers: regulators of cellular differentiation. Nat Rev Genet 2014, 15:93–106.
Li, E, Zhang, Y. DNA methylation in mammals. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2014, 6:a019133.
Bintu, L, Yong, J, Antebi, YE, McCue, K, Kazuki, Y, Uno, N, Oshimura, M, Elowitz, MB. Dynamics of epigenetic regulation at the single‐cell level. Science 2016, 351:720–724.
Sasai, N, Kutejova, E, Briscoe, J. Integration of signals along orthogonal axes of the vertebrate neural tube controls progenitor competence and increases cell diversity. PLoS Biol 2014, 12:e1001907.
Delfino‐Machin, M, Lunn, JS, Breitkreuz, DN, Akai, J, Storey, KG. Specification and maintenance of the spinal cord stem zone. Development 2005, 132:4273–4283.
Diez del Corral, R, Olivera‐Martinez, I, Goriely, A, Gale, E, Maden, M, Storey, K. Opposing FGF and retinoid pathways control ventral neural pattern, neuronal differentiation, and segmentation during body axis extension. Neuron 2003, 40:65–79.
Diez del Corral, R, Breitkreuz, DN, Storey, KG. Onset of neuronal differentiation is regulated by paraxial mesoderm and requires attenuation of FGF signalling. Development 2002, 129:1681–1691.
Pages, F, Kerridge, S. Morphogen gradients. A question of time or concentration? Trends Genet 2000, 16:40–44.
Wartlick, O, Kicheva, A, Gonzalez‐Gaitan, M. Morphogen gradient formation. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2009, 1:a001255.
Barkai, N, Shilo, BZ. Robust generation and decoding of morphogen gradients. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol 2009, 1:a001990.
Dubrulle, J, Jordan, BM, Akhmetova, L, Farrell, JA, Kim, SH, Solnica‐Krezel, L, Schier, AF. Response to Nodal morphogen gradient is determined by the kinetics of target gene induction. Elife 2015, 4:1–27.
Bergmann, S, Sandler, O, Sberro, H, Shnider, S, Schejter, E, Shilo, BZ, Barkai, N. Pre‐steady‐state decoding of the Bicoid morphogen gradient. PLoS Biol 2007, 5:e46.
Chamberlain, CE, Jeong, J, Guo, C, Allen, BL, McMahon, AP. Notochord‐derived Shh concentrates in close association with the apically positioned basal body in neural target cells and forms a dynamic gradient during neural patterning. Development 2008, 135:1097–1106.
Cohen, M, Kicheva, A, Ribeiro, A, Blassberg, R, Page, KM, Barnes, CP, Briscoe, J. Ptch1 and Gli regulate Shh signalling dynamics via multiple mechanisms. Nat Commun 2015, 6:6709.
Wartlick, O, Mumcu, P, Kicheva, A, Bittig, T, Seum, C, Julicher, F, Gonzalez‐Gaitan, M. Dynamics of Dpp signaling and proliferation control. Science 2011, 331:1154–1159.
Zhou, S, Lo, WC, Suhalim, JL, Digman, MA, Gratton, E, Nie, Q, Lander, AD. Free extracellular diffusion creates the Dpp morphogen gradient of the Drosophila wing disc. Curr Biol 2012, 22:668–675.
Neumann, CJ, Cohen, SM. Long‐range action of Wingless organizes the dorsal‐ventral axis of the Drosophila wing. Development 1997, 124:871–880.
Zecca, M, Basler, K, Struhl, G. Direct and long‐range action of a Wingless morphogen gradient. Cell 1996, 87:833–844.
Chen, Y, Schier, AF. The zebrafish Nodal signal Squint functions as a morphogen. Nature 2001, 411:607–610.
Dubrulle, J, Pourquie, O. fgf8 mRNA decay establishes a gradient that couples axial elongation to patterning in the vertebrate embryo. Nature 2004, 427:419–422.
Pfeiffer, S, Alexandre, C, Calleja, M, Vincent, JP. The progeny of Wingless‐expressing cells deliver the signal at a distance in Drosophila embryos. Curr Biol 2000, 10:321–324.
Farin, HF, Jordens, I, Mosa, MH, Basak, O, Korving, J, Tauriello, DV, de Punder, K, Angers, S, Peters, PJ, Maurice, MM, et al. Visualization of a short‐range Wnt gradient in the intestinal stem‐cell niche. Nature 2016, 530:340–343.
Bertrand, N, Medevielle, F, Pituello, F. FGF signalling controls the timing of Pax6 activation in the neural tube. Development 2000, 127:4837–4843.
Dubrulle, J, McGrew, MJ, Pourquie, O. FGF signaling controls somite boundary position and regulates segmentation clock control of spatiotemporal Hox gene activation. Cell 2001, 106:219–232.
Shimizu, K, Gurdon, JB. A quantitative analysis of signal transduction from activin receptor to nucleus and its relevance to morphogen gradient interpretation. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1999, 96:6791–6796.
Dyson, S, Gurdon, JB. The interpretation of position in a morphogen gradient as revealed by occupancy of activin receptors. Cell 1998, 93:557–568.
Bollenbach, T, Pantazis, P, Kicheva, A, Bokel, C, Gonzalez‐Gaitan, M, Julicher, F. Precision of the Dpp gradient. Development 2008, 135:1137–1146.
Barolo, S, Posakony, JW. Three habits of highly effective signaling pathways: principles of transcriptional control by developmental cell signaling. Genes Dev 2002, 16:1167–1181.
Bourillot, PY, Garrett, N, Gurdon, JB. A changing morphogen gradient is interpreted by continuous transduction flow. Development 2002, 129:2167–2180.
Gurdon, JB, Mitchell, A, Mahony, D. Direct and continuous assessment by cells of their position in a morphogen gradient. Nature 1995, 376:520–521.
Jullien, J, Gurdon, J. Morphogen gradient interpretation by a regulated trafficking step during ligand‐receptor transduction. Genes Dev 2005, 19:2682–2694.
Bokel, C, Schwabedissen, A, Entchev, E, Renaud, O, Gonzalez‐Gaitan, M. Sara endosomes and the maintenance of Dpp signaling levels across mitosis. Science 2006, 314:1135–1139.
Uda, S, Saito, TH, Kudo, T, Kokaji, T, Tsuchiya, T, Kubota, H, Komori, Y, Ozaki, Y, Kuroda, S. Robustness and compensation of information transmission of signaling pathways. Science 2013, 341:558–561.
Goldbeter, A, Koshland, DE Jr. An amplified sensitivity arising from covalent modification in biological systems. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1981, 78:6840–6844.
Goldbeter, A, Wolpert, L. Covalent modification of proteins as a threshold mechanism in development. J Theor Biol 1990, 142:243–250.
Melen, GJ, Levy, S, Barkai, N, Shilo, BZ. Threshold responses to morphogen gradients by zero‐order ultrasensitivity. Mol Syst Biol 2005, 1:2005.0028.
Wang, YC, Ferguson, EL. Spatial bistability of Dpp‐receptor interactions during Drosophila dorsal‐ventral patterning. Nature 2005, 434:229–234.
Schmierer, B, Hill, CS. TGFbeta‐SMAD signal transduction: molecular specificity and functional flexibility. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007, 8:970–982.
Clague, MJ, Liu, H, Urbe, S. Governance of endocytic trafficking and signaling by reversible ubiquitylation. Dev Cell 2012, 23:457–467.
Lander, AD. How cells know where they are. Science 2013, 339:923–927.
Balaskas, N, Ribeiro, A, Panovska, J, Dessaud, E, Sasai, N, Page, KM, Briscoe, J, Ribes, V. Gene regulatory logic for reading the sonic hedgehog signaling gradient in the vertebrate neural tube. Cell 2012, 148:273–284.
Sorre, B, Warmflash, A, Brivanlou, AH, Siggia, ED. Encoding of temporal signals by the TGF‐beta pathway and implications for embryonic patterning. Dev Cell 2014, 30:334–342.
Warmflash, A, Zhang, Q, Sorre, B, Vonica, A, Siggia, ED, Brivanlou, AH. Dynamics of TGF‐beta signaling reveal adaptive and pulsatile behaviors reflected in the nuclear localization of transcription factor Smad4. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2012, 109:E1947–E1956.
Chuang, PT, McMahon, AP. Vertebrate Hedgehog signalling modulated by induction of a Hedgehog‐binding protein. Nature 1999, 397:617–621.
Dessaud, E, McMahon, AP, Briscoe, J. Pattern formation in the vertebrate neural tube: a sonic hedgehog morphogen‐regulated transcriptional network. Development 2008, 135:2489–2503.
Goodrich, LV, Johnson, RL, Milenkovic, L, McMahon, JA, Scott, MP. Conservation of the hedgehog/patched signaling pathway from flies to mice: induction of a mouse patched gene by Hedgehog. Genes Dev 1996, 10:301–312.
Jeong, J, McMahon, AP. Growth and pattern of the mammalian neural tube are governed by partially overlapping feedback activities of the hedgehog antagonists patched 1 and Hhip1. Development 2005, 132:143–154.
Marigo, V, Tabin, CJ. Regulation of patched by sonic hedgehog in the developing neural tube. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1996, 93:9346–9351.
Allen, BL, Song, JY, Izzi, L, Althaus, IW, Kang, JS, Charron, F, Krauss, RS, McMahon, AP. Overlapping roles and collective requirement for the coreceptors GAS1, CDO, and BOC in SHH pathway function. Dev Cell 2011, 20:775–787.
Izzi, L, Levesque, M, Morin, S, Laniel, D, Wilkes, BC, Mille, F, Krauss, RS, McMahon, AP, Allen, BL, Charron, F. Boc and Gas1 each form distinct Shh receptor complexes with Ptch1 and are required for Shh‐mediated cell proliferation. Dev Cell 2011, 20:788–801.
Martinelli, DC, Fan, CM. Gas1 extends the range of Hedgehog action by facilitating its signaling. Genes Dev 2007, 21:1231–1243.
Tenzen, T, Allen, BL, Cole, F, Kang, JS, Krauss, RS, McMahon, AP. The cell surface membrane proteins Cdo and Boc are components and targets of the Hedgehog signaling pathway and feedback network in mice. Dev Cell 2006, 10:647–656.
Cohen, M, Page, KM, Perez‐Carrasco, R, Barnes, CP, Briscoe, J. A theoretical framework for the regulation of Shh morphogen‐controlled gene expression. Development 2014, 141:3868–3878.
Biondi, CA, Das, D, Howell, M, Islam, A, Bikoff, EK, Hill, CS, Robertson, EJ. Mice develop normally in the absence of Smad4 nucleocytoplasmic shuttling. Biochem J 2007, 404:235–245.
Driever, W, Thoma, G, Nusslein‐Volhard, C. Determination of spatial domains of zygotic gene expression in the Drosophila embryo by the affinity of binding sites for the Bicoid morphogen. Nature 1989, 340:363–367.
Ochoa‐Espinosa, A, Yucel, G, Kaplan, L, Pare, A, Pura, N, Oberstein, A, Papatsenko, D, Small, S. The role of binding site cluster strength in Bicoid‐dependent patterning in Drosophila. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2005, 102:4960–4965.
Alon, U. Network motifs: theory and experimental approaches. Nat Rev Genet 2007, 8:450–461.
Davidson, EH. Emerging properties of animal gene regulatory networks. Nature 2010, 468:911–920.
Cotterell, J, Sharpe, J. An atlas of gene regulatory networks reveals multiple three‐gene mechanisms for interpreting morphogen gradients. Mol Syst Biol 2010, 6:425.
Schaerli, Y, Munteanu, A, Gili, M, Cotterell, J, Sharpe, J, Isalan, M. A unified design space of synthetic stripe‐forming networks. Nat Commun 2014, 5:4905.
Mangan, S, Alon, U. Structure and function of the feed‐forward loop network motif. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:11980–11985.
Manu,, Surkova, S, Spirov, AV, Gursky, VV, Janssens, H, Kim, AR, Radulescu, O, Vanario‐Alonso, CE, Sharp, DH, Samsonova, M, et al. Canalization of gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm by gap gene cross regulation. PLoS Biol 2009, 7:e1000049.
Manu,, Surkova, S, Spirov, AV, Gursky, VV, Janssens, H, Kim, AR, Radulescu, O, Vanario‐Alonso, CE, Sharp, DH, Samsonova, M, et al. Canalization of gene expression and domain shifts in the Drosophila blastoderm by dynamical attractors. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5:e1000303.
Kicheva, A, Bollenbach, T, Ribeiro, A, Valle, HP, Lovell‐Badge, R, Episkopou, V, Briscoe, J. Coordination of progenitor specification and growth in mouse and chick spinal cord. Science 2014, 345:1254927.
Kicheva, A, Briscoe, J. Developmental pattern formation in phases. Trends Cell Biol 2015, 25:579–591.
Moore, S, Ribes, V, Terriente, J, Wilkinson, D, Relaix, F, Briscoe, J. Distinct regulatory mechanisms act to establish and maintain Pax3 expression in the developing neural tube. PLoS Genet 2013, 9:e1003811.
Bouchoucha, YX, Reingruber, J, Labalette, C, Wassef, MA, Thierion, E, Desmarquet‐Trin Dinh, C, Holcman, D, Gilardi‐Hebenstreit, P, Charnay, P. Dissection of a Krox20 positive feedback loop driving cell fate choices in hindbrain patterning. Mol Syst Biol 2013, 9:690.
Gould, A, Morrison, A, Sproat, G, White, RA, Krumlauf, R. Positive cross‐regulation and enhancer sharing: two mechanisms for specifying overlapping Hox expression patterns. Genes Dev 1997, 11:900–913.
Lin, MC, Park, J, Kirov, N, Rushlow, C. Threshold response of C15 to the Dpp gradient in Drosophila is established by the cumulative effect of Smad and Zen activators and negative cues. Development 2006, 133:4805–4813.
Xu, M, Kirov, N, Rushlow, C. Peak levels of BMP in the Drosophila embryo control target genes by a feed‐forward mechanism. Development 2005, 132:1637–1647.
Bolouri, H, Davidson, EH. Transcriptional regulatory cascades in development: initial rates, not steady state, determine network kinetics. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2003, 100:9371–9376.
Cherry, JL, Adler, FR. How to make a biological switch. J Theor Biol 2000, 203:117–133.
Perez‐Carrasco, R, Guerrero, P, Briscoe, J, Page, KM. Intrinsic noise profoundly alters the dynamics and steady state of morphogen‐controlled bistable genetic switches. PLoS Comput Biol 2016, 12:e1005154.
Saka, Y, Smith, JC. A mechanism for the sharp transition of morphogen gradient interpretation in Xenopus. BMC Dev Biol 2007, 7:47.
Stathopoulos, A, Levine, M. Genomic regulatory networks and animal development. Dev Cell 2005, 9:449–462.
Cohen, M, Briscoe, J, Blassberg, R. Morphogen interpretation: the transcriptional logic of neural tube patterning. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013, 23:423–428.
Dessaud, E, Ribes, V, Balaskas, N, Yang, LL, Pierani, A, Kicheva, A, Novitch, BG, Briscoe, J, Sasai, N. Dynamic assignment and maintenance of positional identity in the ventral neural tube by the morphogen sonic hedgehog. PLoS Biol 2010, 8:e1000382.