How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Dev Biol

Impact Factor: 5.343

Quantitative analysis of cell shape and the cytoskeleton in developmental biology

Advanced Review

Hannah G. Yevick, Adam C. Martin

Published Online: Aug 31 2018

DOI: 10.1002/wdev.333

Full article on Wiley Online Library: HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Computational approaches that enable quantification of microscopy data have revolutionized the field of developmental biology. Due to its inherent complexity, elucidating mechanisms of development requires sophisticated analysis of the structure, shape, and kinetics of cellular processes. This need has prompted the creation of numerous techniques to visualize, quantify, and merge microscopy data. These approaches have defined the order and structure of developmental events, thus, providing insight into the mechanisms that drive them. This review describes current computational approaches that are being used to answer developmental questions related to morphogenesis and describe how these approaches have impacted the field. Our intent is not to comprehensively review techniques, but to highlight examples of how different approaches have impacted our understanding of development. Specifically, we focus on methods to quantify cell shape and cytoskeleton structure and dynamics in developing tissues. Finally, we speculate on where the future of computational analysis in developmental biology might be headed.

This article is categorized under:

Technologies > Analysis of Cell, Tissue, and Animal Phenotypes
Early Embryonic Development > Gastrulation and Neurulation
Early Embryonic Development > Development to the Basic Body Plan

Analyzing how cell shape change and rearrangement contribute to tissue shape. (a) Simulation of one possible cellular scenario during tissue morphogenesis. Strain from cell shape changes counteract strain due to cell intercalations to result in no overall tissue shape change. Cumulative stretch ratios are plotted on a log scale versus time for vertical (solid line) and horizontal orientation (dotted line) for (b) tissue shape, (c) cell shape, and (d) cell intercalation. (Reprinted with permission from Blanchard et al. (). Copyright 2009 Springer Nature)

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Analyzing complex cell shapes: (a) a wounded region in the Drosophila embryo expressing a green fluorescent protein fusion targeted to adherens junctions. The automated tracing algorithm, MEDUSA, employs an active contour algorithm where the delineation of the wound evolves to minimize its energy (green). (Reprinted with permission from Zulueta‐Coarasa, Tamada, Lee, & Fernandez‐Gonzalez (). Copyright 2014 The Company of Biologists) (b) Pavement cells in Arabidopsis thaliana exhibit complex shapes. (Reprinted with permission from Sanchez‐Corrales, Hartley, van Rooij, Maree, & Grieneisen (). Copyright 2018 The Company of Biologists) (c) Complex cell outlines can be approximated using elliptic Fourier analysis (LOCO‐EFA), which deconstructs cell shape into an infinite sum of elliptical modes. (Reprinted with permission from Sanchez‐Corrales et al. (). Copyright 2018 The Company of Biologists) Scale bar: 20 μm

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Image correlation analysis and measuring cytoskeletal flow. (a) Analysis on the Caenorhabditis elegans embryo illustrates how PIV can be used to detect protein movement during gastrulation. Images show PIV vectors tracking the movement of myosin clusters (green arrows) and the cell membrane (red arrows). Note that cell membrane movement becomes aligned with centripetal myosin movement at the late stages of gastrulation. (Reprinted with permission from Roh‐Johnson et al. (). Copyright 2012 American Association for the Advancement of Science) Scale bar: 5 μm. (b) Spatiotemporal image correlation spectroscopy analysis performed on a transmitted light video (left) quantifies the local velocities of yolk granules to measure cytoplasmic activity. (Reprinted with permission from Almonacid et al. (). Copyright 2015 Springer Nature) Scale bar: 15 μm

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Analyzing cytoskeletal dynamics. (a) Cross‐correlation between two signals identifies the time shift of one relative to the other. Here the time offset quantifies the delay between the time when the signal of interest peaks and the time when myosin is at local maximum. (b) To quantitatively identify a sequence of myosin pulses in the Drosophila ventral furrow, first cells were segmented and tracked. Myosin intensity was then quantified inside each cell and a multiple Gaussian fitting to the myosin intensity identified pulse sequences which were confirmed via manual curation. (Reprinted with permission from Xie & Martin (). Copyright 2015 Springer Nature)

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Analyzing cytoskeletal orientation at single time points. (a) Actin cables in fission yeast marked via GFP‐CHD. Actin is traced by SOAX analysis which also infers the topology of the network to identify network junctions (green). (Reprinted with permission from Xu et al. (). Copyright 2015 Springer Nature) (b) A Fourier transform is employed to calculate the local orientation of Dachs:GFP (D:GFP) in the Drosophila dorsal thorax. First, the 2D discrete Fourier transform is calculated on the original image (after multiplication by a square cosine function, “windowing,” to minimize edge effects). Pixels above the 80th percentile are retained and fitted by an ellipse. From the ellipse the anisotropy and orientation of the original image can be extracted. Green bars plotted over the tissue represent local D:GFP anisotropy. (Reprinted with permission from Bosveld et al. (). Copyright 2012 American Association for the Advancement of Science) Scale bar: 10 μm

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Analyzing the three‐dimensional (3D) shapes of cells in developing tissues. (a) 3D reconstruction of cell shape can be approximated by stacking the polygons obtained in each z frame from 2D cell segmentation algorithms. Tracking these stacks over time yields a four‐dimensional mapping of each cell in the tissue. (Reprinted with permission from Gelbart et al. (). Copyright 2012 National Academy of Sciences) (b) Reconstruction of cell shape using EDGE4D during mitotic divisions in the Drosophila embryo. 3D cell shape is followed before mitotic entry, at metaphase (yellow box, 0 s), during cytokinesis, and after abscission. (Reprinted with permission from Chanet, Sharan, Khan, & Martin (). Copyright 2017 Cell Press) (c) Multiangle acquisition of Arabidopsis thaliana flower expressing a flower‐specific GFP marker is fused into a single reconstruction. Each cell is automatically segmented and the full 3D organ reconstruction is represented in blue. By fusing acquisitions from different angles, the limitations of microscope resolution anisotropy on cell segmentation are avoided. (Reprinted with permission from Fernandez et al. (). Copyright 2010 Springer Nature) Scale bar: 25 μm. (d) Tissue cartography reduces the 3D shape of a tissue by identifying a surface of interest. The surface of Drosophila embryo is parameterized to map signal measured on its surface to a single plane for analysis. (Reprinted with permission from Heemskerk & Streichan (). Copyright 2015 eLife Sciences Publications)

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

References

Almonacid,, M., Ahmed,, W. W., Bussonnier,, M., Mailly,, P., Betz,, T., Voituriez,, R., … Verlhac,, M. H. (2015). Active diffusion positions the nucleus in mouse oocytes. Nature Cell Biology, 17(4), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3131
Barbier de Reuille,, P., Routier‐Kierzkowska,, A. L., Kierzkowski,, D., Bassel,, G. W., Schupbach,, T., Tauriello,, G., … Smith,, R. S. (2015). MorphoGraphX: A platform for quantifying morphogenesis in 4D. eLife, 4, 05864. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.05864
Beach,, J. R., Shao,, L., Remmert,, K., Li,, D., Betzig,, E., & Hammer,, J. A. (2014). Nonmuscle myosin II isoforms coassemble in living cells. Current Biology, 24(10), 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.03.071
Bement,, W. M., Leda,, M., Moe,, A. M., Kita,, A. M., Larson,, M. E., Golding,, A. E., … von Dassow,, G. (2015). Activator‐inhibitor coupling between Rho signalling and actin assembly makes the cell cortex an excitable medium. Nature Cell Biology, 17(11), 1471–1483. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3251
Bergmann,, D. C., Lukowitz,, W., & Somerville,, C. R. (2004). Stomatal development and pattern controlled by a MAPKK kinase. Science, 304(5676), 1494–1497. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1096014
Betzig,, E., Patterson,, G. H., Sougrat,, R., Lindwasser,, O. W., Olenych,, S., Bonifacino,, J. S., … Hess,, H. F. (2006). Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science, 313(5793), 1642–1645. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1127344
Blanchard,, G. B., Kabla,, A. J., Schultz,, N. L., Butler,, L. C., Sanson,, B., Gorfinkiel,, N., … Adams,, R. J. (2009). Tissue tectonics: Morphogenetic strain rates, cell shape change and intercalation. Nature Methods, 6(6), 458–464. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1327
Blanchard,, G. B., Murugesu,, S., Adams,, R. J., Martinez‐Arias,, A., & Gorfinkiel,, N. (2010). Cytoskeletal dynamics and supracellular organisation of cell shape fluctuations during dorsal closure. Development, 137(16), 2743–2752. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.045872
Bosveld,, F., Bonnet,, I., Guirao,, B., Tlili,, S., Wang,, Z., Petitalot,, A., … Bellaiche,, Y. (2012). Mechanical control of morphogenesis by fat/Dachsous/four‐jointed planar cell polarity pathway. Science, 336(6082), 724–727. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1221071
Boudaoud,, A., Burian,, A., Borowska‐Wykret,, D., Uyttewaal,, M., Wrzalik,, R., Kwiatkowska,, D., & Hamant,, O. (2014). FibrilTool, an ImageJ plug‐in to quantify fibrillar structures in raw microscopy images. Nature Protocols, 9(2), 457–463. https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2014.024
Butler,, L. C., Blanchard,, G. B., Kabla,, A. J., Lawrence,, N. J., Welchman,, D. P., Mahadevan,, L., … Sanson,, B. (2009). Cell shape changes indicate a role for extrinsic tensile forces in Drosophila germ‐band extension. Nature Cell Biology, 11(7), 859–864. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1894
Cetera,, M., Ramirez‐San Juan,, G. R., Oakes,, P. W., Lewellyn,, L., Fairchild,, M. J., Tanentzapf,, G., … Horne‐Badovinac,, S. (2014). Epithelial rotation promotes the global alignment of contractile actin bundles during Drosophila egg chamber elongation. Nature Communications, 5, 5511. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6511
Chanet,, S., & Martin,, A. C. (2014). Mechanical force sensing in tissues. Progress in Molecular Biology and Translational Science, 126, 317–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐394624‐9.00013‐0
Chanet,, S., Miller,, C. J., Vaishnav,, E. D., Ermentrout,, B., Davidson,, L. A., & Martin,, A. C. (2017). Actomyosin meshwork mechanosensing enables tissue shape to orient cell force. Nature Communications, 8, 15014. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15014
Chanet,, S., Sharan,, R., Khan,, Z., & Martin,, A. C. (2017). Myosin 2‐induced mitotic rounding enables columnar epithelial cells to interpret cortical spindle positioning cues. Current Biology, 27(21), 3350–3358 e3353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.039
Chen,, D. Y., Lipari,, K. R., Dehghan,, Y., Streichan,, S. J., & Bilder,, D. (2016). Symmetry breaking in an edgeless epithelium by Fat2‐regulated microtubule polarity. Cell Reports, 15(6), 1125–1133. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2016.04.014
Christodoulou,, N., & Skourides,, P. A. (2015). Cell‐autonomous Ca(2+) flashes elicit pulsed contractions of an apical actin network to drive apical constriction during neural tube closure. Cell Reports, 13(10), 2189–2202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2015.11.017
Clement,, R., Dehapiot,, B., Collinet,, C., Lecuit,, T., & Lenne,, P. F. (2017). Viscoelastic dissipation stabilizes cell shape changes during tissue morphogenesis. Current Biology, 27(20), 3132–3142 e3134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2017.09.005
Costa,, M., Wilson,, E. T., & Wieschaus,, E. (1994). A putative cell signal encoded by the folded gastrulation gene coordinates cell shape changes during Drosophila gastrulation. Cell, 76(6), 1075–1089.
David,, D. J., Tishkina,, A., & Harris,, T. J. (2010). The PAR complex regulates pulsed actomyosin contractions during amnioserosa apical constriction in Drosophila. Development, 137(10), 1645–1655. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.044107
Dickinson,, D. J., Ward,, J. D., Reiner,, D. J., & Goldstein,, B. (2013). Engineering the Caenorhabditis elegans genome using Cas9‐triggered homologous recombination. Nature Methods, 10(10), 1028–1034. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2641
Dsilva,, C. J., Lim,, B., Lu,, H., Singer,, A., Kevrekidis,, I. G., & Shvartsman,, S. Y. (2015). Temporal ordering and registration of images in studies of developmental dynamics. Development, 142(9), 1717–1724. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.119396
Du,, Z., Santella,, A., He,, F., Tiongson,, M., & Bao,, Z. (2014). De novo inference of systems‐level mechanistic models of development from live‐imaging‐based phenotype analysis. Cell, 156(1–2), 359–372. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.11.046
Etournay,, R., Merkel,, M., Popovic,, M., Brandl,, H., Dye,, N. A., Aigouy,, B., … Julicher,, F. (2016). TissueMiner: A multiscale analysis toolkit to quantify how cellular processes create tissue dynamics. eLife, 5. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.14334
Etournay,, R., Popovic,, M., Merkel,, M., Nandi,, A., Blasse,, C., Aigouy,, B., … Eaton,, S. (2015). Interplay of cell dynamics and epithelial tension during morphogenesis of the Drosophila pupal wing. eLife, 4, e07090. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07090
Fakhri,, N., Wessel,, A. D., Willms,, C., Pasquali,, M., Klopfenstein,, D. R., MacKintosh,, F. C., & Schmidt,, C. F. (2014). High‐resolution mapping of intracellular fluctuations using carbon nanotubes. Science, 344(6187), 1031–1035. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1250170
Faure,, E., Savy,, T., Rizzi,, B., Melani,, C., Stasova,, O., Fabreges,, D., … Bourgine,, P. (2016). A workflow to process 3D+time microscopy images of developing organisms and reconstruct their cell lineage. Nature Communications, 7, 8674. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms9674
Fernandez,, R., Das,, P., Mirabet,, V., Moscardi,, E., Traas,, J., Verdeil,, J. L., … Godin,, C. (2010). Imaging plant growth in 4D: Robust tissue reconstruction and lineaging at cell resolution. Nature Methods, 7(7), 547–553. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.1472
Fernandez‐Gonzalez,, R., & Zallen,, J. A. (2009). Cell mechanics and feedback regulation of actomyosin networks. Science Signaling, 2(101), pe78. https://doi.org/10.1126/scisignal.2101pe78
Fernandez‐Gonzalez,, R., & Zallen,, J. A. (2011). Oscillatory behaviors and hierarchical assembly of contractile structures in intercalating cells. Physical Biology, 8(4), 045005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1478-3975/8/4/045005
Fowlkes,, C. C., Hendriks,, C. L., Keranen,, S. V., Weber,, G. H., Rubel,, O., Huang,, M. Y., … Malik,, J. (2008). A quantitative spatiotemporal atlas of gene expression in the Drosophila blastoderm. Cell, 133(2), 364–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2008.01.053
Gelbart,, M. A., He,, B., Martin,, A. C., Thiberge,, S. Y., Wieschaus,, E. F., & Kaschube,, M. (2012). Volume conservation principle involved in cell lengthening and nucleus movement during tissue morphogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(47), 19298–19303. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1205258109
Gregor,, T., Wieschaus,, E. F., McGregor,, A. P., Bialek,, W., & Tank,, D. W. (2007). Stability and nuclear dynamics of the bicoid morphogen gradient. Cell, 130(1), 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.026
Guirao,, B., Rigaud,, S. U., Bosveld,, F., Bailles,, A., Lopez‐Gay,, J., Ishihara,, S., … Bellaiche,, Y. (2015). Unified quantitative characterization of epithelial tissue development. eLife, 4. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.08519
Guo,, M., Ehrlicher,, A. J., Jensen,, M. H., Renz,, M., Moore,, J. R., Goldman,, R. D., … Weitz,, D. A. (2014). Probing the stochastic, motor‐driven properties of the cytoplasm using force spectrum microscopy. Cell, 158(4), 822–832. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2014.06.051
Gustafsson,, M. G. (2005). Nonlinear structured‐illumination microscopy: Wide‐field fluorescence imaging with theoretically unlimited resolution. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102(37), 13081–13086. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0406877102
Hamant,, O., Heisler,, M. G., Jonsson,, H., Krupinski,, P., Uyttewaal,, M., Bokov,, P., … Traas,, J. (2008). Developmental patterning by mechanical signals in Arabidopsis. Science, 322(5908), 1650–1655. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1165594
Hannezo,, E., Dong,, B., Recho,, P., Joanny,, J. F., & Hayashi,, S. (2015). Cortical instability drives periodic supracellular actin pattern formation in epithelial tubes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 112(28), 8620–8625. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1504762112
Hardin,, J., & Keller,, R. (1988). The behaviour and function of bottle cells during gastrulation of Xenopus laevis. Development, 103(1), 211–230.
He,, L., Wang,, X., Tang,, H. L., & Montell,, D. J. (2010). Tissue elongation requires oscillating contractions of a basal actomyosin network. Nature Cell Biology, 12(12), 1133–1142. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2124
Hebert,, B., Costantino,, S., & Wiseman,, P. W. (2005). Spatiotemporal image correlation spectroscopy (STICS) theory, verification, and application to protein velocity mapping in living CHO cells. Biophysical Journal, 88(5), 3601–3614. https://doi.org/10.1529/biophysj.104.054874
Heemskerk,, I., & Streichan,, S. J. (2015). Tissue cartography: Compressing bio‐image data by dimensional reduction. Nature Methods, 12(12), 1139–1142. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.3648
Heer,, N. C., & Martin,, A. C. (2017). Tension, contraction and tissue morphogenesis. Development, 144(23), 4249–4260. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.151282
Heid,, P. J., Voss,, E., & Soll,, D. R. (2002). 3D‐DIASemb: A computer‐assisted system for reconstructing and motion analyzing in 4D every cell and nucleus in a developing embryo. Developmental Biology, 245(2), 329–347. https://doi.org/10.1006/dbio.2002.0631
Heisenberg,, C. P., & Bellaiche,, Y. (2013). Forces in tissue morphogenesis and patterning. Cell, 153(5), 948–962. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2013.05.008
Heller,, D., Hoppe,, A., Restrepo,, S., Gatti,, L., Tournier,, A. L., Tapon,, N., … Mao,, Y. (2016). EpiTools: An open‐source image analysis toolkit for quantifying epithelial growth dynamics. Developmental Cell, 36(1), 103–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.12.012
Hisano,, Y., Sakuma,, T., Nakade,, S., Ohga,, R., Ota,, S., Okamoto,, H., … Kawahara,, A. (2015). Precise in‐frame integration of exogenous DNA mediated by CRISPR/Cas9 system in zebrafish. Scientific Reports, 5, 8841. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep08841
Holtfreter,, J. (1943). A study of the mechanics of gastrulation (Part 1). Journal of Experimental Zoology, 94, 261–318.
Irvine,, K. D., & Shraiman,, B. I. (2017). Mechanical control of growth: Ideas, facts and challenges. Development, 144(23), 4238–4248. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.151902
Isabella,, A. J., & Horne‐Badovinac,, S. (2015). Dynamic regulation of basement membrane protein levels promotes egg chamber elongation in Drosophila. Developmental Biology, 406(2), 212–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.08.018
Keller,, P. J., Schmidt,, A. D., Wittbrodt,, J., & Stelzer,, E. H. (2008). Reconstruction of zebrafish early embryonic development by scanned light sheet microscopy. Science, 322(5904), 1065–1069. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1162493
Khan,, Z., Wang,, Y. C., Wieschaus,, E. F., & Kaschube,, M. (2014). Quantitative 4D analyses of epithelial folding during Drosophila gastrulation. Development, 141(14), 2895–2900. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.107730
Khuc Trong,, P., Doerflinger,, H., Dunkel,, J., St Johnston,, D., & Goldstein,, R. E. (2015). Cortical microtubule nucleation can organise the cytoskeleton of Drosophila oocytes to define the anteroposterior axis. eLife, 4. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.06088
Kiehart,, D. P., Crawford,, J. M., Aristotelous,, A., Venakides,, S., & Edwards,, G. S. (2017). Cell sheet morphogenesis: Dorsal closure in Drosophila melanogaster as a model system. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 33, 169–202. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-111315-125357
Kierzkowski,, D., Nakayama,, N., Routier‐Kierzkowska,, A. L., Weber,, A., Bayer,, E., Schorderet,, M., … Smith,, R. S. (2012). Elastic domains regulate growth and organogenesis in the plant shoot apical meristem. Science, 335(6072), 1096–1099. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1213100
Kim,, H. Y., & Davidson,, L. A. (2011). Punctuated actin contractions during convergent extension and their permissive regulation by the non‐canonical Wnt‐signaling pathway. Journal of Cell Science, 124(Pt. 4), 635–646. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.067579
Krzic,, U., Gunther,, S., Saunders,, T. E., Streichan,, S. J., & Hufnagel,, L. (2012). Multiview light‐sheet microscope for rapid in toto imaging. Nature Methods, 9(7), 730–733. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2064
Lecuit,, T., Lenne,, P. F., & Munro,, E. (2011). Force generation, transmission, and integration during cell and tissue morphogenesis. Annual Review of Cell and Developmental Biology, 27, 157–184. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-cellbio-100109-104027
Louveaux,, M., Rochette,, S., Beauzamy,, L., Boudaoud,, A., & Hamant,, O. (2016). The impact of mechanical compression on cortical microtubules in Arabidopsis: A quantitative pipeline. Plant Journal, 88(2), 328–342. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.13290
Machacek,, M., Hodgson,, L., Welch,, C., Elliott,, H., Pertz,, O., Nalbant,, P., … Danuser,, G. (2009). Coordination of Rho GTPase activities during cell protrusion. Nature, 461(7260), 99–103. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature08242
Maitre,, J. L., Niwayama,, R., Turlier,, H., Nedelec,, F., & Hiiragi,, T. (2015). Pulsatile cell‐autonomous contractility drives compaction in the mouse embryo. Nature Cell Biology, 17(7), 849–855. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3185
Martin,, A. C., Kaschube,, M., & Wieschaus,, E. F. (2009). Pulsed contractions of an actin–myosin network drive apical constriction. Nature, 457(7228), 495–499. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature07522
Mason,, F. M., Tworoger,, M., & Martin,, A. C. (2013). Apical domain polarization localizes actin–myosin activity to drive ratchet‐like apical constriction. Nature Cell Biology, 15(8), 926–936. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2796
Meijering,, E., Dzyubachyk,, O., & Smal,, I. (2012). Methods for cell and particle tracking. Methods in Enzymology, 504, 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-391857-4.00009-4
Mosaliganti,, K. R., Noche,, R. R., Xiong,, F., Swinburne,, I. A., & Megason,, S. G. (2012). ACME: Automated cell morphology extractor for comprehensive reconstruction of cell membranes. PLoS Computational Biology, 8(12), e1002780. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002780
Munjal,, A., Philippe,, J. M., Munro,, E., & Lecuit,, T. (2015). A self‐organized biomechanical network drives shape changes during tissue morphogenesis. Nature, 524(7565), 351–355. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14603
Osterfield,, M., Schupbach,, T., Wieschaus,, E., & Shvartsman,, S. Y. (2015). Diversity of epithelial morphogenesis during eggshell formation in drosophilids. Development, 142(11), 1971–1977. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.119404
Pan,, L., Yan,, R., Li,, W., & Xu,, K. (2018). Super‐resolution microscopy reveals the native ultrastructure of the erythrocyte cytoskeleton. Cell Reports, 22(5), 1151–1158. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2017.12.107
Ponti,, A., Machacek,, M., Gupton,, S. L., Waterman‐Storer,, C. M., & Danuser,, G. (2004). Two distinct actin networks drive the protrusion of migrating cells. Science, 305(5691), 1782–1786. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1100533
Port,, F., Chen,, H. M., Lee,, T., & Bullock,, S. L. (2014). Optimized CRISPR/Cas tools for efficient germline and somatic genome engineering in Drosophila. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 111(29), E2967–E2976. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1405500111
Puspoki,, Z., Storath,, M., Sage,, D., & Unser,, M. (2016). Transforms and operators for directional bioimage analysis: A survey. Advances in Anatomy, Embryology, and Cell Biology, 219, 69–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-28549-8_3
Raffel,, M., Willert,, C. E., Wereley,, S. T., & Kompenhans,, J. (2013). Particle image velocimetry: A practical guide. Basel, Switzerland: Springer.
Rauzi,, M., Lenne,, P. F., & Lecuit,, T. (2010). Planar polarized actomyosin contractile flows control epithelial junction remodelling. Nature, 468(7327), 1110–1114. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09566
Rodriguez,, E. A., Campbell,, R. E., Lin,, J. Y., Lin,, M. Z., Miyawaki,, A., Palmer,, A. E., … Tsien,, R. Y. (2017). The growing and glowing toolbox of fluorescent and photoactive proteins. Trends in Biochemical Sciences, 42(2), 111–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tibs.2016.09.010
Roh‐Johnson,, M., Shemer,, G., Higgins,, C. D., McClellan,, J. H., Werts,, A. D., Tulu,, U. S., … Goldstein,, B. (2012). Triggering a cell shape change by exploiting preexisting actomyosin contractions. Science, 335(6073), 1232–1235. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1217869
Rust,, M. J., Bates,, M., & Zhuang,, X. (2006). Sub‐diffraction‐limit imaging by stochastic optical reconstruction microscopy (STORM). Nature Methods, 3(10), 793–795. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth929
Saias,, L., Swoger,, J., D`Angelo,, A., Hayes,, P., Colombelli,, J., Sharpe,, J., … Solon,, J. (2015). Decrease in cell volume generates contractile forces driving dorsal closure. Developmental Cell, 33(5), 611–621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.03.016
Sanchez‐Corrales,, Y. E., Hartley,, M., van Rooij,, J., Maree,, A. F. M., & Grieneisen,, V. A. (2018). Morphometrics of complex cell shapes: Lobe contribution elliptic Fourier analysis (LOCO‐EFA). Development, 145, dev156778. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.156778
Santella,, A., Catena,, R., Kovacevic,, I., Shah,, P., Yu,, Z., Marquina‐Solis,, J., … Bao,, Z. (2015). WormGUIDES: An interactive single cell developmental atlas and tool for collaborative multidimensional data exploration. BMC Bioinformatics, 16, 189. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12859-015-0627-8
Sawyer,, J. K., Choi,, W., Jung,, K. C., He,, L., Harris,, N. J., & Peifer,, M. (2011). A contractile actomyosin network linked to adherens junctions by canoe/afadin helps drive convergent extension. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 22(14), 2491–2508. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E11-05-0411
Shih,, J., & Keller,, R. (1992). Cell motility driving mediolateral intercalation in explants of Xenopus laevis. Development, 116(4), 901–914.
Shihavuddin,, A., Basu,, S., Rexhepaj,, E., Delestro,, F., Menezes,, N., Sigoillot,, S. M., … Genovesio,, A. (2017). Smooth 2D manifold extraction from 3D image stack. Nature Communications, 8, 15554. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15554
Sokolow,, A., Toyama,, Y., Kiehart,, D. P., & Edwards,, G. S. (2012). Cell ingression and apical shape oscillations during dorsal closure in Drosophila. Biophysical Journal, 102(5), 969–979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpj.2012.01.027
Solon,, J., Kaya‐Copur,, A., Colombelli,, J., & Brunner,, D. (2009). Pulsed forces timed by a ratchet‐like mechanism drive directed tissue movement during dorsal closure. Cell, 137(7), 1331–1342. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2009.03.050
Streichan,, S. J., Lefebvre,, M. F., Noll,, N., Wieschaus,, E. F., & Shraiman,, B. I. (2018). Global morphogenetic flow is accurately predicted by the spatial distribution of myosin motors. eLife, 7. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.27454
Sun,, Z., Amourda,, C., Shagirov,, M., Hara,, Y., Saunders,, T. E., & Toyama,, Y. (2017). Basolateral protrusion and apical contraction cooperatively drive Drosophila germ‐band extension. Nature Cell Biology, 19(4), 375–383. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3497
Tassy,, O., Daian,, F., Hudson,, C., Bertrand,, V., & Lemaire,, P. (2006). A quantitative approach to the study of cell shapes and interactions during early chordate embryogenesis. Current Biology, 16(4), 345–358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.12.044
Tinevez,, J. Y., Perry,, N., Schindelin,, J., Hoopes,, G. M., Reynolds,, G. D., Laplantine,, E., … Eliceiri,, K. W. (2017). TrackMate: An open and extensible platform for single‐particle tracking. Methods, 115, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymeth.2016.09.016
Tomer,, R., Khairy,, K., Amat,, F., & Keller,, P. J. (2012). Quantitative high‐speed imaging of entire developing embryos with simultaneous multiview light‐sheet microscopy. Nature Methods, 9(7), 755–763. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmeth.2062
Vasquez,, C. G., Heissler,, S. M., Billington,, N., Sellers,, J. R., & Martin,, A. C. (2016). Drosophila non‐muscle myosin II motor activity determines the rate of tissue folding. eLife, 5. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.20828
Vasquez,, C. G., Tworoger,, M., & Martin,, A. C. (2014). Dynamic myosin phosphorylation regulates contractile pulses and tissue integrity during epithelial morphogenesis. Journal of Cell Biology, 206(3), 435–450. https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201402004
Villoutreix,, P., Anden,, J., Lim,, B., Lu,, H., Kevrekidis,, I. G., Singer,, A., & Shvartsman,, S. Y. (2017). Synthesizing developmental trajectories. PLoS Computational Biology, 13(9), e1005742. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005742
Vincent,, L., & Soille,, P. (1991). Watersheds in digital spaces: An efficient algorithm based on immersion simulations. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 13(6), 583–598.
Wang,, M. F., Hunter,, M. V., Wang,, G., McFaul,, C., Yip,, C. M., & Fernandez‐Gonzalez,, R. (2017). Automated cell tracking identifies mechanically oriented cell divisions during Drosophila axis elongation. Development, 144(7), 1350–1361. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.141473
Wang,, M. F. Z., & Fernandez‐Gonzalez,, R. (2017). (Machine‐)learning to analyze in vivo microscopy: Support vector machines. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1865(11 Pt. B), 1719–1727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbapap.2017.09.013
Wang,, Y. C., Khan,, Z., Kaschube,, M., & Wieschaus,, E. F. (2012). Differential positioning of adherens junctions is associated with initiation of epithelial folding. Nature, 484(7394), 390–393. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature10938
Wirshing,, A. C. E., & Cram,, E. J. (2017). Myosin activity drives actomyosin bundle formation and organization in contractile cells of the Caenorhabditis elegans spermatheca. Molecular Biology of the Cell, 28(14), 1937–1949. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E17-01-0029
Xie,, S., & Martin,, A. C. (2015). Intracellular signalling and intercellular coupling coordinate heterogeneous contractile events to facilitate tissue folding. Nature Communications, 6, 7161. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms8161
Xu,, T., Vavylonis,, D., Tsai,, F. C., Koenderink,, G. H., Nie,, W., Yusuf,, E., … Huang,, X. (2015). SOAX: A software for quantification of 3D biopolymer networks. Scientific Reports, 5, 9081. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep09081
Yi,, K., Unruh,, J. R., Deng,, M., Slaughter,, B. D., Rubinstein,, B., & Li,, R. (2011). Dynamic maintenance of asymmetric meiotic spindle position through Arp2/3‐complex‐driven cytoplasmic streaming in mouse oocytes. Nature Cell Biology, 13(10), 1252–1258. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2320
Yuan,, L., Pan,, C., Ji,, S., McCutchan,, M., Zhou,, Z. H., Newfeld,, S. J., … Ye,, J. (2014). Automated annotation of developmental stages of Drosophila embryos in images containing spatial patterns of expression. Bioinformatics, 30(2), 266–273. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btt648
Zhang,, X., Koolhaas,, W. H., & Schnorrer,, F. (2014). A versatile two‐step CRISPR‐ and RMCE‐based strategy for efficient genome engineering in Drosophila. G3 (Bethesda), 4(12), 2409–2418. https://doi.org/10.1534/g3.114.013979
Zulueta‐Coarasa,, T., Tamada,, M., Lee,, E. J., & Fernandez‐Gonzalez,, R. (2014). Automated multidimensional image analysis reveals a role for Abl in embryonic wound repair. Development, 141(14), 2901–2911. https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.106898

Society Partners

	Free online access to WIREs Developmental Biology is a member benefit. Learn More
	SDB Collaborative Resources
	Society for Developmental Biology Homepage

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts