Home
This Title All WIREs
WIREs RSS Feed
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Energy Environ.
Impact Factor: 2.889

Historical, ecological, and governance aspects of intensive forest biomass harvesting in Denmark

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Intensive forest harvesting has increased in Fennoscandia over the last few decades. Similar developments may follow throughout Europe as renewable energy replaces fossil fuels. The international literature suggests that intensive harvesting could increase ecological risks to yield, carbon stores, soil fertility, and biodiversity, but geographically specific knowledge is sparse in many countries, and results do not extend beyond 5–30 years after harvesting. We use Denmark as a case for discussing future directions. Forest history is described, and research on ecological effects and their inclusion in governance is reviewed. Denmark was almost completely deforested by the early 1800s, but centuries of afforestation have resulted in a current forest cover of 14.3%. Research commonly uses stem‐only harvesting as a reference against which to compare intensive harvesting impacts, but pristine forests would be a more useful reference for ecological processes and biodiversity. However, pristine forests are almost non‐existent in Europe, and non‐intervention, self‐regulating forests provide an alternative. Governance and positions of non‐governmental organizations in Denmark focus more on general forest management impacts and conservation of light‐demanding biodiversity associated with historic coppicing and grazing than on intensive harvesting. The energy sector drives the development of new governance to verify forest biomass sustainability, but the national knowledge base for such verification is limited. As part of a larger solution, we suggest establishing a network of non‐intervention, self‐regulating forests that can serve as a reference for long‐term research and monitoring of intensive harvesting impacts. This would support the application of adaptive management strategies, and continuous improvements of best management practice guidelines. WIREs Energy Environ 2016, 5:588–610. doi: 10.1002/wene.206

This article is categorized under:

  • Bioenergy > Economics and Policy
  • Bioenergy > Climate and Environment
  • Energy and Development > Climate and Environment
Wood fuels in the Danish energy production 1972–2013; (a) domestic wood fuels and (b) imported wood fuels.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Average amount of harvested wood in selected countries for one hectare of managed forest in 2005, distributed according to industrial or energy end use as recorded by the Global Forest Resource Assessment by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). Managed forest is obtained by subtracting primary forest from the total forest area.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Annual harvesting of industrial round wood, firewood, and other energy wood from Danish forests 1990–2012; (a) conifers and (b) broadleaves. Note the different scaling of the axes in (a) and (b).
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Intensive forest harvesting in Denmark to produce wood chips for use as fuel in district heating or combined heat and power production, (a) whole‐tree harvesting and chipping of a thinning in a Norway spruce plantation (Photo: Simon Skov), (b) branches stacked after a felling in European beech (Photo: Karsten Raulund‐Rasmussen).
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Related Articles

Principles of nutrient management for sustainable forest bioenergy production
Forest bioenergy feedstock harvesting effects on water supply
A global survey of stakeholder views and experiences for systems needed to effectively and efficiently govern sustainability of bioenergy

Browse by Topic

Energy and Development > Climate and Environment

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts