Cherubini, F, Bird, ND, Cowie, A, Jungmeier, G, Schlamadinger, B, Woess‐Gallasch, S. Energy‐ and greenhouse gas‐based LCA of biofuel and bioenergy systems: key issues, ranges and recommendations. Resour Conservat Recycl 2009, 53:434–447.
Dandres, T, Gaudreault, C, Tirado‐Seco, P, Samson, R. Macroanalysis of the economic and environmental impacts of a 2005–2025 European Union bioenergy policy using the GTAP model and life cycle assessment. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 2012, 16:1180–1192.
Gaudreault, C, Malmberg, B, Upton, B, Miner, R. Life cycle greenhouse gases and non‐renewable energy benefits of kraft black liquor recovery. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 46:683–692.
Cherubini, F, Strømman, AH. Life cycle assessment of bioenergy systems: state of the art and future challenges. Bioresour Technol 2011, 102:437–451.
Michelsen, O. Assessment of land use impact on biodiversity. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2008, 13:22–31.
Koellner, T, Baan, L, Beck, T, Brandão, M, Civit, B, Margni, M, Canals, L, Saad, R, Souza, D, Müller‐Wenk, R. UNEP‐SETAC guideline on global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2013, 18:1188–1202.
Lorimer, CG. The presettlement forest and natural disturbance cycle of Northeastern Maine. Ecology 1977, 58:139–148.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Environmental management—life cycle assessment—requirements and guidelines. ISO Standard: 14044, 2006, 48.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO Standard: 14040, 2006, 20.
International Organization for Standardization (ISO). Environmental management—life cycle assessment—illustrative examples on how to apply ISO 14044 to impact assessment situations. ISO Technical Report: 14047, 2015, 85.
Chapin, FS, Zavaleta, ES, Eviner, VT, Naylor, RL, Vitousek, PM, Reynolds, HL, Hooper, DU, Lavorel, S, Sala, OE, Hobbie, SE, et al. Consequences of changing biodiversity. Nature 2000, 405:234–242.
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystem and human well‐being: synthesis, 2005. Available at: http://www.millenniumassessment.org/documents/document.356.aspx.pdf. (Accessed March 8, 2016).
de Baan, L, Alkemade, R, Koellner, T. Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: a global approach. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2013, 18:1216–1230.
Koellner, T, Geyer, R. Global land use impact assessment on biodiversity and ecosystem services in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2013, 18:1185–1187.
United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). Convention on biological diversity, 1992. Available at: http://www.cbd.int/doc/legal/cbd‐en.pdf. (Accessed March 8, 2016).
Hansson, L. Indicators of biodiversity: recent approaches and some general suggestions, 2000. Available at: http://np‐net.pbworks.com/f/Hansson%2B(2000)%2BIndicators%2Bof%2Bbiodiversity,%2BBEAR.pdf. (Accessed March 8, 2016).
Lindeijer, E. Biodiversity and life support impacts of land use in LCA. J Clean Prod 2000, 8:313–319.
Köllner, T. Species‐pool effect potentials (SPEP) as a yardstick to evaluate land‐use impacts on biodiversity. J Clean Prod 2000, 8:293–311.
Köllner, T. Land Use in Product Life Cycles and Ecosystem Quality. 2003, 271.
Goedkoop, M, Spriensma, R. The Eco‐Indicator 99 A Damage Oriented Method for Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methodology Report. 3rd ed. PRé Consultants B.V.: Amersfoort; 2001, 132.
Koellner, T, Scholz, R. Assessment of land use impacts on the natural environment. Part 2: Generic characterization factors for local species diversity in central Europe. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2008, 13:32–48.
Schmidt, JH. Development of LCIA characterisation factors for land use impacts on biodiversity. J Clean Prod 2008, 16:1929–1942.
Geyer, R, Lindner, J, Stoms, D, Davis, F, Wittstock, B. Coupling GIS and LCA for biodiversity assessments of land use, Part 1: Inventory modeling. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2010, 15:692–703.
De Schryver, A, Goedkoop, M, Leuven, R, Huijbregts, M. Uncertainties in the application of the species area relationship for characterisation factors of land occupation in life cycle assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2010, 15:682–691.
Jordaan, SM, Keith, DW, Stelfox, B. Quantifying land use of oil sands production: a life cycle perspective Environ Res Lett 2009, 4:1–14.
Weidema, BP, Lindeijer, E. Physical impacts of land use in product life cycle assessment ‐ Final report of the EURENVIRONLCAGAPS sub‐project on land use, 2001. Available at: http://lca‐net.com/files/gaps9.pdf. (Accessed March 8, 2016).
Frischknecht, R, Steiner, R, Jungbluth, N. The Ecological Scarcity Method Eco‐Factors 2006. Bern: Federal Office for the Environment (FOEN); 2009.
Pfister, S, Bayer, P, Koehler, A, Hellweg, S. Environmental impacts of water use in global crop production: hotspots and trade‐offs with land use. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45:5761–5768.
van Zelm, R, Schipper, AM, Rombouts, M, Snepvangers, J, Huijbregts, MAJ. Implementing groundwater extraction in life cycle impact assessment: characterization factors based on plant species richness for the Netherlands. Environ Sci Technol 2010, 45:629–635.
Hoekstra, AY, Chapagain, AK, Aldaya, MM, Mekonnen, MM. The Water Footprint Assessment Manual: Setting the Global Standard. London and Washington, DC: Earthscan; 2011.
Steen, B. A systematic approach to environmental priority strategies in product development (EPS). Version 2000—general system characteristics, 1999. Available at: http://msl1.mit.edu/esd123_2001/pdfs/EPS2000.PDF. (Accessed March 8, 2016).
Goedkoop, MJ, Heijungs, R, Huijbregts, M, De Schryver, A, Struijs, J, van Zelm, R. ReCiPe 2008—a life cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level, Report I: characterisation, 2009. Available at: http://www.lcia‐recipe.net/. (Accessed March 8, 2016).
Jolliet, O, Margni, M, Charles, R, Humbert, S, Payet, J, Rebitzer, G, Rosenbaum, R. IMPACT 2002+: a new life cycle impact assessment methodology. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2003, 8:324–330.
Rosenbaum, R, Bachmann, T, Gold, L, Huijbregts, M, Jolliet, O, Juraske, R, Koehler, A, Larsen, H, MacLeod, M, Margni, M, et al. USEtox—the UNEP‐SETAC toxicity model: recommended characterisation factors for human toxicity and freshwater ecotoxicity in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2008, 13:532–546.
European Commission—Joint Research Centre—Institute for Environment Sustainability (EU JRC‐IES). International Reference Life Cycle Data System (ILCD) Handbook: Recommendations for Life Cycle Impact Assessment in the European Context 1st edition. Luxemburg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2011. Available at: http://eplca.jrc.ec.europa.eu/uploads/ILCD‐Recommendation‐of‐methods‐for‐LCIA‐def.pdf. (Accessed March 8, 2016).
Hauschild, M, Goedkoop, M, Guinée, J, Heijungs, R, Huijbregts, M, Jolliet, O, Margni, M, De Schryver, A, Humbert, S, Laurent, A, et al. Identifying best existing practice for characterization modeling in life cycle impact assessment. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2013, 18:683–697.
Milà i Canals, L, Bauer, C, Despetele, J, Dubreuil, A, Knuchel, RF, Gaillard, G, Michelsen, O, Müller‐Wenk, R, Rydgren, B. Key elements in a framework for land use impact assessment in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2007, 12:2–4.
Lindeijer, E, Müller‐Wenk, R, Steen, B. Impact assessment of resources and land use. In: de Haes HA, U, Finnveden, G, Goedkoop, M, Hauschild, M, Hertwich, EG, Hofstetter, P, Jolliet, O, Klöpffer, W, Krewitt, W, Lindeijer, E, et al., eds. Life Cycle Impact Assessment: Striving towards Best Practices. Pensacola, FL: SETAC; 2002, 11–64.
Cao, V, Margni, M, Favis, BD, Deschênes, L. Aggregated indicator to assess land use impacts in life cycle assessment (LCA) based on the economic value of ecosystem services. J Clean Prod 2015, 94:56–66.
Balvanera, P, Pfisterer, AB, Buchmann, N, He, J‐S, Nakashizuka, T, Raffaelli, D, Schmid, B. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecol Lett 2006, 9:1146–1156.
Curran, M, de Baan, L, De Schryver, AM, van Zelm, R, Hellweg, S, Köellner, T, Sonnemann, G, Huijbregts, MAJ. Toward meaningful end points of biodiversity in life cycle assessment†. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45:70–79.
Rosenzweig, ML. Species Diversity in Space and Time. Cambridge, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
Ferris, R, Humphrey, J. A review of potential biodiversity indicators for application in British forests. Forestry 1999, 72:313–328.
Smith, GF, Gittings, T, Wilson, M, French, L, Oxbrough, A, O`Donoghue, S, O`Halloran, J, Kelly, DL, Mitchell, FJG, Kelly, T, et al. Identifying practical indicators of biodiversity for stand‐level management of plantation forests. Biodivers Conserv 2008, 17:991–1015.
Schläpfer, F. Expert estimates about effects of biodiversity on ecosystem processes and services. Oikos 1999, 84:346–352.
Chaudhary, A, Verones, F, de Baan, L, Hellweg, S. Quantifying land use impacts on biodiversity: combining species–area models and vulnerability indicators. Environ Sci Technol 2015, 49:9987–9995.
de Souza, DM, Flynn, DB, DeClerck, F, Rosenbaum, R, Melo Lisboa, H, Koellner, T. Land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: proposal of characterization factors based on functional diversity. Int J Life Cycle Assess 2013, 18:1231–1242.
Riffell, S, Verschuyl, J, Miller, D, Wigley, TB. Potential biodiversity response to intercropping herbaceous biomass crops on forest lands. J For 2012, 110:42–47.
Riffell, S, Verschuyl, J, Miller, D, Wigley, TB. Biofuel harvests, coarse woody debris, and biodiversity—a meta‐analysis. For Ecol Manage 2011, 261:878–887.
Riffell, SAM, Verschuyl, J, Miller, D, Wigley, TB. A meta‐analysis of bird and mammal response to short‐rotation woody crops. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 2011, 3:313–321.
Verschuyl, J, Riffell, S, Miller, D, Wigley, TB. Biodiversity response to intensive biomass production from forest thinning in North American forests—a meta‐analysis. For Ecol Manage 2011, 261:221–232.
Ter‐Mikaelian, MT, Colombo, SJ, Lovekin, D, McKechnie, J, Reynolds, R, Titus, B, Laurin, E, Chapman, A‐M, Chen, J, MacLean, HL. Carbon debt repayment or carbon sequestration parity? Lessons from a forest bioenergy case study in Ontario, Canada. Glob Change Biol Bioenergy 2015, 7:704–716.
Mansuy, N, Thiffault, E, Lemieux, S, Manka, F, Paré, D, Lebel, L. Sustainable biomass supply chains from salvage logging of fire‐killed stands: a case study for wood pellet production in eastern Canada. Appl Energy 2015, 154:62–73.
Rupp, SP, Bies, L, Glaser, A, Kowaleski, C, McCoy, T, Rentz, T, Riffell, S, Sibbing, J, Verschuyl, J, Wigley, T. 2012. Effects of bioenergy production on wildlife and wildlife habitat. Wildlife Society Technical Review 12–03. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kline, K, Martinelli, F, Mayer, A, Medeiros, R, Oliveira, C, Sparovek, G, Walter, A, Venier, L. Bioenergy and biodiversity: key lessons from the Pan American region. Environ Manage 2015, 56:1377–1396.
Campbell, A, Doswal, N. The impacts of biofuel production on biodiversity: a review of the current literature, 2009. Available at: http://www.unep‐wcmc.org/resources‐and‐data/the‐impacts‐of‐biofuel‐production‐on‐biodiversity‐‐a‐review‐of‐the‐current‐literature. (Accessed March 8, 2016).
Otto, CRV, Kroll, AJ, McKenny, HC. Amphibian response to downed wood retention in managed forests: a prospectus for future biomass harvest in North America. For Ecol Manage 2013, 304:275–285.
Fritts, SR, Grodsky, SM, Hazel, DW, Homyack, JA, Castleberry, SB, Moorman, CE. Quantifying multi‐scale habitat use of woody biomass by southern toads. For Ecol Manage 2015, 346:81–88.
Fritts, SR, Moorman, CE, Grodsky, SM, Hazel, DW, Homyack, JA, Farrell, CB, Castleberry, SB. Shrew response to variable woody debris retention: implications for sustainable forest bioenergy. For Ecol Manage 2015, 336:35–43.
Loman, ZG, Riffell, SK, Wheat, BR, Miller, DA, Martin, JA, Vilella, FJ. Breeding bird community response to establishing intercropped switchgrass in intensively‐managed pine stands. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 67:201–211.
Homyack, JA, Aardweg, Z, Gorman, TA, Chalcraft, DR. Initial effects of woody biomass removal and intercropping of switchgrass (Panicum virgatum) on herpetofauna in eastern north Carolina. Wildl Soc Bull 2013, 37:327–335.
Verschuyl, JP, Hansen, AJ, McWethy, DB, Sallabanks, R, Hutto, RL. Is the effect of forest structure on bird diversity modified by forest productivity. Ecol Appl 2008, 18:1155–1170.
Blonk, H, Lindeijer, E, Broers, J. Towards a methodology for taking physical degradation of ecosystems into account in LCA. Int J Life Cycle Assess 1997, 2:91–98.
White, PS. Pattern, process, and natural disturbance in vegetation. Bot Rev 1979, 45:230–299.
Pickett, STA, White, PS. The Ecology of Natural Disturbance and Patch Dynamics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press; 1985.
Lindqvist, M. Research on methodologies for impact assessment on biodiveristy in LCA—the case of biobased products. Vol. Licientiate of Philosophy Thesis, Division of Environmental Systems Analysis, Department of Energy and Environment, 2015.
Souza, DM, Teixeira, RFM, Ostermann, OP. Assessing biodiversity loss due to land use with life cycle assessment: are we there yet? Glob Chang Biol 2015, 21:32–47.
Landres, PB, Morgan, P, Swanson, FJ. Overview of the use of natural variability concepts in managing ecological systems. Ecol Appl 1999, 9:1179–1188.
Teixeira, RFM, Maia de Souza, D, Curran, MP, Antón, A, Michelsen, O, Milà i Canals, L. Towards consensus on land use impacts on biodiversity in LCA: UNEP/SETAC life cycle initiative preliminary recommendations based on expert contributions. J Clean Prod 2016, 112: 4283–4287.
Heywood, VH, Watson, RT, Programme. UNE. Global Biodiversity Assessment. Cambridge and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
Failing, L, Gregory, R. Ten common mistakes in designing biodiversity indicators for forest policy. J Environ Manage 2003, 68:121–132.
Grime, JP. Control of species density in herbaceous vegetation. J Environ Manage 1973, 1:151–167.
Huston, M. Forest Productivity and Diversity: Using Ecological Theory and Landscape Models to Guide Sustainable Forest Management. USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS–P–12; 1999, 329–341.
Litvaitis, JA. Importance of early successional habitats to mammals in eastern forests. Wildl Soc Bull 2001, 29:466–473.
Kimmins, JP. Old‐growth forest: an ancient and stable sylvan equilibrium, or a relatively transitory ecosystem condition that offers people a visual and emotional feast? Answer—it depends. Forest Chron 2003, 79:429–440.
Robbins, P, McSweeney, K, Waite, T, Rice, J. Even conservation rules are made to be broken: implications for biodiversity. Environ Manage 2006, 37:162–169.
McWethy, D, Hansen, A, Verschuyl, J. Bird response to disturbance varies with forest productivity in the northwestern United States. Landsc Ecol 2010, 25:533–549.
Halpern, CB. Early successional pathways and the resistance and resilience of forest communities. Ecology 1988, 69:1703–1715.
Harper, KA, Macdonald, SE, Burton, PJ, Chen, J, Brosofske, KD, Saunders, SC, Euskirchen, ES, Roberts, DAR, Jaiteh, MS, Esseen, P‐A. Edge influence on forest structure and composition in fragmented landscapes—influencia del borde sobre la composición y estructura de bosques en paisajes fragmentados. Conserv Biol 2005, 19:768–782.
McWethy, DB, Hansen, AJ, Verschuyl, JP. Edge effects for songbirds vary with forest productivity. For Ecol Manage 2009, 257:665–678.
Murcia, C. Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends Ecol Evol 1995, 10:58–62.
Duelli, P, Obrist, MK. Biodiversity indicators: the choice of values and measures. Agr Ecosyst Environ 2003, 98:87–98.
Lindenmayer, DB, Margules, CR, Botkin, DB. Indicators of biodiversity for ecologically sustainable forest management indicadores de biodiversidad para el manejo ecológicamente sostenible de bosques. Conserv Biol 2000, 14:941–950.
Gardner, T. Monitoring Forest Biodiversity: Improving Conservation through Ecologically Responsible Management. Earthscan: Oxon; 2010.
McBride, AC, Dale, VH, Baskaran, LM, Downing, ME, Eaton, LM, Efroymson, RA, Garten, CT Jr, Kline, KL, Jager, HI, Mulholland, PJ, et al. Indicators to support environmental sustainability of bioenergy systems. Ecol Indic 2011, 11:1277–1289.
Efroymson, R, Dale, V, Kline, K, McBride, A, Bielicki, J, Smith, R, Parish, E, Schweizer, P, Shaw, D. Environmental indicators of biofuel sustainability: what about context? Environ Manage 2013, 51:291–306.
Michelsen, O, Cherubini, F, Strømman, AH. Impact assessment of biodiversity and carbon pools from land use and land use changes in life cycle assessment, exemplified with forestry operations in Norway. J Ind Ecol 2012, 16:231–242.
McElhinny, C, Gibbons, P, Brack, C, Bauhus, J. Forest and woodland stand structural complexity: its definition and measurement. For Ecol Manage 2005, 218:1–24.
Rossi, JP. Extrapolation and biodiversity indicators: handle with caution!. Ecol Indic 2011, 11:1490–1491.
Penman, T, Law, B, Ximenes, F. A proposal for accounting for biodiversity in life cycle assessment. Biodivers Conserv 2010, 19:3245–3254.