Home
This Title All WIREs
WIREs RSS Feed
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Nanomed Nanobiotechnol
Impact Factor: 6.35

Mapping of the available standards against the regulatory needs for nanomedicines

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Appropriate documentary standards and reference materials are crucial building blocks for the development of innovative products. In order to support the emerging sector of nanomedicine, relevant standards must be identified and/or developed before the products will enter into the regulatory approval process. The anticipation of standardization needs requires a good understanding on the regulatory information requirements that can be triggered by the particularities of nanomedicines. However, robust datasets allowing firm conclusions on regulatory demands are not yet available due to a lack of regulatory experience with innovative products. Such a catch‐22 situation can only be advanced in an iterative process by monitoring continuously the scientific evidence and by promoting intensive knowledge exchange between all involved stakeholders. In this study, we have compiled information requirements released by regulatory scientists so far and mapped it against available standards that could be of relevance for nanomedicines. Our gap analysis clearly demonstrated that for some endpoints such as drug release/loading and the interaction of nanomedicines with the immune system no standards are available so far. The emerging nanomedicine sector could benefit from cross‐sector collaboration and review the suitability of standards that have been developed for nanomaterials used for other industrial applications. Only a concerted action of all parties can lead to a smooth translation of nanomedicines to clinical application and to the market. This is in particular important because nanotechnology‐based drug delivery systems are key for the development and implementation of personalized medicine.

This article is characterized under:

  • Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Regulatory and Policy Issues in Nanomedicine
Identified uncertainties related to the regulatory process of innovative products such as nanomedicines
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Mapping of the available documentary standards against regulatory needs included in European Medicines Agency (EMA) reflection papers, GSRS16 workshop and surveys within the regulatory community; standards are classified as standardized methods developed for medical applications (black bars) or for not specified applications (red bars) and general documentary standards (gray bars)
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Relevance of the physicochemical parameters for the regulatory decision‐making evaluated in surveys performed within regulatory communities: International Pharmaceutical Regulators Forum (IPRF, first survey), EU‐innovation network (second survey), and “Bridging communities in the field of nanomedicine” workshop of the Joint Research Centre of the European Commission (JRC, third survey)
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
List of current endpoints addressed by the standardized test methods for physicochemical characterization of nanomaterials based on the information given in Table
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Search strategy and classification applied to extract standards (methods and materials) relevant for nanomedicine
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Browse by Topic

Toxicology and Regulatory Issues in Nanomedicine > Regulatory and Policy Issues in Nanomedicine

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts