Systems biology and the future of medicine

Opinion

Joseph Loscalzo, Albert‐Laszlo Barabasi

Published Online: Feb 24 2011

DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.144

How to cite this article
Download citation
Contact the editor about this article
Authors: submit updates and notes
Comment on this article
Share

Full article on Wiley Online Library: HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Contemporary views of human disease are based on simple correlation between clinical syndromes and pathological analysis dating from the late 19th century. Although this approach to disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment has served the medical establishment and society well for many years, it has serious shortcomings for the modern era of the genomic medicine that stem from its reliance on reductionist principles of experimentation and analysis. Quantitative, holistic systems biology applied to human disease offers a unique approach for diagnosing established disease, defining disease predilection, and developing individualized (personalized) treatment strategies that can take full advantage of modern molecular pathobiology and the comprehensive data sets that are rapidly becoming available for populations and individuals. In this way, systems pathobiology offers the promise of redefining our approach to disease and the field of medicine. WIREs Syst Biol Med 2011 3 619–627 DOI: 10.1002/wsbm.144

This WIREs title offers downloadable PowerPoint presentations of figures for non-profit, educational use, provided the content is not modified and full credit is given to the author and publication.

Download a PowerPoint presentation of all images

Figure 1.

The human systems biology universe. Human systems comprise molecular and phenotypic networks, which are related to, but distinct from, each other, as indicated by the separate linked ovals. The human disease‐ome represents a collection of subnetworks, the disease modules, which are identified by one of two strategies, the molecular network‐based strategy or the functional and structural similarity‐based strategy. The assembly of disease modules into the disease‐ome can be determined by bioinformatics‐based approaches—the shared gene formalism, the shared metabolic pathway formalism, or the disease comorbidity formalism—or by laboratory‐based experimentation.

[ Normal View 33K | Magnified View 48K ]

References

1 Osler, W. The Principles and Practice of Medicine. New York: Appleton; 1892.
2 Sebastiani, P, Ramoni, MF, Nolan, V, Baldwin, CT, Steinberg, MH. Genetic dissection and prognostic modeling of overt stroke in sickle cell anemia. Nat Genet 2005, 37: 435–440. doi:10.1038/ng1533.
3 Munos, B. Lessons from 60 years of pharmaceutical innovation. Nat Revs Drug Discov 2009, 8:959–968. doi:10/1038.nrd2961.
4 Loscalzo, J, Kohane, I, Barabasi, A‐L. Human disease classification in the postgenomic era: a complex systems approach to human pathobiology. Mol Syst Biol 2007, 3:124. e‐published. doi:10/1038/msb100163.
5 Zanzoni, A, Soler‐Lopez, M, Aloy, P. A network medicine approach to human disease. FEBS Lett 2009, 583: 1759–1765. doi:10.1016/febslet.2009/03.001.
6 Pawson, T, Linding, R. Network medicine. FEBS Lett 2008, 582:1266–1270.
7 Barabasi, AL. Network medicine—from obesity to the diseasome. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:404–407. doi:10.1056/NEJMe078114.
8 Rual, J‐F, Venkatesan, K, Hao, T, Hirozane‐Kishikawa, T, Dricot, A, Li, N, Berriz, GF, Gibbons, FD, Druze, M, Ayivi‐Guedehoussou, N, et al. Towards a proteome‐scale map of the human protein‐protein interaction network. Nature 2005, 437:1173–1178. doi:10.1038/Naure04209.
9 Stelzl, U, Worm, U, Lalowski, M, Haenig, C, Brembeck, FH, Goehler, H, Stroedicke, M, Zenkner, M, Schoenherr, A, Koeppen, S, et al. A human protein‐protein interaction network: a resource for annotating the proteome. Cell 2005, 122:957–968. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2005.08. 029.
10 Jeong, H, Tombor, B, Albert, R, Oltvai, ZN, Barabasi, AL. The large‐scale organization of metabolic networks. Nature 2000, 407:651–654. doi:10.1038/35036627.
11 Fell, DA, Wagner, A. The small world of metabolism. Nat Biotechnol 2000, 18:1121–1122. doi:10.1038/81025.
12 Duarte, NC, Becker, SA, Jamshidi, N, Thiele, I, Mo, ML, Vo, TD, Srivas, R, Palsson, BØ. Global reconstruction of the human metabolic network based on genomic and bibliomic data. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:1777–1782. doi:10.1073/pnas.010772104.
13 Carninci, P, Kasukawa, T, Katayama, S, Gough, J, Frith, MC, Maeda, N, Oyama, R, Ravasi, T, Lenhard, B, Wells, C, et al. The transcriptional landscape of the mammalian genome. Science 2005, 309:1559–1563. doi:10. 1126/science.1112014.
14 Lewis, BP, Burge, CB, Bartel, DP. Conserved seed pairing, often flanked by adenosines, indicates that thousands of human genes are microRNA targets. Cell 2005, 120:15–20. doi:10.16.j.cell.2004.12.035.
15 Reynolds, A, Leake, D, Boese, Q, Scaringe, S, Marshall, WS, Khvorova, A. Rational siRNA design for RNA interference. Nat Biotechnol 2004, 22:326–330. doi:10.1038/nbt936.
16 Stuart, JM, Segal, E, Koller, D, Kim, SK. A gene‐coexpression network for global discovery of conserved genetic modules. Science 2003, 302:249–255. doi:10.1176/science.1087447.
17 Boone, C, Bussey, H, Andrews, BJ. Exploring genetic interactions and networks with yeast. Nat Rev Genet 2007, 8:437–449. doi:10.1038/nrg2085.
18 Beltrao, P, Cagney, G, Krogan, N. Quantitative genetic interactions reveal biological modularity. Cell 2010, 141:739–745. doi:10.1016.j.cell.2010.05.019.
19 Barabasi, AL, Oltvai, Z. Network biology: understanding the cell`s functional organization. Nat Rev Genet 2004, 5:101–113. doi:10.1038/nrg1272.
20 Albert, R, Barabasi, AL. Statistical mechanics of complex networks. Rev Mod Phys 2002, 74:47–97. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47.
21 Caldarelli, G. Scale Free Networks. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
22 Barabasi, AL, Albert, R. Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 1999, 286:509–512. doi:10.1126/science.286.5439.509.
23 Yu, H, Kim, PM, Sprecher, E, Trifonov, V, Gerstein, M. The importance of bottlenecks in protein networks: correlation with gene essentiality and expression dynamics. PLoS Comput Biol 2007, 3:e59. doi:10.137/journal.pcbi.0030059.
24 Watts, DJ, Strogatz, SH. Collective dynamics in ‘small‐world’ networks. Nature 1998, 393:440–442. doi:10.1038/30918.
25 Pastor Satorras, R, Vazquez, A, Vespignani, A. Dynamical and correlation properties of the internet. Phys Rev Lett 2001, 87:258701. e‐published. doi:10.1013/PhysRevL.87.258701.
26 Milo, R, Shen‐Orr, S, Itzkovitz, S, Kashtan, N, Chklovskii, D, Alon, U. Network motifs: simple building blocks of complex networks. Science 2002, 298: 824–827. doi:10.1126/science.298.5594.824.
27 Amberger, J, Bocchini, CA, Scott, AF, Hamosh, A. McKusick`s online Mendelian inheritance in man (OMIM). Nucleic Acids Res 2009, 37:D793–D796. doi:01.1039/nar/qkn665.
28 Goh, KI, Cusick, ME, Valle, D, Childs, B, Vidal, M, Barabási, AL. The human disease network. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:8685–8690. doi:10.1073/pnas.0701361104.
29 Gandhi, TK, Zhong, J, Mathivanan, S, Karthick, L, Chandrika, KN. Analysis of the human protein interactome and comparison with yeast, worm, and fly interaction datasets. Nat Genet 2006, 38:285–293. doi:10.1038/ng1747.
30 Xu, J, Li, Y. Discovering disease‐genes by topological features in human protein‐protein interactions networks. Bioinformatics 2006, 22:2800–2805. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btl467.
31 Barabási, AL, Guhlbace, N, Loscalzo, J. Network medicine: a network‐based approach to human disease. Nature Rev Genet 2010, 12:56–68. doi:10.1038nrg2918.
32 Vankatesan, K, Rual, JF, Vazquez, A, Stelzl, U, Lemmens, I, Hirozane‐Kishikawa, T, Hao, T, Zenkner, M, Xin, X, Goh, KI, et al. An empirical framework for binary interactome mapping. Nat Methods 2009, 6:83–90. doi:10.1038/nmeth.1280.
33 Aranda, B, Achuthan, P, Alam‐Faruque, Y, Armean, I, Bridge, A, Derow, C, Feuermann, M, Ghanbarian, AT, Kerrien, S, Khadake, J, et al. The IntAct molecular interaction database in 2010. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:D525–D531. doi:10.1093/nar/qkp878.
34 Ceol, A, Chatr Aryamontri, A, Licata, L, Peluso, D, Briganti, L, Perfetto, L, Castagnoli, L, Cesareni, G. MINT, the molecular interaction database: 2009 update. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:D532–D539. doi:10.1093/nar/qkp983.
35 Matys, V, Fricke, E, Geffers, R, Gossling, E, Haubrock, M, Hehl, R, Hornischer, K, Karas, D, Kel, AE, Kel‐Margoulis, OV, et al. TRANSFAC: transcriptional regulation, from patterns to profiles. Nucleic Acids Res 2003, 31:374–378.
36 Mani, KM, Lefebvre, C, Wang, K, Lim, WK, Basso, K, Dalla‐Favera, R, Califano, A. A systems biology approach to prediction of oncogenes and molecular perturbation targets in B‐cell lymphomas. Mol Syst Biol 2008, 4:169. e‐published. doi:10.1038/msb.2008.2.
37 Kanehisa, M, Goto, S, Furumichi, M, Tanabe, M, Hirakawa, M. KEGG for representation and analysis of molecular networks involving diseases and drugs. Nucleic Acids Res 2010, 38:D355–D360. doi:10.1093/nar/qkp896.
38 Schellenberger, J, Park, JO, Conrad, TM, Palsson, BO. BiGG: a biochemical genetic and genomic knowledge base of large scale metabolic reconstrjuctions. BMC Bioinformatics 2010, 11:213. e‐published. doi:10.1186/ 1471‐21‐5‐11‐213.
39 Park, J, Lee, DS, Christakis, NA, Barabasi, AL. The impact of cellular networks on disease comorbidity. Mol Syst Biol 2009, 5:262. e‐published. doi:10.1038/msb.2009.16.
40 Palla, G, Derenyi, F, Farkas, I, Vicsek, T. Uncovering the overlapping community structure of complex networks in nature and society. Nature 2005, 435:814–818. doi:10.1038/nature03607.
41 Ahn, YY, Bagrow, JP, Lehmann, S. Link communities reveal multi‐scale complexity in networks. Nature 2010, 466:761–764. doi:10.1038/nature09182.
42 Naviakha, S, Kingsford, C. The power of protein interaction networks for associating genes with diseases. Bioinformatics 2010, 26:1057–1063. doi:10.1093/ bioinformatics/btq076.
43 Harris, MA, Clark, J, Ireland, A, Lomas, J, Ashburner, M, Foulger, R, Eilbeck, K, Lewis, S, Marshall, B, Mungall, C, et al. The Gene Ontology (GO) database and informatics resource. Nucleic Acids Res 2004, 32:D258–D261. doi:10.1093/nar/qkh036.
44 Raychaudhuri, S, Plenge, RM, Rossin, EJ, Ng, AC, Purcell, SM, Guo, W, Cui, Q. Identifying relationships among genomic disease regions: predicting genes at pathogenic SNP associations and rare deletions. PLoS Genet 2009, 5:e1000534. doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000534.
45 Lu, M, Zhang, Q, Deng, M, Miao, J, Guo, Y, Gao, W, Cui, Q. An analysis of human microRNA and disease associations. PLoS One 2008, 3:e3420. doi:10.10307/ journal.pone.0003420.
46 Ray, M, Ruan, J, Zhang, W. Variations in the transcriptome of Alzheimer`s disease reveal molecular networks involved in cardiovascular disease. Genome Biol 2008, 9:R148. doi:10.1186/gb‐2008‐9‐10‐r148.
47 Moran, LB, Graeber, MB. Towards a pathway definition of Parkinson`s disease: a complex disorder with links to cancer, diabetes, and inflammation. Neurogenetics 2008, 9:1–13. doi:10.1007/s10048‐007‐0116‐v.
48 Liu, M, Liberzon, A, Kong, SW, Wai, WR, Park, PJ. Network‐based analysis of affected biological processes in type 2 diabetes models. PLoS Genet 2007, 3:e96. e‐published. doi:10.1037/journal/pgen.0030096.
49 Hwang, S, Son, SW, Kim, SC, Kim, YJ, Jeong, H. A protein interaction network associated with asthma. J Theo Biol 2008, 252:722–731. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2008.02.011.
50 Lusis, AJ, Weiss, JN. Cardiovascular networks: a systems‐based approach to cardiovascular disease. Circulation 2010, 121:157–170. doi:10.1161/ CIRCULATIONAHA.108.847699.
51 Lee, E, Jung, H, Radivojac, P, Kim, JW, Lee, D. Analysis of AML genes in dysregulated molecular networks. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10:S2. doi:10.1186/1471‐2105‐10‐S9‐S2.
52 Chuang, HY, Lee, E, Liu, YT, Lee, D, Ideker, T. Network‐based classification of breast cancer metastasis. Mol Syst Biol 2007, 3:140. e‐published. doi:10.1038/msb4100180.
53 Lim, J, Hao, T, Shaw, C, Patel, AJ, Szabo, C, Rual, JF, Fisk, CJ, Li, N, Smolyar, A, Hill, DE, et al. A protein‐protein interaction network for human inherited ataxias and disorders of Purkinje cell degeneration. Cell 2006, 125:801–814. doi:10.1016/j.cell.2006.03.032.
54 Goehler, H, Lalowski, M, Stelzl, U, Waelter, S, Stroedicke, M, Worm, U, Droege, A, Lindenberg, KS, Knoblich, M, Haenig, C, et al. A protein interaction network links GIT1, an enhancer of huntingtin aggregation, to Huntington`s disease. Mol Cell 2004, 15:853–865. doi:10.1016/j.molcel.2004.09.016.
55 Camargo, LM, Collura, V, Rain, JC, Mizuguchi, K, Hermjakob, H, Kerrien, S, Bonnert, TP, Whiting, PJ, Brandon, NJ. Disrupted in schizophrenia 1 interactome: evidence for the close connectivity of risk genes and a potential synaptic basis for schizophrenia. Mol Psych 2007, 12:74–86. doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001880.
56 Lee, DS, Park, K, Kay, KA, Christakis, NA, Oltvai, ZN, Barabási, AL. The implications of human metabolic network topology for disease comorbidity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2008, 105:9880–9885. doi:10.1073/ pnas.0802208105.
57 Hidalgo, CA, Blumm, N, Barabasi, AL, Christakis, A. A dynamic network approach for the study of human phenotypes. PLoS Comp Biol 2009, 5:1–11. doi:10.137/ journal.pcbi.1000353.
58 Rzhetsky, A, Wajngurt, D, Park, N, Zheng, T. Probing genetic overlap among complex human phenotypes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:11684–11689. doi:10.1073/pnas.0704820104.
59 Suthram, S, Dudley, AJ, Chiang, P, Chen, R, Hastie, TJ, Butte, AJ. Network‐based elucidation of human disease similarities reveals common functional modules enriched for pluripotent drug targets. PLoS Comput Biol 2010, 6:e1000662. e‐published. doi:10.1371/ journal.pcbi.1000662.
60 Liu, YI, Wise, PH, Butte, AJ. The “etiome”: identification and clustering of human disease etiological factors. BMC Bioinformatics 2009, 10(suppl 2):S14. e‐published. doi:10.1186/1427‐1‐2105‐10‐S2‐S14.
61 Yildrim, MA, Goh, KI, Cusik, ME, Barabasi, AL, Vidal, M. Drug‐target networks. Nat Biotechnol 2007, 25: 1119–1126. doi:10.1038/nbt1338.
62 Campillos, M, Kuhn, M, Gavin, AC, Jensen, LJ, Bork, P. Drug target identification using side effect similarity. Science 2008, 321:263–266.
63 Segre, D, Vitkup, D, Church, GM. Analysis of optimality in natural and perturbed metabolic networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99:15112–15117. doi:10.1073/pnas.232349399.
64 Schadt, EE, Friend, SH, Shaywitz, DA. A network view of disease and compound screening. Nat Rev Drug Disc 2009, 8:286–295. doi:10.1038/nrd2826.
65 Christakis, NA, Fowler, JH. The spread of obesity in a large social network over 32 years. N Engl J Med 2007, 357:370–379.
66 Uetz, P, Dong, YA, Zeretzke, C, Atzler, B, Baiker, A, Berger, B, Rajagopala, SV, Roupelieva, M, Rose, D, Fossum, E, et al. Herpesviral protein networks and their interaction with the human proteome. Science 2006, 311:239–242. doi:10.1126/science.1116804.
67 Calderwood, MA, Venkatesan, K, Xing, L, Chase, MR, Vazques, A, Holthaus, AM, Ewence, AE, Li, N, Hirozane‐Kishikawa, T, Hill, DE, et al. Epstein‐Barr virus and virus‐human protein interaction maps. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2007, 104:7606–7011. doi:10.1073/ pnas.0702332104.
68 Turnbaugh, PJ, Gordon, JI. An invitation to the marriage of metagenomics and metabolomics. Cell 2008, 134:708–713. doi:10.1016.j.cell.2008.08.025.

blog comments powered by Disqus

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

In the Spotlight

Philip Benfey

Is intrigued by one of the key questions in developmental biology: how cells acquire their identities. This is an important question in human development, where stem cells divide and differentiate into skin, muscle, fat etc. It is equally central to plant development, where most organs and cells are formed from stem cell populations known as meristems. The Benfey lab addresses this question using a combination of genetics, molecular biology, and genomics to identify and characterize the genes that regulate formation of the root in the plant model system, Arabidopsis thaliana. The choice of the root as a model was based on the simplicity of its organization and its stereotyped developmental program.

Learn More

Article Title	Systems biology and the future of medicine
* Name
* E-mail
* Note

Systems biology and the future of medicine

Browse by Topic

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

In the Spotlight

Twitter: WIREsSysBioMed Follow us on Twitter