1 Berman, CG. Recent advances in breast‐specific imaging. Cancer Control 2007, 14:338–349.
2 Malur, S, Wurdinger, S, Morizt, A, Michels, W, Schneider, W. A comparison of written reports of mammography, sonography, and magnetic resonance mammography for preoperative evaluation of breast lesions, with special emphasis on magnetic resonance mammography. Breast Cancer Research 2001, 3:55–60.
3 Sivaramakrishna, R. 3D breast image registration—a review. Technology in Cancer Research and Treatment 2005, 4:39–48.
4 Dawant, B. Non‐rigid registration of medical images: purpose and methods, a short survey. IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging 2002; 465–468.
5 Wirth, M. A Nonrigid Approach to Medical Image Registration: Matching Images of the Breast
. PhD Thesis. RMIT University, 2000.
6 Rueckert, D, Sonoda, L, Hayes, C, Hill, D, Leach, M, et al.
Non‐rigid registration using free‐form deformations: application to breast MR images. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 1999, 18:712–721.
7 Behrenbruch, CP, Marias, K, Armitage, PA, Yam, M, Moore, N, et al.
Fusion of contrast‐enhanced breast MR and mammographic imaging data. Medical Image Analysis 2003, 7:311–340.
8 Tanner, C, Schnabel, J, Degenhard, A, Smith, AC, Hayes, C, et al.
%22Validation of volume‐preserving non‐rigid registration: application to contranst‐enhanced MR mammography.%22 Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Medical Image Computing and Computer Aided Intervention, Vol. 2489: Berlin: Springer‐Verlag
; 2002; 307–314.
9 Rohlfing, T, Maurer, C. Volume preserving nonrigid registration of MR breast images using free‐form deformation with an incompressibility constraint. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2003, 18:712–721.
10 Kita, Y, Highnam, R, Brady, M. IEEE Computer Society. 1998. Correspondence Between Different View Breast X‐Rays Using a Simulation of Breast Deformation. Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
, Santa Barbara, CA.
11 Kita, , Tohno, E, Highnam, R, Brady, M. A CAD system for 3D location of lesions in mammogram. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 2001, 2208:94–102.
12 Ruiter, N, Stotzka, R, Muller, TO, Gemmeke, H, Reichenbach, JR, et al.
Model‐based registration of X‐ray mammograms and MR images of the female breast. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science 2006, 53:204–211.
13 Zhang, O, Qiu, A, Goldgof, D, Sarkar, S, Li, L. 3D finite element modeling of nonrigid breast deformation for feature registration in X‐ray and MR images. IEEE Workshop on Applications of Computer Vision 2007; 38–38.
14 Roose, L, Maerteleire, W, Mollemans, W, Maes, F, Suetens, P. %22Simulation of soft‐tissue deformations for breast augmentation planning%22. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Vol. 4072: Springer‐Verlag
; 2006; 197–205.
15 Carter, T, Tanner, C, Beechey‐Newman, N, Barratt, D, Hawkes, DJ. %22MR navigated breast surgery: method and initial clinical experience%22 Lectuer Notes in Computer Science: Medical Image Computing and Computer Aided Intervention, Vol. 5242: Springer
; 2008; 356–363.
16 Yu‐Neifert, Q. A Three‐Dimensional Finite Element Model to Predict the Applicability of Holographic Interferometry to Breast Tumour Detection
. PhD Thesis. University of Akron, 1995.
17 Samani, A, Yaffe, M, Plewes, D. Biomechanical 3D finite element modelling of the human breast using MRI Data. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2001, 20:271–279.
18 Azar, F, Metaxas, D, Schnall, M. A deformable finite element model of the breast for predicting mechanical deformations under external perturbations. Academic Radiology 2001, 8:965–975.
19 Roose, L, Mollemans, W, Loeckx, D, Maes, F, Suetens, P. Biomechanically based elastic breast registration using mass tensor simulation. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Medical Image Computing and Computer Aided Intervention 2006, 4191:718–725.
20 Zygantidis, C, Bliznakova, K. A novel simulation algorithm for soft tissue compression. Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2007, 45:661–669.
21 Del Palomar, AP, Calvo, B, Herrero, J, Lopez, J, Doblare, M. A finite element model to accurately predict real deformations of the breast. Medical Engineering and Physics 2008, 30:1089–1097.
22 Tanner, C, Hipwell, JH, Hawkes, DJ. %22Statistical Deformation Models Of Breast Compressions From Biomechanical Simulations%22. In: Krupinski, EA, ed. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: International Workshop on Digital Mammography, Vol. 5116: Springer
; 2008; 426–432.
23 Pathmanathan, P, Gavaghan, DJ, Whiteley, JP, Chapman, SJ, Brady, JM. Predicting tumor location by modelling the deformation of the breast. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering 2008, 55:2471–2480.
24 Rajagopal, V, Lee, A, Chung, J, Warren, R, Highnam, RP, et al.
Creating individual‐specific biomechanical models of the breast for medical image analysis. Academic Radiology 2008, 15:1425–1436.
25 Chung, J, Rajagopal, V, Nielsen, PMF, Nash, MP. Modelling mammographic compression of the breast. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Medical Image Computing and Computer Aided Intervention 2008, 5242:758–765.
26 Roose, L, Mairteleire, WD, Mollemans, W, Suetens, P. Validation of different soft tissue simulation methods for breast augmentation. International Congress Series 2005, 1281:485–490.
27 Cotin, S, Delingette, H, Ayache, N. A hybrid elastic model allowing real‐time cutting, deformations and force‐feedback for surgery training and simulation. The Visual Computer 2000, 16:437–452.
28 Whiteley, JP, Gavaghan, DJ, Chapman, SJ, Brady, JM. Non‐linear modelling of breast tissue. Mathematical Medicine and Biology 2007, 24:327–345.
29 Sarvazyan, A, Skovoroda, A, Emelianov, S, Fowlkes, J, Pipe, J, et al.
Biophysical bases of elasticity imaging. Acoustic Imaging 1995, 21:223–240.
30 Tanner, C, Schnabel, JA, Hill, DL, Hawkes, DJ, Leach, MO, et al.
Factors Influencing the accuracy of biomechanical breast models. Medical Physics 2006, 33:1758–1769.
31 Yam, M, Brady, M, Highnam, R, Behrenbruch, C, English, R, et al.
Three‐dimensional reconstruction of microcalcification clusters from two mammographic views. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging 2001, 20:479–489.
32 Cooper, A. On the Anatomy of the Breast: London: Longman Publishing
33 Gefen, A, Dilmoney, B. Mechanics of the normal woman`s breast. Technology and Health Care 2007, 15:259–271.
34 Guinebretiere, JM, Menet, E, Tardivon, A, Cherel, P, Vanel, D. Normal and pathological breast, the histological basis. European Journal of Radiology 2005, 54:6–14.
35 Rajagopal, V, Kvistedal, , Nielsen, MP, Chung, JH,Nielsen, PMF. Modelling the skin‐breast tissue interface. Journal of Biomechanics: World Congress of Biomechanics 2006, 39(S1
36 Valentin, J. Basic anatomical and physiological data for use in radiological protection: reference values. Annual ICRP 2002, 89:1–277.
37 Rice, JE. Breast Prosthesis. U.S. 5066302,1991.
38 Rajagopal, V, Chung, J, Bullivant, D, Nielsen, P, Nash, M. Finite elasticity: determining the reference state from a loaded configuration. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering 2007, 72:1434–1451.
39 Pathmanathan, P, Gavaghan, D, Whiteley, J, Brady, M, Nash, M, et al.
Predicting tumor location by simulating large deformations of the breast using a 3D finite element model and nonlinear elasticity. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Medical Image Computing and Computer Aided Intervention 2004, 3217:217–224.
40 Rajagopal, V, Chung, J, Nielsen, PM, Nash, MP. Finite element modelling of breast biomechanics: directly calculating the reference state. Conference Proceedings of IEEE EMBS 2006, 1:420–423.
41 Rajagopal, V, Nash, MP, Highnam, RP, Nielsen, PMF. The breast biomechanics reference state for multi‐modal image analysis. Lecture Notes in Computer Science: International Workshop on Digital Mammography 2008, 5116:385–392.
42 Samani, A, Zubovits, J, Plewes, D. Elastic moduli of normal and pathological breast tissues: an inversion‐technique‐based investigation of 169 samples. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2007, 52:1565–1576.
43 Krouskop, T, Wheeler, T, Kallel, K, Garra, B, Hall, T. Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression. Ultrasonic Imaging 1998, 20:260–274.
44 Wellman, P, Howe, R, Dalton, E, Kern, K Breast Tissue Stiffness in Compression is Correlated to Histological Diagnosis: Harvard University
45 Van Houten, E, Doyley, M, Kennedy, F, Weaver, J, Paulsen, K. Initial in‐vivo experience with steady state subzone based MR elastography of the human breast. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 2003, 17:72–85.
46 Samani, A, Plewes, D. A Method to Measure the Hyperelastic Parameters of Ex‐Vivo Breast Tissue Samples. Phys Med Biol 2004, 49:4395–4405.
47 O`Hagan, JJ, Samani, A. Measurement of the hyperelastic properties of tissue slices with tumour inclusion. Physics in Medicine and Biology 2008, 53:7087–7106.
48 Lorenzen, J, Sinkus, R, Biesterfeldt, M, Gerhard, A. Menstrual‐cycle dependence of breast parenchyma elasticity: estimation with magnetic resonance elastography of breast tissue during the menstrual cycle. Investigative Radiology 2003, 38:236–240.
49 Han, L, Noble, J, Burcher, M. Novel ultrasound indentation system for measuring biomechanical properties of in‐vivo soft tissue. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology 2003, 29:813–823.
50 Susman, (ed.) Elastography for Breast Cancer Detection Appears to Get Reproducible Results in Multicentre Trial: Presented at RSNA. Doctor`s Guide. [Online] December 2007. Cited: 3 February 2009. .
51 Edwards, C. Evaluation of biomechanical properties of skin. Clinics in Dermatology 1995, 13:375–380.
52 Korthagen, EJM. Human Skin In‐Vivo: Overview of Mechanical Experiments and Imaging Techniques: Koninklijke Philips Electronics
53 Kvistedal, . Multiaxial In‐Vivo Testing of Human Skin
. Masters Thesis. Auckland Bioengineering Institute, University of Auckland. 2004.
54 Young, AA. Model tags: direct three‐dimensional tracking of heart wall motion from tagged magnetic resonance imaging. Medical Image Analysis 1999, 3:361–372.
55 Young, AA, Cowan, BR, Thrupp, SF, Hedley, WJ, Dell`Italia, LJ. Ventricular mass and volume: fast calculation with guide‐point modeling on MR images. Radiology 2000, 216:597–602.
56 Highnam, R, Brady, M. Mammographic Image Analysis: Kluwer Academic Publishers
57 Tohno, E, Ueno, E. Current improvements in breast ultrasound, with a special focus on elastography. Breast Cancer 2008, 15:200–204.
58 Taylor, ZA, Comas, O, Cheng, M, Passenger, J, Hawkes, DJ, et al.
On modelling of anisotropic viscoelasticity for soft tissue simulation: numerical solution and GPU execution. Medical Image Analysis 2008, 13(2