1 Raya, A, et al.
Notch activity acts as a sensor for extracellular calcium during vertebrate left‐right determination. Nature 2004, 427: 121–128.
2 Goodwin, M, Yap, AS. Classical cadherin adhesion molecules: coordinating cell adhesion, signaling and the cytoskeleton. J Mol Histol 2004, 35: 839–44.
3 Iqbal, J, Zaidi, M. Molecular regulation of mechanotransduction. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2005, 328: 751–755.
4 Ingber, DE. Cellular mechanotransduction: putting all the pieces together again. FASEB J 2006, 20: 811–827.
5 Ingber, DE. The mechanochemical basis of cell and tissue regulation. Mech Chem Biosyst 2004, 1: 53–68.
6 Discher, DE, Janmey, P, Wang, YL. Tissue cells feel and respond to the stiffness of their substrate. Science 2005, 310: 1139–1143.
7 Mofrad, M, Kamm, R. Cellular Mechanotransduction: Diverse Perspectives from Molecules to Tissuesy
. New York: Cambridge University Press
; 2009, 375.
8 Lopez, JI, Mouw, JK, Weaver, VM. Biomechanical regulation of cell orientation and fate. Oncogene 2008, 27: 6981–6993.
9 Butcher, DT, Alliston, T, Weaver, VM. A tense situation: forcing tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer 2009, 9: 108–122.
10 Robertson, MJ, Gip, P, Schaffer, DV. Neural stem cell engineering: directed differentiation of adult and embryonic stem cells into neurons. Front Biosci 2008, 13: 21–50.
11 Phillips, JB, et al.
Neural tissue engineering: a self‐organizing collagen guidance conduit. Tissue Eng 2005, 11: 1611–1617.
12 Marshall, WF, Kintner, C. Cilia orientation and the fluid mechanics of development. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008, 20: 48–52.
13 Taber, LA. Biophysical mechanisms of cardiac looping. Int J Dev Biol 2006, 50: 323–332.
14 Voronov, DA, et al.
The role of mechanical forces in dextral rotation during cardiac looping in the chick embryo. Dev Biol 2004, 272: 339–350.
15 Dewey, CF Jr
, et al.
The dynamic response of vascular endothelial cells to fluid shear stress. J Biomech Eng 1981, 103: 177–185.
16 Hahn, C, Schwartz, MA. Mechanotransduction in vascular physiology and atherogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10: 53–62.
17 Barakat, AI. Responsiveness of vascular endothelium to shear stress: potential role of ion channels and cellular cytoskeleton (review). Int J Mol Med 1999, 4: 323–332.
18 Barbee, KA, et al.
Subcellular distribution of shear stress at the surface of flow‐aligned and nonaligned endothelial monolayers. Am J Physiol 1995, 268: H1765–H1772.
19 Lehoux, S, Tedgui, A. All strain, no gain: stretch keeps proliferation at bay via the NF‐kappaB response gene iex‐1. Circ Res 2003, 93: 1139–1141.
20 Lehoux, S, Tedgui, A. Cellular mechanics and gene expression in blood vessels. J Biomech 2003, 36: 631–643.
21 Kassab, GS. “Bert” Fung: the father of modern biomechanics. Mech Chem Biosyst 2004, 1: 5–22.
22 Kumar, S, Weaver, VM. Mechanics, malignancy, and metastasis: the force journey of a tumor cell. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2009, 28: 113–127.
23 Discher, D, et al.
Biomechanics: cell research and applications for the next decade. Ann Biomed Eng 2009, 37: 847–859.
24 Fernandez‐Gonzalez, R, Zallen, JA. Epithelial organization: may the force be with you. Curr Biol 2008, 18: R163–R165.
25 Huveneers, S, Danen, EH. Adhesion signaling—crosstalk between integrins, Src and Rho. J Cell Sci 2009, 122: 1059–1069.
26 Lindberg, U, et al.
The microfilament system and malignancy. Semin Cancer Biol 2008, 18: 2–11.
27 Jimènez‐Baranda, S, et al.
Filamin‐A regulates actin‐dependent clustering of HIV receptors. Nat Cell Biol 2007, 9: 838–846.
28 Bateman, J, et al.
The receptor tyrosine phosphatase Dlar and integrins organize actin filaments in the Drosophila follicular epithelium. Curr Biol 2001, 11: 1317–1327.
29 Deng, WM, et al.
Dystroglycan is required for polarizing the epithelial cells and the oocyte in Drosophila. Development 2003, 130: 173–184.
30 Frydman, HM, Spradling, AC. The receptor‐like tyrosine phosphatase lar is required for epithelial planar polarity and for axis determination within drosophila ovarian follicles. Development 2001, 128: 3209–3220.
31 Gutzeit, HO. The microfilament pattern in the somatic follicle cells of mid‐vitellogenic ovarian follicles of Drosophila. Euro J Cell Bio 1990, 53: 349–356.
32 Gimbrone, MA, et al.
Endothelial dysfunction, hemodynamic forces, and atherogenesis. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2000, 902: 230–239; discussion 239–40.
33 Haga, JH, Li, YS, Chien, S. Molecular basis of the effects of mechanical stretch on vascular smooth muscle cells. J Biomech 2007, 40: 947–960.
34 Jaalouk, DE, Lammerding, J. Mechanotransduction gone awry. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10: 63–73.
35 Lammerding, J, Kamm, RD, Lee, RT. Mechanotransduction in cardiac myocytes. Ann N Y Acad Sci 2004, 1015: 53–70.
36 Li, YS, Haga, JH, Chien, S. Molecular basis of the effects of shear stress on vascular endothelial cells. J Biomech 2005, 38: 1949–1971.
37 Davies, PF. Flow‐mediated endothelial mechanotransduction. Physiol Rev 1995, 75: 519–560.
38 Dai, G, et al.
Distinct endothelial phenotypes evoked by arterial waveforms derived from atherosclerosis‐susceptible and ‐resistant regions of human vasculature. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2004, 101: 14871–14876.
39 Mack, PJ, et al.
Force‐induced focal adhesion translocation: effects of force amplitude and frequency. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2004, 287: C954–C962.
40 Boussel, L, et al.
Aneurysm growth occurs at region of low wall shear stress: patient‐specific correlation of hemodynamics and growth in a longitudinal study. Stroke 2008, 39: 2997–3002.
41 Mofrad, MRK, et al.
Characterization of the atherosclerotic carotid bifurcation using MRI, finite element modeling, and histology. Ann Biomed Eng 2004, 32: 932–946.
42 Tzima, E, et al.
Activation of Rac1 by shear stress in endothelial cells mediates both cytoskeletal reorganization and effects on gene expression. EMBO J 2002, 21: 6791–6800.
43 Wang, N, Tytell, JD, Ingber, DE. Mechanotransduction at a distance: mechanically coupling the extracellular matrix with the nucleus. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2009, 10: 75–82.
44 Santos, A, Bakker, AD, Klein‐Nulend, J. The role of osteocytes in bone mechanotransduction. Osteoporos Int 2009, 20: 1027–1031.
45 Holt, JR, Corey, DP. Two mechanisms for transducer adaptation in vertebrate hair cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2000, 97: 11730–11735.
46 Hamill, OP. Twenty odd years of stretch‐sensitive channels. Pflugers Arch 2006, 453: 333–351.
47 Ninio, DM, Saint, DA. The role of stretch‐activated channels in atrial fibrillation and the impact of intracellular acidosis. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2008, 97: 401–416.
48 Suchyna, TM, Sachs, F. Mechanosensitive channel properties and membrane mechanics in mouse dystrophic myotubes. J Physiol 2007, 581: 369–387.
49 Zagorodnyuk, VP, et al.
Mechanotransduction and chemosensitivity of two major classes of bladder afferents with endings in the vicinity to the urothelium. J Physiol 2009, 587: 3523–3538.
50 Weinberg, EJ, Schoen, FJ, Mofrad, MR. A computational model of aging and calcification in the aortic heart valve. PLoS One 2009, 4: e5960.
51 Ingber, DE. Tensegrity‐based mechanosensing from macro to micro. Prog Biophys Mol Biol 2008, 97: 163–179.
52 Li, S, et al.
The role of the dynamics of focal adhesion kinase in the mechanotaxis of endothelial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2002, 99: 3546–3551.
53 Sawada, Y, Sheetz, MP. Force transduction by Triton cytoskeletons. J Cell Biol 2002, 156: 609–615.
54 Zhang, YL, Frangos, JA, Chachisvilis, M. Mechanical stimulus alters conformation of type 1 parathyroid hormone receptor in bone cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2009, 296: C1391–C1399.
55 Golji, J, Collins, R, Mofrad, MR. Molecular mechanics of the alpha‐actinin rod domain: bending, torsional, and extensional behavior. PLoS Comput Biol 2009, 5: e1000389.
56 Kolahi, KS, Mofrad, MR. Molecular mechanics of filamin`s rod domain. Biophys J 2008, 94: 1075–1083.
57 Lee, SE, et al.
Molecular dynamics study of talin‐vinculin binding. Biophys J 2008, 95: 2027–2036.
58 Katsumi, A, et al.
Integrins in mechanotransduction. J Biol Chem 2004, 279: 12001–12004.
59 Crisp, M, et al.
Coupling of the nucleus and cytoplasm: role of the LINC complex. J Cell Biol 2006, 172: 41–53.
60 Haque, F, et al.
SUN1 interacts with nuclear lamin A and cytoplasmic nesprins to provide a physical connection between the nuclear lamina and the cytoskeleton. Mol Cell Biol 2006, 26: 3738–3751.
61 Warren, DT, et al.
Nesprins: intracellular scaffolds that maintain cell architecture and coordinate cell function? Expert Rev Mol Med 2005, 7: 1–15.
62 Wolf, C, Mofrad, MR. On the octagonal structure of the nuclear pore complex: insights from coarse‐grained models. Biophys J 2008, 95: 2073–2085.
63 Lopez‐Quintero, SV, et al.
The endothelial glycocalyx mediates shear‐induced changes in hydraulic conductivity. Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol 2009, 296: H1451–H1456.
64 Tarbell, JM, Ebong, EE. The endothelial glycocalyx: a mechano‐sensor and ‐transducer. Sci Signal 2008, 1: pt8.
65 Yan, L, et al.
Knockout of ERK5 causes multiple defects in placental and embryonic development. BMC Dev Biol 2003, 3: 11.
66 Johnson, CP, et al.
Forced unfolding of proteins within cells. Science 2007, 317: 663–666.
67 Hu, S, et al.
Intracellular stress tomography reveals stress focusing and structural anisotropy in cytoskeleton of living cells. Am J Physiol Cell Physiol 2003, 285: C1082–C1090.
68 Lehenkari, PP, Horton, MA. Single integrin molecule adhesion forces in intact cells measured by atomic force microscopy. Biochem Biophy Res Commun 1999, 259: 645–650.
69 Oberhauser, AF, et al.
Stepwise unfolding of titin under force‐clamp atomic force microscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2001, 98: 468–472.
70 Schwaiger, I, et al.
A mechanical unfolding intermediate in an actin‐crosslinking protein. Nat Struct Mol Biol 2004, 11: 81–85.
71 Balaban, NQ, et al.
Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat Cell Biol 2001, 3: 466–472.
72 Geiger, B, et al.
Transmembrane crosstalk between the extracellular matrix–cytoskeleton crosstalk. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2001, 2: 793–805.
73 Montgomery, W. The politics of evolution. Morphology, medicine, and reform in radical London. Adrian Desmond. University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1990. x, 503 pp., illus. $34.95. Science and its conceptual foundations. Science 1990, 248: 883–884.
74 Marieb, EN, Hoehn, K. Anatomy and Physiologyy
. Benjamin Cummings
; 2007, 1048.
75 Leckband, D. Beyond structure: mechanism and dynamics of intercellular adhesion. Biochem Soc Trans 2008, 36: 213–220.
76 Shi, Q, Chien, YH, Leckband, D. Biophysical properties of cadherin bonds do not predict cell sorting. J Biol Chem 2008, 283: 28454–28463.
77 Lecuit, T. Adhesion remodeling underlying tissue morphogenesis. Trends Cell Biol 2005, 15: 34–42.
78 Foty, RA, Steinberg, MS. The differential adhesion hypothesis: a direct evaluation. Dev Biol 2005, 278: 255–263.
79 Steinberg, MS, Poole, TJ. Strategies for specifying form and pattern: adhesion‐guided multicellular assembly. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 1981, 295: 451–460.
80 Lecuit, T, Le Goff, L. Orchestrating size and shape during morphogenesis. Nature 2007, 450: 189–192.
81 Lecuit, T, Lenne, PF. Cell surface mechanics and the control of cell shape, tissue patterns and morphogenesis. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007, 8: 633–644.
82 Chien, YH, et al.
Two stage cadherin kinetics require multiple extracellular domains but not the cytoplasmic region. J Biol Chem 2008, 283: 1848–1856.
83 Ingber, DE. Mechanobiology and diseases of mechanotransduction. Ann Med 2003, 35: 564–577.
84 Fristrom, D. The cellular basis of epithelial morphogenesis. A review. Tissue Cell 1988, 20: 645–690.
85 Pilot, F, Lecuit, T. Compartmentalized morphogenesis in epithelia: from cell to tissue shape. Dev Dyn 2005, 232: 685–694.
86 Quintin, S, Gally, C, Labouesse, M. Epithelial morphogenesis in embryos: asymmetries, motors and brakes. Trends Genet 2008, 24: 221–230.
87 Engler, AJ, et al.
Matrix elasticity directs stem cell lineage specification. Cell 2006, 126: 677–689.
88 Engler, AJ, et al.
Extracellular matrix elasticity directs stem cell differentiation. J Musculoskelet Neuronal Interact 2007, 7: 335.
89 Ghosh, K, Ingber, DE. Micromechanical control of cell and tissue development: implications for tissue engineering. Adv Drug Deliv Rev 2007, 59: 1306–1318.
90 Zajac, AL, Discher, DE. Cell differentiation through tissue elasticity‐coupled, myosin‐driven remodeling. Curr Opin Cell Biol 2008, 20: 609–615.
91 Thakar, RG, et al.
Contractility‐dependent modulation of cell proliferation and adhesion by microscale topographical cues. Small 2008, 4: 1416–1424.
92 Solon, J, et al.
Fibroblast adaptation and stiffness matching to soft elastic substrates. Biophys J 2007, 93: 4453–4461.
93 Novaro, V, Roskelley, CD, Bissell, MJ. Collagen‐IV and laminin‐1 regulate estrogen receptor alpha expression and function in mouse mammary epithelial cells. J Cell Sci 2003, 116: 2975–2986.
94 Rønnov‐Jessen, L, Bissell, MJ. Breast cancer by proxy: can the microenvironment be both the cause and consequence? Trends Mol Med 2009, 15: 5–13.
95 Ulrich, TA, de Juan Pardo, EM, Kumar, S. The mechanical rigidity of the extracellular matrix regulates the structure, motility, and proliferation of glioma cells. Cancer Res 2009, 69: 4167–4174.
96 Tallant, C, Marrero, A, Gomis‐Ruth, FX. Matrix metalloproteinases: fold and function of their catalytic domains. Biochim Biophys Acta 2009, 15.
97 Wolf, K, Friedl, P. Mapping proteolytic cancer cell‐extracellular matrix interfaces. Clin Exp Metastasis 2009, 26: 289–298.
98 Tsang, VL, Bhatia, SN. Fabrication of three‐dimensional tissues. Adv Biochem Eng Biotechnol 2007, 103: 189–205.
99 Borenstein, JT, et al.
Microfabrication of three‐dimensional engineered scaffolds. Tissue Eng 2007, 13: 1837–1844.
100 Heidemann, SR, Buxbaum, RE. Tension as a regulator and integrator of axonal growth. Cell Motil Cytoskeleton 1990, 17: 6–10.