Rubin, Y, Hubbard, SS, eds. Hydrogeophysics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005, 523.

Binley, A, Cassiani, G, Deiana, R. Hydrogeophysics: opportunities and challenges. B Geofis Teor Appl 2010, 51:267–284.

Hubbard, SS, Linde, N. Hydrogeophysics. In: Uhlenbrook, S, ed. Treatise on Water Science, vol. 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2011, 401–434.

Hubbard, SS, Rubin, Y. Hydrogeological parameter estimation using geophysical data: a review of selected techniques. J Contam Hydrol 2000, 45:3–34.

Odoni, NA, Lane, SN. Knowledge‐theoretic models in hydrology. Prog Phys Geog 2010, 34:151–171.

Rubin, Y, Mavko, G, Harris, J. Mapping permeability in heterogeneous aquifers using hydrological and seismic data. Water Resour Res 1992, 28:1809–1816.

Linde, N, Chen, J, Kowalsky, MB, Hubbard, S. Hydrogeophysical parameter estimation approaches for field scale characterization. In: Vereecken, H, Binley, A, Cassiani, G, Revil, A, Titov, K, eds. Applied Hydrogeophysics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2006, 9–44.

Slater, L. Near surface electrical characterization of hydraulic conductivity: from petrophysical properties to aquifer geometries — a review. Surv Geophys 2007, 28:169–197.

Robinson, DA, Binley, A, Crook, N, Day‐Lewis, FD, Ferre, TPA, Grauch, VJS, Knight, R, Knoll, M, Lakshmi, V, Miller, R, et al. Advancing process‐based watershed hydrological research using near‐surface geophysics: a vision for, and review of, electrical and magnetic methods. Hydrol Process 2008, 22:3604–3635.

Revil, A, Karoulis, M, Johnson, T, Kemna, A. Review: some low‐frequency electrical methods for subsurface characterization and monitoring in hydrogeology. Hydrogeol J 2012, 20:617–658.

Menke, W. Geophysical Data Analysis: Discrete Inverse Theory Revised edition. San Diego: Academic Press; 1989, 289.

Tarantola, A. Inverse problem theory and methods for model parameter estimation. Philadelphia: SIAM; 2005, 342.

McLaughlin, D, Townley, LR. A reassessment of the groundwater inverse problem. Water Resour Res 1996, 32:1131–1161.

Carrera, J, Alcolea, A, Medina, A, Hidalgo, J, Slooten, LJ. Inverse problem in hydrogeology. Hydrogeol J 2005, 13:206–222.

Everett, ME. Near‐surface applied geophysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013, 403.

Gupta, HV, Clark, MP, Vrugt, JA, Abramowitz, G. Towards a comprehensive assessment of model structural adequacy. Water Resour Res 2012, 48:W08301.

Zimmerman, DA, de Marsily, G, Gotway, CA, Marietta, MG, Axness, CL, Beauheim, RL, Bras, RL, Carrera, J, Dagen, G, Davies, PB, et al. A comparison of seven geostatistically based inverse approaches to estimate transmissivities for modeling advective transport by groundwater flow. Water Resour Res 1998, 34:1373–1413.

Refsgaard, JC, van der Sluijs, JP, Brown, J, van der Keur, P. A framework for dealing with uncertainty due to model structure error. Adv Water Resour 2006, 29:1586–1597.

Bond, CE, Gibbs, AD, Shipton, ZK, Jones, S. What do you think this is? “Conceptual uncertainty” in geoscience interpretation. GSA Today 2007, 17:4–10.

Oreskes, N, Shrader‐Frechette, K, Belitz, K. Verification, validation, and confirmation of numerical models in the earth sciences. Science 1994, 263:641–646.

Backus, G, Gilbert, F. Uniqueness in the inversion of inaccurate gross earth data. Philos Trans R Soc Lond A 1970, 266:123–192.

Konikow, LF, Bredehoeft, JD. Groundwater models cannot be validated. Adv Water Resour 1992, 15:75–83.

Beven, K. A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. J Hydrol 2006, 320:18–36.

Kowalsky, MB, Finsterle, S, Peterson, J, Hubbard, S, Rubin, Y, Majer, E, Ward, A, Gee, G. Estimation of field‐scale soil hydraulic and dielectric parameters through joint inversion of GPR and hydrological data. Water Resour Res 2005, 41:W11425.

Caers, J. Modeling uncertainty in the earth sciences. Chichester: Wiley‐Blackwell; 2011, 246.

Maurer, H, Curtis, A, Boerner, DE. Recent advances in optimized geophysical survey design. Geophysics 2010, 75:A177–A194.

Parker, RL. The inverse problem of resistivity sounding. Geophysics 1984, 49:2143–2158.

Oldenburg, DW, Li, YG. Estimating depth of investigation in dc resistivity and IP surveys. Geophysics 1999, 64:403–416.

Constable, SC, Parker, RL, Constable, CG. Occam`s inversion — a practical algorithm for generating smooth models from electromagnetic sounding data. Geophysics 1987, 52:289–300.

Ellis, RG, Oldenburg, DW. Applied geophysical inversion. Geophys J Int 1994, 116:5–11.

Scales, JA, Snieder, R. To Bayes or not to Bayes? Geophysics 1997, 62:1045–1046.

Feyen, L, Caers, J. Quantifying geological uncertainty for flow and transport modeling in multi‐modal heterogeneous formations. Adv Water Resour 2006, 29:912–919.

Gómez‐Hernández, JJ, Wen, X‐H. To be or not to be multi‐Gaussian? A reflection on stochastic hydrogeology. Adv Water Resour 1998, 21:47–61.

Kerrou, J, Renard, P, Franssen, HJH, Lunati, I. Issues in characterizing heterogeneity and connectivity in non multiGaussian media. Adv Water Resour 2008, 31:147–159.

Kitanidis, PK. Quasi‐linear geostatistical theory for inversing. Water Resour Res 1995, 31:2411–2419.

Cardiff, M, Barrash, W, Kitanidis, PK. A field proof‐of‐concept of aquifer imaging using 3‐D transient hydraulic tomography with modular, temporarily‐emplaced equipment. Water Resour Res 2012, 48:W05531.

Hu, LY, Chugunova, T. Multiple‐point geostatistics for modeling subsurface heterogeneity: a comprehensive review. Water Resour Res 2008, 44:W11413.

Jakeman, AJ, Hornberger, GM. How much complexity is warranted in a rainfall‐runoff model. Water Resour Res 1993, 29:2637–2649.

Wu, YS, Haukwa, C, Bodvarsson, GS. A site‐scale model for fluid and heat flow in the unsaturated zone of Yucca Mountain, Nevada. J Contam Hydrol 1999, 38:185–215.

Freer, J, McDonnell, JJ, Beven, KJ, Peters, NE, Burns, DA, Hooper, RP, Aulenbach, B, Kendall, C. The role of bedrock topography on subsurface storm flow. Water Resour Res 2002, 38:1269.

Lien, M. Simultaneous joint inversion of amplitude‐versus‐offset and controlled‐source electromagnetic data by implicit representation of common parameter structure. Geophysics 2013, 78:ID15–ID27.

Schön, JH. Physical properties of rocks: fundamentals and principles of petrophysics. Oxford: Elsevier; 2004, 584.

Mavko, G, Mukerji, T, Dvorkin, J. The rock physics handbook: tools for seismic analysis of porous media. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009, 524.

Lesmes, DP, Friedman, SP. Relationships between the electrical and hydrogeological properties of rocks and soils. In: Rubin, Y, Hubbard, SS, eds. Hydrogeophysics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2005, 523.

Rücker, C, Günther, T, Spitzer, K. Three‐dimensional modeling and inversion of dc resistivity data incorporating topography–I Modeling. Geophys J Int 2006, 166:495–505.

Maurer, H, Green, AG. Potential coordinate mislocations in crosshole tomography: results from the Grimsel test site, Switzerland. Geophysics 1997, 62:1696–1709.

Cordua, KS, Nielsen, L, Looms, MC, Hansen, TM, Binley, A. Quantifying the influence of static‐like errors in least‐squares‐based inversion and sequential simulation of cross‐borehole ground penetrating radar data. J Appl Geophys 2009, 68:71–84.

Malinverno, A, Briggs, VA. Expanded uncertainty quantification in inverse problems: hierarchical Bayes and empirical Bayes. Geophysics 2004, 69:1005–1016.

Claerbout, JF, Muir, F. Robust modeling with erratic data. Geophysics 1973, 38:826–844.

Scales, JA, Tenorio, L. Prior information and uncertainty in inverse problems. Geophysics 2001, 66:389–397.

Day‐Lewis, FD, Singha, K, Binley, AM. Applying petrophysical models to radar travel time and electrical resistivity tomograms: Resolution‐dependent limitations. J Geophys Res 2005, 110:B08206.

Looms, MC, Binley, A, Jensen, KH, Nielsen, L, Hansen, TM. Identifying unsaturated hydraulic parameters using an integrated data fusion approach on cross‐borehole geophysical data. Vadose Zone J 2008, 7:238–248.

Binley, A, Beven, K. Vadose zone flow uncertainty as conditioned on geophysical data. Ground Water 2003, 41:119–127.

Farmani, MB, Kitterod, NO, Keers, H. Inverse modeling of unsaturated flow parameters using dynamic geological structure conditioned by GPR tomography. Water Resour Res 2008, 44:W08401.

Carrera, J, Martinez‐Landa, L, Perez‐Estaun, P, Vasquez‐Sune, E. Geophysics and hydrogeology: will they ever marry? Abstract H42A‐02 Presented at the 2012 Fall Meeting, AGU, San Francisco, California, 3–7 December 2012.

Jarvis, NJ, Bergström, L, Dik, PE. Modeling water and solute transport in macroporous soil. 2. Chloride breakthrough under nonsteady flow. J Soil Sci 1991, 42:71–81.

Ronayne, MJ, Gorelick, AM, Zheng, CM. Geological modeling of submeter scale heterogeneity and its influence on tracer transport in a fluvial aquifer. Water Resour Res 2010, 46:W10519.

Funtowicz, SO, Ravetz, JR. Uncertainty and quality in science for policy. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 1990, 229.

Taleb, NN. The black swan: the impact of the highly improbable. New York: Random House; 2007, 366.

Funtowicz, SO, Ravetz, JR. Science for the post‐normal age. Futures 1993, 25:739–755.

Jeffreys, H. Some tests of significance, treated by the theory of probability. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 1935, 31:203–222.

Kass, RE, Raftery, AE. Bayes factors. J Am Stat Assoc 1995, 90:773–795.

Laloy, E, Vrugt, JA. High‐dimensional posterior exploration of hydrological models using multiple‐try DREAM_{(ZS)} and high‐performance computing. Water Resour Res 2012, 48:W01526.

Berk, RA. Statistical learning from a regression perspective. New York: Springer; 2010, 358.

Khan, A, Mosegaard, K. Further constraints on the deep lunar interior. Geophys Res Lett 2005, 32:L22203.

Dettmer, J, Dosso, SE, Osler, JC. Bayesian evidence computation for model selection in non‐linear geoacoustic inference problems. J Acoust Soc Am 2010, 128:3406–3415.

Green, PJ. Reversible jump Markov chain Monte Carlo computation and Bayesian model determination. Biometrika 1995, 82:711–732.

Malinverno, A. Parsimonious Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo inversion in a nonlinear geophysical problem. Geophys J Int 2002, 151:675–688.

Bodin, T, Sambridge, M, Rawlinson, N, Arroucau, P. Transdimensional tomography with unknown data noise. Geophys J Int 2012, 189:1536–1556.

Chib, S, Jeliazkov, I. Marginal likelihood from the Metropolis‐Hastings output. J Am Stat Assoc 2001, 96:270–281.

Draper, D. Assessment and propagation of model uncertainty. J R Stat Soc [Ser B] 1995, 57:45–97.

Linde, N, Revil, A, Bolève, A, Dagès, C, Castermant, J, Suski, B, Voltz, M. Estimation of the water table throughout a catchment using self‐potential and piezometric data in a Bayesian framework. J Hydrol 2006, 334:88–98.

Irving, J, Singha, K. Stochastic inversion of tracer test and electrical geophysical data to estimate hydraulic conductivities. Water Resour Res 2010, 46:W11514.

Hinnell, AC, Ferre, TPA, Vrugt, JA, Huisman, JA, Moysey, S, Rings, J, Kowalsky, MB. Improved extraction of hydrologic information from geophysical data through coupled hydrogeophysical inversion. Water Resour Res 2010, 46:WOOD40.

Pollock, D, Cirpka, OA. Fully coupled hydrogeophysical inversion of a laboratory salt tracer experiment monitored by electrical resistivity tomography. Water Resour Res 2011, 48:W01505.

Johnson, T, Routh, PS, Clemo, T, Barrash, W, Clement, WP. Incorporating geostatistical constraints in nonlinear inversion problems. Water Resour Res 2007, 43:W10422.

Johnson, TC, Versteeg, RJ, Rockhold, M, Slater, LD, Ntargliannis, D, Greenwood, WJ, Zachara, J. Characterization of a contaminated wellfield using 3D electrical resistivity tomography implemented with geostatistical, discontinuous boundary, and known conductivity constraints. Geophysics 2012, 77:EN85–EN96.

Doetsch, J, Linde, N, Pessognelli, M, Green, AG, Günther, T. Constraining 3‐D electrical resistance tomography with GPR reflection data for improved aquifer characterization. J Appl Geophys 2012, 78:68–76.

Auken, E, Christiansen, AV. Layered and laterally constrained 2D inversion of resistivity data. Geophysics 2004, 69:752–764.

Cardiff, M, Kitanidis, PK. Bayesian inversion for facies detection: an extensible level set framework. Water Resour Res 2009, 45:W10416.

Paasche, H, Tronicke, J. Cooperative inversion of 2D geophysical data sets: a zonal approach based on fuzzy c‐means cluster analysis. Geophysics 2007, 72:A35–A39.

Eppstein, MJ, Dougherty, DE. Efficient three‐dimensional data inversion: soil characterization and moisture monitoring from cross‐well ground‐penetrating radar at a Vermont test site. Water Resour Res 1998, 34:1889–1900.

Hyndman, DW, Harris, JM, Gorelick, SM. Coupled seismic and tracer test inversion for aquifer property characterization. Water Resour Res 1994, 30:1965–1977.

Hansen, TM, Cordua, KS, Looms, MJ, Mosegaard, K. SIPPI: A Matlab toolbox for sampling the solution to inverse problems with complex prior information: Part 1–Methodology. Comput Geosci 2013, 52:470–480.

Hansen, TM, Cordua, KS, Looms, MJ, Mosegaard, K. SIPPI: A Matlab toolbox for sampling the solution to inverse problems with complex prior information: Part 2–Application to crosshole GPR tomography. Comput Geosci 2013, 52:481–492.

Irving, J, Holliger, K. Geostatistical inversion of seismic and ground‐penetrating radar reflection images: What can we actually resolve? Geophys Res Lett 2010, 37:L21306.

Day‐Lewis, FD, Chen, Y, Singha, K. Moment inference from tomograms. Geophys Res Lett 2007, 34:L22404.

Pidlisecky, A, Singha, K, Day‐Lewis, FD. A distribution‐based parameterization for improved tomographic imaging of solute plumes. Geophys J Int 2011, 187:214–224.

Laloy, E, Linde, N, Vrugt, JA. Mass conservative three‐dimensional water tracer distribution from MCMC inversion of time‐lapse GPR data. Water Resour Res 2012, 48:W01526.

Moysey, S, Singha, K, Knight, R. A framework for inferring field‐scale rock physics relationships through numerical simulation. Geophys Res Lett 2005, 32:L08304.

Singha, K, Moysey, S. Accounting for spatially variable resolution in electrical resistivity tomography through field‐scale rock‐physics relations. Geophysics 2006, 71:A25–A28.

Lochbühler, T, Pirot, G, Straubhaar, J, Linde, N. Conditioning of multiple‐point statistics facies simulations to tomographic images. *Math Geosci* In press.

Mariethoz, G, Renard, P, Straubhaar, J. The Direct Sampling method to perform multiple‐point geostatistical simulations. Water Resour Res 2010, 46:W11536.

Lochbühler, T, Doetsch, J, Brauchler, R, Linde, N. Structure‐coupled joint inversion of geophysical and hydrological data. Geophysics 2013, 78:ID1–ID14.

Gallardo, LA, Meju, MA. Joint two‐dimensional DC resistivity and seismic travel time inversion with cross‐gradient constraints. J Geophys Res 2004, 109:B03311.

Doetsch, J, Linde, N, Coscia, I, Greenhalgh, SA, Green, AG. Zonation for 3D aquifer characterization based on joint inversions of multimethod crosshole geophysical data. Geophysics 2010, 75:G53–G64.

Ernst, JR, Green, AG, Maurer, H, Holliger, K. Application of a new 2D time‐domain full‐waveform inversion scheme to crosshole radar data. Geophysics 2007, 72:J53–J64.

Dupuis, JC, Butler, KE, Kepic, AW. Seismoelectric imaging of the vadose zone of a sand aquifer. Geophysics 2007, 72:A81–A85.

Revil, A, Jardani, A. The self‐potential method: theory and applications in environmental geosciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2013, 369.

Davis, K, Li, YG, Batzle, M. Time‐lapse gravity monitoring: a systematic 4D approach with application to aquifer storage and recovery. Geophysics 2008, 73:WA61–WA69.

Lehmann‐Horn, JA, Walbrecker, JO, Hertrich, M, Langston, G, McClymont, AF, Green, AG. Imaging groundwater beneath a rugged proglacial moraine. Geophysics 2011, 76:B165–B172.

Borner, FD, Schopper, JR, Weller, A. Evaluation of transport and storage properties in the soil and groundwater zone from induced polarization measurements. Geophys Prospect 1996, 44:583–601.

Dorn, C, Linde, N, Le Borgne, T, Bour, O, De Dreuzy,, J‐R, Conditioning of stochastic 3‐D fracture networks to hydrological and geophysical data. *Adv Water Resour* 2012, 62:79–89.

Doetsch, JA, Coscia, I, Greenhalgh, S, Linde, N, Green, A, Günther, T. The borehole–fluid effect in electrical resistivity imaging. Geophysics 2010, 75:F107–F114.

Linde, N, Vrugt, JA. Distributed soil moisture from crosshole ground‐penetrating radar travel times using stochastic inversion. Vadose Zone J 2013, 12:1–16.