Bakker, K. Water: political, biopolitical, material. Soc Stud Sci 2012, 42:616–623.
Kreuger, T, Maynard, C, Carr, G, Bruns, A, Mueller, EN, Lane, SN. A transdisciplinary account of water research. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 2016, 3:369–389.
Lélé, S, Norgaard, RB. Practicing interdisciplinarity. BioScience 2005, 55:967–975.
Bracken, LJ, Oughton, EA. Interdisciplinarity within and beyond geography: introduction to Special Section. Area 2009, 41:371–373.
Oughton, EA, Bracken, LJ. Interdisciplinary research: framing and reframing. Area 2009, 41:385–394.
Guba, EG, Lincoln, YS. Competing paradigms in qualitative research. In: Denzin, NK, Lincoln, YS, eds. SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1994, 105–117.
Guba, EG, Lincoln, YS. Paradigmatic controversies, contradictions, and emerging confluences. In: Denzin, NK, Lincoln, YS, eds. SAGE Handbook of Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2005, 191–215.
Sivapalan, M, Savenije, HHG, Blöschl, G. Socio‐hydrology: a new science of people and water. Hydrol Process 2012, 26:1270–1276.
Linton, J. Is the hydrologic cycle sustainable? A historical‐geographical critique of a modern concept. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2008, 98:630–649.
Blair, P, Buytaert, W. Socio‐hydrological modelling: a review asking “why, what and how?”. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2016, 20:443–478.
Montanari, A, Young, G, Savenije, HHG, Hughes D, Wagener T, Renf LL, Koutsoyiannis D, Cudennech C, Totha E, Grimaldii S, et al. “Panta Rhei—everything flows”: change in hydrology and society—The IAHS Scientific Decade 2013–2022. Hydrol Sci J 2013, 58:1256–1275.
Vogel, RM, Lall, U, Cai, X, Rajagopalan, B, Weiskel, PK, Hooper, RP, Matalas, NC. Hydrology: the interdisciplinary science of water. Water Resour Res 2015, 51:4409–4430.
Biswas, AK. Integrated water management: some international dimensions. J Hydrol 1981, 51:369–380.
Liu, J, Dietz, T, Carpenter, SR, et al. Coupled human and natural systems. Ambio 2007, 36:639–649.
Sivapalan, M, Blöschl, G. Time scale interactions and the coevolution of humans and water. Water Resour Res 2014, 51:6988–7022.
Falkenmark, M. Water and mankind—a complex system of mutual interaction. Ambio 1977, 6:3–9.
Falkenmark, M. Society`s interaction with the water cycle: a conceptual framework for a more holistic approach. Hydrol Sci J 1997, 42:451–466.
O`Connell, PE, O`Donnell, G. Towards modelling flood protection investment as a coupled human and natural system. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2014, 18:155–171.
Liu, Y, Tian, F, Hu, H, Sivapalan, M. Socio‐hydrologic perspectives of the co‐evolution of humans and water in the Tarim River basin, Western China: the Taiji–Tire model. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2014, 18:1289–1303.
Parveen, S, Winiger, M, Schmidt, S, Nuesser, M. Irrigation in Upper Hunza: evolution of socio‐hydrological interactions in the Karakoram, northern Pakistan. Erdkunde 2015, 69:69–85.
Zhou, S, Huang, Y, Wei, Y, Wang, G. Socio‐hydrological water balance for water allocation between human and environmental purposes in catchments. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2015, 19:3715–3726.
Lu, Z, Wei, Y, Xiao, H, Zou, S, Xie, J, Ren, J, Western, A. Evolution of the human‐water relationships in the Heihe River basin in the past 2000 years. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2015, 19:2261–2273.
Troy, TJ, Pavao‐Zuckerman, M, Evans, TP. Debates—perspectives on socio‐hydrology: socio‐hydrologic modeling: tradeoffs, hypothesis testing, and validation. Water Resour Res 2015, 51:4806–4814.
Elshafei, Y, Coletti, JZ, Sivapalan, M, Hipsey, MR. A model of the socio‐hydrologic dynamics in a semiarid catchment: Isolating feedbacks in the coupled human‐hydrology system. Water Resour Res 2015, 18:2141–2166.
Di Baldassarre, G, Kooy, M, Kemerink, JS, Brandimarte, L. Towards understanding the dynamic behaviour of floodplains as human‐water systems. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2013a, 17:3235–3244.
Di Baldassarre, G, Viglione, A, Carr, G, Kuil, L, Salinas, JL, Bloeschl, G. Socio‐hydrology: conceptualising human‐flood interactions. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2013b, 17:3295–3303.
Di Baldassarre, G, Kemerink, JS, Kooy, M, Brandimarte, L. Floods and societies: the spatial distribution of water‐related disaster risk and its dynamics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 2014a, 1:133–139.
Di Baldassarre, G, Yan, K, Ferdous, R, Brandimarte, L. The interplay between human population dynamics and flooding in Bangladesh: a spatial analysis. In: Proceedings of ICWRS2014, IAHS Publ. No. 364, Bologna, Italy, 2014b, 188–191.
Di Baldassarre, G, Viglione, A, Carr, G, Kuil, L, Yan, K, Brandimarte, L, Bloeschl, G. Debates—perspectives on socio‐hydrology: capturing feedbacks between physical and social processes. Water Resour Res 2015, 51:4770–4781.
Viglione, A, Di Baldassarre, G, Brandimarte, L, Kuil, L, Carr, G, Salinas, JL, Scolobig, A, Blöschl, G. Insights from socio‐hydrology modelling on dealing with flood risk—roles of collective memory, risk‐taking attitude and trust. J Hydrol 2014, 518:71–82.
Douglas, M, Wildavsky, AB. Risk and Culture: An Essay on the Selection of Technical and Environmental Dangers. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press; 1982.
Angyal, A. The structure of wholes. Philos Sci 1939, 6:25–37.
Ablowitz, R. The theory of emergence. Philos Sci 1939, 6:1–16.
Holling, CS. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 1973, 1‐23.
Holling, CS, ed. Adaptive Environmental Assessment and Management. Chichester: Wiley; 1978.
Berkes, F, Folke, C, eds. Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1998.
Biermann, F. Earth system governance as a crosscutting theme of global change research. Glob Environ Change 2007, 17:326–337.
Lövbrand, E, Stripple, J, Wimand, B. Earth System governmentality: reflections on science in the Anthropocene. Glob Environ Change 2009, 19:7–13.
Castree, N, Adams, WM, Barry, J, et al. Changing the intellectual climate. Nat Clim Change 2014, 4:763–768.
Lövbrand, E, Beck, S, Chilvers, J, Forsyth, T, Hedrén, J, Hulme, M, Lidskog, R, Vasileiadou, E. Who speaks for the future of Earth? How critical social science can extend the conversation on the anthropocene. Glob Environ Change 2015, 32:211–218.
Turnhout, E, Waterton, C, Neves, K, Buizer, M. Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to “living with”. Conserv Lett 2013, 6:154–161.
Nganyanyuka, K, Martinez, J, Wesselink, A, Lungo, J, Georgiadou, Y. Accessing water services in Dar es Salaam: are we counting what counts? Habitat Int 2014, 44:358–366.
Walker, PA. Political ecology: where is the ecology? Prog Hum Geogr 2005, 29:73–82.
Lave, R, Wilson, MW, Barron, E, et al. Intervention: critical physical geography. Can Geogr 2014, 58:1–10.
Lave, R. Introduction to special issue on critical physical geography. Prog Phys Geogr 2015, 39:571–575.
Mukerji, C. The Material Turn, Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource. 2015, 1–13. DOI: 10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0109.
Engel‐Di, MS. Ecology, Soils, and the Left. New York: Palgrave; 2014.
Castree, N. Geography and Global Change Science: Relationships Necessary, Absent, and Possible. Geogr Res 2015, 53:1–15.
Gellert, PK. The commodity‐based approach. Nat Raw Mater Polit Econ 2004, 10:65–92.
Tadaki, M, Brierley, G, Dickson, M, Le heron, R, Salmond, J. Cultivating critical practices in physical geography. Geogr J 2015, 181:160–171.
Lane, SN, November, V, Landström, C, Whatmore, SJ. Explaining rapid transitions in the practice of flood risk management. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 2013, 103:330–342.
Lane, SN. Acting, predicting and intervening in a socio‐hydrological world. Hydrol Earth Syst Sci 2014, 18:927–952.
Lane, SN. Slow science, the geographical expedition, and critical physical geography. Can Geogr In press.
Brown, JD. Knowledge, uncertainty and physical geography: towards the development of methodologies for questioning belief. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2004, 29:367–381.
Budds, J, Sultana, F. Guest editorial: exploring political ecologies of water and development. Enviro Plan D 2013, 31:275–279.
Budds, J, Linton, J, McDonnell, R. The hydrosocial cycle. Geoforum 2014, 57:167–169.
Castree, N, Braun, B, eds. Social Nature: Theory, Practice and Politics. Oxford: Wiley; 2001.
Castree, N. The nature of produced nature: materiality and knowledge construction in Marxism. Antipode 1995, 271:12–48.
Swyngedouw, E. The city as a hybrid: on nature, society and cyborg urbanization. Cult Nat Soc 1996, 7:65–80.
Swyngedouw, E. Modernity and hybridity: nature, regeneracionismo, and the production of the Spanish waterscape, 1890–1930. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 1999, 89:443–465.
Linton, J, Budds, J. The hydrosocial cycle: defining and mobilizing a relational–dialectical approach to water. Geoforum 2014, 57:170–180.
Budds, J. Contested H2O: science, policy and politics in water resources management in Chile. Geoforum 2009, 40:418–430.
Boelens, R. Cultural politics and the hydrosocial cycle: water, power and identity in the Andean highlands. Geoforum 2015, 57:234–247.
Latour, B. Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers Through Society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1987.
Latour, B. Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor‐Network‐Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2005.
Law, J, Hassard, J, eds. Actor Network Theory and After. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999.
Pritchard, SB. From hydroimperialism to hydrocapitalism: ‘French’ hydraulics in France, North Africa, and beyond. Soc Stud Sci 2012, 42:591–615.
Zeitoun, M, Eid‐Sabbagh, K, Talhami, M, Dajani, M. Hydro‐hegemony in the Upper Jordan waterscape: control and use of the flows. Water Altern 2013, 6:86–106.
Zurita, MdeLM, Thomsen, DC, Smith, TF, Lyth, A, Preston, BL, Baum, S. Reframing water: contesting H2O within the European Union. Geoforum 2015, 65:170–178.
Bouleau, G. The co‐production of science and waterscapes: the case of the Seine and the Rhône Rivers, France. Geoforum 2015, 57:248–257.
Mollinga, PP. Canal irrigation and the hydrosocial cycle: the morphogenesis of contested water control in the Tungabhadra Left Bank Canal, South India. Geoforum 2015, 57:192–204.
Sutherland, C, Scott, D, Hordijk, M. Urban water governance for more inclusive development: a reflection on the `waterscapes` of Durban, South Africa. Eur J Dev Res 2015, 27:488–504.
Lahiri‐Dutt, K. Towards a more comprehensive understanding of rivers. In: Iyer, RR, ed. Living Rivers, Dying Rivers. New Delhi: Oxford University Press; 2015, 421–434.
Patterson, ME, Williams, DR. Paradigms and problems: the practice of social science in natural resource management. Soc Nat Resour 1998, 11:279–295.
Miller, TR, Baird, TD, Littlefield, CM, Kofinas, G, Chapin, F III, Redman, CL. Epistemological pluralism: reorganizing interdisciplinary research. Ecol Soc 2008, 13:46.
Castree, N. Geography and the new social contract for global change research. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2016, 41:328–347.
Connelly, S, Anderson, C. Studying water: reflections on the problems and possibilities of interdisciplinary working. Interdiscip Sci Rev 2007, 32:213–220.
MacMynowski, DP. Pausing at the brink of interdisciplinarity: power and knowledge at the meeting of social and biophysical science. Ecol Soc 2007, 12:20.
Freudenburg, WR, Gramling, R. Scientific expertise and natural resource decisions: social science participation on interdisciplinary scientific committees. Soc Sci Quart 2002, 83:119–136.
Schoenberger, E. Interdisciplinarity and social power. Prog Hum Geogr 2001, 25:365–382.
Pearce, W, Wesselink, A, Colebatch, H. Evidence and meaning in policy making. Evid Policy 2014, 10:161–165.
Wesselink, A, Colebatch, H, Pearce, W. Evidence‐based policy making: discourses, meanings and practices. Policy Sci 2014, 47:339–344.
Jones, P, Macdonald, N. Getting it wrong first time: building an interdisciplinary research relationship. Area 2007, 39:490–498.
Bracken, LJ, Oughton, EA. ‘What do you mean?’ The importance of language in developing interdisciplinary research. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2006, 31:371–382.
Phillips, J. How to get scientists to ignore you. Available at: https://geography.as.uky.edu/blogs/jdp/how‐get‐scientists‐ignore‐you. (Accessed November 7, 2016)
Leigh Star, S, Griesemer, JR. Institutional ecology, `translations` and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley`s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci 1989, 19:387–420.
Mollinga, PP. The rational organisation of dissent: boundary concepts, boundary objects and boundary settings in the interdisciplinary study of natural resources management. ZEF Working Paper Series No. 33. Bonn: University of Bonn; 2008.
Mollinga, PP. Boundary concepts for interdisciplinary analysis of irrigation water management in South Asia. ZEF Working Paper Series No. 64. Bonn: University of Bonn; 2010.
Boje, DM. Narrative Methods for Organizational and Communication Research. London: SAGE Publications; 2001.
Sinclair, BJ. Narrative inquiry: more than just telling stories. TESOL Quart 2002, 36:207–213.
Phillips, J. Storytelling in Earth sciences: the eight basic plots. Earth‐Sci Rev 2012, 115:153–162.
O`Sullivan, D. Complexity science and human geography. Trans Inst Br Geogr 2004, 29:282–295.
Di Baldassarre, G, Brandimarte, L, Beven, K. The seventh facet of uncertainty: wrong assumptions, unknowns and surprises in the dynamics of human–water systems. Hydrol Sci J 2016, 61:1748–1758.
Swyngedouw, E. Power, water and money: exploring the nexus. Occasional Paper No. 2006/14. United Nations Development Program, Human Development Report Office; 2006.
Srinivasan, V, Lambin, E, Gorelick, SM, Thompson, B, Rozelle, S. The nature and causes of the global water crisis: syndromes from a meta‐analysis of coupled human‐water studies. Water Resour Res 2012, 48:1–16.
Krzywinski, M, Cairo, A. Storytelling. Nat Methods 2013, 10:687.
Tadaki, M, Brierley, G, Cullum, C. River classification: theory, practice, politics. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Water 2014, 1:349–367.
Jansen, K. Implicit sociology, interdisciplinarity and systems theories in agricultural science. Soc Rural 2009, 49:172–188.
Stirling, A. "Opening up" and "closing down": power, participation, and pluralism in the social appraisal of technology. Sci Technol Hum Values 2008, 33:262–294.