This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Water
Impact Factor: 6.139

Sustainable Development Goal 6: watering down justice concerns

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) give much greater attention to environmental concerns than the Millennium Development Goals. SDG6, the water sector goal, is also more broadly framed, as it recognizes conservation needs in addition to drinking water and sanitation. However, normatively speaking, SDG6 is still framed in adequacy and sustainability terms, downplaying the goal of justice. This is a serious lacuna. Intragenerational justice is fundamental to many environmental problems, and especially to water, because water is a common‐pool, multiple‐use and unidirectionally flowing resource. Most debates in the water sector—upstream–downstream sharing, intersectoral allocations and specifically allocation to in‐stream conservation, water pollution, and even groundwater depletion—are about the ‘biophysical (in)justice’ caused by these characteristics of the resource. The debates then focus on how the outcomes may be made more equitable (within sectors) or fair (across sectors). Large interventions, such as big dams, create multiple benefits and costs across multiple users and sectors, focusing attention on procedural justice. Social inequities may add another layer, as they often correlate with biophysical injustice. While SDG6 recognizes conservation and public health needs, it fails to recognize the fundamental tension between these needs and other uses of water, and therefore the issues of equity, fairness, and/or procedural justice in allocating between them. Policy makers may be more comfortable with framing environmental problems as sustainability problems. However, researchers have contributed to this narrowing by framing environmental problems along disciplinarily fragmented lines. The idea of biophysical justice offers an interdisciplinary bridge that may help broaden the discourse. WIREs Water 2017, 4:e1224. doi: 10.1002/wat2.1224 This article is categorized under: Engineering Water > Planning Water Human Water > Rights to Water Human Water > Water Governance

Related Articles

Political ecology of water conflicts
Critical approaches to urban water governance: from critique to justice, democracy, and transdisciplinary collaboration
Water ethics on a human‐dominated planet: rationality, context and values in global governance

Browse by Topic

Human Water > Water Governance
Human Water > Rights to Water
Engineering Water > Planning Water

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts