How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Water

Impact Factor: 4.436

To plug‐in or not to plug‐in? Geomorphic analysis of rivers using the River Styles Framework in an era of big data acquisition and automation

Focus Article

Kirstie A. Fryirs, Joseph M. Wheaton, Simone Bizzi, Richard Williams, Gary J. Brierley

Published Online: Jul 22 2019

DOI: 10.1002/wat2.1372

Full article on Wiley Online Library: HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Abstract In an era of big‐data acquisition and semiautomation of geomorphic river surveys, it is timely to consider how to better integrate this into existing and widely used conceptual frameworks and approaches to analysis. We demonstrate how Stage 1 of the River Styles Framework, which entails identification and interpretation of river character and behavior, patterns and controls, can be used as a “powerboard” into which available, developing and future semiautomated tools and workflows can be plugged (or unplugged). Prospectively, such approaches will increase the efficiency and scope of analyses, providing unprecedented insights into the diversity of rivers and their morphodynamics. We appraise the role of human decision‐making in conducting expert‐manual analyses and interpretations. Genuine integration of big‐data analytics, remote‐sensing based tools for semiautomated river analysis with expert‐manual interpretations including field insights, will be an essential ingredient to fully exploit emerging computational and remote sensing technologies to advance our understanding of river systems, to translate information into knowledge, and raise the standards of practice in river science and management. This article is categorized under: Water and Life > Conservation, Management, and Awareness Water and Life >Methods Engineering Water > Planning Water Engineering Water > Sustainable Engineering of Water

Examples of geomorphic river diversity. Valley bottom margin noted as white lines. For definitions and methods see Fryirs, Wheaton, and Brierley (), Fryirs and Brierley (), and O'Brien et al. (). (a) Franklin River, Australia; (b) Rhein River, Germany; (c) Pages River, Australia; (d) Williams River, Australia; I Humboldt River, USA; (f) Squamish River, Canada; (g) Brahmaputra River, Bangladesh; (h) Nowitna River, Alaska; (i) Macquarie River, Australia; (j) Cooper Creek, Australia; (k) Wingecaribee River, Australia; (l) Mulwaree ponds, Australia. Basemaps produced with ArcGIS software by Esri. Sources: Esri, DigitalGlobe, GeoEye, earthstar Geographics, CNES/Airbus DS, USDA, USGS, AeroGRID, IGN, and the GIS user community. For approaches to identification and naming of these examples see Fryirs and Brierley ()

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

(a) Plug‐in options available to aid production of (b) stacked‐longitudinal profile plots for analysis of downstream patterns and controls on river character and behavior. The example used is the middle fork John Day, USA. (Reprinted with permission from O'Brien et al., . Copyright 2017 Taylor and Francis Online)

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Example of geomorphic change detection (GCD) output overlayed with expert‐manual interpretation of processes and types of adjustment. (a) Wheaton et al. () and (b) Williams, Rennie, Brasington, Hicks, and Vericat ()

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

(a) Plug‐in options available to aid production of (b) example outputs that can be used to characterize river types. Table provides links to, and key readings for, these available tools

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Stage 1, Step 1 of the River Styles Framework as a powerboard into which semiautomated tools for analysis can be plugged or unplugged (denoted by the yellow shading with three‐point power socket) where data and technology are available for tool development (blue shading), and where an expert‐manual approach is still needed (green shading). Note: relative proportions of color in each box are not significant. (a) From Brierley and Fryirs () and Fryirs and Brierley (). (b) V‐BET, valley‐bottom extraction tool; VBCT, valley bottom confinement tool; FCT, fluvial corridor toolkit; API, aerial photograph interpretation; GE, Google earth; SVMc, support vector machine classifier; GUT, geomorphic unit tool; GUS, geomorphic unit survey. The category “H‐res DEM” (high‐resolution digital elevation model) includes use of LiDAR and structure from motion (SfM) as two available geomatics technologies. The category “satellite” refers to both planimetric imagery and derived DEMs. Table provides links to, and key readings for, these available tools

[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

References

Bakker,, M., & Lane,, S. N. (2017). Archival photogrammetric analysis of river–floodplain systems using structure from motion (SfM) methods. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42(8), 1274–1286. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4085
Bangen,, S. G., Wheaton,, J. M., Bouwes,, N., Bouwes,, B., & Jordan,, C. (2014). A methodological intercomparison of topographic survey techniques for characterizing wadeable streams and rivers. Geomorphology, 206, 343–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.10.010
Belletti,, B., Rinaldi,, M., Buijse,, A. D., Gurnell,, A. M., & Mosselman,, E. (2015). A review of assessment methods for river hydromorphology. Environmental Earth Sciences, 73(5), 2079–2100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12665-014-3558-1
Belletti,, B., Rinaldi,, M., Bussettini,, M., Comiti,, F., Gurnell,, A. M., Mao,, L., … Vezza,, P. (2017). Characterising physical habitats and fluvial hydromorphology: A new system for the survey and classification of river geomorphic units. Geomorphology, 283, 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.01.032
Benda,, L., Miller,, D., Barquin,, J., McCleary,, R., Cai,, T., & Ji,, Y. (2016). Building virtual watersheds: A global opportunity to strengthen resource management and conservation. Environmental Management, 57(3), 722–739. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-015-0634-6
Beyer,, H. L. (2012). Geospatial modelling environment (version 0.7. 2.1). Spatial Ecology, LLC. Retrieved from http://www.spatialecology.com/gme
Bizzi,, S., Demarchi,, L., Grabowski,, R. C., Weissteiner,, C. J., & Van de Bund,, W. (2016). The use of remote sensing to characterise hydromorphological properties of European rivers. Aquatic Sciences, 78(1), 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-015-0430-7
Bizzi,, S., & Lerner,, D. N. (2015). The use of stream power as an indicator of channel sensitivity to erosion and deposition processes. River Research and Applications, 31(1), 16–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.2717
Bizzi,, S., Piégay,, H., Demarchi,, L., Van de Bund,, W., Weissteiner,, C. J., & Gob,, F. (2018). LiDAR‐based fluvial remote sensing to assess 50–100‐year human‐driven channel changes at a regional level: The case of the Piedmont region, Italy. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 44, 471–489. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4509
Brasington,, J., Vericat,, D., & Rychkov,, I. (2012). Modelling river bed morphology, roughness andsurface sedimentology using high resolution terrestrial laser scanning. Water Resources Research, 48: W11519. https://doi.org/10.1029/2012WR012223
Brierley,, G., & Fryirs,, K. (2009). Don`t fight the site: Three geomorphic considerations in catchment‐scale river rehabilitation planning. Environmental Management, 43(6), 1201–1218. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00267-008-9266-4
Brierley,, G., Fryirs,, K., Cook,, N., Outhet,, D., Raine,, A., Parsons,, L., & Healey,, M. (2011). Geomorphology in action: Linking policy with on‐the‐ground actions through applications of the River Styles Framework. Applied Geography, 31(3), 1132–1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2011.03.002
Brierley,, G., Fryirs,, K., Cullum,, C., Tadaki,, M., Huang,, H. Q., & Blue,, B. (2013). Reading the landscape: Integrating the theory and practice of geomorphology to develop place‐based understandings of river systems. Progress in Physical Geography, 37(5), 601–621. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133313490007
Brierley,, G. J. (2019). Finding the voice of the river: Beyond management and restoration. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Brierley,, G. J., & Fryirs,, K. A. (2005). Geomorphology and river management: Applications of the River Styles Framework. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publications.
Brierley,, G. J., & Fryirs,, K. A. (Eds.). (2008). River futures: An integrative scientific approach to river repair. Washington, DC: Island Press.
Buscombe,, D. (2013). Transferable wavelet method for grain‐size distribution from images of sediment surfaces and thin sections, and other natural granular patterns. Sedimentology, 60, 1709–1732. https://doi.org/10.1111/sed.12049
Cantelli,, A., Lauer,, W., Marr,, J., McElroy,, B., & Parker,, G. (2019). Data repository. USA. Retrieved from: National Center for Earth Surface Dynamics. National Science Foundation Science and Technology Center, University of Minnesota Supercomputer Institute. https://repository.nced.umn.edu/browser.php?current=author%26author=37%26dataset_id=15
Carbonneau,, P., Fonstad,, M. A., Marcus,, W. A., & Dugdale,, S. J. (2012). Making riverscapes real. Geomorphology, 137(1), 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2010.09.030
Carbonneau,, P. E., Bizzi,, S., & Marchetti,, G. (2018). Robotic photosieving from low‐cost multirotor sUAS: A proof‐of‐concept. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 43(5), 1160–1166. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4298
Carbonneau,, P. E., Lane,, S. N., & Bergeron,, N. E. (2004). Catchment‐scale mapping of surface grain size in gravel bed rivers using airborne digital imagery. Water Resources Research, 40(7), W07202. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002759
Church,, M. (1992). Channel morphology and typology. In P. Calow, & G. E. Petts, (Eds.), The rivers handbook. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
Clubb,, F. J., Mudd,, S. M., Milodowski,, D. T., Valters,, D. A., Slater,, L. J., Hurst,, M. D., & Limaye,, A. B. (2017). Geomorphometric delineation of floodplains and terraces from objectively defined topographic thresholds. Earth Surface Dynamics, 5(3), 369–385. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-5-369-2017
Connor‐Streich,, G., Henshaw,, A. J., Brasington,, J., Bertoldi,, W., & Harvey,, G. L. (2018). Let`s get connected: A new graph theory‐based approach and toolbox for understanding braided river morphodynamics. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 5(5), e1296. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1296
Croke,, J., Fryirs,, K., & Thompson,, C. (2016). Defining the floodplain in hydrologically‐variable settings: Implications for flood risk management. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 41, 2153–2164. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4014
Cullum,, C., Brierley,, G., Perry,, G. L., & Witkowski,, E. T. (2017). Landscape archetypes for ecological classification and mapping: The virtue of vagueness. Progress in Physical Geography, 41(1), 95–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0309133316671103
Czuba,, J. A., & Foufoula‐Georgiou,, E. (2014). A network‐based framework for identifying potential synchronizations and amplifications of sediment delivery in river basins. Water Resources Research, 50(5), 3826–3851. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013WR014227
Czuba,, J. A., & Foufoula‐Georgiou,, E. (2015). Dynamic connectivity in a fluvial network for identifying hotspots of geomorphic change. Water Resources Research, 51(3), 1401–1421. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016139
Czuba,, J. A., Foufoula‐Georgiou,, E., Gran,, K. B., Belmont,, P., & Wilcock,, P. R. (2017). Interplay between spatially explicit sediment sourcing, hierarchical river‐network structure, and in‐channel bed material sediment transport and storage dynamics. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 122(5), 1090–1120. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF003965
Demarchi,, L., Bizzi,, S., & Piégay,, H. (2016). Hierarchical object‐based mapping of riverscape units and in‐stream mesohabitats using LiDAR and VHR imagery. Remote Sensing, 8(2), 97. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs8020097
Demarchi,, L., Bizzi,, S., & Piégay,, H. (2017). Regional hydromorphological characterization with continuous and automated remote sensing analysis based on VHR imagery and low‐resolution LiDAR data. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42(3), 531–551. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4092
Detert,, M., & Weitbrecht,, V. (2013). User guide to gravelometric image analysis by BASEGRAIN. In S. Fukuoka,, H. Nakagawa,, T. Sumi,, & H. Zhang, (Eds.), Advances in science and research. London, UK: Taylor %26 Francis.
Dietrich,, J. T. (2016). Riverscape mapping with helicopter‐based structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry. Geomorphology, 252, 144–157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.008
Dingle,, E. H., Paringit,, E. C., Totentino,, P. L. M., Williams,, R. D., Hoey,, T. B., Barrett,, B., … Stott,, E. (2019). Decadal‐scale morphological adjustment of a lowland tropical river. Geomorphology, 333, 30–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2019.01.022
Downs,, P. W., Dusterhoff,, S. R., Leverich,, G. T., Soar,, P. J., & Napolitano,, M. B. (2018). Fluvial system dynamics derived from distributed sediment budgets: Perspectives from an uncertainty‐bounded application. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 43(6), 1335–1354. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4319
Egozi,, R., & Ashmore,, P. (2008). Defining and measuring braiding intensity. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 33(14), 2121–2138. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1658
Fisher,, G. B., Bookhagen,, B., & Amos,, C. B. (2013). Channel planform geometry and slopes from freely available high‐spatial resolution imagery and DEM fusion: Implications for channel width scalings, erosion proxies, and fluvial signatures in tectonically active landscapes. Geomorphology, 194, 46–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.04.011
Frings,, R.,. M., & Ten Brinke,, W. B. M. (2018). Ten reasons to set up sediment budgets for river management. International Journal of River Basin Management, 16, 35–40. https://doi.org/10.1080/15715124.2017.1345916
Frodeman,, R. (1995). Geological reasoning: Geology as an interpretive and historical science. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 107(8), 960–968. https://doi.org/10.1130/0016-7606(1995)107%3C0960:GRGAAI%3E2.3.CO;2
Fryirs,, K. (2013). (Dis)connectivity in catchment sediment cascades: A fresh look at the sediment delivery problem. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 38, 30–46. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3242
Fryirs,, K. (2015). Developing and using geomorphic condition assessments for river rehabilitation planning, implementation and monitoring. WIREsWater, 2(6), 649–667. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1100
Fryirs,, K., & Brierley,, G. J. (2001). Variability in sediment delivery and storage along river courses in Bega catchment, NSW, Australia: Implications for geomorphic river recovery. Geomorphology, 38(3–4), 237–265. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(00)00093-3
Fryirs,, K., Spink,, A., & Brierley,, G. (2009). Post‐European settlement response gradients of river sensitivity and recoveryacross the upper Hunter catchment, Australia. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 34, 897–918.
Fryirs,, K., & Brierley,, G. J. (2010). Antecedent controls on river character and behaviour in partly confined valley settings: Upper hunter catchment, NSW, Australia. Geomorphology, 117(1–2), 106–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2009.11.015
Fryirs,, K., & Brierley,, G. J. (2016). Assessing the geomorphic recovery potential of rivers: Forecasting future trajectories of adjustment for use in river management. WIREsWater, 3, 727–748. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1158
Fryirs,, K., Brierley,, G. J., & Erskine,, W. D. (2012). Use of ergodic reasoning to reconstruct the historical range of variability and evolutionary trajectory of rivers. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 37(7), 763–773. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3210
Fryirs,, K. A., & Brierley,, G. J. (2013). Geomorphic analysis of river systems: An approach to Reading the landscape. Chichester, UK: John Wiley and Sons.
Fryirs,, K. A., & Brierley,, G. J. (2018). What`s in a name? A naming convention for geomorphic river types using the River Styles Framework. PLoS One, 13(9), e0201909. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0201909
Fryirs,, K. A., Brierley,, G. J., Preston,, N. J., & Kasai,, M. (2007). Buffers, barriers and blankets: The (dis) connectivity of catchment‐scale sediment cascades. Catena, 70(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2006.07.007
Fryirs,, K. A., Ralph,, T. J., Larkin,, Z. T., Tooth,, S., Humphries,, M., McCarthy,, T., … Mosimanyana,, E. (2018). A nested hierarchical perspective to enhance interpretations and communication in fluvial geomorphology for use in water resources management: Lessons from the Okavango Delta, Botswana. The Geographical Journal, 184, 192–207. https://doi.org/10.1111/geoj.12250
Fryirs,, K. A., Wheaton,, J. M., & Brierley,, G. J. (2016). An approach for measuring confinement and assessing the influence of valley setting on river forms and processes. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 41(5), 701–710. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3893
Gilbert,, J. T., Macfarlane,, W. W., & Wheaton,, J. M. (2016). The valley bottom extraction tool (V‐BET): A GIS tool for delineating valley bottoms across entire drainage networks. Computers %26 Geosciences, 97, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2016.07.014
Gorelick,, N., Hancher,, M., Dixon,, M., Ilyushchenko,, S., Thau,, D., & Moore,, R. (2017). Google earth engine: Planetary‐scale geospatial analysis for everyone. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 18–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.06.031
Grabowski,, R. C., Surian,, N., & Gurnell,, A. M. (2014). Characterizing geomorphological change to support sustainable river restoration and management. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 1(5), 483–512. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1037
Graham,, D. J., Rice,, S. P., & Reid,, I. (2005). A transferable method for the automated grain sizing of river gravels. Water Resources Research, 41, W07020. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004wr003868
Gurnell,, A. M., Rinaldi,, M., Belletti,, B., Bizzi,, S., Blamauer,, B., Braca,, G., … Demarchi,, L. (2016). A multi‐scale hierarchical framework for developing understanding of river behaviour to support river management. Aquatic Sciences, 78(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00027-015-0424-5
Hawley,, R. J. (2018). Making stream restoration more sustainable: A geomorphically, ecologically, and socioeconomically principled approach to bridge the practice with the science. Bioscience, 68(7), 517–528. https://doi.org/10.1093/biosci/biy048
Heckmann,, T., & Schwanghart,, W. (2013). Geomorphic coupling and sediment connectivity in an alpine catchment—Exploring sediment cascades using graph theory. Geomorphology, 182, 89–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2012.10.033
Hiers,, J. K., Jackson,, S. T., Hobbs,, R. J., Bernhardt,, E. S., & Valentine,, L. E. (2016). The precision problem in conservation and restoration. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 31(11), 820–830. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2016.08.001
Horton,, A. J., Constantine,, J. A., Hales,, T. C., Goossens,, B., Bruford,, M. W., & Lazarus,, E. D. (2017). Modification of river meandering by tropical deforestation. Geology, 45(6), 511–514. https://doi.org/10.1130/G38740.1
Isikdogan,, F., Bovik,, A., & Passalacqua,, P. (2017). RivaMap: An automated river analysis and mapping engine. Remote Sensing of Environment, 202, 88–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2017.03.044
Jain,, V., Fryirs,, K., & Brierley,, G. (2008). Where do floodplains begin? The role of total stream power and longitudinal profile form on floodplain initiation processes. Geological Society of America Bulletin, 120, 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.08.012
Jones,, A. F., Brewer,, P. A., Johnstone,, E., & Macklin,, M. G. (2007). High‐resolution interpretative geomorphological mapping of river valley environments using airborne LiDAR data. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 32(10), 1574–1592. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1505
Jungwirth,, M., Muhar,, S., & Schmutz,, S. (2002). Re‐establishing and assessing ecological integrity in riverine landscapes. Freshwater Biology, 47(4), 867–887. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00914.x
Kasprak,, A., Hough‐Snee,, N., Beechie,, T., Bouwes,, N., Brierley,, G., Camp,, R., … Rosgen,, D. (2016). The blurred line between form and process: A comparison of stream channel classification frameworks. PLoS One, 11(3), e0150293. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0150293
Lammers,, R. W., & Bledsoe,, B. P. (2018). A network scale, intermediate complexity model for simulating channel evolution over years to decades. Journal of Hydrology, 566, 886–900. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2018.09.036
Leduc,, P., Peirce,, S., & Ashmore,, P. (2019). Challenges and applications of structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry in a physical model of a braided river. Earth Surface Dynamics, 7(1), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.5194/esurf-7-97-2019
Legg,, N. T., Heimburg,, C., Collins,, B. D., & Olson,, P. L. (2014). The channel migration toolbox: ArcGIS tools for measuring stream. Retrieved from https://fortress.wa.gov/ecy/publications/documents/1406032.pdf
Macfarlane,, W. W., Gilbert,, J. T., Jensen,, M. L., Gilbert,, J. D., Hough‐Snee,, N., McHugh,, P. A., … Bennett,, S. N. (2017). Riparian vegetation as an indicator of riparian condition: Detecting departures from historic condition across the north American west. Journal of Environmental Management, 202(2), 447–460. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.10.054
Macfarlane,, W. W., Wheaton,, J. M., Bouwes,, N., Jensen,, M. L., Gilbert,, J. T., Hough‐Snee,, N., & Shivik,, J. A. (2017). Modeling the capacity of riverscapes to support beaver dams. Geomorphology, 27, 72–99. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.11.019
Marçal,, M., Brierley,, G., & Lima,, R. (2017). Using geomorphic understanding of catchment‐scale process relationships to support the management of river futures: Macaé Basin, Brazil. Applied Geography, 84, 23–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2017.04.008
Marcus,, W. A., & Fonstad,, M. A. (2010). Remote sensing of rivers: The emergence of a subdiscipline in the river sciences. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35(15), 1867–1872. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.2094
Marcus,, W. A., Legleiter,, C. J., Aspinall,, R. J., Boardman,, J. W., & Crabtree,, R. L. (2003). High spatial resolution hyperspectral mapping of in‐stream habitats, depths, and woody debris in mountain streams. Geomorphology, 55(1–4), 363–380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-555X(03)00150-8
Marra,, W. A., Kleinhans,, M. G., & Addink,, E. A. (2014). Network concepts to describe channel importance and change in multichannel systems: Test results for the Jamuna River, Bangladesh. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 39(6), 766–778. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3482
Marteau,, B., Vericat,, D., Gibbins,, C., Batalla,, R. J., & Green,, D. R. (2017). Application of structure‐from‐motion photogrammetry to river restoration. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42(3), 503–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4086
Monegaglia,, F., Zolezzi,, G., Güneralp,, I., Henshaw,, A. J., & Tubino,, M. (2018). Automated extraction of meandering river morphodynamics from multitemporal remotely sensed data. Environmental Modelling %26 Software, 105, 171–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.03.028
O`Brien,, G., Wheaton,, J. M., Fryirs,, K., Macfarlane,, W., Brierley, G., Whitehead, K., … Volk,, C. (2019). Modelling valley bottom confinement at the network scale. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 44, 1828–1845. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4615
O`Brien,, G. R., Wheaton,, J., Fryirs,, K., McHugh,, P., Bouwes,, N., Brierley,, G., & Jordan,, C. (2017). A geomorphic assessment to inform strategic stream restoration planning in the middle fork John Day watershed, Oregon, USA. Journal of Maps, 13(2), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.1080/17445647.2017.1313787
Passalacqua,, P., Belmont,, P., Staley,, D., Simley,, J., Arrowsmith,, J. R., Bodee,, C., … Wheaton,, J. (2015). Analyzing high resolution topography for advancing the understanding of mass and energy transfer through landscapes: A review. Earth Science Reviews, 148, 174–193. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.earscirev.2015.05.012
Pasternack,, G. B., & Wyrick,, J. R. (2017). Flood‐driven topographic changes in a gravel‐cobble river over segment, reach, and morphological unit scales. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42(3), 487–502. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4064
Pavelsky,, T. M., & Smith,, L. C. (2008). RivWidth: A software tool for the calculation of river widths from remotely sensed imagery. IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, 5(1), 70–73. https://doi.org/10.1109/LGRS.2007.908305
Pearson,, E., Smith,, M. W., Klaar,, M. J., & Brown,, L. E. (2017). Can high resolution 3D topographic surveys provide reliable grain size estimates in gravel bed rivers? Geomorphology, 293, 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.05.015
Phillips,, J. D. (2007). The perfect landscape. Geomorphology, 84(3–4), 159–169. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2006.01.039
Piégay,, H., Darby,, S. E., Mosselman,, E., & Surian,, N. (2005). A review of techniques available for delimiting the erodible corridor: A sustainable approach to managing bank erosion. River Research Applications, 21, 773–789. https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.881
Reid,, H. E., Williams,, R. D., Brierley,, G. J., Coleman,, S. E., Lamb,, R., Rennie,, C. D., & Tancock,, M. J. (2019). Geomorphological effectiveness of floods to reworkgravel bars: Insight from hyperscale topography and hydraulic modelling. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 44: 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4521
Rinaldi,, M., Belletti,, B., Bussettini,, M., Comiti,, F., Golfieri,, B., Lastoria,, B., … Surian,, N. (2017). New tools for the hydromorphological assessment and monitoring of European streams. Journal of Environmental Management, 202, 363–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.11.036
Rinaldi,, M., Surian,, N., Comiti,, F., & Bussettini,, M. (2015). A methodological framework for hydromorphological assessment, analysis and monitoring (IDRAIM) aimed at promoting integrated river management. Geomorphology, 251, 122–136. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.05.010
Rivas Casado,, M., González,, R., Ortega,, J., Leinster,, P., & Wright,, R. (2017). Towards a transferable UAV‐based framework for river hydromorphological characterization. Sensors, 17(10), 2210. https://doi.org/10.3390/s17102210
Roux,, C., Alber,, A., Bertrand,, M., Vaudor,, L., & Piégay,, H. (2015). “FluvialCorridor”: A new ArcGIS toolbox package for multiscale riverscape exploration. Geomorphology, 242, 29–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2014.04.018
Rowland,, J. C., Shelef,, E., Pope,, P. A., Muss,, J., Gangodagamage,, C., Brumby,, S. P., & Wilson,, C. J. (2016). A morphology independent methodology for quantifying planview river change and characteristics from remotely sensed imagery. Remote Sensing of Environment, 184, 212–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2016.07.005
Rubin,, D. M. (2004). A simple autocorrelation algorithm for determining grain size from digital images of sediment. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 74(1), 160–165. https://doi.org/10.1306/052203740160
Schaffrath,, K. R., Belmont,, P., & Wheaton,, J. M. (2015). Landscape‐scale geomorphic change detection: Quantifying spatially variable uncertainty and circumventing legacy data issues. Geomorphology, 250, 334–348. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.09.020
Schmitt,, R. J., Bizzi,, S., & Castelletti,, A. (2016). Tracking multiple sediment cascades at the river network scale identifies controls and emerging patterns of sediment connectivity. Water Resources Research, 52(5), 3941–3965. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018097
Schmitt,, R. J., Bizzi,, S., Castelletti,, A. F., & Kondolf,, G. M. (2018a). Stochastic modeling of sediment connectivity for reconstructing sand fluxes and origins in the unmonitored se Kong, se san, and Sre Pok tributaries of the Mekong River. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 123(1), 2–25. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF004105
Schmitt,, R. J. P., Bizzi,, S., Castelletti,, A., & Kondolf,, G. M. (2018b). Improved trade‐offs of hydropower and sand connectivity by strategic dam planning in the Mekong. Nature Sustainability, 1(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0022-3
Schmitt,, R. J. P., Rubin,, Z., & Kondolf,, G. M. (2017). Losing ground‐scenarios of land loss as consequence of shifting sediment budgets in the Mekong Delta. Geomorphology, 294, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.04.029
Schumm,, S. A. (1977). The fluvial system. New York, NY: John Wiley and Sons.
Schwenk,, J., Khandelwal,, A., Fratkin,, M., Kumar,, V., & Foufoula‐Georgiou,, E. (2017). High spatiotemporal resolution of river planform dynamics from Landsat: The RivMAP toolbox and results from the Ucayali River. Earth and Space Science, 4(2), 46–75. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016EA000196
Shean,, D. E., Alexandrov,, O., Moratto,, Z. M., Smith,, B. E., Joughin,, I. R., Porter,, C., & Morin,, P. (2016). An automated, open‐source pipeline for mass production of digital elevation models (DEMs) from very‐high‐resolution commercial stereo satellite imagery. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 116, 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2016.03.012
Sinha,, R., Mohanta,, H. A. R. I. D. A. S., Jain,, V., & Tandon,, S. K. (2017). Geomorphic diversity as a river management tool and its application to the Ganga River, India. River and Research Applications, 33, 1157–1176.
Smith,, L. C., & Pavelsky,, T. M. (2008). Estimation of river discharge, propagation speed, and hydraulic geometry from space: Lena River, Siberia. Water Resources Research, 44(3), W03427. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006133
Spiekermann,, R., Betts,, H., Dymond,, J., & Basher,, L. (2017). Volumetric measurement of river bank erosion from sequential historical aerial photography. Geomorphology, 296, 193–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.08.047
Stout,, J. C., & Belmont,, P. (2014). TerEx toolbox for semi‐automated selection of fluvial terrace and floodplain features from lidar. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 39(5), 569–580. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3464
Stout,, J. C., Belmont,, P., Schottler,, S. P., & Willenbring,, J. K. (2014). Identifying sediment sources and sinks in the root river, southeastern Minnesota. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 104(1), 20–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/00045608.2013.843434
Suizu,, T. M., & Nanson,, G. C. (2018). Temporal and spatial adjustments of channel migration and planform geometry: Responses to ENSO driven climate anomalies on the tropical freely‐meandering Aguapeí River, São Paulo, Brazil. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 43(8), 1636–1647. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4343
Tooth,, S. (2006). Virtual globes: A catalyst for the re‐enchantment of geomorphology? Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 31(9), 1192–1194. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1383
Tunnicliffe,, J., Brierley,, G., Fuller,, I. C., Leenman,, A., Marden,, M., & Peacock,, D. (2018). Reaction and relaxation in a coarse‐grained fluvial system following catchment‐wide disturbance. Geomorphology, 307, 50–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2017.11.006
Vaughan,, A. A., Belmont,, P., Hawkins,, C. P., & Wilcock,, P. (2017). Near‐channel versus watershed controls on sediment rating curves. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 122(10), 1901–1923. https://doi.org/10.1002/2016JF004180
Verdú,, J. M., Batalla,, R. J., & Martínez‐Casasnovas,, J. A. (2005). High‐resolution grain‐size characterisation of gravel bars using imagery analysis and geo‐statistics. Geomorphology, 72(1–4), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2005.04.015
Weber,, C., Aberg,, U., Buijse,, A. D., Hughes,, F. M., McKie,, B. G., Piégay,, H., … Haertel‐Borer,, S. (2018). Goals and principles for programmatic river restoration monitoring and evaluation: Collaborative learning across multiple projects. WIREsWater, 2(1), e1257. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1257
Wheaton,, J. M., Bennett,, S., Shahverdian,, S., & Maestas,, J. D. (Eds.). (2019). Low‐tech process‐based restoration of riverscapes: Design manual—Version 1.0. Logan, UT: Utah State University, Wheaton Ecogeomorphology and Topographic Analysis Lab. https://doi.org/10.13140/RG.2.2.15815.75680
Wheaton,, J. M., Bouwes,, N., McHugh,, P., Saunders,, W. C., Bangen,, S. G., Bailey,, P. E., & Jordan,, C. (2017). Upscaling site‐scale Ecohydraulic models to inform salmonid population‐level life cycle Modelling and restoration actions—Lessons from the Columbia River basin. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 43, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.4137
Wheaton,, J. M., Brasington,, J., Darby,, S. E., Kasprak,, A., Sear,, D., & Vericat,, D. (2013). Morphodynamic signatures of braiding mechanisms as expressed through change in sediment storage in a gravel‐bed river. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 118(2), 759–779. https://doi.org/10.1002/jgrf.20060
Wheaton,, J. M., Brasington,, J., Darby,, S. E., & Sear,, D. A. (2010). Accounting for uncertainty in DEMs from repeat topographic surveys: Improved sediment budgets. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 35(2), 136–156. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.1886
Wheaton,, J. M., Fryirs,, K. A., Brierley,, G., Bangen,, S. G., Bouwes,, N., & O`Brien,, G. (2015). Geomorphic mapping and taxonomy of fluvial landforms. Geomorphology, 248, 273–295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2015.07.010
Wiens,, J. A. (2002). Riverine landscapes: Taking landscape ecology into the water. Freshwater Biology, 47(4), 501–515. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00887.x
Williams,, R. D., Brasington,, J., Vericat,, D., & Hicks,, D. M. (2014). Hyperscale terrain modelling of braided rivers: Fusing mobile terrestrial laser scanning and optical bathymetric mapping. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 39(2), 167–183. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3437
Williams,, R. D., Measures,, R., Hicks,, D. M., & Brasington,, J. (2016). Assessment of a numerical model to reproduce event‐scale erosion and deposition distributions in a braided river. Water Resources Research, 52, 6621–6642. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018491
Williams,, R. D., Rennie,, C. D., Brasington,, J., Hicks,, D. M., & Vericat,, D. (2015). Linking the spatial distribution of bed load transport to morphological change during high‐flow events in a shallow braided river. Journal of Geophysical Research: Earth Surface, 120(3), 604–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014JF003346
Wohl,, E., Lane,, S. N., & Wilcox,, A. C. (2015). The science and practice of river restoration. Water Resources Research, 51(8), 5974–5997. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014wr016874
Woodget,, A. S., Austrums,, R., Maddock,, I. P., & Habit,, E. (2017). Drones and digital photogrammetry: From classifications to continuums for monitoring river habitat and hydromorphology. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 4(4), e1222. https://doi.org/10.1002/wat2.1222
Woodget,, A. S., Carbonneau,, P. E., Visser,, F., & Maddock,, I. P. (2015). Quantifying submerged fluvial topography using hyperspatial resolution UAS imagery and structure from motion photogrammetry. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 40(1), 47–64. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3613
Wyrick,, J. R., & Pasternack,, G. B. (2016). Revealing the natural complexity of topographic change processes through repeat surveys and decision‐tree classification. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 41(6), 723–737. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3854
Wyrick,, J. R., Senter,, A. E., & Pasternack,, G. B. (2014). Revealing the natural complexity of fluvial morphology through 2D hydrodynamic delineation of river landforms. Geomorphology, 210, 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2013.12.013

Further Reading

Czuba,, J. A. (2018). A Lagrangian framework for exploring complexities of mixed‐size sediment transport in gravel‐bedded river networks. Geomorphology, 321, 146–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geomorph.2018.08.031
Fryirs,, K. A. (2017). River sensitivity: A lost foundation concept in fluvial geomorphology. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 42(1), 55–70. https://doi.org/10.1002/esp.3940
Williams,, R., Moir,, H., & Wheaton,, J. (2018). Geomorphic unit diversity in restored rivers: How important is riparian woodland? AGU Fall Meeting, Washington DC, 10–14 December 2018.

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts