This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Clim Change
Impact Factor: 6.099

In defense of the traditional null hypothesis: remarks on the Trenberth and Curry WIREs opinion articles

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Abstract In response to their respective opinion articles, I argue that Kevin Trenberth's proposal to reverse the burden of proof in attribution studies is misguided, but Judith Curry's counter proposal to abandon hypothesis tests as useless is worse still. Some observed weather events will have been made more likely by human influence on climate, some less likely, and it is a legitimate and very important field of scientific enquiry to work out which are which. The appropriate null hypothesis to use in such studies is that human influence has not increased the probability of occurrence of a particular weather event unless the evidence suggests otherwise. WIREs Clim Change 2011, 2:931–934. doi: 10.1002/wcc.145 This article is categorized under: Paleoclimates and Current Trends > Detection and Attribution Climate Models and Modeling > Knowledge Generation with Models

Related Articles

Nullifying the climate null hypothesis
Attribution of climate variations and trends to human influences and natural variability

Browse by Topic

Climate Models and Modeling > Knowledge Generation with Models
Paleoclimates and Current Trends > Detection and Attribution

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts