This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Clim Change
Impact Factor: 6.099

Is the Asia‐Pacific Partnership a viable alternative to Kyoto?

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

Abstract The Kyoto Protocol has failed: horizontally because it failed to secure commitments from important players; vertically because of the lack of delivery of outcomes among those who did accede to it. The Asia‐Pacific Partnership on Clean Development and Climate represents a useful way forward, both as a non‐treaty agreement that contains a promising non‐binding sectoral approach to minimizing emissions by seven parties accounting for more than half global emissions, and as an exercise in ‘minilateralism’ where understanding can develop among the key players. It has provided an important building block upon which to build other initiatives, such as the Major Economies Meeting of the US Bush administration and now the Major Economies Forum of the Obama administration. These arenas with 17 members offer opportunities not possible in full multilateral arenas such as Framework Convention on Climate Change, where sheer numbers simply slow processes and help produce lowest common denominator responses. Copyright © 2010 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd. This article is categorized under: Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance

Related Articles

The Asia‐Pacific Partnership: implementation challenges and interplay with Kyoto
The fragmentation of the global climate governance architecture
China's National Climate Change Program

Browse by Topic

Policy and Governance > Multilevel and Transnational Climate Change Governance

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts