This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Clim Change
Impact Factor: 7.385

Rethinking climate engineering categorization in the context of climate change mitigation and adaptation

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

The portfolio of approaches to respond to the challenges posed by anthropogenic climate change has broadened beyond mitigation and adaptation with the recent discussion of potential climate engineering options. How to define and categorize climate engineering options has been a recurring issue in both public and specialist discussions. We assert here that current definitions of mitigation, adaptation, and climate engineering are ambiguous, overlap with each other and thus contribute to confusing the discourse on how to tackle anthropogenic climate change. We propose a new and more inclusive categorization into five different classes: anthropogenic emissions reductions (AER), territorial or domestic removal of atmospheric CO2 and other greenhouse gases (D‐GGR), trans‐territorial removal of atmospheric CO2 and other greenhouse gases (T‐GGR), regional to planetary targeted climate modification (TCM), and climate change adaptation measures (including local targeted climate and environmental modification, abbreviated CCAM). Thus, we suggest that techniques for domestic greenhouse gas removal might better be thought of as forming a separate category alongside more traditional mitigation techniques that consist of emissions reductions. Local targeted climate modification can be seen as an adaptation measure as long as there are no detectable remote environmental effects. In both cases, the scale and intensity of action are essential attributes from the technological, climatic, and political viewpoints. While some of the boundaries in this revised classification depend on policy and judgement, it offers a foundation for debating on how to define and categorize climate engineering options and differentiate them from both mitigation and adaptation measures to climate change. WIREs Clim Change 2014, 5:23–35. doi: 10.1002/wcc.261 This article is categorized under: Climate, History, Society, Culture > Ideas and Knowledge Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Knowledge and Practice
Flowchart of the proposed categorization of climate change responses. Text in white boxes corresponds to policy questions; text in the green box corresponds to a legal question; text in pink boxes corresponds to questions that involve value judgements but can be informed by climate and related sciences. Yellow boxes to the right side list the five categories.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Related Articles

Engineering Global Climate

Browse by Topic

Social Status of Climate Change Knowledge > Knowledge and Practice
Climate, History, Society, Culture > Ideas and Knowledge

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts