This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Clim Change
Impact Factor: 7.385

Should there be future people? A fundamental question for climate change and intergenerational justice

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

The effects of climate change will be felt far into the future, long after currently living people have stopped existing. A popular way of understanding what this means ethically is to conceptualize the issue in terms of intergenerational justice: currently living people have duties of justice toward future generations to not wrongfully harm them, or duties to reduce the risk of violating the rights future people will have when they exist. In this article I show that this depends on assumptions about the existence, identity, and number of future people. I argue for the relevance and importance of ethically investigating these assumptions; in particular of asking: should humanity continue to exist? I argue that this ethical investigation is necessary to properly and fully understand the ethical challenges that climate change creates. WIREs Clim Change 2017, 8:e453. doi: 10.1002/wcc.453 This article is categorized under: Climate, Nature, and Ethics > Climate Change and Human Rights

Related Articles

Climate ethics and population policy
Nonanthropocentric climate ethics
From environmental to climate justice: climate change and the discourse of environmental justice

Browse by Topic

Climate, Nature, and Ethics > Climate Change and Human Rights

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts