This Title All WIREs
How to cite this WIREs title:
WIREs Comput Mol Sci
Impact Factor: 16.778

Nonlinear optical properties in open‐shell molecular systems

Full article on Wiley Online Library:   HTML PDF

Can't access this content? Tell your librarian.

For more than 30 years, nonlinear optical (NLO) properties of molecular systems have been actively studied both theoretically and experimentally due to their potential applications in photonics and optoelectronics. Most of the NLO molecular systems are closed‐shell species, while recently open‐shell molecular species have been theoretically proposed as a new class of NLO systems, which exhibit larger NLO properties than the traditional closed‐shell NLO systems. In particular, the third‐order NLO property, the second hyperpolarizability γ, was found to be strongly correlated to the diradical character y, which is a quantum‐chemically defined index of effective bond weakness or of electron correlation: the γ values are enhanced in the intermediate y region as compared to the closed‐shell (y = 0) and pure open‐shell (y = 1) domains. This principle has been exemplified by accurate quantum‐chemical calculations for polycyclic hydrocarbons including graphene nanoflakes, multinuclear transition‐metal complexes, main group compounds, and so on. Subsequently, some of these predictions have been substantiated by experiments, including two‐photon absorption. The fundamental mechanism of the y–γ correlation has been explained by using a simple two‐site model and the valence configuration interaction method. On the basis of this y–γ principle, several molecular design guidelines for controlling γ have been proposed. They consist in tuning the diradical characters through chemical modifications of realistic open‐shell singlet molecules. These results open a new path toward understanding the structure—NLO property relationships and toward realizing a new class of highly efficient NLO materials. WIREs Comput Mol Sci 2016, 6:198–210. doi: 10.1002/wcms.1242 This article is categorized under: Structure and Mechanism > Molecular Structures Structure and Mechanism > Computational Materials Science Electronic Structure Theory > Ab Initio Electronic Structure Methods
Singlet three states {g, k, f} and a triplet sate {T} together with excitation energies and transition moments of the two‐site diradical model with two electrons in two orbitals.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
(a) Dependence of longitudinal γ/n as a function of yav of regular H2n chains (n = 1–5) calculated by the UCCSD(T)/(6)‐31(+)+G(*)* method, where the dotted line represents the displacement of the maximum γ/n value; (b) Dependences of diradical character y0 and γ/monomer (in the stacking direction) on the intermolecular distance d for the π‐π stacked phenalenyl dimer model.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Resonance structures for open‐shell singlet molecules including diphenalenyl compounds (1(n), 3), oligoacenes (4), rectangular graphene nanoflake (GNF) (5), and hexagonal GNF (6), as well as a closed‐shell analogue 2 for 1(1). The γ (γzzzz) values are calculated using the UBHandHLYP/6‐31G (d) method.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Resonance structures [quinoid (closed‐shell) and benzenoid (open‐shell)] of p‐quinodimethane model (a) and dependence of the diradical character (y) as a function of the length of the exo‐cyclic carbon–carbon bonds (R1) from 1.350 to 1.700 Å (b) under the bond‐length constraint of R2 = R3 = 1.4 Å. Note that the equilibrium geometry (R1 = 1.351, R2 = 1.460, R3 = 1.346 Å, optimized by the RB3LYP/6‐311G(d)) gives the lowest diradical character (y = 0.146).
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
γ values of model compounds as determined at different levels of approximation. (a) stretched H2 molecule (aug‐cc‐pVDZ basis set); (b, c) p‐quinodimethane with different diradical characters (6‐31G(d)+p basis set).
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Variations of second hyperpolarizabilities, , , and , as a function of diradical character (y) in the case of rK = 0 (a), y dependences of , , and in the case of rK = 0 (b), and contours of (−5.0 ≤ < 5.0, interval = 0.1) on the plane (y, rK), where solid, dotted, and dashed black lines indicate positive, negative, and zero lines of , respectively (c). In (c), the red line represents the ridge line connecting the (y, rK) points giving maximum values. The blue curve indicates rJ = 0 and the lower and upper regions of this curve represent the singlet (antiferromagnetic) and triplet (ferromagnetic) ground states, respectively. Region A and B–D represent closed‐shell (traditional NLO systems) and open‐shell (theoretically predicted systems) regions, respectively.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Diradical character dependences of dimensionless excitation energies (EDLkg and EDLfg), squared transition moments ((μDLgk)2 and (μDLkf)2).
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]
Diradical character y versus |U/tab|. Effective bond order q = 1–y is also shown at delocalization (y = 0) and localization (y = 1) limits.
[ Normal View | Magnified View ]

Browse by Topic

Electronic Structure Theory > Ab Initio Electronic Structure Methods
Structure and Mechanism > Molecular Structures
Structure and Mechanism > Computational Materials Science

Access to this WIREs title is by subscription only.

Recommend to Your
Librarian Now!

The latest WIREs articles in your inbox

Sign Up for Article Alerts