Ainsworth,, W. A. (1972). Duration as a cue in the recognition of synthetic vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51(2), 648–651.
Ainsworth,, W. A. (1974). The influence of precursive sequences on the perception of synthesized vowels. Language and Speech, 17(2), 103–109.
Ainsworth,, W. A. (1975). Intrinsic and extrinsic factors in vowel judgments. In G. Fant, & M. Tatham, (Eds.), Auditory analysis and perception of speech (pp. 103–113). London, England: Academic Press.
Alexander,, J. M., & Kluender,, K. R. (2010). Temporal properties of perceptual calibration to local and broad spectral characteristics of a listening context. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(6), 3597–3613.
Assgari,, A. A., & Stilp,, C. E. (2015). Talker information influences spectral contrast effects in speech categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 138(5), 3023–3032.
Assgari,, A. A., Theodore,, R. M., & Stilp,, C. E. (2019). Variability in talkers` fundamental frequencies shapes context effects in speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145(3), 1443–1454.
Assmann,, P. F., & Summerfield,, Q. (2004). The perception of speech under adverse conditions. In Speech processing in the auditory system (Vol. 18). New York, NY: Springer.
Baese‐Berk,, M. M., Dilley,, L. C., Henry,, M. J., Vinke,, L., & Banzina,, E. (2019). Not just a function of function words: Distal speech rate influences perception of prosodically weak syllables. Attention, Perception, %26 Psychophysics, 81(2), 571–589.
Baese‐Berk,, M. M., Heffner,, C. C., Dilley,, L. C., Pitt,, M. A., Morrill,, T. H., & McAuley,, J. D. (2014). Long‐term temporal tracking of speech rate affects spoken‐word recognition. Psychological Science, 25(8), 1546–1553.
Blumstein,, S. E., & Stevens,, K. N. (1979). Acoustic invariance in speech production ‐ Evidence from measurements of the spectral characteristics of stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 66(4), 1001–1017.
Bosker,, H. R. (2017a). Accounting for rate‐dependent category boundary shifts in speech perception. Attention, Perception, %26 Psychophysics, 79(1), 333–343.
Bosker,, H. R. (2017b). How our own speech rate influences our perception of others. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 43(8), 1225–1238.
Bosker,, H. R., & Ghitza,, O. (2018). Entrained theta oscillations guide perception of subsequent speech: Behavioural evidence from rate normalisation. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 33(8), 955–967.
Bosker,, H. R., & Reinisch,, E. (2017). Foreign languages sound fast: Evidence from implicit rate normalization. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01063
Brandewie,, E., & Zahorik,, P. (2010). Prior listening in rooms improves speech intelligibility. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 128(1), 291–299.
Brandewie,, E., & Zahorik,, P. (2013). Time course of a perceptual enhancement effect for noise‐masked speech in reverberant environments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 134(2), EL265–EL270.
Bregman,, A. S. (1990). Auditory scene analysis: The perceptual organization of sound. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Broadbent,, D. E., & Ladefoged,, P. (1960). Vowel judgements and adaptation level. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 151, 384–399.
Coady,, J. A., Kluender,, K. R., & Rhode,, W. S. (2003). Effects of contrast between onsets of speech and other complex spectra. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 114(4), 2225–2235.
Cooper,, F. S., Delattre,, P. C., Liberman,, A. M., Borst,, J. M., & Gerstman,, L. J. (1952). Some experiments on the perception of synthetic speech sounds. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24, 597–606.
Creelman,, C. D. (1957). Case of the unknown talker. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29(5), 655.
Darwin,, C. J. (1984). Auditory processing and speech perception. In H. Bouma, & D. G. Bouwhuis, (Eds.), Attention and performance X: Control of language processes (pp. 197–209). London, England: Erlbaum.
Dechovitz,, D. (1977). Information conveyed by vowels: A confirmation. Haskins Lab Status Report, SR‐51(52), 213–219.
Delgutte,, B. (1996). Auditory neural processing of speech. In W. J. Hardcastle, & J. Laver, (Eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences (pp. 507–538). Oxford, England: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Delgutte,, B., Hammond,, B. M., Kalluri,, S., Litvak,, L. M., & Cariani,, P. A. (1996). Neural encoding of temporal envelope and temporal interactions in speech. In W. Ainsworth, & S. Greenberg, (Eds.), Proceedings of Auditory Basis of Speech Perception (pp. 1–9). European Speech Communication Association.
Denes,, P. (1955). Effect of duration on the perception of voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 27(4), 761–764.
Diehl,, R. L., Lotto,, A. J., & Holt,, L. L. (2004). Speech perception. Annual Reviews in Psychology, 55, 149–179.
Diehl,, R. L., Souther,, A. F., & Convis,, C. L. (1980). Conditions on rate normalization in speech perception. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 27(5), 435–443.
Diehl,, R. L., & Walsh,, M. A. (1989). An auditory basis for the stimulus‐length effect in the perception of stops and glides. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(5), 2154–2164.
Dilley,, L., & Pitt,, M. (2010). Altering context speech rate can cause words to appear or disappear. Psychological Science, 21(11), 1644–1670.
Fowler,, C. A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct‐realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics, 14(1), 3–28.
Fowler,, C. A. (1996). Listeners do hear sounds, not tongues. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(3), 1730–1741.
Fowler,, C. A. (2006). Compensation for coarticulation reflects gesture perception, not spectral contrast. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 68(2), 161–177.
Fowler,, C. A., Best,, C. T., & McRoberts,, G. W. (1990). Young infants` perception of liquid coarticulatory influences on following stop consonants. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 48(6), 559–570.
Fowler,, C. A., Brown,, J. M., & Mann,, V. A. (2000). Contrast effects do not underlie effects of preceding liquids on stop‐consonant identification by humans. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 26(3), 877–888.
Frazier,, J. M., Assgari,, A. A., & Stilp,, C. E. (2019). Musical instrument categorization is highly sensitive to spectral properties of earlier sounds. Attention, Perception, %26 Psychophysics, 81(4), 1119–1126.
Fujimura,, O., Macchi,, M. J., & Streeter,, L. A. (1978). Perception of stop consonants with conflicting transitional cues: A cross‐linguistic study. Language and Speech, 21(4), 337–346.
Ganong,, W. F. (1980). Phonetic categorization in auditory word perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 1, 110–125.
Gibson,, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Giraud,, A.‐L., & Poeppel,, D. (2012). Cortical oscillations and speech processing: Emerging computational principles and operations. Nature Neuroscience, 15(4), 511–517.
Glidden,, C. M., & Assmann,, P. F. (2004). Effects of visual gender and frequency shifts on vowel category judgments. Acoustics Research Letters Online, 5(4), 132–138.
Gordon,, P. C. (1988). Induction of rate‐dependent processing by coarse‐grained aspects of speech. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 43(2), 137–146.
Gottfried,, T. L., Miller,, J. L., & Payton,, P. E. (1990). Effect of speaking rate on the perception of vowels. Phonetica, 47(3–4), 155–172.
Green,, K. P., & Miller,, J. L. (1985). On the role of visual rate information in phonetic perception. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 38(3), 269–276.
Hay,, J., & Drager,, K. (2010). Stuffed toys and speech perception. Linguistics, 48(4), 865–892.
Heffner,, C. C., Dilley,, L. C., McAuley,, J. D., & Pitt,, M. A. (2013). When cues combine: How distal and proximal acoustic cues are integrated in word segmentation. Language %26 Cognitive Processes, 28(9), 1275–1302.
Heffner,, C. C., Newman,, R. S., & Idsardi,, W. J. (2017). Support for context effects on segmentation and segments depends on the context. Attention, Perception, %26 Psychophysics, 79(3), 964–988.
Hillenbrand,, J. M., Getty,, L. A., Clark,, M. J., & Wheeler,, K. (1995). Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 97(5), 3099–3111.
Holt,, L. L. (2005). Temporally nonadjacent nonlinguistic sounds affect speech categorization. Psychological Science, 16(4), 305–312.
Holt,, L. L. (2006). The mean matters: Effects of statistically defined nonspeech spectral distributions on speech categorization. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 120(5), 2801–2817.
Holt,, L. L., & Kluender,, K. R. (2000). General auditory processes contribute to perceptual accommodation of coarticulation. Phonetica, 57(2–4), 170–180.
Holt,, L. L., Lotto,, A. J., & Kluender,, K. R. (2000). Neighboring spectral content influences vowel identification. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 108(2), 710–722.
Johnson,, K. (1990). The role of perceived speaker identity in F0 normalization of vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 88(2), 642–654.
Johnson,, K., Strand,, E. A., & D`Imperio,, M. (1999). Auditory‐visual integration of talker gender in vowel perception. Journal of Phonetics, 27(4), 359–384.
Joos,, M. (1948). Acoustic phonetics. Language, 24(2), 5–136.
Kang,, S., Johnson,, K., & Finley,, G. (2016). Effects of native language on compensation for coarticulation. Speech Communication, 77, 84–100.
Kidd,, G. R., & Wright,, B. A. (1994). Improving the detectability of a brief tone in noise using forward and backward masker fringes: Monotic and dichotic presentations. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(2), 962–967.
Kidd,, G. R. (1989). Articulatory‐rate context effects in phoneme identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(4), 736–748.
Kiefte,, M., & Kluender,, K. R. (2005). Pattern playback revisited: Unvoiced stop consonant perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(4), 2599–2606.
Kiefte,, M., & Kluender,, K. R. (2008). Absorption of reliable spectral characteristics in auditory perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 123(1), 366–376.
Kingston,, J., Kawahara,, S., Chambless,, D., Key,, M., Mash,, D., & Watsky,, S. (2014). Context effects as auditory contrast. Attention, Perception, %26 Psychophysics, 76, 1437–1464.
Kluender,, K. R., & Alexander,, J. M. (2007). Perception of speech sounds. In P. Dallos, & D. Oertel, (Eds.), The senses: A comprehensive reference (pp. 829–860). San Diego, CA: Academic.
Kluender,, K. R., Coady,, J. A., & Kiefte,, M. (2003). Sensitivity to change in perception of speech. Speech Communication, 41(1), 59–69.
Kluender,, K. R., & Kiefte,, M. (2006). Speech perception within a biologically‐realistic information‐theoretic framework. In M. A. Gernsbacher, & M. Traxler, (Eds.), Handbook of Psycholinguistics (pp. 153–199). London, England: Elsevier.
Kluender,, K. R., Stilp,, C. E., & Kiefte,, M. (2013). Perception of vowel sounds within a biologically realistic model of efficient coding. In G. Morrison, & P. Assmann, (Eds.), Vowel inherent spectral change (pp. 117–151). Berlin, Germany: Springer.
Kluender,, K. R., Stilp,, C. E., & Llanos,, F. (2019). Longstanding problems in speech perception dissolve within an information‐theoretic perspective. Attention, Perception, %26 Psychophysics, 81(4), 861–883.
Knudsen,, V. O. (1929). The hearing of speech in auditoriums. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 1, 56–82.
Ladefoged,, P. (1989). A note on “Information conveyed by vowels.”. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(5), 2223–2224.
Ladefoged,, P., & Broadbent,, D. E. (1957). Information conveyed by vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 29(1), 98–104.
Lanning,, J. M., & Stilp,, C. E. (2019). Earlier music biases subsequent musical instrument categorization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 145, 1822.
Liberman,, A. M. (1996). Introduction: Some assumptions about speech and how they changed. In Speech: A special code. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Liberman,, A. M., Cooper,, F. S., Shankweiler,, D. P., & Studdert‐Kennedy,, M. (1967). Perception of the speech code. Psychological Review, 74(6), 431–461.
Liberman,, A. M., Delattre,, P. C., & Cooper,, F. S. (1952). The role of selected stimulus‐variables in the perception of the unvoiced stop consonants. American Journal of Psychology, 65(4), 497–516.
Liberman,, A. M., & Mattingly,, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition, 21(1), 1–36.
Lindblom,, B. E. (1963). Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 35, 1773–1781.
Lindblom,, B. E., & Studdert‐Kennedy,, M. (1967). On the role of formant transitions in vowel recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 42(4), 830–843.
Lotto,, A. J., & Holt,, L. L. (2006). Putting phonetic context effects into context: A commentary on Fowler (2006). Perception %26 Psychophysics, 68(2), 178–183.
Lotto,, A. J., & Kluender,, K. R. (1998). General contrast effects in speech perception: Effect of preceding liquid on stop consonant identification. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 60(4), 602–619.
Lotto,, A. J., Kluender,, K. R., & Holt,, L. L. (1997). Perceptual compensation for coarticulation by Japanese quail (Coturnix coturnix japonica). The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 102(2), 1134–1140.
Magnuson,, J. S., & Nusbaum,, H. C. (2007). Acoustic differences, listener expectations, and the perceptual accommodation of talker variability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 33(2), 391–409.
Mann,, V. A. (1980). Influence of preceding liquid on stop‐consonant perception. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 28(5), 407–412.
Mann,, V. A. (1986). Distinguishing universal and language‐dependent levels of speech perception: Evidence from Japanese listeners` perception of English “l” and “r”. Cognition, 24(3), 169–196.
Mann,, V. A., & Repp,, B. H. (1980). Influence of vocalic context on perception of the [∫]‐[s] distinction. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 28(3), 213–228.
Mann,, V. A., & Repp,, B. H. (1981). Influence of preceding fricative on stop consonant perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 69(2), 548–558.
Maslowski,, M., Meyer,, A. S., & Bosker,, H. R. (2018). Listening to yourself is special: Evidence from global speech rate tracking. PLoS One, 13(9), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203571
Maslowski,, M., Meyer,, A. S., & Bosker,, H. R. (2019). How the tracking of habitual rate influences speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(1), 128–138.
Mattys,, S. L., Davis,, M. H., Bradlow,, A. R., & Scott,, S. K. (2012). Speech recognition in adverse conditions: A review. Language %26 Cognitive Processes, 27(7–8), 953–978.
McMurray,, B., Clayards,, M. A., Tanenhaus,, M. K., & Aslin,, R. N. (2008). Tracking the time course of phonetic cue integration during spoken word recognition. Psychonomic Bulletin %26 Review, 15(6), 1064–1071.
Miller,, J. L., & Dexter,, E. R. (1988). Effects of speaking rate and lexical status on phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 14(3), 369–378.
Miller,, J. L., & Eimas,, P. D. (1980). Contextual effects in infant speech perception. Science, 209(4461), 1140–1141.
Miller,, J. L., & Liberman,, A. M. (1979). Some effects of later‐occurring information on the perception of stop consonant and semivowel. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 25(6), 457–465.
Miller,, J. L., & Volaitis,, L. E. (1989). Effect of speaking rate on the perceptual structure of a phonetic category. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 46(6), 505–512.
Miller,, J. L., & Wayland,, S. C. (1993). Limits on the limitations of context‐conditioned effects in the perception of [b] and [w]. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 54(2), 205–210.
Minifie,, F. D., Kuhl,, P. K., & Stecher,, E. M. (1977). Categorical perception of /b/ and /w/ during changes in rate of utterance. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 62(S1), S79.
Mitterer,, H. (2006). Is vowel normalization independent of lexical processing? Phonetica, 63(4), 209–229.
Mullennix,, J. W., Pisoni,, D. B., & Martin,, C. S. (1989). Some effects of talker variability on spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(1), 365–378.
Nearey,, T. M. (1989). Static, dynamic, and relational properties in vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 85(5), 2088–2113.
Nelson,, P. C., & Young,, E. D. (2010). Neural correlates of context‐dependent perceptual enhancement in the inferior colliculus. The Journal of Neuroscience, 30(19), 6577–6587.
Newman,, R. S., & Sawusch,, J. R. (1996). Perceptual normalization for speaking rate: Effects of temporal distance. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 58(4), 540–560.
Norris,, D., McQueen,, M. J., & Cutler,, A. (2003). Perceptual learning in speech. Cognitive Psychology, 47(2), 204–238.
Peelle,, J. E., & Davis,, M. H. (2012). Neural oscillations carry speech rhythm through to comprehension. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00320
Peterson,, G. E., & Barney,, H. L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 24(2), 175–184.
Pickett,, J. M. (1959). Backward masking. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 31(12), 1613–1615.
Pickett,, J. M., & Decker,, L. R. (1960). Time factors in perception of a double consonant. Language and Speech, 3(1), 11–17.
Pisoni,, D. B., Carrell,, T. D., & Gans,, S. J. (1983). Perception of the duration of rapid spectrum changes in speech and nonspeech signals. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 34(4), 314–322.
Pitt,, M. A., Szostak,, C., & Dilley,, L. C. (2016). Rate dependent speech processing can be speech specific: Evidence from the perceptual disappearance of words under changes in context speech rate. Attention, Perception, %26 Psychophysics, 78(1), 334–345.
Port,, R. F. (1979). The influence of tempo on stop closure duration as a cue for voicing and place. Journal of Phonetics, 7, 45–56.
Port,, R. F., & Dalby,, J. (1982). Consonant/vowel ratio as a cue for voicing in English. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 32(2), 141–152.
Raphael,, L. J. (1972). Preceding vowel duration as a cue to the perception of the voicing characteristic of word‐final consonants in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 51(4B), 1296–1303.
Reinisch,, E. (2016). Speaker‐specific processing and local context information: The case of speaking rate. Applied PsychoLinguistics, 37(6), 1397–1415.
Reinisch,, E., Jesse,, A., & McQueen,, J. M. (2011a). Speaking rate affects the perception of duration as a suprasegmental lexical‐stress cue. Language and Speech, 54(2), 147–165.
Reinisch,, E., Jesse,, A., & McQueen,, J. M. (2011b). Speaking rate from proximal and distal contexts is used during word segmentation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37(3), 978–996.
Reinisch,, E., & Sjerps,, M. J. (2013). The uptake of spectral and temporal cues in vowel perception is rapidly influenced by context. Journal of Phonetics, 41(2), 101–116.
Repp,, B. H. (1982). Phonetic trading relations and context effects ‐ New experimental‐evidence for a speech mode of perception. Psychological Bulletin, 92(1), 81–110.
Repp,, B. H. (1983). Bidirectional contrast effects in the perception of VC‐CV sequences. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 33(2), 147–155.
Repp,, B. H., Liberman,, A. M., Eccardt,, T., & Pesetsky,, D. (1978). Perceptual integration of acoustic cues for stop, fricative, and affricate manner. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 4(4), 621–637.
Rysling,, A., Jesse,, A., & Kingston,, J. (2019). Regressive spectral assimilation bias in speech perception. Attention, Perception, %26 Psychophysics, 81(4), 1127–1146.
Sawusch,, J. R., & Newman,, R. S. (2000). Perceptual normalization for speaking rate II: Effects of signal discontinuities. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 62(2), 285–300.
Schouten,, J. (1940). The residue and the mechanism of hearing. Proceedings of the Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen, 43, 991–999.
Shinn,, P. C., Blumstein,, S. E., & Jongman,, A. (1985). Limitations of context conditioned effects in the perception of [b] and [w]. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 38(5), 397–407.
Sjerps,, M. J., & Reinisch,, E. (2015). Divide and conquer: How perceptual contrast sensitivity and perceptual learning cooperate in reducing input variation in speech perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41(3), 710–722.
Sjerps,, M. J., & Smiljanic,, R. (2013). Compensation for vocal tract characteristics across native and non‐native languages. Journal of Phonetics, 41(3–4), 145–155.
Sjerps,, M. J., Zhang,, C., & Peng,, G. (2018). Lexical tone is perceived relative to locally surrounding context, vowel quality to preceding context. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 44(6), 914–924.
Srinivasan,, N. K., & Zahorik,, P. (2013). Prior listening exposure to a reverberant room improves open‐set intelligibility of high‐variability sentences. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 133(1), EL33–EL39.
Stevens,, K. N., & Blumstein,, S. E. (1978). Invariant cues for place of articulation in stop consonants. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 64(5), 1358–1368.
Stilp,, C. E. (2018). Short‐term, not long‐term, average spectra of preceding sentences bias consonant categorization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 144(3), 1797.
Stilp,, C. E. (2019). Auditory enhancement and spectral contrast effects in speech perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
Stilp,, C. E., & Alexander,, J. M. (2016). Spectral contrast effects in vowel categorization by listeners with sensorineural hearing loss. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, 26, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1121/2.0000233
Stilp,, C. E., Alexander,, J. M., Kiefte,, M., & Kluender,, K. R. (2010). Auditory color constancy: Calibration to reliable spectral properties across nonspeech context and targets. Attention, Perception, %26 Psychophysics, 72(2), 470–480.
Stilp,, C. E., & Anderson,, P. W. (2014). Modest, reliable spectral peaks in preceding sounds influence vowel perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 136(5), EL383–EL389.
Stilp,, C. E., Anderson,, P. W., Assgari,, A. A., Ellis,, G. M., & Zahorik,, P. (2016). Speech perception adjusts to stable spectrotemporal properties of the listening environment. Hearing Research, 341, 168–178.
Stilp,, C. E., Anderson,, P. W., & Winn,, M. B. (2015). Predicting contrast effects following reliable spectral properties in speech perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 137(6), 3466–3476.
Stilp,, C. E., & Assgari,, A. A. (2017). Consonant categorization exhibits a graded influence of surrounding spectral context. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 141(2), EL153–EL158.
Stilp,, C. E., & Assgari,, A. A. (2019). Natural speech statistics shift phoneme categorization. Attention, Perception, %26 Psychophysics, 81(6), 2037–2052.
Summerfield,, A. Q. (1981). Articulatory rate and perceptual constancy in phonetic perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(5), 1074–1095.
Summerfield,, A. Q., & Assmann,, P. F. (1987). Auditory enhancement and speech perception. In M. E. H. Schouten, (Ed.), Proceedings of the NATO advanced research workshop: The psychophysics of speech perception (pp. 140–150). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Martinus Nijhoff.
Summerfield,, A. Q., & Assmann,, P. F. (1989). Auditory enhancement and the perception of concurrent vowels. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 45(6), 529–536.
Summerfield,, A. Q., Haggard,, M., Foster,, J., & Gray,, S. (1984). Perceiving vowels from uniform spectra ‐ phonetic exploration of an auditory aftereffect. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 35(3), 203–213.
Summerfield,, A. Q., Sidwell,, A., & Nelson,, T. (1987). Auditory enhancement of changes in spectral amplitude. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 81(3), 700–708.
Toscano,, J. C., & McMurray,, B. (2012). Cue‐integration and context effects in speech: Evidence against speaking‐rate normalization. Attention, Perception, %26 Psychophysics, 74(6), 1284–1301.
Toscano,, J. C., & McMurray,, B. (2015). The time‐course of speaking rate compensation: Effects of sentential rate and vowel length on voicing judgments. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 30(5), 529–543.
Utman,, J. A. (1998). Effects of local speaking rate context on the perception of voice‐onset time in initial stop consonants. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 103(3), 1640–1653.
Viemeister,, N. F. (1980). Adaptation of masking. In G. V. D. Brink, & F. A. Bilsen, (Eds.), Psychophysical, physiological and behavioural studies in hearing (pp. 190–198). Delft: Delft University Press.
Viemeister,, N. F., & Bacon,, S. P. (1982). Forward masking by enhanced components in harmonic complexes. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 71(6), 1502–1507.
Viswanathan,, N., Fowler,, C. A., & Magnuson,, J. S. (2009). A critical examination of the spectral contrast account of compensation for coarticulation. Psychonomic Bulletin %26 Review, 16(1), 74–79.
Viswanathan,, N., Magnuson,, J. S., & Fowler,, C. A. (2010). Compensation for coarticulation: Disentangling auditory and gestural theories of perception of coarticulatory effects in speech. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(4), 1005–1015.
Volaitis,, L. E., & Miller,, J. L. (1992). Phonetic prototypes: Influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 92(2), 723–735.
von Békésy,, G. (1967). Sensory perception. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Wade,, T., & Holt,, L. L. (2005a). Effects of later‐occurring nonlinguistic sounds on speech categorization. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(3), 1701–1710.
Wade,, T., & Holt,, L. L. (2005b). Perceptual effects of preceding nonspeech rate on temporal properties of speech categories. Perception %26 Psychophysics, 67(6), 939–950.
Wark,, B., Lundstrom,, B. N., & Fairhall,, A. (2007). Sensory adaptation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17(4), 423–429.
Warren,, R. M. (1985). Criterion shift rule and perceptual homeostasis. Psychological Review, 92(4), 574–584.
Watkins,, A. J. (1988). Spectral transitions and perceptual compensation for effects of transmission channels. In W. Ainsworth, & J. Holmes, (Eds.), Proceedings of the 7th symposium of the Federation of Acoustical Societies of Europe: Speech `88. Edinburgh, England: Institute of Acoustics.
Watkins,, A. J. (1989). Spectral transitions and vowel perception. British Journal of Audiology, 23(2), 170.
Watkins,, A. J. (1991). Central, auditory mechanisms of perceptual compensation for spectral‐envelope distortion. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 90(6), 2942–2955.
Watkins,, A. J. (2005a). Perceptual compensation for effects of echo and of reverberation on speech identification. Acta Acustica, 91(5), 892–901.
Watkins,, A. J. (2005b). Perceptual compensation for effects of reverberation in speech identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 118(1), 249–262.
Watkins,, A. J., & Makin,, S. J. (1996). Some effects of filtered contexts on the perception of vowels and fricatives. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 99(1), 588–594.
Watkins,, A. J., & Makin,, S. J. (2007). Steady‐spectrum contexts and perceptual compensation for reverberation in speech identification. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(1), 257–266.
Watkins,, A. J., Raimond,, A. P., & Makin,, S. J. (2011). Temporal‐envelope constancy of speech in rooms and the perceptual weighting of frequency bands. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 130(5), 2777–2788.
Wayland,, S. C., Miller,, J. L., & Volaitis,, L. E. (1994). The influence of sentential speaking rate on the internal structure of phonetic categories. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 95(5), 2694–2701.
Winn,, M. B., Rhone,, A. E., Chatterjee,, M., & Idsardi,, W. J. (2013). The use of auditory and visual context in speech perception by listeners with normal hearing and listeners with cochlear implants. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 1–13.
Winn,, M. B., & Stilp,, C. E. (2019). Phonetics and the auditory system. In W. F. Katz, & P. F. Assmann, (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of phonetics (pp. 164–192). New York, NY: Routledge.
Zahorik,, P., & Brandewie,, E. J. (2016). Speech intelligibility in rooms: Effect of prior listening exposure interacts with room acoustics. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 140(1), 74–86.